Commit Graph

70 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jingyue Wu
5733100450 Divergence analysis for GPU programs
Summary:
Some optimizations such as jump threading and loop unswitching can negatively
affect performance when applied to divergent branches. The divergence analysis
added in this patch conservatively estimates which branches in a GPU program
can diverge. This information can then help LLVM to run certain optimizations
selectively.

Test Plan: test/Analysis/DivergenceAnalysis/NVPTX/diverge.ll

Reviewers: resistor, hfinkel, eliben, meheff, jholewinski

Subscribers: broune, bjarke.roune, madhur13490, tstellarAMD, dberlin, echristo, jholewinski, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8576

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@234567 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-04-10 05:03:50 +00:00
Michael Zolotukhin
51b4d85c62 TTI: Add getCallInstrCost.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8094

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232524 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-03-17 19:26:23 +00:00
Olivier Sallenave
2f19fc85a4 Do not restrict interleaved unrolling to small loops, depending on the target.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231528 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-03-06 23:12:04 +00:00
Mehdi Amini
c94da20917 Make DataLayout Non-Optional in the Module
Summary:
DataLayout keeps the string used for its creation.

As a side effect it is no longer needed in the Module.
This is "almost" NFC, the string is no longer
canonicalized, you can't rely on two "equals" DataLayout
having the same string returned by getStringRepresentation().

Get rid of DataLayoutPass: the DataLayout is in the Module

The DataLayout is "per-module", let's enforce this by not
duplicating it more than necessary.
One more step toward non-optionality of the DataLayout in the
module.

Make DataLayout Non-Optional in the Module

Module->getDataLayout() will never returns nullptr anymore.

Reviewers: echristo

Subscribers: resistor, llvm-commits, jholewinski

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7992

From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231270 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-03-04 18:43:29 +00:00
Chad Rosier
6229219f7e Prevent hoisting fmul from THEN/ELSE to IF if there is fmsub/fmadd opportunity.
This patch adds the isProfitableToHoist API.  For AArch64, we want to prevent a
fmul from being hoisted in cases where it is more profitable to form a
fmsub/fmadd.

Phabricator Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7299
Patch by Lawrence Hu <lawrence@codeaurora.org>

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230241 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-02-23 19:15:16 +00:00
Cameron Esfahani
d02540a1d7 Value soft float calls as more expensive in the inliner.
Summary: When evaluating floating point instructions in the inliner, ask the TTI whether it is an expensive operation.  By default, it's not an expensive operation.  This keeps the default behavior the same as before.  The ARM TTI has been updated to return back TCC_Expensive for targets which don't have hardware floating point.

Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo

Reviewed By: echristo

Subscribers: t.p.northover, aemerson, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6936

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228263 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-02-05 02:09:33 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
26bc071088 [multiversion] Remove the function parameter from the unrolling
preferences interface on TTI now that all of TTI is per-function.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227741 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-02-01 14:31:23 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
276f405407 [multiversion] Implement the old pass manager's TTI wrapper pass in
terms of the new pass manager's TargetIRAnalysis.

Yep, this is one of the nicer bits of the new pass manager's design.
Passes can in many cases operate in a vacuum and so we can just nest
things when convenient. This is particularly convenient here as I can
now consolidate all of the TargetMachine logic on this analysis.

The most important change here is that this pushes the function we need
TTI for all the way into the TargetMachine, and re-creates the TTI
object for each function rather than re-using it for each function.
We're now prepared to teach the targets to produce function-specific TTI
objects with specific subtargets cached, etc.

One piece of feedback I'd love here is whether its worth renaming any of
this stuff. None of the names really seem that awesome to me at this
point, but TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass is particularly ... odd.
TargetIRAnalysisWrapper might make more sense. I would want to do that
rename separately anyways, but let me know what you think.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227731 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-02-01 12:26:09 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
7724e8efa2 [PM] Port TTI to the new pass manager, introducing a TargetIRAnalysis to
produce it.

This adds a function to the TargetMachine that produces this analysis
via a callback for each function. This in turn faves the way to produce
a *different* TTI per-function with the correct subtarget cached.

I've also done the necessary wiring in the opt tool to thread the target
machine down and make it available to the pass registry so that we can
construct this analysis from a target machine when available.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227721 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-02-01 10:11:22 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
1937233a22 [PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager
base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type
erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine.

