Given that large parts of inst combine is restricted to instructions which have one use, getting rid of a use on the condition can help the effectiveness of the optimizer. Also, it allows the condition to potentially be deleted by instcombine rather than waiting for another pass.
I noticed this completely by accident in another test case. It's not anything that actually came from a real workload.
p.s. We should probably do the same thing for switch instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8220
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231881 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adds limited support in ValueTracking for inferring known bits of a value from conditional expressions which must be true to reach the instruction we're trying to optimize. At this time, the feature is off by default. Once landed, I'm hoping for feedback from others on both profitability and compile time impact.
Forms of conditional value propagation have been tried in LLVM before and have failed due to compile time problems. In an attempt to side step that, this patch only considers conditions where the edge leaving the branch dominates the context instruction. It does not attempt full dataflow. Even with that restriction, it handles many interesting cases:
* Early exits from functions
* Early exits from loops (for context instructions in the loop and after the check)
* Conditions which control entry into loops, including multi-version loops (such as those produced during vectorization, IRCE, loop unswitch, etc..)
Possible applications include optimizing using information provided by constructs such as: preconditions, assumptions, null checks, & range checks.
This patch implements two approaches to the problem that need further benchmarking. Approach 1 is to directly walk the dominator tree looking for interesting conditions. Approach 2 is to inspect other uses of the value being queried for interesting comparisons. From initial benchmarking, it appears that Approach 2 is faster than Approach 1, but this needs to be further validated.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7708
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231879 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
ReplaceInstUsesWith needs to return nullptr when the input has no users,
because in that case it does not mutate the program. Otherwise, we can
get stuck in an infinite loop of repeatedly attempting to constant fold
and instruction with no users.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231755 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For inner one of nested loops, it is more likely to be a hot loop,
and the runtime check can be promoted out from patch 0001, so the
overhead is less, we can try a doubled threshold to unroll more loops.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231632 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Runtime unrolling is an expensive optimization which can bring benefit
only if the loop is hot and iteration number is relatively large enough.
For some loops, we know they are not worth to be runtime unrolled.
The scalar loop from vectorization is one of the cases.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231631 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Runtime unrollng will introduce a runtime check in loop prologue.
If the unrolled loop is a inner loop, then the proglogue will be inside
the outer loop. LICM pass can help to promote the runtime check out if
the checked value is loop invariant.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231630 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
See the two test cases.
; Can fold fcmp with undef on one side by choosing NaN for the undef
; Can fold fcmp with undef on both side
; fcmp u_pred undef, undef -> true
; fcmp o_pred undef, undef -> false
; because whatever you choose for the first undef
; you can choose NaN for the other undef
Reviewers: hfinkel, chandlerc, majnemer
Reviewed By: majnemer
Subscribers: majnemer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7617
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231626 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This pass interchanges loops to provide a more cache-friendly memory access.
For e.g. given a loop like -
for(int i=0;i<N;i++)
for(int j=0;j<N;j++)
A[j][i] = A[j][i]+B[j][i];
is interchanged to -
for(int j=0;j<N;j++)
for(int i=0;i<N;i++)
A[j][i] = A[j][i]+B[j][i];
This pass is currently disabled by default.
To give a brief introduction it consists of 3 stages-
LoopInterchangeLegality : Checks the legality of loop interchange based on Dependency matrix.
LoopInterchangeProfitability: A very basic heuristic has been added to check for profitibility. This will evolve over time.
LoopInterchangeTransform : Which does the actual transform.
LNT Performance tests shows improvement in Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/mvt and Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemver becnmarks.
TODO:
1) Add support for reductions and lcssa phi.
2) Improve profitability model.
3) Improve loop selection algorithm to select best loop for interchange. Currently the innermost loop is selected for interchange.
4) Improve compile time regression found in llvm lnt due to this pass.
5) Fix issues in Dependency Analysis module.
A special thanks to Hal for reviewing this code.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7499
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231458 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
At this point, we should have decent coverage of the involved code. I've got a few more test cases to cleanup and submit, but what's here is already reasonable.
I've got a collection of liveness tests which will be posted for review along with a decent liveness algorithm in the next few days. Once those are in, the code in this file should be well tested and I can start renaming things without risk of serious breakage.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231414 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
DataLayout keeps the string used for its creation.
As a side effect it is no longer needed in the Module.
This is "almost" NFC, the string is no longer
canonicalized, you can't rely on two "equals" DataLayout
having the same string returned by getStringRepresentation().
Get rid of DataLayoutPass: the DataLayout is in the Module
The DataLayout is "per-module", let's enforce this by not
duplicating it more than necessary.
One more step toward non-optionality of the DataLayout in the
module.
