- the selector for the landing pad must provide all available information
about the handlers, filters, and cleanups within that landing pad
- calls to _Unwind_Resume must be converted to branches to the enclosing
lpad so as to avoid re-entering the unwinder when the lpad claimed it
was going to handle the exception in some way
This is quite specific to libUnwind-based unwinding. In an effort to not
interfere too badly with other unwinders, and with existing hacks in frontends,
this only triggers on _Unwind_Resume (not _Unwind_Resume_or_Rethrow) and does
nothing with selectors if it cannot find a selector call for either lpad.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@132200 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
crc32.[8|16|32] have been renamed to .crc32.32.[8|16|32] and
crc64.[8|16|32] have been renamed to .crc32.64.[8|64].
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@132163 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Use a proper worklist for use-def traversal without holding onto an
iterator. Now that we process all IV uses, we need complete logic for
resusing existing derived IV defs. See HoistStep.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@132103 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
aligned.
Teach memcpyopt to not give up all hope when confonted with an underaligned
memcpy feeding an overaligned byval. If the *source* of the memcpy can be
determined to be adequeately aligned, or if it can be forced to be, we can
eliminate the memcpy.
This addresses PR9794. We now compile the example into:
define i32 @f(%struct.p* nocapture byval align 8 %q) nounwind ssp {
entry:
%call = call i32 @g(%struct.p* byval align 8 %q) nounwind
ret i32 %call
}
in both x86-64 and x86-32 mode. We still don't get a tailcall though,
because tailcalls apparently can't handle byval.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@131884 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
failing to form a memset, then having to delete it" but my approximation
isn't safe for self recurrent loops. Instead of doign a hack, just
do it the right way.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@131858 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I also changed -simplifycfg, -jump-threading and -codegenprepare to use this to produce slightly better code without any extra cleanup passes (AFAICT this was the only place in -simplifycfg where now-dead conditions of replaced terminators weren't being cleaned up). The only other user of this function is -sccp, but I didn't read that thoroughly enough to figure out whether it might be holding pointers to instructions that could be deleted by this.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@131855 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
causing it to get into infinite loops when it would widen a
load (which can necessarily leave around dead loads).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@131847 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It's better to do this in codegen, mul.with.overflow(X, 2) is more canonical because it has only one use on "X".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@131798 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As an example, the change to InstCombineCalls catches a common case where a call to a bitcast of a function is rewritten.
Chris, does this approach look reasonable?
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@131516 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
often expressed as "x >= y ? x : y", there is a good chance we can extract
the existing "x >= y" from it and use that as a replacement for "max(x,y)==x".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@131049 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
return the pointer being dereferenced, it returns the pointee, but a call
might return the pointer itself.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@130979 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
but according to my super-optimizer there are only two missed simplifications
of -instsimplify kind when compiling bzip2, and this is one of them. It amuses
me to have bzip2 be perfectly optimized as far as instsimplify goes!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@130840 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
max(a,b) >= a -> true. According to my super-optimizer, these are
by far the most common simplifications (of the -instsimplify kind)
that occur in the testsuite and aren't caught by -std-compile-opts.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@130780 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This automagically provides a transform noticed by my super-optimizer
as occurring quite often: "rem x, (select cond, x, 1)" -> 0.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@130694 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This obviously helps a lot if the division would be turned into a libcall
(think i64 udiv on i386), but div is also one of the few remaining instructions
on modern CPUs that become more expensive when the bitwidth gets bigger.
This also helps register pressure on i386 when dividing chars, divb needs
two 8-bit parts of a 16 bit register as input where divl uses two registers.
int foo(unsigned char a) { return a/10; }
int bar(unsigned char a, unsigned char b) { return a/b; }
compiles into (x86_64)
_foo:
imull $205, %edi, %eax
shrl $11, %eax
ret
_bar:
movzbl %dil, %eax
divb %sil, %al
movzbl %al, %eax
ret
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@130615 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
