needed for this test, but otherwise, there's nothing ARM-specific about
it and no need to specify the calling convention.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@94862 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
when it should have been and'd with LowBits. Fix that and while there beef
up the logic in the case of a negative LHS.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@94745 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
"sext cond" instead of a select. This simplifies some instcombine
code, matches the policy for zext (cond ? 1 : 0 -> zext), and allows
us to generate better code for a testcase on ppc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@94339 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
aggressive changed the canonical form from sext(trunc(x)) to ashr(lshr(x)),
make sure to transform a couple more things into that canonical form,
and catch a case where we missed turning zext/shl/ashr into a single sext.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@93787 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
added to the FSub version. However, the original version of this xform guarded
against doing this for floating point (!Op0->getType()->isFPOrFPVector()).
This is causing LLVM to perform incorrect xforms for code like:
void func(double *rhi, double *rlo, double xh, double xl, double yh, double yl){
double mh, ml;
double c = 134217729.0;
double up, u1, u2, vp, v1, v2;
up = xh*c;
u1 = (xh - up) + up;
u2 = xh - u1;
vp = yh*c;
v1 = (yh - vp) + vp;
v2 = yh - v1;
mh = xh*yh;
ml = (((u1*v1 - mh) + (u1*v2)) + (u2*v1)) + (u2*v2);
ml += xh*yl + xl*yh;
*rhi = mh + ml;
*rlo = (mh - (*rhi)) + ml;
}
The last line was optimized away, but rl is intended to be the difference
between the infinitely precise result of mh + ml and after it has been rounded
to double precision.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@93369 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
BitsToClear case. This allows it to promote expressions which have an
and/or/xor after the lshr, promoting cases like test2 (from PR4216)
and test3 (random extample extracted from a spec benchmark).
clang now compiles the code in PR4216 into:
_test_bitfield: ## @test_bitfield
movl %edi, %eax
orl $194, %eax
movl $4294902010, %ecx
andq %rax, %rcx
orl $32768, %edi
andq $39936, %rdi
movq %rdi, %rax
orq %rcx, %rax
ret
instead of:
_test_bitfield: ## @test_bitfield
movl %edi, %eax
orl $194, %eax
movl $4294902010, %ecx
andq %rax, %rcx
shrl $8, %edi
orl $128, %edi
shlq $8, %rdi
andq $39936, %rdi
movq %rdi, %rax
orq %rcx, %rax
ret
which is still not great, but is progress.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@93145 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
new BitsToClear result which allows us to start promoting
expressions that end with a lshr-by-constant. This is
conservatively correct and better than what we had before
(see testcases) but still needs to be extended further.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@93144 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the zext dest type. This allows us to handle test52/53 in cast.ll,
and allows llvm-gcc to generate much better code for PR4216 in -m64
mode:
_test_bitfield: ## @test_bitfield
orl $32962, %edi
movl %edi, %eax
andl $-25350, %eax
ret
This also fixes a bug handling vector extends, ensuring that the
mask produced is a vector constant, not an integer constant.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@93127 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
elimination of a sign extend to be a win, which simplifies
the client of CanEvaluateSExtd, and allows us to eliminate
more casts (examples taken from real code).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@93109 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
lshr+ashr instead of trunc+sext. We want to avoid type
conversions whenever possible, it is easier to codegen expressions
without truncates and extensions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@93107 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
1) don't try to optimize a sext or zext that is only used by a trunc, let
the trunc get optimized first. This avoids some pointless effort in
some common cases since instcombine scans down a block in the first pass.
2) Change the cost model for zext elimination to consider an 'and' cheaper
than a zext. This allows us to do it more aggressively, and for the next
patch to simplify the code quite a bit.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@93097 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
that feeds into a zext, similar to the patch I did yesterday for sext.
