1
0
mirror of https://github.com/cc65/cc65.git synced 2024-11-06 15:06:07 +00:00
Commit Graph

24 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
acqn
d69e81cd66 Moved and improved test cases for Issue #1462.
Fixed an old test case for unsigned enum bit-fields that are supposed to be int-promoted.
2021-06-09 08:03:12 +02:00
mrdudz
b08dc28cc1 another testcase related to issue #1462 2021-05-22 22:34:52 +02:00
mrdudz
e13f57e86c added another testcase for issue #1462 2021-05-21 16:09:10 +02:00
mrdudz
080cb1bac9 added testcase for issue #1462 2021-04-23 21:52:36 +02:00
acqn
da4cc08b78 Moved and improved test case for Issue #1310. 2021-02-22 14:14:59 -05:00
Jesse Rosenstock
c2c73e7d06 Move #1332 test from todo/ to val/
This bug was fixed by 2915464.
2020-11-16 03:23:52 -05:00
Jesse Rosenstock
83ac2755fe Add test case for #1332 2020-11-15 21:32:45 +01:00
Jesse Rosenstock
0e482c7f92 Add test for issue #1310 2020-11-01 19:09:20 +01:00
Oliver Schmidt
c658acbf85 Avoid cl65 in tests.
cl65 creates intermediate files based on the source file name in the source file directory. Calling cl65 in parallel with the same source file causes those intermediate files to get overwritten.

Fixes #1080
2020-08-26 20:39:34 +02:00
acqn
0486d28abc Fixed Issue #327. 2020-08-22 13:44:18 +02:00
Jesse Rosenstock
ff535b8e1a Treat signed int bit-fields as signed
Prior to this PR, `int`, `signed int`, and `unsigned int`
bitfields are all treated as `unsigned int`.

With this PR, `signed int` will be treated as `signed int`,
and the others remain unsigned.

Since `Type` does not distinguish between `int` and `signed int`,
add an extra `int* SignenessSpecified` param to `ParseTypeSpec`
so we can tell these apart for bit-fields and treat plain `int : N`
as `unsigned int : N` since it is more efficient to zero-extend
than sign-extend.

Fixes #1095
2020-08-18 12:23:20 +02:00
Jesse Rosenstock
c4698dfd07 Use C89 semantics for integer conversions
Previously, the following rules were used for binary operators:
* If one of the values is a long, the result is long.
* If one of the values is unsigned, the result is also unsigned.
* Otherwise the result is an int.

C89 specifies the "usual arithmetic conversions" as:
* The integral promotions are performed on both operands.
* Then the following rules are applied:
  * If either operand has type unsigned long int, the other operand is
    converted to unsigned long int.
  * Otherwise, if one operand has type long int and the other has type
    unsigned int, if a long int can represent all values of an unsigned int,
    the operand of type unsigned int is converted to long int; if a long int
    cannot represent all the values of an unsigned int, both operands are
    converted to unsigned long int.
  * Otherwise, if either operand has type long int, the other operand is
    converted to long int.
  * Otherwise, if either operand has type unsigned int, the other operand is
    converted to unsigned int.
  * Otherwise, both operands have type int.
https://port70.net/~nsz/c/c89/c89-draft.html#3.2.1.5

As one example, these rules give a different result for an operator
with one long operand and one unsigned int operand.  Previously,
the result type was unsigned long.  With C89 semantics, it is just long,
since long can represent all unsigned ints.

Integral promotions convert types shorter than int to int (or unsigned int).
Both char and unsigned char are promoted to int since int can represent
all unsigned chars.
https://port70.net/~nsz/c/c89/c89-draft.html#3.2.1.1

Rename promoteint to ArithmeticConvert, since this is more accurate.

Fixes #170
2020-08-15 19:14:31 +02:00
Jesse Rosenstock
847982c6bf Handle bit-field test after shift/mask
Previously, bit-field tests were incorrectly combined with load in
`if (x.bitfield)`.  Delay the test until after the shift/mask
is done.  Still combine tests with load if no shift/mask is required.

Fixes #1139
2020-07-31 19:33:28 +02:00
Jesse Rosenstock
c72fa735b9 Add test for #1139 2020-07-30 19:13:19 +02:00
Jesse Rosenstock
c0f2b69bef Add test case for sign extending < 1 byte 2020-07-28 22:01:22 +02:00
mrdudz
6abf24e25e move test for issue #1077 to test/val 2020-07-22 15:12:02 +02:00
Jesse Rosenstock
bbcb39978c Add test of signed bitfields for #1095 2020-07-19 11:05:27 +02:00
mrdudz
5ad365c5df some tweaks to the moved tests to make them more suitable for automatic testing 2020-07-13 21:26:07 +02:00
mrdudz
882194c221 move a bunch of tests from testcode/lib to test/val (and a failing one to test/todo) 2020-07-13 21:25:13 +02:00
mrdudz
579b50f0c5 test for issue #927 2020-07-09 16:18:08 +02:00
mrdudz
2428285694 test for issue #327 2020-07-09 16:17:31 +02:00
mrdudz
ff18218b0a test for issue #170 2020-07-09 16:17:16 +02:00
mrdudz
5925a7f8ee test for issue #1077 2020-07-09 16:16:46 +02:00
Oliver Schmidt
0f8b587bc2 Added directory for currently failing regression tests. 2020-07-01 00:13:55 +02:00