bin | ||
machfs | ||
.gitignore | ||
LICENSE | ||
README.md | ||
setup.cfg | ||
setup.py | ||
test_all.py | ||
upload.sh |
This is a library for creating and inspecting HFS-format disk images. Mac-specific concepts like resource forks and type/creator codes are first-class citizens.
Python interface
The Python API is simple. The contents of a Volume
or a Folder
are
accessed using the index operator []
. While working on a filesystem,
its entire high-level contents are stored in memory as a Python object.
from machfs import Volume, Folder, File
v = Volume()
v['Folder'] = Folder()
v['Folder']['File'] = File()
v['Folder']['File'].data = b'Hello from Python!\r'
v['Folder']['File'].rsrc = b'' # Use the macresources library to work with resource forks
v['Folder']['File'].type = b'TEXT'
v['Folder']['File'].creator = b'TTXT' # Teach Text/SimpleText
with open('FloppyImage.dsk', 'wb') as f:
flat = v.write(
size=1440*1024, # "High Density" floppy
align=512, # Allocation block alignment modulus (2048 for CDs)
desktopdb=True, # Create a dummy Desktop Database to prevent a rebuild on boot
bootable=True, # This requires a folder with a ZSYS and a FNDR file
startapp=('Folder','File'), # Path (as tuple) to an app to open at boot
)
f.write(flat)
with open('FloppyImage.dsk', 'rb') as f:
flat = f.read()
v = Volume()
v.read(flat) # And you can read an image back!
Command-line interface
This package also installs the MakeHFS
and DumpHFS
utilities, for
working with folders on your native filesystem. Briefly, resource forks
are stored in Rez-formatted .rdump
files, and type and creator codes
are stored in 8-byte .idump
files. Admittedly this method of storage
is not pretty, but it exposes changes to resource files without
requiring Mac-specific software. For example, Git can track the addition
and removal of resources. Files with a TEXT
type are assumed to be
UTF-8 encoded with Unix-style (LF) line endings, and are converted to
Mac OS Roman encoding with Mac-style (CR) line endings.
Both commands have a --help
argument to display their options.
Why?
I want an automated, reproducible way to compile legacy MacOS software.
Without any current operating system fully supporting HFS,
libhfs/hfsutils (a C library
and command-line wrapper) is the most capable implementation. The
implementor chose to emulate POSIX I/O on a fake "mounted" filesystem.
While this is important for machines with very limited RAM, the
maintenance of consistent HFS data structures across incremental
operations is a complicated task requiring a large amount of low-level
code. Frequent I/O to the real filesystem also occurs. Current machines
have memory and cycles to burn, so an in-memory implementation in a
high-level programming language seemed like a reasonable tradeoff. As a
result, machfs
has nearly an order of magnitude fewer lines than
libhfs
, and is more maintainable, at a nearly negligible cost in
performance.