There is a lot of room for extension beyond this patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92962 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously, instcombine would only promote an expression tree to
the larger type if doing so eliminated two casts. This is because
a need to manually do the sign extend after the promoted expression
tree with two shifts. Now, we keep track of whether the result of
the computation is going to be properly sign extended already. If
so, we can unconditionally promote the expression, which allows us
to zap more sext's.
This implements rdar://6598839 (aka gcc pr38751)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92815 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The only difference is that EvaluateInDifferentType checks to ensure
they are profitable before doing them :)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92788 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
when doing this transform if the GEP is not inbounds. No testcase because
it is very difficult to trigger this: instcombine already canonicalizes
GEP indices to pointer size, so it relies specific permutations of the
instcombine worklist.
Thanks to Duncan for pointing this possible problem out.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92495 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
on the example in PR4216. This doesn't trigger in the testsuite,
so I'd really appreciate someone scrutinizing the logic for
correctness.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92458 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
occurs in 403.gcc in mode_mask_array, in safe-ctype.c (which
is copied in multiple apps) in _sch_istable, etc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92427 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
when a consequtive sequence of elements all satisfies the
predicate. Like the double compare case, this generates better
code than the magic constant case and generalizes to more than
32/64 element array lookups.
Here are some examples where it triggers. From 403.gcc, most
accesses to the rtx_class array are handled, e.g.:
@rtx_class = constant [153 x i8] c"xxxxxmmmmmmmmxxxxxxxxxxxxmxxxxxxiiixxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxooxooooooxxoooooox3x2c21c2222ccc122222ccccaaaaaa<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<111111111111bbooxxxxxxxxxxcc2211x", align 32 ; <[153 x i8]*> [#uses=547]
%142 = icmp eq i8 %141, 105
@rtx_class = constant [153 x i8] c"xxxxxmmmmmmmmxxxxxxxxxxxxmxxxxxxiiixxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxooxooooooxxoooooox3x2c21c2222ccc122222ccccaaaaaa<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<111111111111bbooxxxxxxxxxxcc2211x", align 32 ; <[153 x i8]*> [#uses=543]
%165 = icmp eq i8 %164, 60
Also, most of the 59-element arrays (mode_class/rid_to_yy, etc)
optimized before are actually range compares. This lets 32-bit
machines optimize them.
400.perlbmk has stuff like this:
400.perlbmk: PL_regkind, even for 32-bit:
@PL_regkind = constant [62 x i8] c"\00\00\02\02\02\06\06\06\06\09\09\0B\0B\0D\0E\0E\0E\11\12\12\14\14\16\16\18\18\1A\1A\1C\1C\1E\1F !!!$$&'((((,-.///88886789:;8$", align 32 ; <[62 x i8]*> [#uses=4]
%811 = icmp ne i8 %810, 33
@PL_utf8skip = constant [256 x i8] c"\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\04\04\04\04\04\04\04\04\05\05\05\05\06\06\07\0D", align 32 ; <[256 x i8]*> [#uses=94]
%12 = icmp ult i8 %10, 2
etc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92426 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
two elements match or don't match with two comparisons. For
example, the testcase compiles into:
define i1 @test5(i32 %X) {
%1 = icmp eq i32 %X, 2 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
%2 = icmp eq i32 %X, 7 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
%R = or i1 %1, %2 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
ret i1 %R
}
This generalizes the previous xforms when the array is larger than
64 elements (and this case matches) and generates better code for
cases where it overlaps with the magic bitshift case.
This generalizes more cases than you might expect. For example,
400.perlbmk has:
@PL_utf8skip = constant [256 x i8] c"\01\01\01\...
%15 = icmp ult i8 %7, 7
403.gcc has:
@rid_to_yy = internal constant [114 x i16] [i16 259, i16 260, ...
%18 = icmp eq i16 %16, 295
and xalancbmk has a bunch of examples, such as
_ZN11xercesc_2_5L15gCombiningCharsE and _ZN11xercesc_2_5L10gBaseCharsE.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92417 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8