Yes, there are other types than i8* and GEPs on them can produce an add+multiply.
We don't consider that cheap enough to be speculatively executed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@126481 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
itself without going via a phi node then we could return false here in
spite of making a change. Also, tweak the comment because this method
can (and always could) return true without deleting the original phi node.
For example, if the phi node was used by a read-only invoke instruction
which is used by another phi node phi2 which is only used by and only uses
the invoke, then phi2 would be deleted but not the invoke instruction and
not the original phi node.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@126129 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
should be that if the phi is used by a side-effect free instruction with
no uses then the phi and the instruction now get zapped (checked by the
unittest).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@126124 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
test for that. With this change, test/CodeGen/X86/codegen-dce.ll no longer finds
any instructions to DCE, so delete the test.
Also renamed J and JP to I and IP in RecursivelyDeleteDeadPHINode.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@126088 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is part of a futile attempt to not "break" bizzaro
code like this:
l1:
printf("l1: %p\n", &&l1);
++x;
if( x < 3 ) goto l1;
Previously we'd fold &&l1 to 1, which is fine per our semantics
but not helpful to the user.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@125827 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This makes the job of the later optzn passes easier, allowing the vast amount of
icmp transforms to chew on it.
We transform 840 switches in gcc.c, leading to a 16k byte shrink of the resulting
binary on i386-linux.
The testcase from README.txt now compiles into
decl %edi
cmpl $3, %edi
sbbl %eax, %eax
andl $1, %eax
ret
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@124724 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
function. This seems to be about a 1.5% speedup of -scalarrepl on test-suite
with SPEC2000 and SPEC2006.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123731 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
checks enabled:
1) Use '<' to compare integers in a comparison function rather than '<='.
2) Use the uniqued set DefBlocks rather than Info.DefiningBlocks to initialize
the priority queue.
The speedup of scalarrepl on test-suite + SPEC2000 + SPEC2006 is a bit less, at
just under 16% rather than 17%.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123662 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
eliminating a potentially quadratic data structure, this also gives a 17%
speedup when running -scalarrepl on test-suite + SPEC2000 + SPEC2006. My initial
experiment gave a greater speedup around 25%, but I moved the dominator tree
level computation from dominator tree construction to PromoteMemToReg.
Since this approach to computing IDFs has a much lower overhead than the old
code using precomputed DFs, it is worth looking at using this new code for the
second scalarrepl pass as well.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123609 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
DT->changeImmediateDominator() trivially ignores identity updates, so there is
really no need for the uniqueing provided by SmallPtrSet.
I expect this to fix PR8954.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123286 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
phi nodes. It is called from MergeBlockIntoPredecessor which is
called from GVN, which claims to preserve these.
I'm skeptical that this is the actual problem behind PR8954, but
this is a stab in the right direction.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123222 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
they all ready do). This removes two dominator recomputations prior to isel,
which is a 1% improvement in total llc time for 403.gcc.
The only potentially suspect thing is making GCStrategy recompute dominators if
it used a custom lowering strategy.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123064 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
1. Take a flags argument instead of a bool. This makes
it more clear to the reader what it is used for.
2. Add a flag that says that "remapping a value not in the
map is ok".
3. Reimplement MapValue to share a bunch of code and be a lot
more efficient. For lookup failures, don't drop null values
into the map.
4. Using the new flag a bunch of code can vaporize in LinkModules
and LoopUnswitch, kill it.
No functionality change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123058 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
in the PR, the pass could break LCSSA form when inserting preheaders. It probably
would be easy enough to fix this, but since currently we always go into LCSSA form
after running this pass, doing so is not urgent.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122695 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
