Assert that this doesn't fire - I'll remove all of this later, but just
leaving it in for a while in case this is firing & we just don't have
test coverage.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@233116 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the IR optimizer follow-on patch for D8563: the x86 backend patch
that converts this kind of shuffle back into a vperm2.
This is also a continuation of the transform that started in D8486.
In that patch, Andrea suggested that we could convert vperm2 intrinsics that
use zero masks into a single shuffle.
This is an implementation of that suggestion.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8567
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@233110 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This caused PR23008, compiles failing with: "Use still stuck around after Def is
destroyed: %.sroa.speculated"
Also reverting follow-up r233064.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@233105 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
IRCE requires the induction variables it handles to not sign-overflow.
The current scheme of checking if sext({X,+,S}) == {sext(X),+,sext(S)}
fails when SCEV simplifies sext(X) too. After this change we //also//
check no-signed-wrap by looking at the flags set on the SCEVAddRecExpr.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@233102 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
IRCE should not try to eliminate range checks that check an induction
variable against a loop-varying length.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@233101 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It is possible to have code that converts from integer to float, performs operations then converts back, and the result is provably the same as if integers were used.
This can come from different sources, but the most obvious is a helper function that uses floats but the arguments given at an inlined callsites are integers.
This pass considers all integers requiring a bitwidth less than or equal to the bitwidth of the mantissa of a floating point type (23 for floats, 52 for doubles) as exactly representable in floating point.
To reduce the risk of harming efficient code, the pass only attempts to perform complete removal of inttofp/fptoint operations, not just move them around.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@233062 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
strchr("123!", C) != nullptr is a common pattern to check if C is one
of 1, 2, 3 or !. If the largest element of the string is smaller than
the target's register size we can easily create a bitfield and just
do a simple test for set membership.
int foo(char C) { return strchr("123!", C) != nullptr; } now becomes
cmpl $64, %edi ## range check
sbbb %al, %al
movabsq $0xE000200000001, %rcx
btq %rdi, %rcx ## bit test
sbbb %cl, %cl
andb %al, %cl ## and the two conditions
andb $1, %cl
movzbl %cl, %eax ## returning an int
ret
(imho the backend should expand this into a series of branches, but
that's a different story)
The code is currently limited to bit fields that fit in a register, so
usually 64 or 32 bits. Sadly, this misses anything using alpha chars
or {}. This could be fixed by just emitting a i128 bit field, but that
can generate really ugly code so we have to find a better way. To some
degree this is also recreating switch lowering logic, but we can't
simply emit a switch instruction and thus change the CFG within
instcombine.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232902 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
vperm2* intrinsics are just shuffles.
In a few special cases, they're not even shuffles.
Optimizing intrinsics in InstCombine is better than
handling this in the front-end for at least two reasons:
1. Optimizing custom-written SSE intrinsic code at -O0 makes vector coders
really angry (and so I have regrets about some patches from last week).
2. Doing mask conversion logic in header files is hard to write and
subsequently read.
There are a couple of TODOs in this patch to complete this optimization.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8486
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232852 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Don't use `DebugLoc` accessors if we're pointing at null, which will be
a problem after a WIP patch to make the `DIDescriptor` accessors more
strict. Caught by Frontend/profile-sample-use-loc-tracking.c (in
clang).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232792 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Remove `DebugInfoVerifierLegacyPass` and the `-verify-di` pass.
Instead, call into the `DebugInfoVerifier` from inside
`VerifierLegacyPass::finalizeModule()`. This better matches the logic
in `verifyModule()` (used by the new PassManager), avoids requiring two
separate passes to verify the IR, and makes the API for "add a pass to
verify the IR" simple.
Note: the `-verify-debug-info` flag still works (for now, at least;
eventually it might make sense to just remove it).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232772 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Each use of the byte array uses a different alias. This makes the
backend less likely to reuse previously computed byte array addresses,
improving the security of the CFI mechanism based on this pass.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8455
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232770 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
`StripDebug` was only used by tools/opt/opt.cpp in
`AddStandardLinkPasses()`, but opt.cpp adds the same pass based on its
command-line flag before it calls `AddStandardLinkPasses()`. Stripping
debug info twice isn't very useful.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232765 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When we encounter a global with a comdat, rather than iterating over
every global in the module to find globals in the same comdat, store the
members in a multimap. This effectively lowers the complexity to O(N log N),
improving performance significantly for large modules such as might be
encountered during LTO.
It looks like we used to do something like this until r219191.