Make DataLayout Non-Optional in the Module
Module->getDataLayout() will never returns nullptr anymore.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: resistor, llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7992
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231270 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
RewriteStatepointsForGC pass emits an alloca for each GC pointer which will be relocated. It then inserts stores after def and all relocations, and inserts loads before each use as well. In the end, mem2reg is used to update IR with relocations in SSA form.
However, there is a problem with inserting stores for values defined by invoke instructions. The code didn't expect a def was a terminator instruction, and inserting instructions after these terminators resulted in malformed IR.
This patch fixes this problem by handling invoke instructions as a special case. If the def is an invoke instruction, the store will be inserted at the beginning of the normal destination block. Since return value from invoke instruction does not dominate the unwind destination block, no action is needed there.
Patch by: Chen Li
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7923
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231183 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Selection conditions may be vectors or scalars. Make sure InstCombine
doesn't indiscriminately assume that a select which is value dependent
on another select have identical select condition types.
This fixes PR22773.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231156 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Move the specialized metadata nodes for the new debug info hierarchy
into place, finishing off PR22464. I've done bootstraps (and all that)
and I'm confident this commit is NFC as far as DWARF output is
concerned. Let me know if I'm wrong :).
The code changes are fairly mechanical:
- Bumped the "Debug Info Version".
- `DIBuilder` now creates the appropriate subclass of `MDNode`.
- Subclasses of DIDescriptor now expect to hold their "MD"
counterparts (e.g., `DIBasicType` expects `MDBasicType`).
- Deleted a ton of dead code in `AsmWriter.cpp` and `DebugInfo.cpp`
for printing comments.
- Big update to LangRef to describe the nodes in the new hierarchy.
Feel free to make it better.
Testcase changes are enormous. There's an accompanying clang commit on
its way.
If you have out-of-tree debug info testcases, I just broke your build.
- `upgrade-specialized-nodes.sh` is attached to PR22564. I used it to
update all the IR testcases.
- Unfortunately I failed to find way to script the updates to CHECK
lines, so I updated all of these by hand. This was fairly painful,
since the old CHECKs are difficult to reason about. That's one of
the benefits of the new hierarchy.
This work isn't quite finished, BTW. The `DIDescriptor` subclasses are
almost empty wrappers, but not quite: they still have loose casting
checks (see the `RETURN_FROM_RAW()` macro). Once they're completely
gutted, I'll rename the "MD" classes to "DI" and kill the wrappers. I
also expect to make a few schema changes now that it's easier to reason
about everything.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231082 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
By loading from indexed offsets into a byte array and applying a mask, a
program can test bits from the bit set with a relatively short instruction
sequence. For example, suppose we have 15 bit sets to lay out:
A (16 bits), B (15 bits), C (14 bits), D (13 bits), E (12 bits),
F (11 bits), G (10 bits), H (9 bits), I (7 bits), J (6 bits), K (5 bits),
L (4 bits), M (3 bits), N (2 bits), O (1 bit)
These bits can be laid out in a 16-byte array like this:
Byte Offset
0123456789ABCDEF
Bit
7 HHHHHHHHHIIIIIII
6 GGGGGGGGGGJJJJJJ
5 FFFFFFFFFFFKKKKK
4 EEEEEEEEEEEELLLL
3 DDDDDDDDDDDDDMMM
2 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCNN
1 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBO
0 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
For example, to test bit X of A, we evaluate ((bits[X] & 1) != 0), or to
test bit X of I, we evaluate ((bits[9 + X] & 0x80) != 0). This can be done
in 1-2 machine instructions on x86, or 4-6 instructions on ARM.
This uses the LPT multiprocessor scheduling algorithm to lay out the bits
efficiently.
Saves ~450KB of instructions in a recent build of Chromium.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7954
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231043 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There's really no reason to have them have entries in the symbol table
anymore. Old versions of ld64 had some bugs in this area but those have
been fixed long ago.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231041 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This re-lands change r230921. r230921 was reverted because it broke a
clang test; a checkin fixing the clang test will be commited shortly.
Summary:
As far as I can tell, the real bug causing the issue was fixed in
r230533. SCEVExpander should mark an increment operation as nuw or nsw
only if it can *prove* that the operation does not overflow. There
shouldn't be any situation where we have to do something different
because of no-wrap flags generated by SCEVExpander.
Revert "IndVarSimplify: Allow LFTR to fire more often"
This reverts commit 1ade0f0faa (SVN: 222213).
Revert "IndVarSimplify: Don't let LFTR compare against a poison value"
This reverts commit c0f2b8b528 (SVN: 217102).
Reviewers: majnemer, atrick, spatel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7979
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231018 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
As far as I can tell, the real bug causing the issue was fixed in
r230533. SCEVExpander should mark an increment operation as nuw or nsw
only if it can *prove* that the operation does not overflow. There
shouldn't be any situation where we have to do something different
because of no-wrap flags generated by SCEVExpander.
