Truncate the operands of a switch instruction to a narrower type if the upper
bits are known to be all ones or zeros.
rdar://problem/17720004
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219832 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Eliminate library calls and intrinsic calls to fabs when the input
is a squared value.
Note that no unsafe-math / fast-math assumptions are needed for
this optimization.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5777
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219717 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We assumed that A must be greater than B because the right hand side of
a remainder operator must be nonzero.
However, it is possible for A to be less than B if Pow2 is a power of
two greater than 1.
Take for example:
i32 %A = 0
i32 %B = 31
i32 Pow2 = 2147483648
((Pow2 << 0) >>u 31) is non-zero but A is less than B.
This fixes PR21274.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219713 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We assumed that negation operations of the form (0 - %Z) resulted in a
negative number. This isn't true if %Z was originally negative.
Substituting the negative number into the remainder operation may result
in undefined behavior because the dividend might be INT_MIN.
This fixes PR21256.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219639 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We have a transform that changes:
(x lshr C1) udiv C2
into:
x udiv (C2 << C1)
However, it is unsafe to do so if C2 << C1 discards any of C2's bits.
This fixes PR21255.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219634 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Consider the case where X is 2. (2 <<s 31)/s-2147483648 is zero but we
would fold to X. Note that this is valid when we are in the unsigned
domain because we require NUW: 2 <<u 31 results in poison.
This fixes PR21245.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219568 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
consider:
C1 = INT_MIN
C2 = -1
C1 * C2 overflows without a doubt but consider the following:
%x = i32 INT_MIN
This means that (%X /s C1) is 1 and (%X /s C1) /s C2 is -1.
N. B. Move the unsigned version of this transform to InstSimplify, it
doesn't create any new instructions.
This fixes PR21243.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219567 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
consider:
mul i32 nsw %x, -2147483648
this instruction will not result in poison if %x is 1
however, if we transform this into:
shl i32 nsw %x, 31
then we will be generating poison because we just shifted into the sign
bit.
This fixes PR21242.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219566 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The LLVM Lang Ref states for signed/unsigned int to float conversions:
"If the value cannot fit in the floating point value, the results are undefined."
And for FP to signed/unsigned int:
"If the value cannot fit in ty2, the results are undefined."
This matches the C definitions.
The existing behavior pins to infinity or a max int value, but that may just
lead to more confusion as seen in:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21130
Returning undef will hopefully lead to a less silent failure.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5603
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219542 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch fixes a bug in method InstCombiner::FoldCmpCstShrCst where we
wrongly computed the distance between the highest bits set of two negative
values.
This fixes PR21222.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5700
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219406 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The icmp-select-icmp optimization targets select-icmp.eq
only. This is now ensured by testing the branch predicate
explictly. This commit also includes the test case for pr21199.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219282 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Takes care of the assert that caused build fails.
Rather than asserting the code checks now that the definition
and use are in the same block, and does not attempt
to optimize when that is not the case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219175 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For any @llvm.assume intrinsic, if there is another which dominates it and uses
the same condition, then it is redundant and can be removed. While this does
not alter the semantics of the @llvm.assume intrinsics, it makes subsequent
handling more efficient (and the resulting IR easier to read).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219067 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
C++14 adds new builtin signatures for 'operator delete'. This change allows
new/delete pairs to be removed in C++14 onwards, as they were in C++11 and
before.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219014 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r218918, effectively reapplying r218914 after fixing
an Ocaml bindings test and an Asan crash. The root cause of the latter
was a tightened-up check in `DILexicalBlock::Verify()`, so I'll file a
PR to investigate who requires the loose check (and why).
Original commit message follows.
--
This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant
arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and
a `\0` character is used as a separator.
Part of PR17891.
Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've
just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219010 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant
arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and
a `\0` character is used as a separator.
Part of PR17891.
Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've
just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218914 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When unsafe-fp-math is enabled, we can turn sqrt(X) * sqrt(X) into X.
This can happen in the real world when calculating x ** 3/2. This occurs
in test-suite/SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/n-body.c.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5584
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218906 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As discussed here:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140609/220598.html
And again here:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-September/077168.html
The sqrt of a negative number when using the llvm intrinsic is undefined.
We should return undef rather than 0.0 to match the definition in the LLVM IR lang ref.
This change should not affect any code that isn't using "no-nans-fp-math";
ie, no-nans is a requirement for generating the llvm intrinsic in place of a sqrt function call.
Unfortunately, the behavior introduced by this patch will not match current gcc, xlc, icc, and
possibly other compilers. The current clang/llvm behavior of returning 0.0 doesn't either.
We knowingly approve of this difference with the other compilers in an attempt to flag code
that is invoking undefined behavior.
A front-end warning should also try to convince the user that the program will fail:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21093
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5527
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218803 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.
Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.
By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.
The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.
What this patch doesn't do:
This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491
Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!
Note: I accidentally committed a bogus older version of this patch previously.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218787 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.
Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.
By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.
The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.
What this patch doesn't do:
This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491
Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218778 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In special cases select instructions can be eliminated by
replacing them with a cheaper bitwise operation even when the
select result is used outside its home block. The instances implemented
are patterns like
%x=icmp.eq
%y=select %x,%r, null
%z=icmp.eq|neq %y, null
br %z,true, false
==> %x=icmp.ne
%y=icmp.eq %r,null
%z=or %x,%y
br %z,true,false
The optimization is integrated into the instruction
combiner and performed only when all uses of the select result can
be replaced by the select operand proper. For this dominator information
is used and dominance is now a required analysis pass in the combiner.
The optimization itself is iterative. The critical step is to replace the
select result with the non-constant select operand. So the select becomes
local and the combiner iteratively works out simpler code pattern and
eventually eliminates the select.
rdar://17853760
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218721 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Example:
define i1 @foo(i32 %a) {
%shr = ashr i32 -9, %a
%cmp = icmp ne i32 %shr, -5
ret i1 %cmp
}
Before this fix, the instruction combiner wrongly thought that %shr
could have never been equal to -5. Therefore, %cmp was always folded to 'true'.
However, when %a is equal to 1, then %cmp evaluates to 'false'. Therefore,
in this example, it is not valid to fold %cmp to 'true'.
The problem was only affecting the case where the comparison was between
negative quantities where one of the quantities was obtained from arithmetic
shift of a negative constant.
This patch fixes the problem with the wrong folding (fixes PR20945).
With this patch, the 'icmp' from the example is now simplified to a
comparison between %a and 1. This still allows us to get rid of the arithmetic
shift (%shr).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217950 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
From a combination of @llvm.assume calls (and perhaps through other means, such
as range metadata), it is possible that all bits of a return value might be
known. Previously, InstCombine did not check for this (which is understandable
given assumptions of constant propagation), but means that we'd miss simple
cases where assumptions are involved.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217346 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This builds on r217342, which added the infrastructure to compute known bits
using assumptions (@llvm.assume calls). That original commit added only a few
patterns (to catch common cases related to determining pointer alignment); this
change adds several other patterns for simple cases.
r217342 contained that, for assume(v & b = a), bits in the mask
that are known to be one, we can propagate known bits from the a to v. It also
had a known-bits transfer for assume(a = b). This patch adds:
assume(~(v & b) = a) : For those bits in the mask that are known to be one, we
can propagate inverted known bits from the a to v.
assume(v | b = a) : For those bits in b that are known to be zero, we can
propagate known bits from the a to v.
assume(~(v | b) = a): For those bits in b that are known to be zero, we can
propagate inverted known bits from the a to v.
assume(v ^ b = a) : For those bits in b that are known to be zero, we can
propagate known bits from the a to v. For those bits in
b that are known to be one, we can propagate inverted
known bits from the a to v.
assume(~(v ^ b) = a) : For those bits in b that are known to be zero, we can
propagate inverted known bits from the a to v. For those
bits in b that are known to be one, we can propagate
known bits from the a to v.
assume(v << c = a) : For those bits in a that are known, we can propagate them
to known bits in v shifted to the right by c.
assume(~(v << c) = a) : For those bits in a that are known, we can propagate
them inverted to known bits in v shifted to the right by c.
assume(v >> c = a) : For those bits in a that are known, we can propagate them
to known bits in v shifted to the right by c.
assume(~(v >> c) = a) : For those bits in a that are known, we can propagate
them inverted to known bits in v shifted to the right by c.
assume(v >=_s c) where c is non-negative: The sign bit of v is zero
assume(v >_s c) where c is at least -1: The sign bit of v is zero
assume(v <=_s c) where c is negative: The sign bit of v is one
assume(v <_s c) where c is non-positive: The sign bit of v is one
assume(v <=_u c): Transfer the known high zero bits
assume(v <_u c): Transfer the known high zero bits (if c is know to be a power
of 2, transfer one more)
A small addition to InstCombine was necessary for some of the test cases. The
problem is that when InstCombine was simplifying and, or, etc. it would fail to
check the 'do I know all of the bits' condition before checking less specific
conditions and would not fully constant-fold the result. I'm not sure how to
trigger this aside from using assumptions, so I've just included the change
here.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217343 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change, which allows @llvm.assume to be used from within computeKnownBits
(and other associated functions in ValueTracking), adds some (optional)
parameters to computeKnownBits and friends. These functions now (optionally)
take a "context" instruction pointer, an AssumptionTracker pointer, and also a
DomTree pointer, and most of the changes are just to pass this new information
when it is easily available from InstSimplify, InstCombine, etc.
