2009-09-20 07:28:26 +00:00
|
|
|
//===-- X86IntelInstPrinter.cpp - AT&T assembly instruction printing ------===//
|
2009-09-20 07:17:49 +00:00
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
|
|
|
|
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// This file includes code for rendering MCInst instances as AT&T-style
|
|
|
|
// assembly.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define DEBUG_TYPE "asm-printer"
|
|
|
|
#include "X86IntelInstPrinter.h"
|
I have manually decoded the imm field of an insertps one too many
times. This patch causes llc and llvm-mc (which both default to
verbose-asm) to print out comments after a few common shuffle
instructions which indicates the shuffle mask, e.g.:
insertps $113, %xmm3, %xmm0 ## xmm0 = zero,xmm0[1,2],xmm3[1]
unpcklps %xmm1, %xmm0 ## xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[0],xmm0[1],xmm1[1]
pshufd $1, %xmm1, %xmm1 ## xmm1 = xmm1[1,0,0,0]
This is carefully factored to keep the information extraction (of the
shuffle mask) separate from the printing logic. I plan to move the
extraction part out somewhere else at some point for other parts of
the x86 backend that want to introspect on the behavior of shuffles.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@112387 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-08-28 20:42:31 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "X86InstComments.h"
|
2011-07-06 22:01:53 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "MCTargetDesc/X86MCTargetDesc.h"
|
2009-09-20 07:17:49 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/MC/MCInst.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/MC/MCAsmInfo.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/MC/MCExpr.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/FormattedStream.h"
|
2011-01-17 19:17:01 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <cctype>
|
2009-09-20 07:17:49 +00:00
|
|
|
using namespace llvm;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Include the auto-generated portion of the assembly writer.
|
2010-02-11 22:57:32 +00:00
|
|
|
#define GET_INSTRUCTION_NAME
|
2009-09-20 07:17:49 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "X86GenAsmWriter1.inc"
|
|
|
|
|
2011-06-02 02:34:55 +00:00
|
|
|
void X86IntelInstPrinter::printRegName(raw_ostream &OS, unsigned RegNo) const {
|
|
|
|
OS << getRegisterName(RegNo);
|
2011-05-30 20:20:15 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-15 23:38:46 +00:00
|
|
|
void X86IntelInstPrinter::printInst(const MCInst *MI, raw_ostream &OS,
|
|
|
|
StringRef Annot) {
|
2010-04-04 05:04:31 +00:00
|
|
|
printInstruction(MI, OS);
|
I have manually decoded the imm field of an insertps one too many
times. This patch causes llc and llvm-mc (which both default to
verbose-asm) to print out comments after a few common shuffle
instructions which indicates the shuffle mask, e.g.:
insertps $113, %xmm3, %xmm0 ## xmm0 = zero,xmm0[1,2],xmm3[1]
unpcklps %xmm1, %xmm0 ## xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[0],xmm0[1],xmm1[1]
pshufd $1, %xmm1, %xmm1 ## xmm1 = xmm1[1,0,0,0]
This is carefully factored to keep the information extraction (of the
shuffle mask) separate from the printing logic. I plan to move the
extraction part out somewhere else at some point for other parts of
the x86 backend that want to introspect on the behavior of shuffles.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@112387 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-08-28 20:42:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If verbose assembly is enabled, we can print some informative comments.
|
2011-09-15 18:36:29 +00:00
|
|
|
if (CommentStream) {
|
2011-09-21 00:25:23 +00:00
|
|
|
printAnnotation(OS, Annot);
|
I have manually decoded the imm field of an insertps one too many
times. This patch causes llc and llvm-mc (which both default to
verbose-asm) to print out comments after a few common shuffle
instructions which indicates the shuffle mask, e.g.:
insertps $113, %xmm3, %xmm0 ## xmm0 = zero,xmm0[1,2],xmm3[1]
unpcklps %xmm1, %xmm0 ## xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[0],xmm0[1],xmm1[1]
pshufd $1, %xmm1, %xmm1 ## xmm1 = xmm1[1,0,0,0]
This is carefully factored to keep the information extraction (of the
shuffle mask) separate from the printing logic. I plan to move the
extraction part out somewhere else at some point for other parts of
the x86 backend that want to introspect on the behavior of shuffles.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@112387 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-08-28 20:42:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EmitAnyX86InstComments(MI, *CommentStream, getRegisterName);
|
2011-09-15 18:36:29 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-04-04 04:47:45 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-02-11 22:57:32 +00:00
|
|
|
StringRef X86IntelInstPrinter::getOpcodeName(unsigned Opcode) const {
|
|
|
|
return getInstructionName(Opcode);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2009-09-20 07:17:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-04-04 04:47:45 +00:00
|
|
|
void X86IntelInstPrinter::printSSECC(const MCInst *MI, unsigned Op,
|
|
|
|
raw_ostream &O) {
|
2009-09-20 07:17:49 +00:00
|
|
|
switch (MI->getOperand(Op).getImm()) {
|
2010-04-04 04:47:45 +00:00
|
|
|
default: assert(0 && "Invalid ssecc argument!");
|
2009-09-20 07:17:49 +00:00
|
|
|
case 0: O << "eq"; break;
|
|
|
|
case 1: O << "lt"; break;
|
|
|
|
case 2: O << "le"; break;
|
|
|
|
case 3: O << "unord"; break;
|
|
|
|
case 4: O << "neq"; break;
|
|
|
|
case 5: O << "nlt"; break;
|
|
|
|
case 6: O << "nle"; break;
|
|
|
|
case 7: O << "ord"; break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// print_pcrel_imm - This is used to print an immediate value that ends up
|
2009-09-20 07:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
/// being encoded as a pc-relative value.