Revert "IndVarSimplify: Allow LFTR to fire more often"
This reverts commit 1ade0f0faa (SVN: 222213).
Revert "IndVarSimplify: Don't let LFTR compare against a poison value"
This reverts commit c0f2b8b528 (SVN: 217102).
Reviewers: majnemer, atrick, spatel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7979
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230921 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
r228631 stopped using `DW_OP_piece` inside `DIExpression`s in the IR,
but it apparently missed updating these testcases. Caught by verifier
checks for `MDExpression` while working on moving the new hierarchy into
place.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230882 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Leaving empty blocks around just opens up a can of bugs like PR22704. Deleting
them early also slightly simplifies code.
Thanks to Sanjay for the IR test case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230856 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It turns out the naming of inserted phis and selects is sensative to the order in which two sets are iterated. We need to nail this down to avoid non-deterministic output and possible test failures.
The modified test is the one I first noticed something odd in. The change is making it more strict to report the error. With the test change, but without the code change, the test fails roughly 1 in 5. With the code change, I've run ~30 runs without error.
Long term, the right fix here is to adjust the naming scheme. I'm checking in this hack to avoid any possible non-determinism in the tests over the weekend. HJust because I only noticed one case doesn't mean it's actually the only case. I hope to get to the right change Monday.
std->llvm data structure changes bugfix change #3
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230835 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These tests cover the 'base object' identification and rewritting portion of RewriteStatepointsForGC. These aren't completely exhaustive, but they've proven to be reasonable effective over time at finding regressions.
In the process of porting these tests over, I found my first "cleanup per llvm code style standards" bug. We were relying on the order of iteration when testing the base pointers found for a derived pointer. When we switched from std::set to DenseSet, this stopped being a safe assumption. I'm suspecting I'm going to find more of those. In particular, I'm now really wondering about the main iteration loop for this algorithm. I need to go take a closer look at the assumptions there.
I'm not really happy with the fact these are testing what is essentially debug output (i.e. enabled via command line flags). Suggestions for how to structure this better are very welcome.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230818 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.
A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)
import fileinput
import sys
import re
pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")
for line in sys.stdin:
sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))
Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230794 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
One of several parallel first steps to remove the target type of pointers,
replacing them with a single opaque pointer type.
This adds an explicit type parameter to the gep instruction so that when the
first parameter becomes an opaque pointer type, the type to gep through is
still available to the instructions.
* This doesn't modify gep operators, only instructions (operators will be
handled separately)
* Textual IR changes only. Bitcode (including upgrade) and changing the
in-memory representation will be in separate changes.
* geps of vectors are transformed as:
getelementptr <4 x float*> %x, ...
->getelementptr float, <4 x float*> %x, ...
Then, once the opaque pointer type is introduced, this will ultimately look
like:
getelementptr float, <4 x ptr> %x
with the unambiguous interpretation that it is a vector of pointers to float.
* address spaces remain on the pointer, not the type:
getelementptr float addrspace(1)* %x
->getelementptr float, float addrspace(1)* %x
Then, eventually:
getelementptr float, ptr addrspace(1) %x
Importantly, the massive amount of test case churn has been automated by
same crappy python code. I had to manually update a few test cases that
wouldn't fit the script's model (r228970,r229196,r229197,r229198). The
python script just massages stdin and writes the result to stdout, I
then wrapped that in a shell script to handle replacing files, then
using the usual find+xargs to migrate all the files.
update.py:
import fileinput
import sys
import re
ibrep = re.compile(r"(^.*?[^%\w]getelementptr inbounds )(((?:<\d* x )?)(.*?)(| addrspace\(\d\)) *\*(|>)(?:$| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$))")
normrep = re.compile( r"(^.*?[^%\w]getelementptr )(((?:<\d* x )?)(.*?)(| addrspace\(\d\)) *\*(|>)(?:$| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$))")
def conv(match, line):
if not match:
return line
line = match.groups()[0]
if len(match.groups()[5]) == 0:
line += match.groups()[2]
line += match.groups()[3]
line += ", "
line += match.groups()[1]
line += "\n"
return line
for line in sys.stdin:
if line.find("getelementptr ") == line.find("getelementptr inbounds"):
if line.find("getelementptr inbounds") != line.find("getelementptr inbounds ("):
line = conv(re.match(ibrep, line), line)
elif line.find("getelementptr ") != line.find("getelementptr ("):
line = conv(re.match(normrep, line), line)
sys.stdout.write(line)
apply.sh:
for name in "$@"
do
python3 `dirname "$0"`/update.py < "$name" > "$name.tmp" && mv "$name.tmp" "$name"
rm -f "$name.tmp"
done
The actual commands:
From llvm/src:
find test/ -name *.ll | xargs ./apply.sh
From llvm/src/tools/clang:
find test/ -name *.mm -o -name *.m -o -name *.cpp -o -name *.c | xargs -I '{}' ../../apply.sh "{}"
From llvm/src/tools/polly:
find test/ -name *.ll | xargs ./apply.sh
After that, check-all (with llvm, clang, clang-tools-extra, lld,
compiler-rt, and polly all checked out).