This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI
*pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target
communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While
the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make
types available in a header file for use in a different source file
within each target.

I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line
with this move, but let me know if I missed anything.

With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass
manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces
a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine.
Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept
a function argument as well.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227685 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-31 11:17:59 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
a6a87b595d [PM] Change the core design of the TTI analysis to use a polymorphic
type erased interface and a single analysis pass rather than an
extremely complex analysis group.

The end result is that the TTI analysis can contain a type erased
implementation that supports the polymorphic TTI interface. We can build
one from a target-specific implementation or from a dummy one in the IR.

I've also factored all of the code into "mix-in"-able base classes,
including CRTP base classes to facilitate calling back up to the most
specialized form when delegating horizontally across the surface. These
aren't as clean as I would like and I'm planning to work on cleaning
some of this up, but I wanted to start by putting into the right form.

There are a number of reasons for this change, and this particular
design. The first and foremost reason is that an analysis group is
complete overkill, and the chaining delegation strategy was so opaque,
confusing, and high overhead that TTI was suffering greatly for it.
Several of the TTI functions had failed to be implemented in all places
because of the chaining-based delegation making there be no checking of
this. A few other functions were implemented with incorrect delegation.
The message to me was very clear working on this -- the delegation and
analysis group structure was too confusing to be useful here.

The other reason of course is that this is *much* more natural fit for
the new pass manager. This will lay the ground work for a type-erased
per-function info object that can look up the correct subtarget and even
cache it.

Yet another benefit is that this will significantly simplify the
interaction of the pass managers and the TargetMachine. See the future
work below.

The downside of this change is that it is very, very verbose. I'm going
to work to improve that, but it is somewhat an implementation necessity
in C++ to do type erasure. =/ I discussed this design really extensively
with Eric and Hal prior to going down this path, and afterward showed
them the result. No one was really thrilled with it, but there doesn't
seem to be a substantially better alternative. Using a base class and
virtual method dispatch would make the code much shorter, but as
discussed in the update to the programmer's manual and elsewhere,
a polymorphic interface feels like the more principled approach even if
this is perhaps the least compelling example of it. ;]

Ultimately, there is still a lot more to be done here, but this was the
huge chunk that I couldn't really split things out of because this was
the interface change to TTI. I've tried to minimize all the other parts
of this. The follow up work should include at least:

1) Improving the TargetMachine interface by having it directly return
   a TTI object. Because we have a non-pass object with value semantics
   and an internal type erasure mechanism, we can narrow the interface
   of the TargetMachine to *just* do what we need: build and return
   a TTI object that we can then insert into the pass pipeline.
2) Make the TTI object be fully specialized for a particular function.
   This will include splitting off a minimal form of it which is
   sufficient for the inliner and the old pass manager.
3) Add a new pass manager analysis which produces TTI objects from the
   target machine for each function. This may actually be done as part
   of #2 in order to use the new analysis to implement #2.
4) Work on narrowing the API between TTI and the targets so that it is
   easier to understand and less verbose to type erase.
5) Work on narrowing the API between TTI and its clients so that it is
   easier to understand and less verbose to forward.
6) Try to improve the CRTP-based delegation. I feel like this code is
   just a bit messy and exacerbating the complexity of implementing
   the TTI in each target.

Many thanks to Eric and Hal for their help here. I ended up blocked on
this somewhat more abruptly than I expected, and so I appreciate getting
it sorted out very quickly.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7293

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227669 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-31 03:43:40 +00:00
Chad Rosier
13faabb6c5 Commoning of target specific load/store intrinsics in Early CSE.
Phabricator revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7121
Patch by Sanjin Sijaric <ssijaric@codeaurora.org>!

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227149 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-26 22:51:15 +00:00
Elena Demikhovsky
70bae89669 Implemented cost model for masked load/store operations.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227035 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-25 08:44:46 +00:00
Ramkumar Ramachandra
230796b278 Intrinsics: introduce llvm_any_ty aka ValueType Any
Specifically, gc.result benefits from this greatly. Instead of:

gc.result.int.*
gc.result.float.*
gc.result.ptr.*
...

