Requires a lot less code and complexity on loop-idiom's side and the more
precise analysis can catch more cases, like the one I included as a test case.
This also fixes the edge-case miscompilation from PR9481. I'm not entirely
sure that all cases are handled that the old checks handled but LDA will
certainly become smarter in the future.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166390 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We used a SCEV to detect that A[X] is consecutive. We assumed that X was
the induction variable. But X can be any expression that uses the induction
for example: X = i + 2;
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166388 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is important for nested-loop reductions such as :
In the innermost loop, the induction variable does not start with zero:
for (i = 0 .. n)
for (j = 0 .. m)
sum += ...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166387 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
obvious stuff and most new code being committed conforms to that. Some old
code does not; this might cause confusion and this is the motivation to
document the correct guidelines.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166378 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If the pointer is consecutive then it is safe to read and write. If the pointer is non-loop-consecutive then
it is unsafe to vectorize it because we may hit an ordering issue.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166371 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(The change at Clang side was committed in r166345)
2. Cosmetic change in order to conform to coding standards.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166350 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently, it is enabled only if option "enable-mips-tail-calls" is given and
all of the callee's arguments are passed in registers.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166342 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a memory operand. Retain this information and then add the sizing directives
to the IR. This allows the backend to do proper instruction selection.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166316 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- The XTARGET feature (inherited from old DG tests) was just confusing (and
barely ever used). The same effect can now be achieved with a combination of
the more useful REQUIRES and XFAIL.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166305 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
which is supposed to consistently raise SIGTRAP across all systems. In contrast,
__builtin_trap() behave differently on different systems. e.g. it raises SIGTRAP on ARM, and
SIGILL on X86. The purpose of __builtin_debugtrap() is to consistently provide "trap"
functionality, in the mean time preserve the compatibility with on gcc on __builtin_trap().
The X86 backend is already able to handle debugtrap(). This patch is to:
1) make front-end recognize "__builtin_debugtrap()" (emboddied in the one-line change to Clang).
2) In DAG legalization phase, by default, "debugtrap" will be replaced with "trap", which
make the __builtin_debugtrap() "available" to all existing ports without the hassle of
changing their code.
3) If trap-function is specified (via -trap-func=xyz to llc), both __builtin_debugtrap() and
__builtin_trap() will be expanded into the function call of the specified trap function.
This behavior may need change in the future.
The provided testing-case is to make sure 2) and 3) are working for ARM port, and we
already have a testing case for x86.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166300 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- If INSERT_VECTOR_ELT is supported (above SSE2, either by custom
sequence of legal insn), transform BUILD_VECTOR into SHUFFLE +
INSERT_VECTOR_ELT if most of elements could be built from SHUFFLE with few
(so far 1) elements being inserted.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166288 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
