This commit creates infinite loop in DAG combine for in the LLVM test-suite
for aarch64 with mcpu=cylcone (just having neon may be enough to expose this).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227272 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch resolves part of PR21711 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21711 ).
The 'f3' test case in that report presents a situation where we have two 128-bit
stores extracted from a 256-bit source vector.
Instead of producing this:
vmovaps %xmm0, (%rdi)
vextractf128 $1, %ymm0, 16(%rdi)
This patch merges the 128-bit stores into a single 256-bit store:
vmovups %ymm0, (%rdi)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7208
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227242 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a 2nd try at the same optimization as http://reviews.llvm.org/D6698.
That patch was checked in at r224611, but reverted at r225031 because it
caused a failure outside of the regression tests.
The cause of the crash was not recognizing consecutive stores that have mixed
source values (loads and vector element extracts), so this patch adds a check
to bail out if any store value is not coming from a vector element extract.
This patch also refactors the shared logic of the constant source and vector
extracted elements source cases into a helper function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6850
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@226845 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The current memory-instruction optimization logic in CGP, which sinks parts of
the address computation that can be adsorbed by the addressing mode, does this
by explicitly converting the relevant part of the address computation into
IR-level integer operations (making use of ptrtoint and inttoptr). For most
targets this is currently not a problem, but for targets wishing to make use of
IR-level aliasing analysis during CodeGen, the use of ptrtoint/inttoptr is a
problem for two reasons:
1. BasicAA becomes less powerful in the face of the ptrtoint/inttoptr
2. In cases where type-punning was used, and BasicAA was used
to override TBAA, BasicAA may no longer do so. (this had forced us to disable
all use of TBAA in CodeGen; something which we can now enable again)
This (use of GEPs instead of ptrtoint/inttoptr) is not currently enabled by
default (except for those targets that use AA during CodeGen), and so aside
from some PowerPC subtargets and SystemZ, there should be no change in
behavior. We may be able to switch completely away from the ptrtoint/inttoptr
sinking on all targets, but further testing is required.
I've doubled-up on a number of existing tests that are sensitive to the
address sinking behavior (including some store-merging tests that are
sensitive to the order of the resulting ADD operations at the SDAG level).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206092 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
All changes were made by the following bash script:
find test/CodeGen -name "*.ll" | \
while read NAME; do
echo "$NAME"
grep -q "^; *RUN: *llc.*debug" $NAME && continue
grep -q "^; *RUN:.*llvm-objdump" $NAME && continue
grep -q "^; *RUN: *opt.*" $NAME && continue
TEMP=`mktemp -t temp`
cp $NAME $TEMP
sed -n "s/^define [^@]*@\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\)(.*$/\1/p" < $NAME | \
while read FUNC; do
sed -i '' "s/;\([A-Za-z0-9_-]*\)\([A-Za-z0-9_-]*\):\( *\)$FUNC[:]* *\$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3$FUNC:/g" $TEMP
done
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-LABEL-LABEL:/;\1-LABEL:/" $TEMP
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-NEXT-LABEL:/;\1-NEXT:/" $TEMP
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-NOT-LABEL:/;\1-NOT:/" $TEMP
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-DAG-LABEL:/;\1-DAG:/" $TEMP
mv $TEMP $NAME
done
This script catches a superset of the cases caught by the script associated with commit r186280. It initially found some false positives due to unusual constructs in a minority of tests; all such cases were disambiguated first in commit r186621.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186624 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We would also like to merge sequences that involve a variable index like in the
example below.
int index = *idx++
int i0 = c[index+0];
int i1 = c[index+1];
b[0] = i0;
b[1] = i1;
By extending the parsing of the base pointer to handle dags that contain a
base, index, and offset we can handle examples like the one above.
The dag for the code above will look something like:
(load (i64 add (i64 copyfromreg %c)
(i64 signextend (i8 load %index))))
(load (i64 add (i64 copyfromreg %c)
(i64 signextend (i32 add (i32 signextend (i8 load %index))
(i32 1)))))
The code that parses the tree ignores the intermediate sign extensions. However,
if there is a sign extension it needs to be on all indexes.
(load (i64 add (i64 copyfromreg %c)
(i64 signextend (add (i8 load %index)
(i8 1))))
vs
(load (i64 add (i64 copyfromreg %c)
(i64 signextend (i32 add (i32 signextend (i8 load %index))
(i32 1)))))
radar://13536387
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178483 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
is not profitable in many cases because modern processors perform multiple stores
in parallel and merging stores prior to merging requires extra work. We handle two main cases:
1. Store of multiple consecutive constants:
q->a = 3;
q->4 = 5;
In this case we store a single legal wide integer.
2. Store of multiple consecutive loads:
int a = p->a;
int b = p->b;
q->a = a;
q->b = b;
In this case we load/store either ilegal vector registers or legal wide integer registers.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165125 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
because moden processos can store multiple values in parallel, and preparing the consecutive store requires
some work. We only handle these cases:
1. Consecutive stores where the values and consecutive loads. For example:
int a = p->a;
int b = p->b;
q->a = a;
q->b = b;
2. Consecutive stores where the values are constants. Foe example:
q->a = 4;
q->b = 5;
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164910 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
buildbots. Original commit message:
A DAGCombine optimization for merging consecutive stores. This optimization is not profitable in many cases
because moden processos can store multiple values in parallel, and preparing the consecutive store requires
some work. We only handle these cases:
1. Consecutive stores where the values and consecutive loads. For example:
int a = p->a;
int b = p->b;
q->a = a;
q->b = b;
2. Consecutive stores where the values are constants. Foe example:
q->a = 4;
q->b = 5;
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164890 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
because moden processos can store multiple values in parallel, and preparing the consecutive store requires
some work. We only handle these cases:
1. Consecutive stores where the values and consecutive loads. For example:
int a = p->a;
int b = p->b;
q->a = a;
q->b = b;
2. Consecutive stores where the values are constants. Foe example:
q->a = 4;
q->b = 5;
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164885 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