We now have a gc.result.* that can specialize to literally any type.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7020

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@226857 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-22 20:14:38 +00:00
Nick Lewycky
f411a8dd29 Remove empty statement. No functionality change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225420 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-08 00:47:03 +00:00
Elena Demikhovsky
1c3a1516f8 Loop Vectorizer minor changes in the code -
some comments, function names, identation.

Reviewed here: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6527


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224218 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-14 09:43:50 +00:00
Elena Demikhovsky
73ae1df82c Masked Load / Store Intrinsics - the CodeGen part.
I'm recommiting the codegen part of the patch.
The vectorizer part will be send to review again.

Masked Vector Load and Store Intrinsics.
Introduced new target-independent intrinsics in order to support masked vector loads and stores. The loop vectorizer optimizes loops containing conditional memory accesses by generating these intrinsics for existing targets AVX2 and AVX-512. The vectorizer asks the target about availability of masked vector loads and stores.
Added SDNodes for masked operations and lowering patterns for X86 code generator.
Examples:
<16 x i32> @llvm.masked.load.v16i32(i8* %addr, <16 x i32> %passthru, i32 4 /* align */, <16 x i1> %mask)
declare void @llvm.masked.store.v8f64(i8* %addr, <8 x double> %value, i32 4, <8 x i1> %mask)

Scalarizer for other targets (not AVX2/AVX-512) will be done in a separate patch.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D6191



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223348 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-04 09:40:44 +00:00
Philip Reames
204e21b51a [Statepoints 1/4] Statepoint infrastructure for garbage collection: IR Intrinsics
The statepoint intrinsics are intended to enable precise root tracking through the compiler as to support garbage collectors of all types. The addition of the statepoint intrinsics to LLVM should have no impact on the compilation of any program which does not contain them. There are no side tables created, no extra metadata, and no inhibited optimizations.

A statepoint works by transforming a call site (or safepoint poll site) into an explicit relocation operation. It is the frontend's responsibility (or eventually the safepoint insertion pass we've developed, but that's not part of this patch series) to ensure that any live pointer to a GC object is correctly added to the statepoint and explicitly relocated. The relocated value is just a normal SSA value (as seen by the optimizer), so merges of relocated and unrelocated values are just normal phis. The explicit relocation operation, the fact the statepoint is assumed to clobber all memory, and the optimizers standard semantics ensure that the relocations flow through IR optimizations correctly.

This is the first patch in a small series.  This patch contains only the IR parts; the documentation and backend support will be following separately.  The entire series can be seen as one combined whole in http://reviews.llvm.org/D5683.

Reviewed by: atrick, ributzka





git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223078 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-01 21:18:12 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
54786a0936 Revert "Masked Vector Load and Store Intrinsics."
This reverts commit r222632 (and follow-up r222636), which caused a host
of LNT failures on an internal bot.  I'll respond to the commit on the
list with a reproduction of one of the failures.

Conflicts:
	lib/Target/X86/X86TargetTransformInfo.cpp

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222936 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-28 21:29:14 +00:00
Elena Demikhovsky
ae1ae2c3a1 Masked Vector Load and Store Intrinsics.
Introduced new target-independent intrinsics in order to support masked vector loads and stores. The loop vectorizer optimizes loops containing conditional memory accesses by generating these intrinsics for existing targets AVX2 and AVX-512. The vectorizer asks the target about availability of masked vector loads and stores.
Added SDNodes for masked operations and lowering patterns for X86 code generator.
Examples:
<16 x i32> @llvm.masked.load.v16i32(i8* %addr, <16 x i32> %passthru, i32 4 /* align */, <16 x i1> %mask)
declare void @llvm.masked.store.v8f64(i8* %addr, <8 x double> %value, i32 4, <8 x i1> %mask)

Scalarizer for other targets (not AVX2/AVX-512) will be done in a separate patch.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D6191



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222632 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-23 08:07:43 +00:00
Matt Arsenault
252134602f Add minnum / maxnum intrinsics
These are named following the IEEE-754 names for these
functions, rather than the libm fmin / fmax to avoid
possible ambiguities. Some languages may implement something
resembling fmin / fmax which return NaN if either operand is
to propagate errors. These implement the IEEE-754 semantics
of returning the other operand if either is a NaN representing
missing data.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@220341 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-21 23:00:20 +00:00
David Peixotto
ea468dddfe Ignore annotation function calls in cost computation
The annotation instructions are dropped during codegen and have no
impact on size.  In some cases, the annotations were preventing the
unroller from unrolling a loop because the annotation calls were
pushing the cost over the unrolling threshold.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5335



