[docs] Slight reword for precision.

The new wording cannot be construed as suggesting the use of
SmallVectorImpl<T> as e.g. a class member (just because the class
happens to be in an interface).

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177778 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Sean Silva 2013-03-22 23:52:38 +00:00
parent 0059eb1e2e
commit 928ef439a5

View File

@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ SmallVector also provides a nice portable and efficient replacement for
.. note::
Prefer to use ``SmallVectorImpl<T>`` in interfaces.
Prefer to use ``SmallVectorImpl<T>`` as a parameter type.
In APIs that don't care about the "small size" (most?), prefer to use
the ``SmallVectorImpl<T>`` class, which is basically just the "vector