mirror of
https://github.com/ctm/executor.git
synced 2024-11-23 05:33:16 +00:00
1086 lines
43 KiB
Plaintext
1086 lines
43 KiB
Plaintext
FAQ for Executor [last updated 95-05-16]
|
|
|
|
This set of answers to Frequently Asked Questions is not designed to
|
|
take the place of our Executor manual. However, currently our manual
|
|
is not available on-line, so this FAQ does briefly touch on some
|
|
issues that are covered more in depth in our manual.
|
|
|
|
In addition to this FAQ, there should be README files bundled with
|
|
Executor and there is also an Executor/DOS document that describes how
|
|
to get started with Executor/DOS from a DOS user's point of view,
|
|
which may be useful to users of Executor on other platforms as well.
|
|
That document is called "ERNSTOUD.TXT", since it's hard to come up
|
|
with useful names when constrained by the DOS 8.3 filename limits and
|
|
the author of the document is Ernst J. Oud.
|
|
|
|
Changes in this issue of the FAQ are denoted with ">>" in the beginning
|
|
of a line.
|
|
|
|
[1] Executor in General
|
|
|
|
[1.1] What is Executor?
|
|
[1.2] On which platforms is Executor available?
|
|
[1.3] Who makes Executor?
|
|
[1.4] Pronunciation?
|
|
[1.5] Does Executor require you to obtain ROMs or System Files
|
|
from Apple?
|
|
[1.6] How long has Executor been in development?
|
|
[1.7] What techniques were used to rewrite the OS and Toolbox?
|
|
[1.8] What limitations does Executor have?
|
|
[1.9] Does Executor run all applications?
|
|
[1.10] What do the various Executor version numbers mean?
|
|
[1.11] Where can I pick up the Executor demos?
|
|
[1.12] Is Executor shareware?
|
|
[1.13] How do the demo versions differ from the commercial versions?
|
|
[1.14] What's next?
|
|
[1.15] When will 2.0 be out?
|
|
[1.16] How can I get in ARDI's beta program?
|
|
[1.17] Does Executor have networking support?
|
|
[1.18] How do you install Fonts and Desk Accessories (DAs)?
|
|
[1.19] Will Desk Accessories work under Executor?
|
|
[1.20] Does E/D run xxx?
|
|
[1.21] What's the best way to keep informed about Executor?
|
|
[1.22] Why shouldn't I send e-mail to ctm@ardi.com?
|
|
[1.23] What is an ".hfv" file?
|
|
[1.24] Can I launch apps directly from the command line?
|
|
>> [1.25] What are all the command line switches?
|
|
[1.26] Can I have Executor use more than 8Mb for the application zone?
|
|
[1.27] An app I'm trying crashes. What should I do?
|
|
[1.28] How do Executor's "license keys" work?
|
|
[1.29] Don't your "license keys" allow people to pirate Executor?
|
|
[1.30] I want to bundle Executor on a CD-ROM. Can I do that?
|
|
|
|
[2] Executor/DOS
|
|
|
|
[2.1] Which FTP sites will carry stable versions of E/D?
|
|
[2.2] What are the hardware requirements for Executor/DOS?
|
|
[2.3] What do I do if my Super VGA card isn't VESA compliant?
|
|
[2.4] Executor crashes with "GrSetMode ; unknown adapter type
|
|
in driver."
|
|
[2.5] Does E/D require an ASPI driver to access SCSI?
|
|
[2.6] Have you released Executor for OS/2 yet?
|
|
[2.7] Why won't Executor/DOS work with my Diamond Viper PCI card?
|
|
[2.8] Why doesn't my mouse work when I run Executor under OS/2 Warp?
|
|
[2.9] Does Executor work under Windows '95?
|
|
|
|
[3] Executor/Linux
|
|
|
|
[3.1] Can I buy the Linux version now?
|
|
[3.2] Why can't the Linux version access floppies with option-shift-2
|
|
[3.3] Are we ready to hear about Executor/Linux bugs?
|
|
[3.4] Should bug reports be sent one at a time or in a big list?
|
|
[3.5] Why is there no Executor for NetBSD or FreeBSD?
|
|
[3.6] Where are the bitmaps stored on the Linux version of executor?
|
|
[3.7] Will there be an SVGALIB version of E/L in the future?
|
|
[3.8] Why do all the non-Executor Windows get creepy colors when
|
|
Executor is running?
|
|
[3.9] How does printing work under Executor/Linux?
|
|
[3.10] Why does Executor complain that it cannot find 'libXt.so.6'?
|
|
[3.11] Which FTP sites have E/L
|
|
[3.12] Why does Lemmings' splash screen take so long to be drawn?
|
|
|
|
[4] Executor/NEXTSTEP
|
|
|
|
[4.1] Why hasn't there been an Executor/NEXTSTEP release in a while?
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.1] What is Executor?
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
Executor is a commercial emulator that allows non-Macintosh
|
|
hardware to run some applications originally written on a
|
|
Macintosh. Executor has many limitations, see below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.2] On which platforms is Executor available?
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Executor/DOS (E/D) is an implementation that runs under
|
|
DOS and Windows. Executor/NEXTSTEP (E/NS) is an implementation
|
|
that runs under NEXTSTEP, both on original NeXT hardware
|
|
and Intel based hardware running NEXTSTEP. Executor/Linux
|
|
is an implementation that runs under Linux, using X-Windows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.3] Who makes Executor?
