6502/cc65
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/cc65/cc65.git synced 2024-12-25 17:29:50 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
85e572f4e1
cc65/cfg/pce.cfg

47 lines
1.8 KiB
INI
Raw Normal View History

more cleanup, joystick works again
2015-07-12 12:27:24 +00:00
# linker config to produce simple NEC PC-Engine cartridge (.pce)
more hacking
2014-11-30 10:20:57 +00:00
SYMBOLS {
Renamed INITBSS to INIT and INIT to ONCE. The way we want to use the INITBSS segment - and especially the fact that it won't have the type bss on all ROM based targets - means that the name INITBSS is misleading. After all INIT is the best name from my perspective as it serves several purposes and therefore needs a rather generic name. Unfortunately this means that the current INIT segment needs to be renamed too. Looking for a short (ideally 4 letter) name I came up with ONCE as it contains all code (and data) accessed only once during initialization.
2016-03-06 20:26:22 +00:00
__STACKSIZE__: type = weak, value = $0300; # 3 pages stack
more hacking
2014-11-30 10:20:57 +00:00
}
initial import, completely untested, does not compile yet
2014-11-29 13:18:48 +00:00
more cleanup, joystick works again
2015-07-12 12:27:24 +00:00
MEMORY {
Renamed INITBSS to INIT and INIT to ONCE. The way we want to use the INITBSS segment - and especially the fact that it won't have the type bss on all ROM based targets - means that the name INITBSS is misleading. After all INIT is the best name from my perspective as it serves several purposes and therefore needs a rather generic name. Unfortunately this means that the current INIT segment needs to be renamed too. Looking for a short (ideally 4 letter) name I came up with ONCE as it contains all code (and data) accessed only once during initialization.
2016-03-06 20:26:22 +00:00
# FIXME: is this correct? the first 3? bytes cant be used?
ZP: file = "", start = $0003, size = $00FD, type = rw, define = yes;
initial import, completely untested, does not compile yet
2014-11-29 13:18:48 +00:00
Renamed INITBSS to INIT and INIT to ONCE. The way we want to use the INITBSS segment - and especially the fact that it won't have the type bss on all ROM based targets - means that the name INITBSS is misleading. After all INIT is the best name from my perspective as it serves several purposes and therefore needs a rather generic name. Unfortunately this means that the current INIT segment needs to be renamed too. Looking for a short (ideally 4 letter) name I came up with ONCE as it contains all code (and data) accessed only once during initialization.
2016-03-06 20:26:22 +00:00
# reset-bank and hardware vectors
ROM0: file = %O, start = $E000, size = $1FF6, fill = yes, define = yes;
ROMV: file = %O, start = $FFF6, size = $000A, fill = yes;
initial import, completely untested, does not compile yet
2014-11-29 13:18:48 +00:00
Renamed INITBSS to INIT and INIT to ONCE. The way we want to use the INITBSS segment - and especially the fact that it won't have the type bss on all ROM based targets - means that the name INITBSS is misleading. After all INIT is the best name from my perspective as it serves several purposes and therefore needs a rather generic name. Unfortunately this means that the current INIT segment needs to be renamed too. Looking for a short (ideally 4 letter) name I came up with ONCE as it contains all code (and data) accessed only once during initialization.
2016-03-06 20:26:22 +00:00
# first RAM page (also contains stack and zeropage)
RAM: file = "", start = $2200, size = $1e00, define = yes;
initial import, completely untested, does not compile yet
2014-11-29 13:18:48 +00:00
}
more cleanup, joystick works again
2015-07-12 12:27:24 +00:00
SEGMENTS {
Renamed INITBSS to INIT and INIT to ONCE. The way we want to use the INITBSS segment - and especially the fact that it won't have the type bss on all ROM based targets - means that the name INITBSS is misleading. After all INIT is the best name from my perspective as it serves several purposes and therefore needs a rather generic name. Unfortunately this means that the current INIT segment needs to be renamed too. Looking for a short (ideally 4 letter) name I came up with ONCE as it contains all code (and data) accessed only once during initialization.
2016-03-06 20:26:22 +00:00
ZEROPAGE: load = ZP, type = zp, define = yes;
EXTZP: load = ZP, type = zp, define = yes, optional = yes;
APPZP: load = ZP, type = zp, define = yes, optional = yes;
STARTUP: load = ROM0, type = ro, define = yes;
Removed symbol definition for ONCE. Almost all targets don't need symbols for the ONCE segment. Likely their definition was a C&P error in the first place.
2016-03-15 20:25:22 +00:00
ONCE: load = ROM0, type = ro, optional = yes;
Renamed INITBSS to INIT and INIT to ONCE. The way we want to use the INITBSS segment - and especially the fact that it won't have the type bss on all ROM based targets - means that the name INITBSS is misleading. After all INIT is the best name from my perspective as it serves several purposes and therefore needs a rather generic name. Unfortunately this means that the current INIT segment needs to be renamed too. Looking for a short (ideally 4 letter) name I came up with ONCE as it contains all code (and data) accessed only once during initialization.
2016-03-06 20:26:22 +00:00
CODE: load = ROM0, type = ro, define = yes;
RODATA: load = ROM0, type = ro, define = yes;
DATA: load = ROM0, run = RAM, type = rw, define = yes;
BSS: load = RAM, type = bss, define = yes;
VECTORS: load = ROMV, type = rw, define = yes;
initial import, completely untested, does not compile yet
2014-11-29 13:18:48 +00:00
}
more cleanup, joystick works again
2015-07-12 12:27:24 +00:00
initial import, completely untested, does not compile yet
2014-11-29 13:18:48 +00:00
FEATURES {
more cleanup and fixing
2015-07-12 14:40:52 +00:00
CONDES: type = constructor,
label = __CONSTRUCTOR_TABLE__,
count = __CONSTRUCTOR_COUNT__,
Renamed INITBSS to INIT and INIT to ONCE. The way we want to use the INITBSS segment - and especially the fact that it won't have the type bss on all ROM based targets - means that the name INITBSS is misleading. After all INIT is the best name from my perspective as it serves several purposes and therefore needs a rather generic name. Unfortunately this means that the current INIT segment needs to be renamed too. Looking for a short (ideally 4 letter) name I came up with ONCE as it contains all code (and data) accessed only once during initialization.
2016-03-06 20:26:22 +00:00
segment = ONCE;
more cleanup and fixing
2015-07-12 14:40:52 +00:00
CONDES: type = destructor,
label = __DESTRUCTOR_TABLE__,
count = __DESTRUCTOR_COUNT__,
segment = RODATA;
added interruptor support
2015-09-19 13:55:43 +00:00
CONDES: type = interruptor,
label = __INTERRUPTOR_TABLE__,
count = __INTERRUPTOR_COUNT__,
segment = RODATA,
import = __CALLIRQ__;
initial import, completely untested, does not compile yet
2014-11-29 13:18:48 +00:00
}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink