A subtle bug was found where attempting to copy a non-const function_ref
lvalue would actually invoke the generic forwarding constructor (as it
was a closer match - being T& rather than the const T& of the implicit
copy constructor). In the particular case this lead to a dangling
function_ref member (since it had referenced the function_ref passed by
value to its ctor, rather than the outer function_ref that was still
alive)
SFINAE the converting constructor to not be considered if the copy
constructor is available and demonstrate that this causes the copy to
refer to the original functor, not to the function_ref it was copied
from. (without the code change, the test would fail as Y would be
referencing X and Y() would see the result of the mutation to X, ie: 2)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221753 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was reverted in r208642 due to regressions surrounding file changes
within lexical scopes causing inlining information to be lost.
The issue was in LexicalScopes::getOrCreateInlinedScope, where I was
previously testing "isLexicalBlock" which is false for
"DILexicalBlockFile" (a scope used to represent changes in the current
file name) and assuming it was then a function (breaking out of the
inlined scope path and reaching for the parent non-inlined scopes). By
inverting the condition and testing for "isSubprogram" the correct
behavior is attained.
(also found some weirdness in Clang, see r208742 when reducing this test
case - the resulting test case doesn't apply with the Clang fix, but
I've added a more realistic test case to inline-scopes.ll which does
reproduce the issue and demonstrate the fix)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r208506.
Some inlined subroutine scopes appear to be missing with this change.
Reverting while I investigate.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208642 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This makes using array_pod_sort significantly safer. The implementation relies
on function pointer casting but that should be safe as we're dealing with void*
here.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191175 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There is a pretty staggering amount of this in LLVM's header files, this
is not all of the instances I'm afraid. These include all of the
functions that (in my build) are used by a non-static inline (or
external) function. Specifically, these issues were caught by the new
'-Winternal-linkage-in-inline' warning.
I'll try to just clean up the remainder of the clearly redundant "static
inline" cases on functions (not methods!) defined within headers if
I can do so in a reliable way.
There were even several cases of a missing 'inline' altogether, or my
personal favorite "static bool inline". Go figure. ;]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@158800 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This nicely handles the most common case of virtual register sets, but
also handles anticipated cases where we will map pointers to IDs.
The goal is not to develop a completely generic SparseSet
template. Instead we want to handle the expected uses within llvm
without any template antics in the client code. I'm adding a bit of
template nastiness here, and some assumption about expected usage in
order to make the client code very clean.
The expected common uses cases I'm designing for:
- integer keys that need to be reindexed, and may map to additional
data
- densely numbered objects where we want pointer keys because no
number->object map exists.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@155227 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
instead of std::sort. This shrinks the release-asserts LSR.o file
by 1100 bytes of code on my system.
We should start using array_pod_sort where possible.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@60335 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
