on the example in PR4216. This doesn't trigger in the testsuite,
so I'd really appreciate someone scrutinizing the logic for
correctness.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92458 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
returned null, and may not have been big enough in any case.
Thanks to Jay Foad for pointing this out!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92452 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
occurs in 403.gcc in mode_mask_array, in safe-ctype.c (which
is copied in multiple apps) in _sch_istable, etc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92427 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
when a consequtive sequence of elements all satisfies the
predicate. Like the double compare case, this generates better
code than the magic constant case and generalizes to more than
32/64 element array lookups.
Here are some examples where it triggers. From 403.gcc, most
accesses to the rtx_class array are handled, e.g.:
@rtx_class = constant [153 x i8] c"xxxxxmmmmmmmmxxxxxxxxxxxxmxxxxxxiiixxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxooxooooooxxoooooox3x2c21c2222ccc122222ccccaaaaaa<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<111111111111bbooxxxxxxxxxxcc2211x", align 32 ; <[153 x i8]*> [#uses=547]
%142 = icmp eq i8 %141, 105
@rtx_class = constant [153 x i8] c"xxxxxmmmmmmmmxxxxxxxxxxxxmxxxxxxiiixxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxooxooooooxxoooooox3x2c21c2222ccc122222ccccaaaaaa<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<111111111111bbooxxxxxxxxxxcc2211x", align 32 ; <[153 x i8]*> [#uses=543]
%165 = icmp eq i8 %164, 60
Also, most of the 59-element arrays (mode_class/rid_to_yy, etc)
optimized before are actually range compares. This lets 32-bit
machines optimize them.
400.perlbmk has stuff like this:
400.perlbmk: PL_regkind, even for 32-bit:
@PL_regkind = constant [62 x i8] c"\00\00\02\02\02\06\06\06\06\09\09\0B\0B\0D\0E\0E\0E\11\12\12\14\14\16\16\18\18\1A\1A\1C\1C\1E\1F !!!$$&'((((,-.///88886789:;8$", align 32 ; <[62 x i8]*> [#uses=4]
%811 = icmp ne i8 %810, 33
@PL_utf8skip = constant [256 x i8] c"\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\01\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\02\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\03\04\04\04\04\04\04\04\04\05\05\05\05\06\06\07\0D", align 32 ; <[256 x i8]*> [#uses=94]
%12 = icmp ult i8 %10, 2
etc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92426 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
two elements match or don't match with two comparisons. For
example, the testcase compiles into:
define i1 @test5(i32 %X) {
%1 = icmp eq i32 %X, 2 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
%2 = icmp eq i32 %X, 7 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
%R = or i1 %1, %2 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
ret i1 %R
}
This generalizes the previous xforms when the array is larger than
64 elements (and this case matches) and generates better code for
cases where it overlaps with the magic bitshift case.
This generalizes more cases than you might expect. For example,
400.perlbmk has:
@PL_utf8skip = constant [256 x i8] c"\01\01\01\...
%15 = icmp ult i8 %7, 7
403.gcc has:
@rid_to_yy = internal constant [114 x i16] [i16 259, i16 260, ...
%18 = icmp eq i16 %16, 295
and xalancbmk has a bunch of examples, such as
_ZN11xercesc_2_5L15gCombiningCharsE and _ZN11xercesc_2_5L10gBaseCharsE.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92417 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
arrays with variable indices into a comparison of the index
with a constant. The most common occurrence of this that
I see by far is stuff like:
if ("foobar"[i] == '\0') ...
which we compile into: if (i == 6), saving a load and
materialization of the global address. This also exposes
loop trip count information to later passes in many cases.
This triggers hundreds of times in xalancbmk, which is where I first
noticed it, but it also triggers in many other apps. Here are a few
interesting ones from various apps:
@must_be_connected_without = internal constant [8 x i8*] [i8* getelementptr inbounds ([3 x i8]* @.str64320, i64 0, i64 0), i8* getelementptr inbounds ([3 x i8]* @.str27283, i64 0, i64 0), i8* getelementptr inbounds ([4 x i8]* @.str71327, i64 0, i64 0), i8* getelementptr inbounds ([4 x i8]* @.str72328, i64 0, i64 0), i8* getelementptr inbounds ([3 x i8]* @.str18274, i64 0, i64 0), i8* getelementptr inbounds ([6 x i8]* @.str11267, i64 0, i64 0), i8* getelementptr inbounds ([3 x i8]* @.str32288, i64 0, i64 0), i8* null], align 32 ; <[8 x i8*]*> [#uses=2]
%scevgep.i = getelementptr [8 x i8*]* @must_be_connected_without, i64 0, i64 %indvar.i ; <i8**> [#uses=1]
%17 = load ...
%18 = icmp eq i8* %17, null ; <i1> [#uses=1]
-> icmp eq i64 %indvar.i, 7
@yytable1095 = internal constant [84 x i8] c"\12\01(\05\06\07\08\09\0A\0B\0C\0D\0E1\0F\10\11266\1D: \10\11,-,0\03'\10\11B6\04\17&\18\1945\05\06\07\08\09\0A\0B\0C\0D\0E\1E\0F\10\11*\1A\1B\1C$3+>#%;<IJ=ADFEGH9KL\00\00\00C", align 32 ; <[84 x i8]*> [#uses=2]
%57 = getelementptr inbounds [84 x i8]* @yytable1095, i64 0, i64 %56 ; <i8*> [#uses=1]
%mode.0.in = getelementptr inbounds [9 x i32]* @mb_mode_table, i64 0, i64 %.pn ; <i32*> [#uses=1]
load ...
%64 = icmp eq i8 %58, 4 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
-> icmp eq i64 %.pn, 35 ; <i1> [#uses=0]
@gsm_DLB = internal constant [4 x i16] [i16 6554, i16 16384, i16 26214, i16 32767]
%scevgep.i = getelementptr [4 x i16]* @gsm_DLB, i64 0, i64 %indvar.i ; <i16*> [#uses=1]
%425 = load %scevgep.i
%426 = icmp eq i16 %425, -32768 ; <i1> [#uses=0]
-> false
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92411 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
pointer to int casts that confuse later optimizations. See PR3351
for details.
This improves but doesn't complete fix 483.xalancbmk because llvm-gcc
does this xform in GCC's "fold" routine as well. Clang++ will do
better I guess.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92408 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(X != null) | (Y != null) --> (X|Y) != 0
(X == null) & (Y == null) --> (X|Y) == 0
so that instcombine can stop doing this for pointers. This is part of PR3351,
which is a case where instcombine doing this for pointers (inserting ptrtoint)
is pessimizing code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92406 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a constantexpr gep on the 'base' side of the expression.
This completes comment #4 in PR3351, which comes from
483.xalancbmk.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92402 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
