Summary:
Now that the DataLayout is a mandatory part of the module, let's start
cleaning the codebase. This patch is a first attempt at doing that.
This patch is not exactly NFC as for instance some places were passing
a nullptr instead of the DataLayout, possibly just because there was a
default value on the DataLayout argument to many functions in the API.
Even though it is not purely NFC, there is no change in the
validation.
I turned as many pointer to DataLayout to references, this helped
figuring out all the places where a nullptr could come up.
I had initially a local version of this patch broken into over 30
independant, commits but some later commit were cleaning the API and
touching part of the code modified in the previous commits, so it
seemed cleaner without the intermediate state.
Test Plan:
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231740 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Author: Lang Hames <lhames@gmail.com>
Date: Mon Mar 9 23:51:09 2015 +0000
[Orc][MCJIT][RuntimeDyld] Add header that was accidentally left out of r231724.
Author: Lang Hames <lhames@gmail.com>
Date: Mon Mar 9 23:44:13 2015 +0000
[Orc][MCJIT][RuntimeDyld] Add symbol flags to symbols in RuntimeDyld. Thread the
new types through MCJIT and Orc.
In particular, add a 'weak' flag. When plumbed through RTDyldMemoryManager, this
will allow us to distinguish between weak and strong definitions and find the
right ones during symbol resolution.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231731 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
new types through MCJIT and Orc.
In particular, add a 'weak' flag. When plumbed through RTDyldMemoryManager, this
will allow us to distinguish between weak and strong definitions and find the
right ones during symbol resolution.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231724 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fix the double-deletion of AnalysisResolver when delegating through to
Dwarf EH preparation by creating one from scratch. Hopefully the new
pass manager simplifies this.
This reverts commit r229952.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231719 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This removes some duplicated code, and also helps optimization: e.g. in
the test case added, `%idx ULT 128` in `@x` is not currently optimized
to `true` by `-indvars` but will be, after this change.
The only functional change in ths commit is that for add recurrences,
ScalarEvolution::getRange will be more aggressive -- computing the
unsigned (resp. signed) range for a SCEVAddRecExpr will now look at the
NSW (resp. NUW) bits and check for signed (resp. unsigned) overflow.
This can be a strict improvement in some cases (such as the attached
test case), and should be no worse in other cases.
Reviewers: atrick, nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8142
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231709 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
CloudABI is a POSIX-like runtime environment built around the concept of
capability-based security. More details:
https://github.com/NuxiNL/cloudlibc
CloudABI uses its own ELFOSABI number. This number has been allocated by
the maintainers of ELF a couple of days ago.
Reviewed by: echristo
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231681 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
See the two test cases.
; Can fold fcmp with undef on one side by choosing NaN for the undef
; Can fold fcmp with undef on both side
; fcmp u_pred undef, undef -> true
; fcmp o_pred undef, undef -> false
; because whatever you choose for the first undef
; you can choose NaN for the other undef
Reviewers: hfinkel, chandlerc, majnemer
Reviewed By: majnemer
Subscribers: majnemer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7617
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231626 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We have an increasing number of cases where we are creating commuted shuffle masks - all implementing nearly the same code.
This patch adds a static helper function - ShuffleVectorSDNode::commuteMask() and replaces a number of cases to use it.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8139
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231581 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This will provide the analogous replacements for the PassManagerBuilder
and other code long term. This code is extracted from the opt tool
currently, and I plan to extend it as I build up support for using the
new pass manager in Clang and other places.
Mailing this out for review in part to let folks comment on the terrible names
here. A brief word about why I chose the names I did.
The library is called "Passes" to try and make it clear that it is a high-level
utility and where *all* of the passes come together and are registered in
a common library. I didn't want it to be *limited* to a registry though, the
registry is just one component.
The class is a "PassBuilder" but this name I'm less happy with. It doesn't
build passes in any traditional sense and isn't a Builder-style API at all. The
class is a PassRegisterer or PassAdder, but neither of those really make a lot
of sense. This class is responsible for constructing passes for registry in an
analysis manager or for population of a pass pipeline. If anyone has a better
name, I would love to hear it. The other candidate I looked at was
PassRegistrar, but that doesn't really fit either. There is no register of all
the passes in use, and so I think continuing the "registry" analog outside of
the registry of pass *names* and *types* is a mistake. The objects themselves
are just objects with the new pass manager.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8054
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231556 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is based on the following equivalences:
select(C0 & C1, X, Y) <=> select(C0, select(C1, X, Y), Y)
select(C0 | C1, X, Y) <=> select(C0, X, select(C1, X, Y))
Many target cannot perform and/or on the CPU flags and therefore the
right side should be choosen to avoid materializign the i1 flags in an
integer register. If the target can perform this operation efficiently
we normalize to the left form.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7622
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231507 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Multiplication is not dependent on signedness, so just treating
all input ranges as unsigned is not incorrect. However it will cause
overly pessimistic ranges (such as full-set) when used with signed
negative values.