The extra 'rm' in the apply.sh script is due to a few files in clang's test
suite using interesting unicode stuff that my python script was throwing
exceptions on. None of those files needed to be migrated, so it seemed
sufficient to ignore those cases.
Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7636
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230786 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
InstCombine has long had logic to convert aligned Altivec load/store intrinsics
into regular loads and stores. This mirrors that functionality for QPX vector
load/store intrinsics.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230660 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
InstCombine has logic to convert aligned Altivec load/store intrinsics into
regular loads and stores. Unfortunately, there seems to be no regression test
covering this behavior. Adding one...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230632 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
IRCE can now split the iteration space for loops like:
for (i = n; i >= 0; i--)
a[i + k] = 42; // bounds check on access
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230618 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Use the IRBuilder helpers for gc.statepoint and gc.result, instead of
coding the construction by hand. Note that the gc.statepoint IRBuilder
handles only CallInst, not InvokeInst; retain that part of hand-coding.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7518
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230591 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a follow-on to r227491 which tightens the check for propagating FP
values. If a non-constant value happens to be a zero, we would hit the same
bug as before.
Bug noted and patch suggested by Eli Friedman.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230564 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: SROA generates code that isn't quite as easy to optimize and contains unusual-sized shuffles, but that code is generally correct. As discussed in D7487 the right place to clean things up is InstCombine, which will pick up the type-punning pattern and transform it into a more obvious bitcast+extractelement, while leaving the other patterns SROA encounters as-is.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: jvoung, chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230560 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change aligns globals to the next highest power of 2 bytes, up to a
maximum of 128. This makes it more likely that we will be able to compress
bit sets with a greater alignment. In many more cases, we can now take
advantage of a new optimization also introduced in this patch that removes
bit set checks if the bit set is all ones.
The 128 byte maximum was found to provide the best tradeoff between instruction
overhead and data overhead in a recent build of Chromium. It allows us to
remove ~2.4MB of instructions at the cost of ~250KB of data.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7873
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230540 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(The change was landed in r230280 and caused the regression PR22674.
This version contains a fix and a test-case for PR22674).
When emitting the increment operation, SCEVExpander marks the
operation as nuw or nsw based on the flags on the preincrement SCEV.
This is incorrect because, for instance, it is possible that {-6,+,1}
is <nuw> while {-6,+,1}+1 = {-5,+,1} is not.
This change teaches SCEV to mark the increment as nuw/nsw only if it
can explicitly prove that the increment operation won't overflow.
Apart from the attached test case, another (more realistic)
manifestation of the bug can be seen in
Transforms/IndVarSimplify/pr20680.ll.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7778
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230533 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
With a diabolically crafted test case, we could recurse
through this code and return true instead of false.
The larger engineering crime is the use of magic numbers.
Added FIXME comments for those.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230515 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This change fixes the FIXME that you recently added when you committed
(a modified version of) my patch. When `InstCombine` combines a load and
store of an pointer to those of an equivalently-sized integer, it currently
drops any `!nonnull` metadata that might be present. This change replaces
`!nonnull` metadata with `!range !{ 1, -1 }` metadata instead.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7621
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230462 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The builder is based on a layout algorithm that tries to keep members of
small bit sets together. The new layout compresses Chromium's bit sets to
around 15% of their original size.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7796
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230394 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This case is interesting because ScalarEvolutionExpander lowers min(a,
b) as ~max(~a,~b). I think the profitability heuristics can be made
more clever/aggressive, but this is a start.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7821
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230285 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When emitting the increment operation, SCEVExpander marks the
operation as nuw or nsw based on the flags on the preincrement SCEV.
This is incorrect because, for instance, it is possible that {-6,+,1}
is <nuw> while {-6,+,1}+1 = {-5,+,1} is not.
This change teaches SCEV to mark the increment as nuw/nsw only if it
can explicitly prove that the increment operation won't overflow.
Apart from the attached test case, another (more realistic) manifestation
of the bug can be seen in Transforms/IndVarSimplify/pr20680.ll.
NOTE: this change was landed with an incorrect commit message in
rL230275 and was reverted for that reason in rL230279. This commit
message is the correct one.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7778
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230280 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
