This bug only bit the C++98 build bots because all of the actual uses
really do move. ;] But not *quite* ready to do the whole C++11 switch
yet, so clean it up. Also add a unit test that catches this immediately.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194548 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
more smarts in it. This is where most of the interesting logic that used
to live in the implicit-scheduling-hackery of the old pass manager will
live.
Like the previous commits, note that this is a very early prototype!
I expect substantial changes before this is ready to use.
The core of the design is the following:
- We have an AnalysisManager which can be used across a series of
passes over a module.
- The code setting up a pass pipeline registers the analyses available
with the manager.
- Individual transform passes can check than an analysis manager
provides the analyses they require in order to fail-fast.
- There is *no* implicit registration or scheduling.
- Analysis passes are different from other passes: they produce an
analysis result that is cached and made available via the analysis
manager.
- Cached results are invalidated automatically by the pass managers.
- When a transform pass requests an analysis result, either the analysis
is run to produce the result or a cached result is provided.
There are a few aspects of this design that I *know* will change in
subsequent commits:
- Currently there is no "preservation" system, that needs to be added.
- All of the analysis management should move up to the analysis library.
- The analysis management needs to support at least SCC passes. Maybe
loop passes. Living in the analysis library will facilitate this.
- Need support for analyses which are *both* module and function passes.
- Need support for pro-actively running module analyses to have cached
results within a function pass manager.
- Need a clear design for "immutable" passes.
- Need support for requesting cached results when available and not
re-running the pass even if that would be necessary.
- Need more thorough testing of all of this infrastructure.
There are other aspects that I view as open questions I'm hoping to
resolve as I iterate a bit on the infrastructure, and especially as
I start writing actual passes against this.
- Should we have separate management layers for function, module, and
SCC analyses? I think "yes", but I'm not yet ready to switch the code.
Adding SCC support will likely resolve this definitively.
- How should the 'require' functionality work? Should *that* be the only
way to request results to ensure that passes always require things?
- How should preservation work?
- Probably some other things I'm forgetting. =]
Look forward to more patches in shorter order now that this is in place.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194538 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is still just a skeleton. I'm trying to pull together the
experimentation I've done into committable chunks, and this is the first
coherent one. Others will follow in hopefully short order that move this
more toward a useful initial implementation. I still expect the design
to continue evolving in small ways as I work through the different
requirements and features needed here though.
Keep in mind, all of this is off by default.
Currently, this mostly exercises the use of a polymorphic smart pointer
and templates to hide the polymorphism for the pass manager from the
pass implementation. The next step will be more significant, adding the
first framework of analysis support.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194325 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
give the files a legacy prefix in the right directory. Use forwarding
headers in the old locations to paper over the name change for most
clients during the transitional period.
No functionality changed here! This is just clearing some space to
reduce renaming churn later on with a new system.
Even when the new stuff starts to go in, it is going to be hidden behind
a flag and off-by-default as it is still WIP and under development.
This patch is specifically designed so that very little out-of-tree code
has to change. I'm going to work as hard as I can to keep that the case.
Only direct forward declarations of the PassManager class are impacted
by this change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194324 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
r-value references. I still want to test that when we have them,
llvm_move is actually a move.
Have I mentioned that I really want to move to C++11? ;]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194318 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Clang managed to never instantiate the copy constructor. Added tests to
ensure this path is tested.
We could still use tests for the polymorphic nature. Those coming up
next.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194317 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
unique ownership smart pointer which is *deep* copyable by assuming it
can call a T::clone() method to allocate a copy of the owned data.
This is mostly useful with containers or other collections of uniquely
owned data in C++98 where they *might* copy. With C++11 we can likely
remove this in favor of move-only types and containers wrapped around
those types.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194315 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This would cause internal symbols that are only referenced by global initializers to be removed.
This reverts commit 194219.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194304 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The BlockAddress doesn't have access to the correct basic blocks until the
functions have been cloned. This causes the BlockAddress to point to the old
values. Just wait until the functions have been cloned before copying the
initializers.
PR13163
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194218 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
ErrorOr had quiet a bit of complexity and indirection to be able to hold a user
type with the error.
That feature is not used anymore. This patch removes it, it will live in svn
history if we ever need it again.
If we do need it again, IMHO there is one thing that should be done
differently: Holding extra info in the error is not a property a function also
returning a value or not. The ability to hold extra info should be in the error
type and ErrorOr templated over it so that we don't need the funny looking
ErrorOr<void>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194030 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The function verifyFunction() in lib/IR/Verifier.cpp misses some
calls. It creates a temporary FunctionPassManager that will run a
single Verifier pass. Unfortunately, FunctionPassManager is no
PassManager and does not call doInitialization() and doFinalization()
by itself. Verifier does important tasks in doInitialization() such as
collecting type information used to check DebugInfo metadata and
doFinalization() does some additional checks. Therefore these checks
were missed and debug info couldn't be verified at all, it just
crashed if the function had some.
verifyFunction() is currently not used in llvm unless -debug option is
enabled, and in unittests/IR/VerifierTest.cpp
VerifierTest had to be changed to create the function in a module from
which the type debug info can be collected.
Patch by Michael Kruse.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@193719 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Use DWARF4 table of form classes to fetch attributes from DIE
in a more consistent way. This shouldn't change the functionality and
serves as a refactoring for upcoming change: DW_AT_high_pc has different
semantics depending on its form class.
Reviewers: dblaikie, echristo
Reviewed By: echristo
CC: echristo, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1961
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@193553 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Includes a test case/FIXME demonstrating a bug/limitation in pointer to
member hashing. To be honest I'm not sure why we don't just always use
summary hashing for referenced types... but perhaps I'm missing
something.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@193175 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There are several other tag types that need similar handling but to
ensure test coverage they'll be coming incrementally.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@193126 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This uses a map, keeping the type DIE numbering separate from the DIEs
themselves - alternatively we could do things the way GCC does if we
want to add an integer to the DIE type to record the numbering there.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@193105 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
GTest assumes the left hand side of the assert is the expectation and
the right hand side is the test result. It's easier to read gtest
failures when these things are ordered correctly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@192854 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch fixes a small mistake in MCDataAtom::addData() where it doesn't ever
call remap():
- if (Data.size() > Begin - End - 1)
+ if (Data.size() > End + 1 - Begin)
remap(Begin, End + 1);
This is currently not visible because of another bug is the disassembler, so
the patch includes a unit test.
Patch by Stephen Checkoway.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@192823 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Before this patch we would assert when building llvm as multiple shared
libraries (cmake's BUILD_SHARED_LIBS). The problem was the line
if (T.AsmStreamerCtorFn == Target::createDefaultAsmStreamer)
which returns false because of -fvisibility-inlines-hidden. It is easy
to fix just this one case, but I decided to try to also make the
registration more strict. It looks like the old logic for ignoring
followup registration was just a temporary hack that outlived its
usefulness.
This patch converts the ifs to asserts, fixes the few cases that were
registering twice and makes sure all the asserts compare with null.
Thanks for Joerg for reporting the problem and reviewing the patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@192803 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Also minor using namespace move so it's not hard-up against the function
definition and outside the namespace as is usual.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@192744 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
