First, don't combine bit masking into vector shuffles (even ones the
target can handle) once operation legalization has taken place. Custom
legalization of vector shuffles may exist for these patterns (making the
predicate return true) but that custom legalization may in some cases
produce the exact bit math this matches. We only really want to handle
this prior to operation legalization.
However, the x86 backend, in a fit of awesome, relied on this. What it
would do is mark VSELECTs as expand, which would turn them into
arithmetic, which this would then match back into vector shuffles, which
we would then lower properly. Amazing.
Instead, the second change is to teach the x86 backend to directly form
vector shuffles from VSELECT nodes with constant conditions, and to mark
all of the vector types we support lowering blends as shuffles as custom
VSELECT lowering. We still mark the forms which actually support
variable blends as *legal* so that the custom lowering is bypassed, and
the legal lowering can even be used by the vector shuffle legalization
(yes, i know, this is confusing. but that's how the patterns are
written).
This makes the VSELECT lowering much more sensible, and in fact should
fix a bunch of bugs with it. However, as you'll see in the test cases,
right now what it does is point out the *hilarious* deficiency of the
new vector shuffle lowering when it comes to blends. Fortunately, my
very next patch fixes that. I can't submit it yet, because that patch,
somewhat obviously, forms the exact and/or pattern that the DAG combine
is matching here! Without this patch, teaching the vector shuffle
lowering to produce the right code infloops in the DAG combiner. With
this patch alone, we produce terrible code but at least lower through
the right paths. With both patches, all the regressions here should be
fixed, and a bunch of the improvements (like using 2 shufps with no
memory loads instead of 2 andps with memory loads and an orps) will
stay. Win!
There is one other change worth noting here. We had hilariously wrong
vectorization cost estimates for vselect because we fell through to the
code path that assumed all "expand" vector operations are scalarized.
However, the "expand" lowering of VSELECT is vector bit math, most
definitely not scalarized. So now we go back to the correct if horribly
naive cost of "1" for "not scalarized". If anyone wants to add actual
modeling of shuffle costs, that would be cool, but this seems an
improvement on its own. Note the removal of 16 and 32 "costs" for doing
a blend. Even in SSE2 we can blend in fewer than 16 instructions. ;] Of
course, we don't right now because of OMG bad code, but I'm going to fix
that. Next patch. I promise.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229835 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
actually removed all but a *very* small number of choices for v2i64.
Also remove dead code handling cases that simply cannot arise.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229670 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
quite literally the same work, we just need to special case the >64-bit
element shift code emission to emit the byte shift instructions and
offsets. This also makes reasoning about each of the vector lowering
strategies easier as we don't have to remember to use both forms.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229662 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
code.
While this didn't have the miscompile (it used MatchLeft consistently)
it missed some cases where it could use right shifts. I've added a test
case Craig Topper came up with to exercise the right shift matching.
This code is really identical between the two. I'm going to merge them
next so that we don't keep two copies of all of this logic.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229655 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
track state.
I didn't like this in the code review because the pattern tends to be
error prone, but I didn't see a clear way to rewrite it. Turns out that
there were bugs here, I found them when fuzz testing our shuffle
lowering for correctness on x86.
The core of the problem is that we need to consistently test all our
preconditions for the same directionality of shift and the same input
vector. Instead, formulate this as two predicates (one doesn't depend on
the input in any way), pass things like the directionality and input
vector as inputs, and loop over the alternatives.
This fixes a pattern of very rare miscompiles coming out of this code.
Turned up roughly 4 out of every 1 million v8 shuffles in my fuzz
testing. The new code is over half a million test runs with no failures
yet. I've also fuzzed every other function in the lowering code with
over 3.5 million test cases and not discovered any other miscompiles.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229642 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
GCC 4.8 reported two new warnings due to comparisons
between signed and unsigned integer expressions. The new warnings were
accidentally introduced by revision 229480.
Added explicit casts to silence the warnings. No functional change intended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229488 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Vector zext tends to get legalized into a vector anyext, represented as a vector shuffle with an undef vector + a bitcast, that gets ANDed with a mask that zeroes the undef elements.
Combine this into an explicit shuffle with a zero vector instead. This allows shuffle lowering to match it as a zext, instead of matching it as an anyext and emitting an explicit AND.