As explained below, the significant conceptual change is that known properties
of a value might depend on the control-flow location of the use (because we
care that the @llvm.assume dominates the use because assumptions have
control-flow dependencies). This means that, when we ask if bits are known in a
value, we might get different answers for different uses.
The significant changes are all in ValueTracking. Two main changes: First, as
with the rest of the code, new parameters need to be passed around. To make
this easier, I grouped them into a structure, and I made internal static
versions of the relevant functions that take this structure as a parameter. The
new code does as you might expect, it looks for @llvm.assume calls that make
use of the value we're trying to learn something about (often indirectly),
attempts to pattern match that expression, and uses the result if successful.
By making use of the AssumptionTracker, the process of finding @llvm.assume
calls is not expensive.
Part of the structure being passed around inside ValueTracking is a set of
already-considered @llvm.assume calls. This is to prevent a query using, for
example, the assume(a == b), to recurse on itself. The context and DT params
are used to find applicable assumptions. An assumption needs to dominate the
context instruction, or come after it deterministically. In this latter case we
only handle the specific case where both the assumption and the context
instruction are in the same block, and we need to exclude assumptions from
being used to simplify their own ephemeral values (those which contribute only
to the assumption) because otherwise the assumption would prove its feeding
comparison trivial and would be removed.
This commit adds the plumbing and the logic for a simple masked-bit propagation
(just enough to write a regression test). Future commits add more patterns
(and, correspondingly, more regression tests).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217342 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The special case did not work when run under -reassociate and can easily
be expressed by a further generalization of an existing pattern.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217227 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r216698 which reverted r216523 and r216598.
We would attempt to perform the transformation even if the match()
failed because, as a side effect, it would set V. This would trick us
into believing that we correctly found a place to correctly apply the
transform.
An additional test case was added to getelementptr.ll so that we might
not regress in the future.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216890 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
consider: (and (icmp X, Y), (and Z, (icmp A, B)))
It may be possible to combine (icmp X, Y) with (icmp A, B).
If we successfully combine, create an 'and' instruction with Z.
This fixes PR20814.
N.B. There is room for improvement after this change but I'm not
convinced it's worth chasing yet.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216814 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Several combines involving icmp (shl C2, %X) C1 can be simplified
without introducing any new instructions. Move them to InstSimplify;
while we are at it, make them more powerful.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216642 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We try to perform this transform in InstSimplify but we aren't always
able to. Sometimes, we need to insert a bitcast if X and Y don't have
the same time.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216598 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We supported transforming:
(gep i8* X, -(ptrtoint Y))
to:
(inttoptr (sub (ptrtoint X), (ptrtoint Y)))
However, this only fired if 'X' had type i8*. Generalize this to
support various types of different sizes. This results in much better
CodeGen, especially for pointers to packed structs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216523 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
CFE, with -03, would turn:
bool f(unsigned x) {
bool a = x & 1;
bool b = x & 2;
return a | b;
}
into:
%1 = lshr i32 %x, 1
%2 = or i32 %1, %x
%3 = and i32 %2, 1
%4 = icmp ne i32 %3, 0
This sort of thing exposes a nasty pathology in GCC, ICC and LLVM.
Instead, we would rather want:
%1 = and i32 %x, 3
%2 = icmp ne i32 %1, 0
Things get a bit more interesting in the following case:
%1 = lshr i32 %x, %y
%2 = or i32 %1, %x
%3 = and i32 %2, 1
%4 = icmp ne i32 %3, 0
Replacing it with the following sequence is better:
%1 = shl nuw i32 1, %y
%2 = or i32 %1, 1
%3 = and i32 %2, %x
%4 = icmp ne i32 %3, 0
This sequence is preferable because %1 doesn't involve %x and could
potentially be hoisted out of loops if it is invariant; only perform
this transform in the non-constant case if we know we won't increase
register pressure.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216343 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Consider:
%add = add nuw i32 %a, -16777216
%and = and i32 %add, 255
Regardless of whether or not we demand the sign bit of %add, we cannot
replace -16777216 with 2130706432 without also removing 'nuw' from the
instruction.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216273 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Consider:
%add = add nsw i32 %a, -16777216
%and = and i32 %add, 255
Regardless of whether or not we demand the sign bit of %add, we cannot
replace -16777216 with 2130706432 without also removing 'nsw' from the
instruction.
This fixes PR20377.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216261 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We can prove that a 'sub' can be a 'sub nuw' if the left-hand side is
negative and the right-hand side is non-negative.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216045 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We can prove that a 'sub' can be a 'sub nsw' under certain conditions:
- The sign bits of the operands is the same.
- Both operands have more than 1 sign bit.
The subtraction cannot be a signed overflow in either case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216037 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