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218525 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-09-26 17:48:40 +00:00
Eric Christopher
757c90dd00 Add a new pass FunctionTargetTransformInfo. This pass serves as a
shim between the TargetTransformInfo immutable pass and the Subtarget
via the TargetMachine and Function. Migrate a single call from
BasicTargetTransformInfo as an example and provide shims where TargetMachine
begins taking a Function to determine the subtarget.

No functional change.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218004 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-09-18 00:34:14 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
87c977a52b Rename getMaximumUnrollFactor -> getMaxInterleaveFactor; also rename option names controlling this variable.
"Unroll" is not the appropriate name for this variable. Clang already uses 
the term "interleave" in pragmas and metadata for this.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5066



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217528 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-09-10 17:58:16 +00:00
Craig Topper
3af13568fb Remove 'virtual' keyword from methods markedwith 'override' keyword.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216823 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-08-30 16:48:34 +00:00
Karthik Bhat
e637d65af3 Allow vectorization of division by uniform power of 2.
This patch adds support to recognize division by uniform power of 2 and modifies the cost table to vectorize division by uniform power of 2 whenever possible.
Updates Cost model for Loop and SLP Vectorizer.The cost table is currently only updated for X86 backend.
Thanks to Hal, Andrea, Sanjay for the review. (http://reviews.llvm.org/D4971)



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216371 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-08-25 04:56:54 +00:00
James Molloy
72035e9a8e Teach the SLP Vectorizer that keeping some values live over a callsite can have a cost.
Some types, such as 128-bit vector types on AArch64, don't have any callee-saved registers. So if a value needs to stay live over a callsite, it must be spilled and refilled. This cost is now taken into account.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214859 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-08-05 12:30:34 +00:00
Hal Finkel
8ef7b17dfc Add @llvm.assume, lowering, and some basic properties
This is the first commit in a series that add an @llvm.assume intrinsic which
can be used to provide the optimizer with a condition it may assume to be true
(when the control flow would hit the intrinsic call). Some basic properties are added here:

 - llvm.invariant(true) is dead.
 - llvm.invariant(false) is unreachable (this directly corresponds to the
   documented behavior of MSVC's __assume(0)), so is llvm.invariant(undef).

The intrinsic is tagged as writing arbitrarily, in order to maintain control
dependencies. BasicAA has been updated, however, to return NoModRef for any
particular location-based query so that we don't unnecessarily block code
motion.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213973 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-07-25 21:13:35 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
4da253756d [Modules] Fix potential ODR violations by sinking the DEBUG_TYPE
definition below all the header #include lines, lib/Analysis/...
edition.

This one has a bit extra as there were *other* #define's before #include
lines in addition to DEBUG_TYPE. I've sunk all of them as a block.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206843 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-04-22 02:48:03 +00:00
Craig Topper
570e52c6f1 [C++11] More 'nullptr' conversion. In some cases just using a boolean check instead of comparing to nullptr.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206243 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-04-15 04:59:12 +00:00
Hal Finkel
a7a02cb737 Use TopTTI->getGEPCost from within getUserCost
The implementation of getUserCost had duplicated (and hard-coded) the default
logic in getGEPCost. Instead, it is better to use getGEPCost directly, which
limits the default logic to the implementation of one function, and allows
targets to override the behavior.

No functionality change intended.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@205346 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-04-01 18:50:06 +00:00
Juergen Ributzka
d3cf783ed1 [Constant Hoisting] Make the constant materialization cost operand dependent
Extend the target hook to take also the operand index into account when
calculating the cost of the constant materialization.

Related to <rdar://problem/16381500>

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204435 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-21 06:04:45 +00:00
Juergen Ributzka
ee3242ed0b Revert "[Constant Hoisting] Extend coverage of the constant hoisting pass."
I will break this up into smaller pieces for review and recommit.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204393 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-20 20:17:13 +00:00
Juergen Ributzka
228c72a841 [Constant Hoisting] Extend coverage of the constant hoisting pass.
This commit extends the coverage of the constant hoisting pass, adds additonal
debug output and updates the function names according to the style guide.

