6502/cc65
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/cc65/cc65.git synced 2024-10-31 20:06:11 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
659d1729eb
cc65/cfg/gamate.cfg

52 lines
2.2 KiB
INI
Raw Normal View History

conio and most other stuff working now
2015-11-29 00:14:59 +00:00
# linker config to produce simple Gamate cartridge (.bin)
initial import of the gamate stuff
2015-11-14 12:15:29 +00:00
some more fiddling
2015-11-22 18:02:47 +00:00
SYMBOLS {
Renamed INITBSS to INIT and INIT to ONCE. The way we want to use the INITBSS segment - and especially the fact that it won't have the type bss on all ROM based targets - means that the name INITBSS is misleading. After all INIT is the best name from my perspective as it serves several purposes and therefore needs a rather generic name. Unfortunately this means that the current INIT segment needs to be renamed too. Looking for a short (ideally 4 letter) name I came up with ONCE as it contains all code (and data) accessed only once during initialization.
2016-03-06 20:26:22 +00:00
__STARTUP__: type = import;
__STACKSIZE__: type = weak, value = $0080; # 1 page stack
some more fiddling
2015-11-22 18:02:47 +00:00
}
initial import of the gamate stuff
2015-11-14 12:15:29 +00:00
MEMORY {
Renamed INITBSS to INIT and INIT to ONCE. The way we want to use the INITBSS segment - and especially the fact that it won't have the type bss on all ROM based targets - means that the name INITBSS is misleading. After all INIT is the best name from my perspective as it serves several purposes and therefore needs a rather generic name. Unfortunately this means that the current INIT segment needs to be renamed too. Looking for a short (ideally 4 letter) name I came up with ONCE as it contains all code (and data) accessed only once during initialization.
2016-03-06 20:26:22 +00:00
# 0000-03ff is RAM
# FIXME: what zp range can we actually use?
# $0a-$11 is used by IRQ/NMI, $e8 is used by NMI
Renamed RAM to MAIN for all disk based targets. The name RAM doesn't make much sense in general for a memeory area because i.e. the zero page is for sure RAM but is not part of the memory area named RAM. For disk based targets it makes sense to put the disk file more into focus and here MAIN means the main part of the file - in contrast to some header. Only for ROM based targets the name RAM is kept as it makes sense to focus on the difference between RAM and ROM.
2016-03-07 00:28:55 +00:00
ZP: start = $0012, size = $00E8 - $0012;
CPUSTACK: start = $0100, size = $0100;
RAM: start = $0200, size = $0200 - __STACKSIZE__, define = yes;
conio and most other stuff working now
2015-11-29 00:14:59 +00:00
Renamed RAM to MAIN for all disk based targets. The name RAM doesn't make much sense in general for a memeory area because i.e. the zero page is for sure RAM but is not part of the memory area named RAM. For disk based targets it makes sense to put the disk file more into focus and here MAIN means the main part of the file - in contrast to some header. Only for ROM based targets the name RAM is kept as it makes sense to focus on the difference between RAM and ROM.
2016-03-07 00:28:55 +00:00
CARTHEADER: file = %O, define = yes, start = %S, size = $0029;
Renamed INITBSS to INIT and INIT to ONCE. The way we want to use the INITBSS segment - and especially the fact that it won't have the type bss on all ROM based targets - means that the name INITBSS is misleading. After all INIT is the best name from my perspective as it serves several purposes and therefore needs a rather generic name. Unfortunately this means that the current INIT segment needs to be renamed too. Looking for a short (ideally 4 letter) name I came up with ONCE as it contains all code (and data) accessed only once during initialization.
2016-03-06 20:26:22 +00:00
# 6000-e000 can be (Cartridge) ROM
# WARNING: fill value must be $00 else it will no more work
Renamed RAM to MAIN for all disk based targets. The name RAM doesn't make much sense in general for a memeory area because i.e. the zero page is for sure RAM but is not part of the memory area named RAM. For disk based targets it makes sense to put the disk file more into focus and here MAIN means the main part of the file - in contrast to some header. Only for ROM based targets the name RAM is kept as it makes sense to focus on the difference between RAM and ROM.