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
ARDI questions@ardi.com
|
|
Suite 4-101
|
|
1650 University Blvd., NE
|
|
Albuquerque, NM 87102
|
|
|
|
+1 505 766 9115 Phone +1 505 247 1899 FAX
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.4] Pronunciation?
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
Ig-zek'-yu-tor
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.5] Does Executor require you to obtain ROMs or System Files from Apple?
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
No. Executor reimplements from scratch the Macintosh
|
|
Operating System and Toolbox.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.6] How long has Executor been in development?
|
|
-------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Work began in September of 1986.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.7] What techniques were used to rewrite the OS and Toolbox?
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Entirely clean-room techniques. That is to say none of the
|
|
Apple ROMs or Apple System File were ever disassembled.
|
|
Instead ROMlib (the section of Executor that emulates the OS
|
|
and Toolbox) was written from the manuals "Inside Macintosh",
|
|
and Tech. notes. That isn't sufficient to get the degree of
|
|
compatibility that we need, so tests were written and run on
|
|
Macs to see what a real Mac would do. In addition, we run
|
|
applications under Executor and when they deviate from how
|
|
they would behave on a Mac, we take a look at what is going on
|
|
and fix Executor accordingly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.8] What limitations does Executor have?
|
|
-------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Because the OS and Toolbox have been rewritten from scratch,
|
|
Executor has many limitations, including no AppleTalk, no
|
|
sound, no System 7, no INITs, no CDEVs and no
|
|
Internationalization. Executor can read and write 1.4 Mb Mac
|
|
formatted floppy disks, but can not format floppies, nor can
|
|
it read or write 800 Kb floppy disks.
|
|
|
|
E/NS can access the serial ports and can print, E/D and
|
|
E/L can not access serial ports, but can print to a Postscript
|
|
file that you can then send to a Postscript printer.
|
|
|
|
The reason Executor can't read 800 Kb floppy disks is that physically
|
|
they're written in a different way than most floppy drives can
|
|
read, so this limitation won't disappear soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.9] Does Executor run all applications?
|
|
------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Currently, no. In addition to applications that won't run
|
|
because they require something that we currently don't
|
|
support (e.g. System 7), due to our rewriting of the OS
|
|
and Toolbox, there is room for enough incompatibility that
|
|
many large programs do not work. For this reason, we make
|
|
demo versions of Executor available for potential customers
|
|
to run before purchasing Executor (see below).
|
|
|
|
We are in the process of cataloging what we have tested
|
|
and will include that as appendix A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.10] What do the various Executor version numbers mean?
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Any 1.x release other than 1.99 is a black and white release.
|
|
Any release that ends in a lower case letter is technically an
|
|
"experimental" release. In general, experimental releases are
|
|
pre-beta or beta releases that will eventually be released
|
|
with a higher version number.
|
|
|
|
The most recent non-experimental release of Executor/NEXTSTEP
|
|
is version 1.3. The most recent non-experimental release of
|
|
Executor/DOS is 1.2. There has not yet been a
|
|
non-experimental release of Executor/Linux.
|
|
|
|
Currently, with the recent addition of color support to
|
|
Executor, Executor is experimental for all platforms. We are
|
|
trying to release new versions for all platforms in lockstep,
|
|
so 1.99b has roughly the same feature set and bug set under
|
|
DOS, Linux and NEXTSTEP. Unfortunately, we haven't released
|
|
a NEXTSTEP release in a while; see [4.1] for an explanation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.11] Where can I pick up the Executor demos?
|
|
-----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The canonical place to find Executor demos is ftp.ardi.com.
|
|
However, ftp.ardi.com is currently only connected to the
|
|
Internet via a 28.8kb modem, and as such is really only useful
|
|
to provide data for mirror sites. When you connect to
|
|
ftp.ardi.com it will give you a current list of those mirror
|
|
sites.
|
|
|
|
As long as they put up with us, the primary mirror site for
|
|
ftp.ardi.com is ftp.cs.unm.edu in /pub/ardi. However,
|
|
ftp.cs.unm.edu does not have the bandwidth to accept many
|
|
simultaneous users, so now that we're happy with the stability
|
|
of our color experimental versions, we also make them
|
|
available on the traditional sites for commercial demos of the
|
|
given platform. See the platform specific answers for a list
|
|
of these sites.
|
|
|
|
We don't mind people making our current experimental versions
|
|
available on other sites, but *please* be sure to include all
|
|
the READMEs and FAQs which will allow users to find more
|
|
current versions of Executor as they're released.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.12] Is Executor shareware?
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
No. Executor is a commercial program available from ARDI.
|
|
Unregistered demo versions are the only versions that should
|
|
be found on bulletin boards or FTP sites. If you find a
|
|
non-limited version of Executor available to download, it was
|
|
put there illegally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.13] How do the demo versions differ from the commercial versions?
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Prior to Executor 1.99j, ARDI released two separate versions
|
|
of each Executor/DOS and Executor/Linux release: a
|
|
time-limited demo, and a full-fledged commercial version.
|
|
NEXTSTEP versions could be "unlocked" by entering a serial
|
|
number and registration key purchased from ARDI.
|
|
|
|
The E/D, E/L and E/NS "locked" demos are time limited to ten
|
|
minutes of use. Once your ten minutes are up, you are thrown
|
|
out, but you can restart the program again and run for another
|
|
ten minutes as many times as you want.
|
|
|
|
See [1.28] for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.14] What's next?