|
2010-04-04 04:47:45 +00:00
|
|
|
void X86IntelInstPrinter::print_pcrel_imm(const MCInst *MI, unsigned OpNo,
|
|
|
|
raw_ostream &O) {
|
2009-09-20 07:17:49 +00:00
|
|
|
const MCOperand &Op = MI->getOperand(OpNo);
|
|
|
|
if (Op.isImm())
|
|
|
|
O << Op.getImm();
|
|
|
|
else {
|
|
|
|
assert(Op.isExpr() && "unknown pcrel immediate operand");
|
2010-01-18 00:37:40 +00:00
|
|
|
O << *Op.getExpr();
|
2009-09-20 07:17:49 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void PrintRegName(raw_ostream &O, StringRef RegName) {
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = RegName.size(); i != e; ++i)
|
|
|
|
O << (char)toupper(RegName[i]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void X86IntelInstPrinter::printOperand(const MCInst *MI, unsigned OpNo,
|
2010-04-04 04:47:45 +00:00
|
|
|
raw_ostream &O) {
|
2009-09-20 07:17:49 +00:00
|
|
|
const MCOperand &Op = MI->getOperand(OpNo);
|
|
|
|
if (Op.isReg()) {
|
|
|
|
PrintRegName(O, getRegisterName(Op.getReg()));
|
|
|
|
} else if (Op.isImm()) {
|
|
|
|
O << Op.getImm();
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
assert(Op.isExpr() && "unknown operand kind in printOperand");
|
2010-01-18 00:37:40 +00:00
|
|
|
O << *Op.getExpr();
|
2009-09-20 07:17:49 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-08 23:46:44 +00:00
|
|
|
void X86IntelInstPrinter::printMemReference(const MCInst *MI, unsigned Op,
|
|
|
|
raw_ostream &O) {
|
2009-09-20 07:17:49 +00:00
|
|
|
const MCOperand &BaseReg = MI->getOperand(Op);
|
|
|
|
unsigned ScaleVal = MI->getOperand(Op+1).getImm();
|
|
|
|
const MCOperand &IndexReg = MI->getOperand(Op+2);
|
|
|
|
const MCOperand &DispSpec = MI->getOperand(Op+3);
|
2010-07-08 23:46:44 +00:00
|
|
|
const MCOperand &SegReg = MI->getOperand(Op+4);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If this has a segment register, print it.
|
|
|
|
if (SegReg.getReg()) {
|
|
|
|
printOperand(MI, Op+4, O);
|
|
|
|
O << ':';
|
|
|
|
}
|
2009-09-20 07:17:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O << '[';
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool NeedPlus = false;
|
|
|
|
if (BaseReg.getReg()) {
|
2010-04-04 04:47:45 +00:00
|
|
|
printOperand(MI, Op, O);
|
2009-09-20 07:17:49 +00:00
|
|
|
NeedPlus = true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (IndexReg.getReg()) {
|
|
|
|
if (NeedPlus) O << " + ";
|
|
|
|
if (ScaleVal != 1)
|
|
|
|
O << ScaleVal << '*';
|
2010-04-04 04:47:45 +00:00
|
|
|
printOperand(MI, Op+2, O);
|
2009-09-20 07:17:49 +00:00
|
|
|
NeedPlus = true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-08 23:46:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-09-20 07:17:49 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!DispSpec.isImm()) {
|
|
|
|
if (NeedPlus) O << " + ";
|
|
|
|
assert(DispSpec.isExpr() && "non-immediate displacement for LEA?");
|
2010-01-18 00:37:40 +00:00
|
|
|
O << *DispSpec.getExpr();
|
2009-09-20 07:17:49 +00:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
int64_t DispVal = DispSpec.getImm();
|
|
|
|
if (DispVal || (!IndexReg.getReg() && !BaseReg.getReg())) {
|
|
|
|
if (NeedPlus) {
|
|
|
|
if (DispVal > 0)
|
|
|
|
O << " + ";
|
|
|
|
else {
|
|
|
|
O << " - ";
|
|
|
|
DispVal = -DispVal;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
O << DispVal;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O << ']';
|
|
|
|
}
|