This combine only covers a subset of the cases, but it's a start.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7666
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229480 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This allows it to match still more places where previously we would have
to fall back on floating point shuffles or other more complex lowering
strategies.
I'm hoping to replace some of the hand-rolled unpack matching with this
routine is it gets more and more clever.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229463 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to generically lower blends and is particularly nice because it is
available frome SSE2 onward. This removes a lot of the remaining domain
crossing blends in SSE2 code.
I'm hoping to replace some of the "interleaved" lowering hacks with
something closer to this which should be more principled. First, this
needs to learn how to detect and use other interleavings besides that of
the natural type provided. That will be a follow-up patch though.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229378 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This blend instruction is ... really lame. The register usage is insane.
As a consequence this is probably only *barely* better than 2 pshufbs
followed by a por, and that mostly because it only has to read from
a single memory location.
However, this doesn't fix as much as I kind of expected, so more to go.
Pretty sure that the ordering and delegation of v16i8 is just really,
really bad.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229373 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
template now that we can use them.
This is, of course, horribly ugly because of the required recursive
formulation. Suggestions for making it less ugly welcome.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229367 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
advantage of the existence of a reasonable blend instruction.
The 256-bit vector shuffle lowering has leveraged the general technique
of decomposed shuffles and blends for quite some time, but this never
made it back into the 128-bit code, and there are a large number of
patterns where this is substantially better. For example, this removes
almost all domain crossing in vector shuffles that involve some blend
and some permutation with SSE4.1 and later. See the massive reduction
in 'shufps' for integer test cases in this commit.
This isn't perfect yet for a few reasons:
1) The v8i16 shuffle lowering continues to plague me. We don't always
form an unpack-based blend when that would be better. But the wins
pretty drastically outstrip the losses here.
2) The v16i8 shuffle lowering is just a disaster here. I never went and
implemented blend support here for some terrible reason. I'll do
that next probably. I've not updated it for now.
More variations on this technique are coming as well -- we don't
shuffle-into-unpack or shuffle-into-palignr, both of which would also be
profitable.
Note that some test cases grow significantly in the number of
instructions, but I expect to actually be faster. We use
pshufd+pshufd+blendw instead of a single shufps, but the pshufd's are
very likely to pipeline well (two ports on most modern intel chips) and
the blend is a *very* fast instruction. The domain switch penalty will
essentially always be more than a blend instruction, which is the only
increase in tree height.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229350 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch refactors the existing lowerVectorShuffleAsByteShift function to add support for 256-bit vectors on AVX2 targets.
It also fixes a tablegen issue that prevented the lowering of vpslldq/vpsrldq vec256 instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7596
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229311 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
when that will allow it to lower with a single permute instead of
multiple permutes.
It tries to detect when it will only have to do a single permute in
either case to maximize folding of loads and such.
This cuts a *lot* of the avx2 shuffle permute counts in half. =]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229309 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
vectors and detect equivalent inputs.
This lets the code match unpck-style instructions when only one of the
inputs are lined up but the other input is a splat and so which lanes we
pull from doesn't matter. Today, this doesn't really happen, but just by
accident. I have a patch that normalizes how we shuffle splats, and with
that patch this will be necessary for a lot of the mask equivalence
tests to work.
I don't really know how to write a test case for this specific change
until the other change lands though.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229307 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
don't try to do element insertion for non-zero-index floating point
vectors.
We don't have any useful patterns or lowering for element insertion into
high elements of a floating point vector, and the generic shuffle
lowering will end up being better -- namely it will fall back to unpck.
But we should try to handle other forms of element insertion before
matching unpck patterns.
While this doesn't matter much right now, I'm working on a patch that
makes unpck matching much more powerful, and that patch will break
without this re-ordering.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229306 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I was somewhat surprised this pattern really came up, but it does. It
seems better to just directly handle it than try to special case every
place where we end up forming a shuffle that devolves to a shuffle of
a zero vector.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229301 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
subvectors from buildvectors. That doesn't really make any sense and it
breaks all of the down-stream matching of buildvectors to cleverly lower
shuffles.
With this, we now get the shift-based lowering of 256-bit vector
shuffles with AVX1 when we split them into 128-bit vectors. We also do
much better on the zero-extension patterns, although there remains quite
a bit of room for improvement here.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229299 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
least in theory.