No functional change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8431
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232743 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This change splits `makeICmpRegion` into `makeAllowedICmpRegion` and
`makeSatisfyingICmpRegion` with slightly different contracts. The first
one is useful for determining what values some expression //may// take,
given that a certain `icmp` evaluates to true. The second one is useful
for determining what values are guaranteed to //satisfy// a given
`icmp`.
Reviewers: nlewycky
Reviewed By: nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8345
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232575 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Benign warning (clang deliberately suppresses this case) but does
regularly produce bad formatting, so it's nice to fix/reformat.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232508 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The experiments can be used to evaluate potential optimizations that remove
instrumentation (assess false negatives). Instead of completely removing
some instrumentation, you set Exp to a non-zero value (mask of optimization
experiments that want to remove instrumentation of this instruction).
If Exp is non-zero, this pass will emit special calls into runtime
(e.g. __asan_report_exp_load1 instead of __asan_report_load1). These calls
make runtime terminate the program in a special way (with a different
exit status). Then you run the new compiler on a buggy corpus, collect
the special terminations (ideally, you don't see them at all -- no false
negatives) and make the decision on the optimization.
The exact reaction to experiments in runtime is not implemented in this patch.
It will be defined and implemented in a subsequent patch.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8198
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232502 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Allow unresolved nodes through the `MapMetadata()` if
`RF_NoModuleLevelChanges`, since there's no remapping to do anyway.
This fixes PR22929. I'll add a clang test as a follow-up.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232449 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change to IRCE gets it to recognize "half" range checks. Half
range checks are range checks that only either check if the index is
`slt` some positive integer ("length") or if the index is `sge` `0`.
The range solver does not try to be clever / aggressive about solving
half-range checks -- it transforms "I < L" to "0 <= I < L" and "0 <= I"
to "0 <= I < INT_SMAX". This is safe, but not always optimal.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232444 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
By default we want our gcov emission to stay 4.2 compatible, which
means we need to continue emit the exit block last by default. We add
an option to emit it before the body for users that need it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232438 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
LLVM currently turns these into linker-private symbols, which can be dead
stripped by the Darwin linker.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232435 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The problem here is the infamous one direction known safe. I was
hesitant to turn it off before b/c of the potential for regressions
without an actual bug from users hitting the problem. This is that bug ;
).
The main performance impact of having known safe in both directions is
that often times it is very difficult to find two releases without a use
in-between them since we are so conservative with determining potential
uses. The one direction known safe gets around that problem by taking
advantage of many situations where we have two retains in a row,
allowing us to avoid that problem. That being said, the one direction
known safe is unsafe. Consider the following situation:
retain(x)
retain(x)
call(x)
call(x)
release(x)
Then we know the following about the reference count of x:
// rc(x) == N (for some N).
retain(x)
// rc(x) == N+1
retain(x)
// rc(x) == N+2
call A(x)
call B(x)
// rc(x) >= 1 (since we can not release a deallocated pointer).
release(x)
// rc(x) >= 0
That is all the information that we can know statically. That means that
we know that A(x), B(x) together can release (x) at most N+1 times. Lets
say that we remove the inner retain, release pair.
// rc(x) == N (for some N).
retain(x)
// rc(x) == N+1
call A(x)
call B(x)
// rc(x) >= 1
release(x)
// rc(x) >= 0
We knew before that A(x), B(x) could release x up to N+1 times meaning
that rc(x) may be zero at the release(x). That is not safe. On the other
hand, consider the following situation where we have a must use of
release(x) that x must be kept alive for after the release(x)**. Then we
know that:
// rc(x) == N (for some N).
retain(x)
// rc(x) == N+1
retain(x)
// rc(x) == N+2
call A(x)
call B(x)
// rc(x) >= 2 (since we know that we are going to release x and that that release can not be the last use of x).
release(x)
// rc(x) >= 1 (since we can not deallocate the pointer since we have a must use after x).
…
// rc(x) >= 1
use(x)
Thus we know that statically the calls to A(x), B(x) can together only
release rc(x) N times. Thus if we remove the inner retain, release pair:
// rc(x) == N (for some N).
retain(x)
// rc(x) == N+1
call A(x)
call B(x)
// rc(x) >= 1
…
// rc(x) >= 1
use(x)
We are still safe unless in the final … there are unbalanced retains,
releases which would have caused the program to blow up anyways even
before optimization occurred. The simplest form of must use is an
additional release that has not been paired up with any retain (if we
had paired the release with a retain and removed it we would not have
the additional use). This fits nicely into the ARC framework since
basically what you do is say that given any nested releases regardless
of what is in between, the inner release is known safe. This enables us to get
back the lost performance.
<rdar://problem/19023795>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232351 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This will be tested in the next commit (which required it). The commit
is going to update a bunch of tests at the same time.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@232350 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