Teach multiply to try to interpret its inputs as both signed and
unsigned, and then to take the most specific (smallest population)
as its result.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231483 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add MachO 32-bit (i.e. arm and x86) support for replacing global GOT equivalent
symbol accesses. Unlike 64-bit targets, there's no GOTPCREL relocation, and
access through a non_lazy_symbol_pointers section is used instead.
-- before
_extgotequiv:
.long _extfoo
_delta:
.long _extgotequiv-_delta
-- after
_delta:
.long L_extfoo$non_lazy_ptr-_delta
.section __IMPORT,__pointers,non_lazy_symbol_pointers
L_extfoo$non_lazy_ptr:
.indirect_symbol _extfoo
.long 0
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231475 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Follow up r230264 and add ARM64 support for replacing global GOT
equivalent symbol accesses by references to the GOT entry for the final
symbol instead, example:
-- before
.globl _foo
_foo:
.long 42
.globl _gotequivalent
_gotequivalent:
.quad _foo
.globl _delta
_delta:
.long _gotequivalent-_delta
-- after
.globl _foo
_foo:
.long 42
.globl _delta
Ltmp3:
.long _foo@GOT-Ltmp3
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231474 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This pass interchanges loops to provide a more cache-friendly memory access.
For e.g. given a loop like -
for(int i=0;i<N;i++)
for(int j=0;j<N;j++)
A[j][i] = A[j][i]+B[j][i];
is interchanged to -
for(int j=0;j<N;j++)
for(int i=0;i<N;i++)
A[j][i] = A[j][i]+B[j][i];
This pass is currently disabled by default.
To give a brief introduction it consists of 3 stages-
LoopInterchangeLegality : Checks the legality of loop interchange based on Dependency matrix.
LoopInterchangeProfitability: A very basic heuristic has been added to check for profitibility. This will evolve over time.
LoopInterchangeTransform : Which does the actual transform.
LNT Performance tests shows improvement in Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/mvt and Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemver becnmarks.
TODO:
1) Add support for reductions and lcssa phi.
2) Improve profitability model.
3) Improve loop selection algorithm to select best loop for interchange. Currently the innermost loop is selected for interchange.
4) Improve compile time regression found in llvm lnt due to this pass.
5) Fix issues in Dependency Analysis module.
A special thanks to Hal for reviewing this code.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7499
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231458 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We would set the body of a struct type (therefore making it non-opaque)
but were forgetting to move it to the non-opaque set.
Fixes pr22807.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231442 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The copies already diverged, don't let them become any worse. Reduce
redundancy in code with a little macro metaprogramming.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231401 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Teach SCEV to prove no overflow for an add recurrence by proving
something about the range of another add recurrence a loop-invariant
distance away from it.
Reviewers: atrick, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7980
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231305 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The implementation accepts explicitely signed forms (DW_FORM_sdata),
but also unsigned forms as long as they fit in an int64_t.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231299 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When calling lock() after all passes are registered, the PassRegistry doesn't need a mutex anymore to look up passes.
This speeds up multithreaded llvm execution by ~5% (tested with 4 threads).
In an asserts build of llvm this has an even bigger impact.
Note that it's not required to use the lock function.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231276 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Reverted in r231254 due to a self-hosting crash of Clang (see Clang
PR22793). Workaround the crash by using {} instead of = default to
define a dtor.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231274 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
DataLayout keeps the string used for its creation.
As a side effect it is no longer needed in the Module.
This is "almost" NFC, the string is no longer
canonicalized, you can't rely on two "equals" DataLayout
having the same string returned by getStringRepresentation().
Get rid of DataLayoutPass: the DataLayout is in the Module
The DataLayout is "per-module", let's enforce this by not
duplicating it more than necessary.
One more step toward non-optionality of the DataLayout in the
module.
Make DataLayout Non-Optional in the Module
Module->getDataLayout() will never returns nullptr anymore.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: resistor, llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7992
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231270 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
In PNaCl, most atomic instructions have their own @llvm.nacl.atomic.* function, each one, with a few exceptions, represents a consistent behaviour across all NaCl-supported targets. Unfortunately, the atomic RMW operations nand, [u]min, and [u]max aren't directly represented by any such @llvm.nacl.atomic.* function. This patch refines shouldExpandAtomicRMWInIR in TargetLowering so that a future `Le32TargetLowering` class can selectively inform the caller how the target desires the atomic RMW instruction to be expanded (ie via load-linked/store-conditional for ARM/AArch64, via cmpxchg for X86/others?, or not at all for Mips) if at all.
This does not represent a behavioural change and as such no tests were added.
Patch by: Richard Diamond.
Reviewers: jfb
Reviewed By: jfb
Subscribers: jfb, aemerson, t.p.northover, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7713
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231250 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Asserting that the source and destination iterators are from the same
region is unnecessary - there's no reason to disallow reassignment from
any regions, so long as they aren't compared.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231224 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