I don't actually have a test case that benefits from this, but
theoretically, it could come up, and I don't want to try to think about
whether this is the culprit or something else is, so I'd rather just
make this code powerful. =/ Makes me sad that I can't really test it
though.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229298 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
lowerings -- one which decomposes into an initial blend followed by
a permute.
Particularly on newer chips, blends are handled independently of
shuffles and so this is much less bottlenecked on the single port that
floating point shuffles are executed with on Intel.
I'll be adding this lowering to a bunch of other code paths in
subsequent commits to handle still more places where we can effectively
leverage blends when they're available in the ISA.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229292 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Canonicalize access to function attributes to use the simpler API.
getAttributes().getAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex, Kind)
=> getFnAttribute(Kind)
getAttributes().hasAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex, Kind)
=> hasFnAttribute(Kind)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229214 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Constant pool entries are uniqued by their contents regardless of their
type. This means that a pshufb can have a shuffle mask which isn't a
simple array of bytes.
The code path which attempts to decode the mask didn't check for
failure, causing PR22559.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228979 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Using KORTESTW for comparison i1 value with zero was wrong since the instruction tests 16 bits.
KORTESTW may be used with KSHIFTL+KSHIFTR that clean the 15 upper bits.
I removed (X86cmp i1, 0) pattern and zero-extend i1 to i8 and then use TESTB.
There are some cases where i1 is in the mask register and the upper bits are already zeroed.
Then KORTESTW is the better solution, but it is subject for optimization.
Meanwhile, I'm fixing the correctness issue.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228916 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Simply loading or storing the frame pointer is not sufficient for
Windows targets. Instead, create a synthetic frame object that we will
lower later. References to this synthetic object will be replaced with
the correct reference to the frame address.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The combine that forms extloads used to be disabled on vector types,
because "None of the supported targets knows how to perform load and
sign extend on vectors in one instruction."
That's not entirely true, since at least SSE4.1 X86 knows how to do
those sextloads/zextloads (with PMOVS/ZX).
But there are several aspects to getting this right.
First, vector extloads are controlled by a profitability callback.
For instance, on ARM, several instructions have folded extload forms,
so it's not always beneficial to create an extload node (and trying to
match extloads is a whole 'nother can of worms).
The interesting optimization enables folding of s/zextloads to illegal
(splittable) vector types, expanding them into smaller legal extloads.
It's not ideal (it introduces some legalization-like behavior in the
combine) but it's better than the obvious alternative: form illegal
extloads, and later try to split them up. If you do that, you might
generate extloads that can't be split up, but have a valid ext+load
expansion. At vector-op legalization time, it's too late to generate
this kind of code, so you end up forced to scalarize. It's better to
just avoid creating egregiously illegal nodes.
This optimization is enabled unconditionally on X86.
Note that the splitting combine is happy with "custom" extloads. As
is, this bypasses the actual custom lowering, and just unrolls the
extload. But from what I've seen, this is still much better than the
current custom lowering, which does some kind of unrolling at the end
anyway (see for instance load_sext_4i8_to_4i64 on SSE2, and the added
FIXME).
Also note that the existing combine that forms extloads is now also
enabled on legal vectors. This doesn't have a big effect on X86
(because sext+load is usually combined to sext_inreg+aextload).
On ARM it fires on some rare occasions; that's for a separate commit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6904
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228325 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The return value's address must be returned in %rax.
i.e. the callee needs to copy the sret argument (%rdi)
into the return value (%rax).
This probably won't manifest as a bug when the caller is LLVM-compiled
code. But it is an ABI guarantee and tools expect it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228321 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Implement a BITCAST dag combine to transform i32->mmx conversion patterns
into a X86 specific node (MMX_MOVW2D) and guarantee that moves between
i32 and x86mmx are better handled, i.e., don't use store-load to do the
conversion..
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228293 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the simplest form of bit-math based blending which only fires
when we are blending with zero and is relatively profitable. I've only
enabled this path on very specific lowering strategies. I'm planning to
widen its applicability in subsequent patches, but so far you'll notice
that even though we get fewer shufps instructions, we *still* do the bit
math in the FP execution port. I'm looking into why this is still
happening.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228124 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