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
Our immediate goal is to get Executor 2.0 out. Back before
|
|
1.99 was out, we had a set of goals for what would be in 2.0.
|
|
We have had enough trouble implementing 32-bit color QuickDraw
|
|
that we have had to pare some features out of what we had
|
|
orginally proposed for the 2.0 feature set. Features present
|
|
in 2.0 are *still* subject to change, but our current plans
|
|
are to add:
|
|
|
|
A file browser -- we've written one in house. We will
|
|
be releasing it with source.
|
|
|
|
Better documentation
|
|
|
|
The ability to change the screen "depth" (number of colors
|
|
that can be present at one time on the screen) and size
|
|
on the fly.
|
|
|
|
A simpler method for installing fonts and Desk Accessories
|
|
|
|
A better set of demo and utility programs
|
|
|
|
We also have a set of general and platform specific bugs that
|
|
we need to have fixed before we can freeze 2.0.
|
|
|
|
Beyond 2.0, we want to make Executor compatible with Apple's
|
|
System 7.5, so you'll be able to purchase a copy of System
|
|
7.5, install it on top of Executor and get even more
|
|
compatibility and features.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.15] When will 2.0 be out?
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
The answer here is embarrassing. Our original target was
|
|
summer of 1994.
|
|
|
|
Here's what is planned between now and when 2.0 ships:
|
|
|
|
1.99m will have a significantly faster blitter under DOS,
|
|
(we're hoping for about a speedup of about a factor
|
|
of five). It will also support some screens with 16
|
|
bpp (thousands of colors) and 32 bpp (millions of colors).
|
|
We also hope that the remaining
|
|
DPMI provider bug that we know of will be fixed by
|
|
then, and we will be paying attention when people find
|
|
browser bugs. I don't know if System 7 spoofing will
|
|
be in "m", but it is my goal (however, of all the ARDI
|
|
employees, I'm the one who is most likely to not meet
|
|
my goals). Floppy disk formatting and the ability to
|
|
install fonts and DAs by dragging them into the hot
|
|
band are also tentatively slated for 1.99m, as is a
|
|
"death certificate" that tells you *why* Executor died
|
|
when it dies unexpectedly.
|
|
|
|
1.99n will have any of the features mentioned above in 1.99m
|
|
that don't make the cut. Tentatively, 1.99n will be
|
|
the last experimental version to have new
|
|
functionality.
|
|
|
|
Beyond 1.99n we plan to fly Cotton out to Albuquerque (he
|
|
normally works out of Boston) and have a two or
|
|
three (three is preferred) week "hackathon", where
|
|
without having to worry about getting a new version
|
|
out the door, and without any of us having to add new
|
|
functionality or chase DOS extenders, we'll work
|
|
exclusively on making more applications run.
|
|
|
|
After the "hackathon" is finished, Executor will go into a six
|
|
week beta period where we only fix major bugs, and
|
|
document minor bugs. During this time we'll also be
|
|
working on our packaging and documentation, working on
|
|
our list of how well which apps work and which don't,
|
|
and lining up our distributors, writing our press
|
|
releases and placing our ads in popular magazines.
|
|
|
|
After those six weeks have elapsed, 2.0 will ship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.16] How can I get in ARDI's beta program?
|
|
---------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Our beta program is really boring. The only thing that you
|
|
get that you can't get over the net is an actual set of
|
|
floppies that contain installation scripts. As such, we
|
|
really don't need new beta members. Just pick up the
|
|
experimental versions and keep us informed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.17] Does Executor have networking support?
|
|
----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Currently, no. Nor, will it be available in Executor 2.0.
|
|
Networking support is planned for release 3.0, but we do not
|
|
yet have an estimated date of completion for 3.0. The first
|
|
platform to have networking support built in will probably be
|
|
Linux.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.18] How do you install Fonts and Desk Accessories (DAs)?
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The short answer is "wait for our new file browser feature
|
|
that will allow you to install fonts and DAs via drag and
|
|
drop."
|
|
|
|
However, if you are an old time Macintosh user and you have a
|
|
copy of Font/DA Mover on a Mac, you can copy the Executor
|
|
System file over to a Mac, install the Fonts/DAs over there
|
|
and then bring the System file back to Executor. This is
|
|
tricky and not for the faint of heart.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.19] Will Desk Accessories work under Executor?
|
|
--------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Currently Desk Accessory support is very weak; most will not
|
|
run. After we get the browser released that allows easy
|
|
installation and removal of desk accessories, we'll spruce up
|
|
our DA code and work on insuring that some of the more popular
|
|
DAs work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.20] Does E/D run xxx?
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
With all the rush to get 2.0 out the door ASAP, we're
|
|
putting our testing people to work testing new experimental
|
|
versions, instead of testing 1.2. There is plenty that
|
|
1.2 will not run, and as such, we recommend people try out
|
|
the demo before purchasing Executor.
|
|
|
|
We will be making a list of what runs and what doesn't available
|
|
as part of this document as Appendix A, but that information is
|
|
not available in this release of the FAQ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.21] What's the best way to keep informed about Executor?