Related to <rdar://problem/16381500>

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204389 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-20 19:55:52 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
436906ab3c [TTI] There is actually no realistic way to pop TTI implementations off
the stack of the analysis group because they are all immutable passes.
This is made clear by Craig's recent work to use override
systematically -- we weren't overriding anything for 'finalizePass'
because there is no such thing.

This is kind of a lame restriction on the API -- we can no longer push
and pop things, we just set up the stack and run. However, I'm not
invested in building some better solution on top of the existing
(terrifying) immutable pass and legacy pass manager.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203437 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-10 02:45:14 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
4bbfbdf7d7 [Modules] Move CallSite into the IR library where it belogs. It is
abstracting between a CallInst and an InvokeInst, both of which are IR
concepts.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202816 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-04 11:01:28 +00:00
Craig Topper
629b96cb4f Switch all uses of LLVM_OVERRIDE to just use 'override' directly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202621 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-02 09:09:27 +00:00
Craig Topper
4eb03f049e Switch all uses of LLVM_FINAL to just use 'final', and remove the macro.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202618 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-02 08:08:51 +00:00
Rafael Espindola
57edc9d4ff Make DataLayout a plain object, not a pass.
Instead, have a DataLayoutPass that holds one. This will allow parts of LLVM
don't don't handle passes to also use DataLayout.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202168 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-02-25 17:30:31 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer
299918ad48 Make succ_iterator a real random access iterator and clean up a couple of users.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@201088 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-02-10 14:17:42 +00:00
Juergen Ributzka
943ce55f39 Revert "Revert "Add Constant Hoisting Pass" (r200034)"
This reverts commit r200058 and adds the using directive for
ARMTargetTransformInfo to silence two g++ overload warnings.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200062 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-01-25 02:02:55 +00:00
Hans Wennborg
503793e834 Revert "Add Constant Hoisting Pass" (r200034)
This commit caused -Woverloaded-virtual warnings. The two new
TargetTransformInfo::getIntImmCost functions were only added to the superclass,
and to the X86 subclass. The other targets were not updated, and the
warning highlighted this by pointing out that e.g. ARMTTI::getIntImmCost was
hiding the two new getIntImmCost variants.

We could pacify the warning by adding "using TargetTransformInfo::getIntImmCost"
to the various subclasses, or turning it off, but I suspect that it's wrong to
leave the functions unimplemnted in those targets. The default implementations
return TCC_Free, which I don't think is right e.g. for ARM.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200058 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-01-25 01:18:18 +00:00
Juergen Ributzka
96172cb4a4 Add Constant Hoisting Pass
Retry commit r200022 with a fix for the build bot errors. Constant expressions
have (unlike instructions) module scope use lists and therefore may have users
in different functions. The fix is to simply ignore these out-of-function uses.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200034 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-01-24 20:18:00 +00:00
Juergen Ributzka
dc6f9b9a4f Revert "Add Constant Hoisting Pass"
This reverts commit r200022 to unbreak the build bots.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200024 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-01-24 18:40:30 +00:00
Juergen Ributzka
fb282c68b7 Add Constant Hoisting Pass
This pass identifies expensive constants to hoist and coalesces them to
better prepare it for SelectionDAG-based code generation. This works around the
limitations of the basic-block-at-a-time approach.

First it scans all instructions for integer constants and calculates its
cost. If the constant can be folded into the instruction (the cost is
TCC_Free) or the cost is just a simple operation (TCC_BASIC), then we don't
consider it expensive and leave it alone. This is the default behavior and
the default implementation of getIntImmCost will always return TCC_Free.

If the cost is more than TCC_BASIC, then the integer constant can't be folded
into the instruction and it might be beneficial to hoist the constant.
Similar constants are coalesced to reduce register pressure and
materialization code.

When a constant is hoisted, it is also hidden behind a bitcast to force it to
be live-out of the basic block. Otherwise the constant would be just
duplicated and each basic block would have its own copy in the SelectionDAG.
The SelectionDAG recognizes such constants as opaque and doesn't perform
certain transformations on them, which would create a new expensive constant.

