There's a missed optimization opportunity where we could look at the full chain of computation and take the intersection of the flags instead of only looking one instruction deep.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232134 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Instead, run both EH preparation passes, and have them both ignore
functions with unrecognized EH personalities. Pass delegation involved
some hacky code for creating an AnalysisResolver that we don't need now.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231995 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adds limited support in ValueTracking for inferring known bits of a value from conditional expressions which must be true to reach the instruction we're trying to optimize. At this time, the feature is off by default. Once landed, I'm hoping for feedback from others on both profitability and compile time impact.
Forms of conditional value propagation have been tried in LLVM before and have failed due to compile time problems. In an attempt to side step that, this patch only considers conditions where the edge leaving the branch dominates the context instruction. It does not attempt full dataflow. Even with that restriction, it handles many interesting cases:
* Early exits from functions
* Early exits from loops (for context instructions in the loop and after the check)
* Conditions which control entry into loops, including multi-version loops (such as those produced during vectorization, IRCE, loop unswitch, etc..)
Possible applications include optimizing using information provided by constructs such as: preconditions, assumptions, null checks, & range checks.
This patch implements two approaches to the problem that need further benchmarking. Approach 1 is to directly walk the dominator tree looking for interesting conditions. Approach 2 is to inspect other uses of the value being queried for interesting comparisons. From initial benchmarking, it appears that Approach 2 is faster than Approach 1, but this needs to be further validated.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7708
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231879 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The debug message was pretty confusing here. It only reported the
situation with memchecks without the result of the dependence analysis.
Now it prints whether the loop is safe from the POV of the dependence
analysis and if yes, whether we need memchecks.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231854 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the final patch that actually introduces the new parameter of
partition mapping to RuntimePointerCheck::needsChecking.
Another API (LAI::getInstructionsForAccess) is also exposed that helps
to map pointers to instructions because ultimately we partition
instructions.
The WIP version of the Loop Distribution pass in D6930 has been adapted
to use all this. See for example, how
InstrPartitionContainer::computePartitionSetForPointers sets up the
partitions using the above API and then calls to LAI::addRuntimeCheck
with the pointer partitions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231818 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Now the analysis won't "fail" if the memchecks exceed the threshold. It
is the transform pass' responsibility to perform the check.
This allows the transform pass to further analyze/eliminate the
memchecks. E.g. in Loop distribution we only need to check pointers
that end up in different partitions.
Note that there is a slight change of functionality here. The logic in
analyzeLoop is that if dependence checking fails due to non-constant
distance between the pointers, another attempt is made to prove safety
of the dependences purely using run-time checks.
Before this patch we could fail the loop due to exceeding the memcheck
threshold after the first step, now we only check the threshold in the
client after the full analysis. There is no measurable compile-time
effect but I wanted to record this here.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231817 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The check for the number of memchecks will be moved to the client of
this analysis. Besides allowing for transform-specific thresholds, this
also lets Loop Distribution post-process the memchecks; Loop
Distribution only needs memchecks between pointers of different
partitions.
The motivation for this first patch is to untangle the CanDoRT check
from the NumComparison check before moving the NumComparison part.
CanDoRT means that we couldn't determine the bounds for the pointer.
Note that NumComparison is set independent of this flag.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231816 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The dependences are now expose through the new getInterestingDependences
API so we can use that with -analyze too and fix the FIXME.
This lets us remove the test that relied on -debug to check the
dependences.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231807 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Gather an array of interesting dependences rather than just failing
after the first unsafe one and regarding the loop unsafe. Loop
Distribution needs to be able to collect all dependences in order to
isolate the dependence cycles into their own partition.
Since the dependence checking algorithm is quadratic in terms of
accesses sharing the same underlying pointer, I am applying a cut-off
threshold (MaxInterestingDependence). Exceeding that, the logic reverts
back to the original approach deeming the loop unsafe upon encountering
the first unsafe dependence.
The main idea of the patch is to split isDepedent from directly
answering the question whether the dep is safe for vectorization to
return a dependence type which then gets mapped to old boolean result
using Dependence::isSafeForVectorization.
Tested that this was compile-time neutral on SpecINT2006 LTO bitcode
inputs. No assembly change on the testsuite including external.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231806 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
LoopDistribution needs to query various results of the dependence
analysis. This series will expose some more APIs and state of the
dependence checker.
This patch is a simple one to just expose the DepChecker instance. The
set is compile-time neutral measured with LTO bitcode files of
SpecINT2006. Also there is no assembly change on the testsuite.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231805 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This crash occurs due to memory corruption when trying to update dependency
direction based on Constraints.
This crash was observed during lnt regression of Polybench benchmark test case dynprog.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8059
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231788 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This crash in Dependency analysis is because we assume here that in case of UsefulGEP
both source and destination have the same number of operands which may not be true.
This incorrect assumption results in crash while populating Pairs. Fix the same.
This crash was observed during lnt regression for code such as-
struct s{
int A[10][10];
int C[10][10][10];
} S;
void dep_constraint_crash_test(int k,int N) {
for( int i=0;i<N;i++)
for( int j=0;j<N;j++)
S.A[0][0] = S.C[0][0][k];
}
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8162
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231784 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
CFLAA didn't know how to properly handle ConstantExprs; it would silently
ignore them. This was a problem if the ConstantExpr is, say, a GEP of a global,
because CFLAA wouldn't realize that there's a global there. :)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231743 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We now treat pointers given to ptrtoint and pointers retrieved from
inttoptr as similar to arguments or globals (can alias anything, etc.)
This solves some of the problems we were having with giving incorrect
results.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231741 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Now that the DataLayout is a mandatory part of the module, let's start
cleaning the codebase. This patch is a first attempt at doing that.