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Join the Executor mailing list. Send a message to
|
|
"executor-request@nacm.com". Make sure your subject line is blank
|
|
and your message body says:
|
|
|
|
subscribe
|
|
|
|
We try to post important events to the net, and send new
|
|
release information via U.S. mail to our current customers,
|
|
but the Executor mailing list is where we post news about our
|
|
experimental versions and where you can send mail to talk with
|
|
other people who are using Executor.
|
|
|
|
If you'd rather get the Executor Interest information in a
|
|
daily digest form, send the same subscribe message to
|
|
"executor-digest-request@nacm.com", instead of
|
|
"executor-request@nacm.com".
|
|
|
|
To remove yourself from either mailing list, send a message to
|
|
the address that you used to subscribe, saying:
|
|
|
|
unsubscribe
|
|
|
|
This will work only if you send the unsubscribe message from
|
|
the same account that you used to send the subscribe message.
|
|
You can also send a message of "help" to executor-request and more
|
|
information about how to use it will be e-mailed to you. If
|
|
you are still having trouble, you can send e-mail to
|
|
"majordomo-owner@nacm.com" and that will be processed by a
|
|
person, although it may take a few days for the person to get
|
|
around to to your request.
|
|
|
|
Even after you have unsubscribed to the list, you will
|
|
continue to get any messages that were posted to the list
|
|
before you unsubscribed but were not actually sent
|
|
immediately, but once you have unsubscribed, any new messages
|
|
that come in will not be sent to you.
|
|
|
|
The Executor Interest mailing list is administered by a
|
|
volunteer. We do not directly control the list. Lately there
|
|
has been a request that we operate a mailing list for
|
|
announcements only. Although we can't provide that right now,
|
|
we're hoping the digestification will make such a separate
|
|
list much less needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.22] Why shouldn't I send e-mail to ctm@ardi.com?
|
|
----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Cliff gets tons of e-mail. E-mail sent to questions@ardi.com
|
|
is answered much more punctually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.23] What is an ".hfv" file?
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Executor has the ability to store an entire Macintosh "volume"
|
|
(i.e. filesystem corresponding to a disk drive or a partition
|
|
within a disk drive) in a DOS or UNIX file. Under DOS, this
|
|
feature is very handy because there is no way to have files
|
|
with long names and upper and lower case characters in their
|
|
names unless you use a ".hfv" file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.24] Can I launch apps directly from the command line?
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Yes. If an app resides within a UNIX or DOS filesystem, you
|
|
can specify the name of the app, and documents that you would
|
|
like the app to open when it starts up, on the command line.
|
|
|
|
Apps that reside in ".hfv" files can't currently be launched
|
|
from the command line. This will change soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.25] What are all the command line switches?
|
|
-----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
NOTE: we are currently in the process of revamping how executor
|
|
processes command line switches. This should allow
|
|
us to have much less confusing documentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Switch Min Max Default Default when switch
|
|
is present, but with no
|
|
value specified
|
|
|
|
nobrowser
|
|
|
|
bpp 1 8 8 8
|
|
refresh 0 60 0 10
|
|
shadow 0 1 0 1
|
|
|
|
nosplash 0 1 0 1
|
|
|
|
noclock 0 1 0 1
|
|
|
|
drivecheck 0 1 0 1
|
|
|
|
nomouse 0 1 0 1
|
|
|
|
applzone 128 8192 1024 2048
|
|
syszone 128 4096 512 1024
|
|
stack 64 4096 256 128
|
|
|
|
size 512x342 varies 640x480 illegal
|
|
|
|
nativecode 0 1 1 1
|
|
|
|
Additional Linux/X windows options
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
privatecmap
|
|
invertedcursorbug
|
|
geometry
|
|
synchronous
|
|
|
|
The relatively new switch "nobrowser" prevents Executor from trying
|
|
to run the file browser upon startup. Sometimes this is a handy
|
|
to start an appliction a little more quickly and other times it can
|
|
be useful if the browser save file gets corrupted and the browser
|
|
refuses to run.
|
|
|
|
The switches bpp, refresh and shadow all affect how the screen
|
|
is emulated. The number of bits per pixel that the program
|
|
running under Executor sees is specified by bpp. If bpp is
|
|
set to 1, then there are only two "colors" (black and white)
|
|
available. If it is set to 8, then 256 colors are available.
|
|
For Executor/DOS, you need a SVGA board with a VESA compatible
|
|
driver to get 8 bits per pixel and screen sizes larger
|
|
than 640x480.
|
|
|
|
When Executor first starts up, a "splash screen" is printed.
|
|
You can omit this splash screen with the nosplash switch.
|
|
|
|
One of the hardest things to emulate properly is the internal
|
|
timing mechanisms of a Macintosh. Sometimes it is desirable
|
|
to turn off our clock emulation. The noclock switch does
|
|
this.
|
|
|
|
When Executor displays a standard "get" or "put" dialog box,
|
|
there is a button marked "drive" that allows you to cycle
|
|
through the Macintosh volumes that Executor knows about. You
|
|
can use the drivecheck switch to have Executor examine your
|
|
DOS drives each time you click the "drive" button. In
|
|
general, this is more annoying than it is useful.
|
|
|
|
The switches applzone, syszone and stack control how much
|
|
memory is allocated to the application, the system, and the
|
|
application stack. In general, if you have more memory,
|
|
you should override the default applzone and allow Executor
|
|
to use more memory.
|
|
|
|
For X windows users, privatecmap specifies that Executor
|
|
should use a private colormap. This is the fastest graphics
|
|
mode and gives you the most accurate colors, but at the
|
|
expense of radically changed colors in your other windows
|
|
whenever the cursor is in the Executor window, and radically
|
|
changed colors in the Executor window whenever the cursor is
|
|
outside of it. Because this is annoying, this mode is not the
|
|
default. When not in this mode, the pixels in Executor's
|
|
internal frame buffer are converted to the nearest X colors
|
|
before being drawn to the screen.