This optimization is only applied to integer constants in instructions and
simple (this means not nested) constant cast experessions. For example:
%0 = load i64* inttoptr (i64 big_constant to i64*)

Reviewed by Eric

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200022 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-01-24 18:23:08 +00:00
Juergen Ributzka
8346f147ab Add final and owerride keywords to TargetTransformInfo's subclasses.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200021 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-01-24 18:22:59 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
974a445bd9 Re-sort all of the includes with ./utils/sort_includes.py so that
subsequent changes are easier to review. About to fix some layering
issues, and wanted to separate out the necessary churn.

Also comment and sink the include of "Windows.h" in three .inc files to
match the usage in Memory.inc.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@198685 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-01-07 11:48:04 +00:00
Arnold Schwaighofer
65457b679a Costmodel: Add support for horizontal vector reductions
Upcoming SLP vectorization improvements will want to be able to estimate costs
of horizontal reductions. Add infrastructure to support this.

We model reductions as a series of (shufflevector,add) tuples ultimately
followed by an extractelement. For example, for an add-reduction of <4 x float>
we could generate the following sequence:

 (v0, v1, v2, v3)
   \   \  /  /
     \  \  /
       +  +

 (v0+v2, v1+v3, undef, undef)
    \      /
 ((v0+v2) + (v1+v3), undef, undef)

 %rdx.shuf = shufflevector <4 x float> %rdx, <4 x float> undef,
                           <4 x i32> <i32 2, i32 3, i32 undef, i32 undef>
 %bin.rdx = fadd <4 x float> %rdx, %rdx.shuf
 %rdx.shuf7 = shufflevector <4 x float> %bin.rdx, <4 x float> undef,
                          <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 undef>
 %bin.rdx8 = fadd <4 x float> %bin.rdx, %rdx.shuf7
 %r = extractelement <4 x float> %bin.rdx8, i32 0

This commit adds a cost model interface "getReductionCost(Opcode, Ty, Pairwise)"
that will allow clients to ask for the cost of such a reduction (as backends
might generate more efficient code than the cost of the individual instructions
summed up). This interface is excercised by the CostModel analysis pass which
looks for reduction patterns like the one above - starting at extractelements -
and if it sees a matching sequence will call the cost model interface.

We will also support a second form of pairwise reduction that is well supported
on common architectures (haddps, vpadd, faddp).

 (v0, v1, v2, v3)
  \   /    \  /
 (v0+v1, v2+v3, undef, undef)
    \     /
 ((v0+v1)+(v2+v3), undef, undef, undef)

  %rdx.shuf.0.0 = shufflevector <4 x float> %rdx, <4 x float> undef,
        <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 2 , i32 undef, i32 undef>
  %rdx.shuf.0.1 = shufflevector <4 x float> %rdx, <4 x float> undef,
        <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 3, i32 undef, i32 undef>
  %bin.rdx.0 = fadd <4 x float> %rdx.shuf.0.0, %rdx.shuf.0.1
  %rdx.shuf.1.0 = shufflevector <4 x float> %bin.rdx.0, <4 x float> undef,
        <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 undef>
  %rdx.shuf.1.1 = shufflevector <4 x float> %bin.rdx.0, <4 x float> undef,
        <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 undef>
  %bin.rdx.1 = fadd <4 x float> %rdx.shuf.1.0, %rdx.shuf.1.1
  %r = extractelement <4 x float> %bin.rdx.1, i32 0

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190876 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-09-17 18:06:50 +00:00
Hal Finkel
4f7e2c38e8 Add getUnrollingPreferences to TTI
Allow targets to customize the default behavior of the generic loop unrolling
transformation. This will be used by the PowerPC backend when targeting the A2
core (which is in-order with a deep pipeline), and using more aggressive
defaults is important.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190542 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-09-11 19:25:43 +00:00
Hal Finkel
f208398528 Revert: r189565 - Add getUnrollingPreferences to TTI
Revert unintentional commit (of an unreviewed change).

Original commit message:

Add getUnrollingPreferences to TTI

Allow targets to customize the default behavior of the generic loop unrolling
transformation. This will be used by the PowerPC backend when targeting the A2
core (which is in-order with a deep pipeline), and using more aggressive
defaults is important.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@189566 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-08-29 03:33:15 +00:00