This update was done with the following bash script:
find test/Transforms -name "*.ll" | \
while read NAME; do
echo "$NAME"
if ! grep -q "^; *RUN: *llc" $NAME; then
TEMP=`mktemp -t temp`
cp $NAME $TEMP
sed -n "s/^define [^@]*@\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\)(.*$/\1/p" < $NAME | \
while read FUNC; do
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\):\( *\)@$FUNC\([( ]*\)\$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3@$FUNC(/g" $TEMP
done
mv $TEMP $NAME
fi
done
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186268 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We use constant folding to see if an intrinsic evaluates to the same value as a
constant that we know. If we don't take the undefinedness into account we get a
value that doesn't match the actual implementation, and miscompiled code.
This was uncovered by Chandler's simplifycfg changes.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173356 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is done to avoid odd test failures, like the one fixed in r171243.
My previous regex was not good enough to find these.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171343 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
unsigned foo(unsigned x) { return 31 - __builtin_clz(x); }
now compiles into a single "bsrl" instruction on x86.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147255 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I followed three heuristics for deciding whether to set 'true' or
'false':
- Everything target independent got 'true' as that is the expected
common output of the GCC builtins.
- If the target arch only has one way of implementing this operation,
set the flag in the way that exercises the most of codegen. For most
architectures this is also the likely path from a GCC builtin, with
'true' being set. It will (eventually) require lowering away that
difference, and then lowering to the architecture's operation.
- Otherwise, set the flag differently dependending on which target
operation should be tested.
Let me know if anyone has any issue with this pattern or would like
specific tests of another form. This should allow the x86 codegen to
just iteratively improve as I teach the backend how to differentiate
between the two forms, and everything else should remain exactly the
same.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@146370 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
of the instruction.
Note that this change affects the existing non-atomic load and store
instructions; the parser now accepts both forms, and the change is noted
in the release notes.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@137527 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It's better to do this in codegen, mul.with.overflow(X, 2) is more canonical because it has only one use on "X".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@131798 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This happens a lot in clang-compiled C++ code because it adds overflow checks to operator new[]:
unsigned *foo(unsigned n) { return new unsigned[n]; }
We can optimize away the overflow check on 64 bit targets because (uint64_t)n*4 cannot overflow.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@127418 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