|
|
|
|
Executor 1.99<x> uses a new "synthetic CPU" which is much
|
|
faster than the synthetic CPU in previous releases of
|
|
Executor. The speed increase is due to our use of native
|
|
code; Executor now translates the 68k code being emulated into
|
|
80x86 code "on the fly" and runs the 80x86 code. However,
|
|
like anything that is new, there's a chance that our
|
|
improvement has some hidden drawbacks. You can turn off the
|
|
use of native code by specifying nativecode 0.
|
|
|
|
Here is an example of some of those switches:
|
|
|
|
executor -applzone 4096 -noclock -nativecode 0
|
|
|
|
That would allocate 4 Mb of memory for the applications use,
|
|
turn off our clock emulation and revert to a slower type of
|
|
68LC040 emulation -- an unlikely combination of switches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.26] Can I have Executor use more than 8Mb for the application zone?
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Currently, no. We are reorganizing our memory layout to allow
|
|
you to do this in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.27] An app I'm trying crashes. What should I do?
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Perhaps the most common avoidable cause of crashes is
|
|
insufficient memory for the emulated application. You can fix
|
|
this by increasing the "applzone" parameter. For example,
|
|
many programs which normally die quickly will work with
|
|
"executor -applzone 4096" (which allocates 4Mb of space for
|
|
the emulated application; see the list of command line
|
|
switches and their meanings elsewhere in this document).
|
|
|
|
Some programs are unhappy when they discover that Executor
|
|
does not provide sound support, and crash. You can turn on
|
|
the "pretend sound" option before running the application in
|
|
question and see if this helps. In addition, some programs
|
|
have menu items, or preference check boxes that can be used to
|
|
disable sound. It is always recommended that you disable
|
|
sound from within a program in addition to using the Executor
|
|
sound preferences.
|
|
|
|
One example of a program that will have problems with sound is
|
|
"Ultimate Solitaire". If you do not disable sound from within
|
|
Ultimate Solitaire, the game will play fine, until you win.
|
|
At that point it will tell Executor to start playing a sound
|
|
and request that Executor notify it when the sound is done
|
|
playing. Even with "pretend sound" enabled, this will result
|
|
in Ultimate Solitaire hanging after you win a game.
|
|
|
|
Some programs also save preferences in a file, and if
|
|
something bad happens to that file, the program can then get
|
|
confused and will not run properly. Occasionally this happens
|
|
to Microsoft Word, and you need to use HFS_XFer to delete the
|
|
file "Word Preferences" from your "System Folder".
|
|
|
|
Although it should not happen, even our file browser keeps a
|
|
file around that can cause trouble if it becomes corrupt.
|
|
That file is "godata.sav". It stores which folders you have
|
|
open and the contents of your "hot-band". If that file gets
|
|
corrupt, the file browser may not run. In the rare case that
|
|
the browser won't run, you can use the "-nobrowser" switch
|
|
when you start Executor to bypass the browser, then you can
|
|
run a program and from that program you can bring up HFS_XFer
|
|
and find and rename "godata.sav" and see if that fixes the
|
|
problem with the browser.
|
|
|
|
The "noclock" switch has also been known to help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.28] How do Executor's "license keys" work?
|
|
-------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
We have now added this "unlocking" capability to the DOS and
|
|
Linux versions. NEXTSTEP versions have always had license
|
|
keys. Now any Executor owner can pick up the latest Executor
|
|
release from the Internet, "unlock" it with his serial number
|
|
and registration key, and take advantage of the latest
|
|
features and bug fixes. This does not mean that all future
|
|
upgrades will be available for free in this mode, but we
|
|
intend to make "minor" upgrades free.
|
|
|
|
The "unlocking" process actually modifies your copy of
|
|
Executor, stamping *your* serial number into it permanently.
|
|
For this reason, once you have registered a copy of Executor,
|
|
you may not redistribute it, nor should you leave it on an
|
|
unprotected machine, where someone may illegally copy it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.29] Don't your "license keys" allow people to pirate Executor?
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
No. If the proper license fee has not been paid to ARDI, then
|
|
the use of a fully registered copy of Executor is illegal, no
|
|
matter how it was acquired. It is true that since license
|
|
serial number, authorization key pairs are small bits of text,
|
|
it is easier to disseminate unauthorized serial key pairs than
|
|
it is to disseminate unauthorized Executor binaries, but
|
|
that's beside the point.
|
|
|
|
We decided to use serial numbers and authorization keys as a
|
|
convenience to our customers, especially while we're still
|
|
pressing toward the release of 2.0 and each new experimental
|
|
copy is (usually!) much better than the one that preceeded it.
|
|
We prefer prosecuting the pirates to punishing our patrons.
|
|
|
|
Our demo mode allows the honest person to evaluate our product
|
|
before making the decision to purchase it and become a
|
|
customer. The use of an authorization key allows our
|
|
customers to automatically participate in our beta and even
|
|
pre-beta testing. This leads to faster development cycles and
|
|
a better product.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1.30] I want to bundle Executor on a CD-ROM. Can I do that?
|
|
|
|
The short answer is "yes".
|
|
|
|
You are able to freely copy and distribute demo versions of
|
|
Executor, as long as you follow the restrictions set forth in
|
|
Executor's license panel:
|
|
|
|
Complete, unregistered distributions of Executor may be
|
|
copied and redistributed as long as all copies are
|
|
unmodified and contain all of the original files in their
|
|
entirety. Once it is registered, Executor may be copied
|
|
only for backup purposes. Licensee may not modify or create
|
|
derivative works based on Executor or any part thereof.
|
|
|
|
A suggestion: contact us to make sure you have the latest
|
|
version of Executor. We can also tell you if a new release is
|
|
imminent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[2] Executor/DOS
|
|
=================
|
|
|
|
[2.1] Which FTP sites will carry stable versions of Executor/DOS?
