3 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Benjamin Kramer	f51190b697	X86: Add a bunch of peeps for add and sub of SETB. ... "b + ((a < b) ? 1 : 0)" compiles into cmpl %esi, %edi adcl $0, %esi instead of cmpl %esi, %edi sbbl %eax, %eax andl $1, %eax addl %esi, %eax This saves a register, a false dependency on %eax (Intel's CPUs still don't ignore it) and it's shorter. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@131070 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8	2011-05-08 18:36:07 +00:00
Chris Lattner	c19d1c3ba2	improve the setcc -> setcc_carry optimization to happen more ... consistently by moving it out of lowering into dag combine. Add some missing patterns for matching away extended versions of setcc_c. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122201 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8	2010-12-19 22:08:31 +00:00
Owen Anderson	c004eec71b	When adding the carry bit to another value on X86, exploit the fact that the carry-materialization ... (sbbl x, x) sets the registers to 0 or ~0. Combined with two's complement arithmetic, we can fold the intermediate AND and the ADD into a single SUB. This fixes <rdar://problem/8449754>. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@114460 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8	2010-09-21 18:41:19 +00:00