Teach basicaa that x|c == x+c when the c bits of x are clear. This

allows us to compile the example in readme.txt into:

LBB1_1:                                                     ## %bb
	movl	4(%rdx,%rax), %ecx
	movl	%ecx, %esi
	imull	(%rdx,%rax), %esi
	imull	%esi, %ecx
	movl	%esi, 8(%rdx,%rax)
	imull	%ecx, %esi
	movl	%ecx, 12(%rdx,%rax)
	movl	%esi, 16(%rdx,%rax)
	imull	%ecx, %esi
	movl	%esi, 20(%rdx,%rax)
	addq	$16, %rax
	cmpq	$4000, %rax
	jne	LBB1_1

instead of:

LBB1_1: 
	movl	(%rdx,%rax), %ecx
	imull	4(%rdx,%rax), %ecx
	movl	%ecx, 8(%rdx,%rax)
	imull	4(%rdx,%rax), %ecx
	movl	%ecx, 12(%rdx,%rax)
	imull	8(%rdx,%rax), %ecx
	movl	%ecx, 16(%rdx,%rax)
	imull	12(%rdx,%rax), %ecx
	movl	%ecx, 20(%rdx,%rax)
	addq	$16, %rax
	cmpq	$4000, %rax
	jne	LBB1_1

GCC (4.2) doesn't seem to be able to eliminate the loads in this 
testcase either, it generates:

L2:
	movl	(%rdx), %eax
	imull	4(%rdx), %eax
	movl	%eax, 8(%rdx)
	imull	4(%rdx), %eax
	movl	%eax, 12(%rdx)
	imull	8(%rdx), %eax
	movl	%eax, 16(%rdx)
	imull	12(%rdx), %eax
	movl	%eax, 20(%rdx)
	addl	$4, %ecx
	addq	$16, %rdx
	cmpl	$1002, %ecx
	jne	L2




git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@89952 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp

@@ -14,8 +14,6 @@
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 
 #include "llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/CaptureTracking.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/MemoryBuiltins.h"
 #include "llvm/Analysis/Passes.h"
 #include "llvm/Constants.h"
 #include "llvm/DerivedTypes.h"
@@ -26,6 +24,9 @@
 #include "llvm/IntrinsicInst.h"
 #include "llvm/Operator.h"
 #include "llvm/Pass.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/CaptureTracking.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/MemoryBuiltins.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h"
 #include "llvm/Target/TargetData.h"
 #include "llvm/ADT/SmallSet.h"
 #include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"
@@ -381,15 +382,22 @@ BasicAliasAnalysis::getModRefInfo(CallSite CS1, CallSite CS2) {
 /// GetLinearExpression - Analyze the specified value as a linear expression:
 /// "A*V + B".  Return the scale and offset values as APInts and return V as a
 /// Value*.  The incoming Value is known to be a scalar integer.
-static Value *GetLinearExpression(Value *V, APInt &Scale, APInt &Offset) {
+static Value *GetLinearExpression(Value *V, APInt &Scale, APInt &Offset,
+                                  const TargetData *TD) {
   assert(isa<IntegerType>(V->getType()) && "Not an integer value");
   
   if (BinaryOperator *BOp = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(V)) {
     if (ConstantInt *RHSC = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(BOp->getOperand(1))) {
       switch (BOp->getOpcode()) {
       default: break;
+      case Instruction::Or:
+        // X|C == X+C if all the bits in C are unset in X.  Otherwise we can't
+        // analyze it.
+        if (!MaskedValueIsZero(BOp->getOperand(0), RHSC->getValue(), TD))
+          break;
+        // FALL THROUGH.
       case Instruction::Add:
-        V = GetLinearExpression(BOp->getOperand(0), Scale, Offset);
+        V = GetLinearExpression(BOp->getOperand(0), Scale, Offset, TD);
         Offset += RHSC->getValue();
         return V;
       // TODO: SHL, MUL, OR.
@@ -482,7 +490,7 @@ static const Value *DecomposeGEPExpression(const Value *V, int64_t &BaseOffs,
       
       unsigned Width = cast<IntegerType>(Index->getType())->getBitWidth();
       APInt IndexScale(Width, 0), IndexOffset(Width, 0);
-      Index = GetLinearExpression(Index, IndexScale, IndexOffset);
+      Index = GetLinearExpression(Index, IndexScale, IndexOffset, TD);
       
       Scale *= IndexScale.getZExtValue();
       BaseOffs += IndexOffset.getZExtValue()*Scale;

lib/Target/README.txt

@@ -443,23 +443,6 @@ entry:
 
 //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 
-"basicaa" should know how to look through "or" instructions that act like add
-instructions.  For example in this code, the x*4+1 is turned into x*4 | 1, and
-basicaa can't analyze the array subscript, leading to duplicated loads in the
-generated code:
-
-void test(int X, int Y, int a[]) {
-int i;
-  for (i=2; i<1000; i+=4) {
-  a[i+0] = a[i-1+0]*a[i-2+0];
-  a[i+1] = a[i-1+1]*a[i-2+1];
-  a[i+2] = a[i-1+2]*a[i-2+2];
-  a[i+3] = a[i-1+3]*a[i-2+3];
-  }
-}
-
-//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
 We should investigate an instruction sinking pass.  Consider this silly
 example in pic mode:
 

test/Analysis/BasicAA/gep-alias.ll

@@ -86,4 +86,18 @@ define i32 @test5(i32* %p, i64 %i) {
 ; CHECK: ret i32 0
 }
 
+; P[i] != p[(i*4)|1]
+define i32 @test6(i32* %p, i64 %i1) {
+  %i = shl i64 %i1, 2
+  %pi = getelementptr i32* %p, i64 %i
+  %i.next = or i64 %i, 1
+  %pi.next = getelementptr i32* %p, i64 %i.next
+  %x = load i32* %pi
+  store i32 42, i32* %pi.next
+  %y = load i32* %pi
+  %z = sub i32 %x, %y
+  ret i32 %z
+; CHECK: @test6
+; CHECK: ret i32 0
+}