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
E/D is available from the SimTel mirrors. The primary
|
|
SimTel mirror is oak.oakland.edu, and you can find the
|
|
Executor/DOS demo within the "SimTel/msdos/emulator"
|
|
directory. Look for exec199?.zip (where ? is a letter,
|
|
the further into the alphabet the letter, the more recent
|
|
the experimental release).
|
|
|
|
Other SimTel mirrors are:
|
|
|
|
St. Louis, MO: wuarchive.wustl.edu (128.252.135.4)
|
|
/systems/ibmpc/msdos
|
|
Corvallis, OR: archive.orst.edu (128.193.2.13)
|
|
/pub/mirrors/simtel/msdos
|
|
Australia: archie.au (139.130.4.6)
|
|
/micros/pc/oak
|
|
England: src.doc.ic.ac.uk (146.169.2.10)
|
|
/pub/packages/simtel
|
|
Finland: ftp.funet.fi (128.214.248.6)
|
|
/pub/msdos/SimTel
|
|
France: ftp.ibp.fr (132.227.60.2)
|
|
/pub/msdos
|
|
Germany: ftp.uni-paderborn.de (131.234.2.32)
|
|
/SimTel/msdos
|
|
Hong Kong: ftp.cs.cuhk.hk (137.189.4.57)
|
|
/pub/simtel/msdos
|
|
Israel: ftp.technion.ac.il (132.68.1.10)
|
|
/pub/unsupported/dos/simtel
|
|
Poland: ftp.cyf-kr.edu.pl (149.156.1.8)
|
|
/pub/mirror/msdos
|
|
Sweden: ftp.sunet.se (130.238.127.3)
|
|
/pub/pc/mirror/SimTel/msdos
|
|
Switzerland: ftp.switch.ch (130.59.1.40)
|
|
/mirror/msdos
|
|
Taiwan: NCTUCCCA.edu.tw (140.111.1.10)
|
|
/PC/simtel
|
|
Thailand: ftp.nectec.or.th (192.150.251.32)
|
|
/pub/mirrors/msdos
|
|
|
|
|
|
See also [1.11]
|
|
|
|
|
|
[2.2] What are the hardware requirements for Executor/DOS?
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
For Executor/DOS 1.2 you need a '386 or better, VGA, 7 Mb disk
|
|
space, a 3.5" 1.44 Mb floppy drive, and 4 Mb RAM. A SCSI
|
|
Controller is needed only if you want to access external
|
|
Macintosh hard disks or PowerBooks.
|
|
|
|
Executor/DOS 1.99<x> should work in sixteen colors on any VGA,
|
|
although we do not have the facilities to test more than a few
|
|
in house. In addition, if you have a Super VGA that is "VESA
|
|
compliant", Executor/DOS should be able to provide 256 colors
|
|
and a range of screen sizes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[2.3] What do I do if my Super VGA card isn't VESA compliant?
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
There is a shareware SVGA utility that provides VESA compliance
|
|
for SVGA cards that normally are not VESA compliant. At the time
|
|
this FAQ was last modified, univbe50.zip was the most recent
|
|
release of this extender.
|
|
|
|
It is not a product of ARDI, but as a convenience to people
|
|
picking up experimental versions of Executor, the file
|
|
univbe50.zip is available in
|
|
ftp.cs.unm.edu:/pub/ardi/Executor_DOS. If you use it, you
|
|
should pay the shareware fee as described in the documentation
|
|
included in the zip file. If you have a recent SVGA card you
|
|
probably don't need univbe. There may be a more recent
|
|
version of univbe in oak.oakland.edu:/SimTel/msdos/graphics.
|
|
This directory also has several other card specific VESA
|
|
drivers, some of which can be found in vesa-tsr.zip and
|
|
vesadrv2.zip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[2.4] Executor crashes with "GrSetMode ; unknown adapter type in driver."
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
You must be running an old version of Executor; this error
|
|
cannot occur in versions >= 1.99h.
|
|
|
|
1.99b had problems when Microsoft's display.sys driver is in
|
|
config.sys. We have updated the code that had this problem
|
|
and hope that the problem is now fixed. If it is not, you
|
|
must remove display.sys from the config.sys section you use
|
|
when you're using Executor/DOS. Please report this bug if you
|
|
see it in E/D 1.99e or later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[2.5] Does E/D require an ASPI driver to access SCSI?
|
|
------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If your SCSI drivers patch the "INT 13" BIOS calls, then an
|
|
ASPI driver is not needed. As long as "INT 13" can allow Executor
|
|
to read a SCSI drive, there is no need to use ASPI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[2.6] Have you released Executor for OS/2 yet?
|
|
-----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
We plan on making an OS/2 specific version of Executor, but only
|
|
after we get Executor 2.0 shipping. However, Executor 1.99l
|
|
is reported to work well under OS/2 Warp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[2.7] Why won't Executor/DOS work with my Diamond Viper PCI card?
