Fix FP_TO_UINT->i32 on ppc32 -mcpu=g5. This was

using Promote which won't work because i64 isn't
a legal type.  It's easy enough to use Custom, but
then we have the problem that when the type
legalizer is promoting FP_TO_UINT->i16, it has no
way of telling it should prefer FP_TO_SINT->i32
to FP_TO_UINT->i32.  I have uncomfortably hacked
this by making the type legalizer choose FP_TO_SINT
when both are Custom.
This fixes several regressions in the testsuite.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@72891 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Dale Johannesen 2009-06-04 20:53:52 +00:00
parent 073e7e5807
commit 4c9369df57
3 changed files with 17 additions and 16 deletions

View File

@ -356,13 +356,12 @@ SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntRes_FP_TO_XINT(SDNode *N) {
unsigned NewOpc = N->getOpcode();
DebugLoc dl = N->getDebugLoc();
// If we're promoting a UINT to a larger size, check to see if the new node
// will be legal. If it isn't, check to see if FP_TO_SINT is legal, since
// we can use that instead. This allows us to generate better code for
// FP_TO_UINT for small destination sizes on targets where FP_TO_UINT is not
// legal, such as PowerPC.
// If we're promoting a UINT to a larger size and the larger FP_TO_UINT is
// not Legal, check to see if we can use FP_TO_SINT instead. (If both UINT
// and SINT conversions are Custom, there is no way to tell which is preferable.
// We choose SINT because that's the right thing on PPC.)
if (N->getOpcode() == ISD::FP_TO_UINT &&
!TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::FP_TO_UINT, NVT) &&
!TLI.isOperationLegal(ISD::FP_TO_UINT, NVT) &&
TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::FP_TO_SINT, NVT))
NewOpc = ISD::FP_TO_SINT;

View File

@ -227,15 +227,14 @@ PPCTargetLowering::PPCTargetLowering(PPCTargetMachine &TM)
setOperationAction(ISD::FP_TO_UINT, MVT::i64, Expand);
setOperationAction(ISD::SINT_TO_FP, MVT::i64, Custom);
setOperationAction(ISD::UINT_TO_FP, MVT::i64, Expand);
setOperationAction(ISD::FP_TO_UINT, MVT::i32, Expand);
// This is just the low 32 bits of a (signed) fp->i64 conversion.
// We cannot do this with Promote because i64 is not a legal type.
setOperationAction(ISD::FP_TO_UINT, MVT::i32, Custom);
// FIXME: disable this lowered code. This generates 64-bit register values,
// and we don't model the fact that the top part is clobbered by calls. We
// need to flag these together so that the value isn't live across a call.
//setOperationAction(ISD::SINT_TO_FP, MVT::i32, Custom);
// To take advantage of the above i64 FP_TO_SINT, promote i32 FP_TO_UINT
setOperationAction(ISD::FP_TO_UINT, MVT::i32, Promote);
} else {
// PowerPC does not have FP_TO_UINT on 32-bit implementations.
setOperationAction(ISD::FP_TO_UINT, MVT::i32, Expand);
@ -2858,7 +2857,7 @@ SDValue PPCTargetLowering::LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
}
// FIXME: Split this code up when LegalizeDAGTypes lands.
SDValue PPCTargetLowering::LowerFP_TO_SINT(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG,
SDValue PPCTargetLowering::LowerFP_TO_INT(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG,
DebugLoc dl) {
assert(Op.getOperand(0).getValueType().isFloatingPoint());
SDValue Src = Op.getOperand(0);
@ -2867,9 +2866,11 @@ SDValue PPCTargetLowering::LowerFP_TO_SINT(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG,
SDValue Tmp;
switch (Op.getValueType().getSimpleVT()) {
default: assert(0 && "Unhandled FP_TO_SINT type in custom expander!");
default: assert(0 && "Unhandled FP_TO_INT type in custom expander!");
case MVT::i32:
Tmp = DAG.getNode(PPCISD::FCTIWZ, dl, MVT::f64, Src);
Tmp = DAG.getNode(Op.getOpcode()==ISD::FP_TO_SINT ? PPCISD::FCTIWZ :
PPCISD::FCTIDZ,
dl, MVT::f64, Src);
break;
case MVT::i64:
Tmp = DAG.getNode(PPCISD::FCTIDZ, dl, MVT::f64, Src);
@ -3740,7 +3741,8 @@ SDValue PPCTargetLowering::LowerOperation(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
return LowerDYNAMIC_STACKALLOC(Op, DAG, PPCSubTarget);
case ISD::SELECT_CC: return LowerSELECT_CC(Op, DAG);
case ISD::FP_TO_SINT: return LowerFP_TO_SINT(Op, DAG,
case ISD::FP_TO_UINT:
case ISD::FP_TO_SINT: return LowerFP_TO_INT(Op, DAG,
Op.getDebugLoc());
case ISD::SINT_TO_FP: return LowerSINT_TO_FP(Op, DAG);
case ISD::FLT_ROUNDS_: return LowerFLT_ROUNDS_(Op, DAG);
@ -3834,7 +3836,7 @@ void PPCTargetLowering::ReplaceNodeResults(SDNode *N,
return;
}
case ISD::FP_TO_SINT:
Results.push_back(LowerFP_TO_SINT(SDValue(N, 0), DAG, dl));
Results.push_back(LowerFP_TO_INT(SDValue(N, 0), DAG, dl));
return;
}
}

View File

@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ namespace llvm {
SDValue LowerDYNAMIC_STACKALLOC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG,
const PPCSubtarget &Subtarget);
SDValue LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG);
SDValue LowerFP_TO_SINT(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG, DebugLoc dl);
SDValue LowerFP_TO_INT(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG, DebugLoc dl);
SDValue LowerSINT_TO_FP(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG);
SDValue LowerFLT_ROUNDS_(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG);
SDValue LowerSHL_PARTS(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG);