hook for each way in which a result type can be
legalized (promotion, expansion, softening etc),
just use one: ReplaceNodeResults, which returns
a node with exactly the same result types as the
node passed to it, but presumably with a bunch of
custom code behind the scenes. No change if the
new LegalizeTypes infrastructure is not turned on.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@53137 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
moves in order to get correct debug info. Since
I can't imagine how any target could possibly
be any different, I've just stripped out the
option: now all the world's like Darwin!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@53134 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Also, if LV isn't around, then TwoAddr doesn't need to be updating flags, since they won't have been set in the first place.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@53058 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- Use a more accurate heuristic for the size of the hashtable.
- Use bitwise and instead of modulo since the size is a power of two.
- Use new[] instead of malloc().
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@52951 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the need for a flavor operand, and add a new SDNode subclass,
LabelSDNode, for use with them to eliminate the need for a label id
operand.
Change instruction selection to let these label nodes through
unmodified instead of creating copies of them. Teach the MachineInstr
emitter how to emit a MachineInstr directly from an ISD label node.
This avoids the need for allocating SDNodes for the label id and
flavor value, as well as SDNodes for each of the post-isel label,
label id, and label flavor.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@52943 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
SmallVectors. Change the signature of TargetLowering::LowerArguments
to avoid returning a vector by value, and update the two targets
which still use this directly, Sparc and IA64, accordingly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@52917 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
<16 x float> is 64-byte aligned (for some reason),
which gets us into the stack realignment code. The
computation changing FP-relative offsets to SP-relative
was broken, assiging a spill temp to a location
also used for parameter passing. This
fixes it by rounding up the stack frame to a multiple
of the largest alignment (I concluded it wasn't fixable
without doing this, but I'm not very sure.)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@52750 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
InvalidateInstructionCache method instead of calling through
a hook on the JIT. This is a host feature, not a target feature.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@52734 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
wrong for volatile loads and stores. In fact this
is almost all of them! There are three types of
problems: (1) it is wrong to change the width of
a volatile memory access. These may be used to
do memory mapped i/o, in which case a load can have
an effect even if the result is not used. Consider
loading an i32 but only using the lower 8 bits. It
is wrong to change this into a load of an i8, because
you are no longer tickling the other three bytes. It
is also unwise to make a load/store wider. For
example, changing an i16 load into an i32 load is
wrong no matter how aligned things are, since the
fact of loading an additional 2 bytes can have
i/o side-effects. (2) it is wrong to change the
number of volatile load/stores: they may be counted
by the hardware. (3) it is wrong to change a volatile
load/store that requires one memory access into one
that requires several. For example on x86-32, you
can store a double in one processor operation, but to
store an i64 requires two (two i32 stores). In a
multi-threaded program you may want to bitcast an i64
to a double and store as a double because that will
occur atomically, and be indivisible to other threads.
So it would be wrong to convert the store-of-double
into a store of an i64, because this will become two
i32 stores - no longer atomic. My policy here is
to say that the number of processor operations for
an illegal operation is undefined. So it is alright
to change a store of an i64 (requires at least two
stores; but could be validly lowered to memcpy for
example) into a store of double (one processor op).
In short, if the new store is legal and has the same
size then I say that the transform is ok. It would
also be possible to say that transforms are always
ok if before they were illegal, whether after they
are illegal or not, but that's more awkward to do
and I doubt it buys us anything much.
However this exposed an interesting thing - on x86-32
a store of i64 is considered legal! That is because
operations are marked legal by default, regardless of
whether the type is legal or not. In some ways this
is clever: before type legalization this means that
operations on illegal types are considered legal;
after type legalization there are no illegal types
so now operations are only legal if they really are.
But I consider this to be too cunning for mere mortals.
Better to do things explicitly by testing AfterLegalize.
So I have changed things so that operations with illegal
types are considered illegal - indeed they can never
map to a machine operation. However this means that
the DAG combiner is more conservative because before
it was "accidentally" performing transforms where the
type was illegal because the operation was nonetheless
marked legal. So in a few such places I added a check
on AfterLegalize, which I suppose was actually just
forgotten before. This causes the DAG combiner to do
slightly more than it used to, which resulted in the X86
backend blowing up because it got a slightly surprising
node it wasn't expecting, so I tweaked it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@52254 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
of apint codegen failure is the DAG combiner doing
the wrong thing because it was comparing MVT's using
< rather than comparing the number of bits. Removing
the < method makes this mistake impossible to commit.
Instead, add helper methods for comparing bits and use
them.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@52098 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and better control the abstraction. Rename the type
to MVT. To update out-of-tree patches, the main
thing to do is to rename MVT::ValueType to MVT, and
rewrite expressions like MVT::getSizeInBits(VT) in
the form VT.getSizeInBits(). Use VT.getSimpleVT()
to extract a MVT::SimpleValueType for use in switch
statements (you will get an assert failure if VT is
an extended value type - these shouldn't exist after
type legalization).
This results in a small speedup of codegen and no
new testsuite failures (x86-64 linux).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@52044 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
instruction to execute. This can be used for transformations (like two-address
conversion) to remat an instruction instead of generating a "move"
instruction. The idea is to decrease the live ranges and register pressure and
all that jazz.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51660 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