This patch is not exactly NFC as for instance some places were passing
a nullptr instead of the DataLayout, possibly just because there was a
default value on the DataLayout argument to many functions in the API.
Even though it is not purely NFC, there is no change in the
validation.
I turned as many pointer to DataLayout to references, this helped
figuring out all the places where a nullptr could come up.
I had initially a local version of this patch broken into over 30
independant, commits but some later commit were cleaning the API and
touching part of the code modified in the previous commits, so it
seemed cleaner without the intermediate state.
Test Plan:
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231740 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This removes some duplicated code, and also helps optimization: e.g. in
the test case added, `%idx ULT 128` in `@x` is not currently optimized
to `true` by `-indvars` but will be, after this change.
The only functional change in ths commit is that for add recurrences,
ScalarEvolution::getRange will be more aggressive -- computing the
unsigned (resp. signed) range for a SCEVAddRecExpr will now look at the
NSW (resp. NUW) bits and check for signed (resp. unsigned) overflow.
This can be a strict improvement in some cases (such as the attached
test case), and should be no worse in other cases.
Reviewers: atrick, nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8142
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231709 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
See the two test cases.
; Can fold fcmp with undef on one side by choosing NaN for the undef
; Can fold fcmp with undef on both side
; fcmp u_pred undef, undef -> true
; fcmp o_pred undef, undef -> false
; because whatever you choose for the first undef
; you can choose NaN for the other undef
Reviewers: hfinkel, chandlerc, majnemer
Reviewed By: majnemer
Subscribers: majnemer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7617
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231626 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-debug-pass is not specified, as the string is only used when dumping pass
information. There is a big cost of determining the name in
ReginBase<Tr>:getNameStr() if the region's entry or exit block doesn't have a
name. This is the case for the Release build, as names are not preserved by the
front-end.
RegionPass is mainly used by Polly, resulting in long compile time for one file
of a customer application with the Release build (1m24s) vs Release+Asserts
build (10s) when Polly is used. With this change, the compile time with the
Release build went down to 8s.
Patch by Sanjin Sijaric <ssijaric@codeaurora.org>!
Phabricator: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8076
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231485 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Teach SCEV to prove no overflow for an add recurrence by proving
something about the range of another add recurrence a loop-invariant
distance away from it.
Reviewers: atrick, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7980
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231305 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
DataLayout keeps the string used for its creation.
As a side effect it is no longer needed in the Module.
This is "almost" NFC, the string is no longer
canonicalized, you can't rely on two "equals" DataLayout
having the same string returned by getStringRepresentation().
Get rid of DataLayoutPass: the DataLayout is in the Module
The DataLayout is "per-module", let's enforce this by not
duplicating it more than necessary.
One more step toward non-optionality of the DataLayout in the
module.
Make DataLayout Non-Optional in the Module
Module->getDataLayout() will never returns nullptr anymore.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: resistor, llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7992
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231270 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This makes it more obvious that the enum definition and the
"StandardName" array is in sync. Mechanically refactored w/ a
python script.
Test Plan: still compiles
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7845
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231172 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This does not conceptually belongs here. Instead provide a shortcut
getModule() that provides access to the DataLayout.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo
Reviewed By: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8027
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231147 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Accidentally committed a few more of these cleanup changes than
intended. Still breaking these out & tidying them up.
This reverts commit r231135.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231136 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There doesn't seem to be any need to assert that iterator assignment is
between iterators over the same node - if you want to reuse an iterator
variable to iterate another node, that's perfectly acceptable. Just
don't mix comparisons between iterators into disjoint sequences, as
usual.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231135 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Making this type a little harder to abuse (see workaround relating to
use of the implicit copy ctor in the prior commit)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231104 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Move the specialized metadata nodes for the new debug info hierarchy
into place, finishing off PR22464. I've done bootstraps (and all that)
and I'm confident this commit is NFC as far as DWARF output is
concerned. Let me know if I'm wrong :).
The code changes are fairly mechanical:
- Bumped the "Debug Info Version".
- `DIBuilder` now creates the appropriate subclass of `MDNode`.
- Subclasses of DIDescriptor now expect to hold their "MD"
counterparts (e.g., `DIBasicType` expects `MDBasicType`).
- Deleted a ton of dead code in `AsmWriter.cpp` and `DebugInfo.cpp`
for printing comments.
- Big update to LangRef to describe the nodes in the new hierarchy.
Feel free to make it better.
Testcase changes are enormous. There's an accompanying clang commit on
its way.
If you have out-of-tree debug info testcases, I just broke your build.
- `upgrade-specialized-nodes.sh` is attached to PR22564. I used it to
update all the IR testcases.
- Unfortunately I failed to find way to script the updates to CHECK
lines, so I updated all of these by hand. This was fairly painful,
since the old CHECKs are difficult to reason about. That's one of
the benefits of the new hierarchy.
This work isn't quite finished, BTW. The `DIDescriptor` subclasses are
almost empty wrappers, but not quite: they still have loose casting
checks (see the `RETURN_FROM_RAW()` macro). Once they're completely
gutted, I'll rename the "MD" classes to "DI" and kill the wrappers. I
also expect to make a few schema changes now that it's easier to reason
about everything.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231082 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This work is currently being rethought along different lines and
if this work is needed it can be resurrected out of svn. Remove it
for now as no current work in ongoing on it and it's unused. Verified
with the authors before removal.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230780 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It is not sound to mark the increment operation as `nuw` or `nsw`
based on a proof off of the add recurrence if the increment operation
we emit happens to be a `sub` instruction.
I could not come up with a test case for this -- the cases where
SCEVExpander decides to emit a `sub` instruction is quite small, and I
cannot think of a way I'd be able to get SCEV to prove that the
increment does not overflow in those cases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7899
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230673 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