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Executor/DOS requires VESA compliant graphics cards. Many
|
|
cards are not directly VESA compliant and need a tsr to be run
|
|
before they will work with Executor/DOS. On a Gateway
|
|
computer, you can do this with the "vprmode VESA" command.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[2.8] Why doesn't my mouse work when I run Executor under OS/2 Warp?
|
|
|
|
If it's not already there, you may need to add this line:
|
|
|
|
DEVICE=C:\OS2\MDOS\VMOUSE.SYS
|
|
|
|
to your CONFIG.SYS. This, and related issues, are described
|
|
on pages 206-207 of _User's Guide to OS/2 Warp_. This line
|
|
should already have been added for you when you installed Warp.
|
|
|
|
Also, you may need to load MOUSE.COM in your AUTOEXEC.BAT, for
|
|
example:
|
|
|
|
LOADHIGH C:\OS2\MDOS\MOUSE.COM
|
|
|
|
You can also create an AUTOEXEC file specifically for Executor,
|
|
place it in the same directory as Executor, and configure Warp
|
|
to execute that file whenever you launch Executor.
|
|
|
|
[2.9] Does Executor work under Windows '95?
|
|
|
|
Several users have reported that Executor/DOS 1.99l works
|
|
well under Windows '95. We have not yet created a version
|
|
of Executor specifically for Windows '95, but we plan to do
|
|
so in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[3] Executor/Linux
|
|
===================
|
|
|
|
[3.1] Can I buy the Linux version now?
|
|
---------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
(Technically, our software is licensed, not sold). You can
|
|
now license Executor/Linux and be provided with a serial
|
|
number and license key from ARDI and "unlock" the experimental
|
|
Executor 1.99<x> releases as well as Executor/Linux 2.0.*.
|
|
However, currently there is no printed manual available for
|
|
Executor/Linux.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[3.2] Why can't the Linux version access floppies with option-shift-2
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
(like the DOS version does)?
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
This problem was fixed in Executor/Linux 1.99j.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[3.3] Are we ready to hear about Executor/Linux bugs?
|
|
------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Yes. Send them to "bugs@ardi.com" and make sure that you
|
|
identify what version of Executor you're running (i.e.
|
|
Executor/Linux 1.99k) as well as what kernel and X-Windows
|
|
you're using. Please mention what Mac software you were
|
|
running when you encountered the bug and explain whether the
|
|
bug is reproducible or not. If Executor provides some sort of
|
|
debug output, please include that as well. Our NEXTSTEP
|
|
version has a bug-sending facility that automatically fills in
|
|
all that information for you. If we get some time, we'll
|
|
incorporate that code into Executor/Linux.
|
|
|
|
Executor/Linux is bundled with a "send-pr" package that allows
|
|
you to submit bug reports directly into our "gnats" bug
|
|
tracking database. We prefer that you use this tool, although
|
|
it's not necessary. See [3.4] for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[3.4] Should bug reports be sent one at a time or in a big list?
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
In general, it's easier for *us* if you send them one at a
|
|
time. Internally we use "gnats", a free bug-tracking tool and
|
|
we need to separate each bug into a single file for tracking.
|
|
On the other hand, since by providing us with bug reports
|
|
you're helping us out, we won't refuse bug reports that are
|
|
collections.
|
|
|
|
In fact, if you're particularly brave, you can pick up the
|
|
file "send-pr.tar.gz" and install a program "send-pr" which
|
|
will allow you to send us bug reports pre-formatted for gnats.
|
|
This will save us time and also give you a bug tracking number
|
|
that you can refer to in further e-mail to ARDI about the bug.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[3.5] Why is there no Executor for NetBSD or FreeBSD?
|
|
------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
We don't currently have the manpower to support it. The Linux
|
|
release is a byproduct of the fact that we use Linux in house.
|
|
After we've cleaned up the Linux version and get some
|
|
Executor/Linux sales, we'll look into the feasibility of
|
|
Executor for NetBSD and FreeBSD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[3.6] Where are the bitmaps stored on the Linux version of executor?
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
All versions of Executor maintain an internal bitmap
|
|
corresponding to the actual screen. We accrue a "dirty rect"
|
|
as the program draws to what it thinks is the screen via
|
|
Executor's QuickDraw implementation. We periodically update
|
|
the _real_ screen (e.g., the X window) by transferring the
|
|
"dirty rect" across. So basically our graphics interface to
|
|
the host machine consists of nothing more than blitting
|
|
rectangles to the screen, which aids our portability. Under
|
|
X, we use shared memory extensions for speed, but we don't do
|
|
anything fancy like trying to cache Mac fonts on the X server
|
|
side. Spending time trying to do so would be a bad idea for a
|
|
number of reasons we won't go into.
|
|
|
|
"Refresh" mode is useful when the program directly manipulates
|
|
the frame buffer itself. In this mode, we periodically
|
|
analyze the internal screen memory to decide what has been
|
|
changed, and transfer the changed data to the real screen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[3.7] Will there be an SVGALIB version of Executor/Linux in the future?
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Probably. Executor/Linux would clearly get a major
|
|
performance benefit from an SVGALIB implementation. We are in
|
|
the process of rewriting our graphics and event handling code
|
|
so that it will be easy to add this sort of capability, but we
|
|
don't yet have a timetable for doing so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[3.8] Why do all the non-Executor Windows get creepy colors when Executor
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
is running?
