6502/cc65
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/cc65/cc65.git synced 2024-12-22 12:30:41 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Remove paragraph about limitations that do no longer exist

Browse Source 
git-svn-id: svn://svn.cc65.org/cc65/trunk@35 b7a2c559-68d2-44c3-8de9-860c34a00d81
This commit is contained in:
cuz 2000-06-08 18:51:37 +00:00
parent 7f563d0349
commit 012470bdcb
1 changed files with 8 additions and 13 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

19
doc/coding.txt
View File

@ -14,16 +14,10 @@ How to generate the most effective code with cc65.
2. Don't declare auto variables in nested function blocks.
Variable declarations in nested blocks are usually a good thing. But with
cc65, there are several drawbacks:
a. The compiler has only one symbol table (there's no true nesting).
This means that your variables must not have the same names as
variables in the enclosing block.
b. Since the compiler generates code in one pass, it must create the
the variables on the stack each time the block is entered and destroy
them when the block is left. This causes a speed penalty and larger
code.
cc65, there is a drawback: Since the compiler generates code in one pass,
it must create the variables on the stack each time the block is entered
and destroy them when the block is left. This causes a speed penalty and
larger code.
@ -137,8 +131,8 @@ How to generate the most effective code with cc65.
10. Use the preincrement and predecrement operators.
The compiler is currently not smart enough to figure out, if the rvalue of
an increment is used or not. So it has to save and restore that value when
The compiler not always smart enough to figure out, if the rvalue of an
increment is used or not. So it has to save and restore that value when
producing code for the postincrement and postdecrement operators, even if
this value is never used. To avoid the additional overhead, use the
preincrement and predecrement operators if you don't need the resulting
@ -338,3 +332,4 @@ How to generate the most effective code with cc65.