Fix typo by changing Lower256IntVETCC to Lower256IntVSETCC.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@139993 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Craig Topper 2011-09-18 08:03:58 +00:00
parent 5778fef314
commit 89af15ee11

View File

@ -8414,9 +8414,9 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerSETCC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
DAG.getConstant(X86CC, MVT::i8), EFLAGS);
}
// Lower256IntVETCC - Break a VSETCC 256-bit integer VSETCC into two new 128
// Lower256IntVSETCC - Break a VSETCC 256-bit integer VSETCC into two new 128
// ones, and then concatenate the result back.
static SDValue Lower256IntVETCC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
static SDValue Lower256IntVSETCC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
EVT VT = Op.getValueType();
assert(VT.getSizeInBits() == 256 && Op.getOpcode() == ISD::SETCC &&
@ -8520,7 +8520,7 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerVSETCC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
// Break 256-bit integer vector compare into smaller ones.
if (!isFP && VT.getSizeInBits() == 256)
return Lower256IntVETCC(Op, DAG);
return Lower256IntVSETCC(Op, DAG);
// We are handling one of the integer comparisons here. Since SSE only has
// GT and EQ comparisons for integer, swapping operands and multiple