As discussed in https://github.com/cc65/cc65/pull/452 after my premature merge the two functions in question don't work as expected.
Additionally I adjusted several style deviations in the pull request in question.
So far the joy_masks array allowed several joystick drivers for a single target to each have different joy_read return values. However this meant that every call to joy_read implied an additional joy_masks lookup to post-process the return value.
Given that almost all targets only come with a single joystick driver this seems an inappropriate overhead. Therefore now the target header files contain constants matching the return value of the joy_read of the joystick driver(s) on that target.
If there indeed are several joystick drivers for a single target they must agree on a common return value for joy_read. In some cases this was alredy the case as there's a "natural" return value for joy_read. However a few joystick drivers need to be adjusted. This may cause some overhead inside the driver. But that is for sure smaller than the overhead introduced by the joy_masks lookup before.
!!! ToDo !!!
The following three joystick drivers become broken with this commit and need to be adjusted:
- atrmj8.s
- c64-numpad.s
- vic20-stdjoy.s
There were two aspects of this behavior that were considered undesirable:
- Although the safe inlining is in general desirable it should only be enabled if asked for it - like any other optimization.
- The option name -Os implies that it is a safe option, the potentially unsafe inlining should have a more explicit name.
So now:
- The option -Os enables the safe inlining.
- The new option --eagerly-inline-funcs enables the potentially unsafe inlining (including the safe inlining).
Additionally was added:
- The option --inline-stdfuncs that does like -Os enable the safe inlining but doesn't enable optimizations.
- The pragma inline-stdfuncs that works identical to --inline-stdfuncs.
- The pragma allow-eager-inline that enables the potentially unsafe inlining but doesn't include the safe inlining. That means that by itself it only marks code as safe for potentially unsafe inlining but doesn't actually enable any inlining.