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
This is no longer true for recent versions of Executor.
|
|
Executor/Linux can run in two modes on 4 or 8-bit X servers.
|
|
|
|
1) "private colormap" mode. In this mode, Executor "takes
|
|
over" all colors on your screen when the cursor is in the
|
|
Executor window. That means that the colors for all your
|
|
other windows will suddenly change radically. This is
|
|
the fastest mode, and provides the most accurate colors,
|
|
but it can be a real eyesore. Still, if you're playing
|
|
Wolfenstein 3D or some other interactive game, you may
|
|
want to maximize performance by using this mode. You can
|
|
enable this mode with "-privatecmap".
|
|
2) "non-private colormap" mode. In this mode (the default),
|
|
Executor coexists nicely with other X windows by not
|
|
mucking about with the colors they use. This mode loses
|
|
some accuracy and speed, because Executor cannot set the
|
|
entire color table to exactly what it wants and it must
|
|
convert its internal graphics representation to one
|
|
appropriate for the X screen whenever it updates your
|
|
display. We have carefully optimized this conversion
|
|
process, so you won't notice the performance penalty most
|
|
of the time.
|
|
|
|
The "-privatecmap" flag is irrelevant to 16, 24, and 32-bit X
|
|
servers, since they don't have a color table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[3.9] How does printing work under Executor/Linux?
|
|
---------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Executor expects to print to a PostScript printer, or to send
|
|
output to a PostScript compatible filter, like GhostScript.
|
|
When an application prints under Executor, a PostScript stream
|
|
will be created and sent through the program "executor_filter"
|
|
which you can create by hand to "do the right thing", or "lpr"
|
|
if there is no "executor_filter" for Executor to run.
|
|
|
|
On our systems, "lpr" automatically does the right thing, so
|
|
other than occasionally setting our "PRINTER" environment variable,
|
|
we don't have to do much to print from Executor.
|
|
|
|
If you need to write your own filter, you can test it by typing:
|
|
|
|
myfilter < myfile.ps
|
|
|
|
where "myfile.ps" is some PostScript file you have lying
|
|
around. The "<" is VERY important! Executor does NOT give
|
|
your filter any command line arguments; it just "pipes" the
|
|
PostScript file through it.
|
|
|
|
CAVEAT #1: The PostScript that is currently produced relies on
|
|
some "Encoding" changes that appear not to work with
|
|
GhostScript. As such, certain characters are improperly
|
|
mapped. Word output for example can not print apostrophes!
|
|
Yes, we know this is very bad and are looking for a remedy.
|
|
|
|
CAVEAT #2: Different apps running under Executor have different
|
|
levels of success when printing. As always, *especially* with the
|
|
experimental versions, try first to make sure Executor will do what
|
|
you want it to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[3.10] Why does Executor complain that it cannot find 'libXt.so.6'?
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If Executor complains as soon as you start it up, you are either
|
|
running an old version of Executor (prior to 1.99e, at least) or
|
|
you are running XFree86 2.x instead of XFree86 3.x. Currently we
|
|
do not have the time to create two separate versions of E/L, so
|
|
use the "current" XFree86 server/libraries.
|
|
|
|
It has been reported that you can install the XFree86 3.x shared
|
|
libraries and still use an XFree86 2.x server. We have not
|
|
verified such trickery here at ARDI -- you're on your own.
|
|
|
|
When E/L 2.0 is released, we'll reevaluate our "3.x" only policy
|
|
and if there are a significant number of XFree86 2.x users that
|
|
would like to run E/L, we'll consider offering a version that links
|
|
with the XFree86 2.x libraries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[3.11] Which FTP sites have E/L?
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Other than ftp.ardi.com:/pub/Executor_Linux (too slow) and
|
|
ftp.cs.unm.edu:/pub/ardi/Executor_Linux, you can also find
|
|
Executor/Linux in
|
|
sunsite.unc.edu:/pub/Linux/system/Emulators/executorlinux199?.tar.gz.
|
|
|
|
See also [1.11]
|
|
|
|
|
|
[3.12] Why does Lemmings' splash screen take so long to be drawn?
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
As mentioned in [3.8] Executor/Linux by default now tries to
|
|
cooperate with X-Windows when assigning colors. That leaves X
|
|
in charge of "the colormap", which means Executor can't
|
|
quickly change the colors in the colormap itself. If you use
|
|
the "-privatecmap" option when you start Executor, you'll find
|
|
that Lemmings splash screen will come up much quicker, but
|
|
you'll also experience the "creepy colors" problem in other
|
|
windows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[4] Executor/NEXTSTEP
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
[4.1] Why hasn't there been an Executor/NEXTSTEP release in a while?
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Recently we've revamped how Executor handles graphics
|
|
internally. This broke our NEXTSTEP support, so we have not
|
|
released a NEXTSTEP version in a while. Since we have to
|
|
rewrite that part of Executor anyway, we are looking into some
|
|
NeXT tools that allow programs to implement very fast
|
|
graphics. Before we can use these tools, we need some
|
|
information from NeXT which thus far has not been forthcoming.
|
|
|
|
Howeever, we've now resigned ourselves to the possibility that
|
|
nobody at NeXT will officially answer our questions. As such,
|
|
we're prepared to do the (re-)port of Executor to NEXTSTEP
|
|
without taking addvantage of these fast screen access methods.
|
|
We hope to have the port done by the end of May, 1995.
|
|
|
|
Perhaps after we have the port done using the standard screen
|
|
access methods, someone at NeXT will decide that it's worth
|
|
allowing us to speed things up.
|
|
|