2016-03-07 00:28:55 +00:00
#ROM: start = $6000, size = $1000, fill = yes, fillval = $00, file = %O, define = yes;
#ROMFILL: start = $7000, size = $7000, fill = yes, fillval = $00, file = %O, define = yes;
Renamed INITBSS to INIT and INIT to ONCE. The way we want to use the INITBSS segment - and especially the fact that it won't have the type bss on all ROM based targets - means that the name INITBSS is misleading. After all INIT is the best name from my perspective as it serves several purposes and therefore needs a rather generic name. Unfortunately this means that the current INIT segment needs to be renamed too. Looking for a short (ideally 4 letter) name I came up with ONCE as it contains all code (and data) accessed only once during initialization.
2016-03-06 20:26:22 +00:00
# for images that have code >$6fff we must calculate the checksum!
Renamed RAM to MAIN for all disk based targets. The name RAM doesn't make much sense in general for a memeory area because i.e. the zero page is for sure RAM but is not part of the memory area named RAM. For disk based targets it makes sense to put the disk file more into focus and here MAIN means the main part of the file - in contrast to some header. Only for ROM based targets the name RAM is kept as it makes sense to focus on the difference between RAM and ROM.
2016-03-07 00:28:55 +00:00
ROM: start = $6000 + $0029, size = $8000 - $0029, fill = yes, fillval = $00, file = %O, define = yes;
initial import of the gamate stuff
2015-11-14 12:15:29 +00:00
}
SEGMENTS {
Renamed INITBSS to INIT and INIT to ONCE. The way we want to use the INITBSS segment - and especially the fact that it won't have the type bss on all ROM based targets - means that the name INITBSS is misleading. After all INIT is the best name from my perspective as it serves several purposes and therefore needs a rather generic name. Unfortunately this means that the current INIT segment needs to be renamed too. Looking for a short (ideally 4 letter) name I came up with ONCE as it contains all code (and data) accessed only once during initialization.
2016-03-06 20:26:22 +00:00
ZEROPAGE: load = ZP, type = zp, define = yes;
EXTZP: load = ZP, type = zp, define = yes, optional = yes;
APPZP: load = ZP, type = zp, define = yes, optional = yes;
STARTUP: load = CARTHEADER, type = ro, define = yes;
Removed symbol definition for ONCE. Almost all targets don't need symbols for the ONCE segment. Likely their definition was a C&P error in the first place.
2016-03-15 20:25:22 +00:00
ONCE: load = ROM, type = ro, optional = yes;
Renamed INITBSS to INIT and INIT to ONCE. The way we want to use the INITBSS segment - and especially the fact that it won't have the type bss on all ROM based targets - means that the name INITBSS is misleading. After all INIT is the best name from my perspective as it serves several purposes and therefore needs a rather generic name. Unfortunately this means that the current INIT segment needs to be renamed too. Looking for a short (ideally 4 letter) name I came up with ONCE as it contains all code (and data) accessed only once during initialization.
2016-03-06 20:26:22 +00:00
CODE: load = ROM, type = ro, define = yes;
RODATA: load = ROM, type = ro, define = yes;
DATA: load = ROM, run = RAM, type = rw, define = yes;
BSS: load = RAM, type = bss, define = yes;
initial import of the gamate stuff
2015-11-14 12:15:29 +00:00
}
FEATURES {
Renamed INITBSS to INIT and INIT to ONCE. The way we want to use the INITBSS segment - and especially the fact that it won't have the type bss on all ROM based targets - means that the name INITBSS is misleading. After all INIT is the best name from my perspective as it serves several purposes and therefore needs a rather generic name. Unfortunately this means that the current INIT segment needs to be renamed too. Looking for a short (ideally 4 letter) name I came up with ONCE as it contains all code (and data) accessed only once during initialization.
2016-03-06 20:26:22 +00:00
CONDES: type = constructor,
label = __CONSTRUCTOR_TABLE__,
count = __CONSTRUCTOR_COUNT__,
segment = ONCE;
CONDES: type = destructor,
label = __DESTRUCTOR_TABLE__,
count = __DESTRUCTOR_COUNT__,
segment = RODATA;
CONDES: type = interruptor,
label = __INTERRUPTOR_TABLE__,
count = __INTERRUPTOR_COUNT__,
segment = RODATA,
import = __CALLIRQ__;
initial import of the gamate stuff
2015-11-14 12:15:29 +00:00
}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink