A DAGRootSet models an induction variable being used in a rerollable
loop. For example:
x[i*3+0] = y1
x[i*3+1] = y2
x[i*3+2] = y3
Base instruction -> i*3
+---+----+
/ | \
ST[y1] +1 +2 <-- Roots
| |
ST[y2] ST[y3]
There may be multiple DAGRootSets, for example:
x[i*2+0] = ... (1)
x[i*2+1] = ... (1)
x[i*2+4] = ... (2)
x[i*2+5] = ... (2)
x[(i+1234)*2+5678] = ... (3)
x[(i+1234)*2+5679] = ... (3)
This concept is similar to the "Scale" member used previously, but allows
multiple independent sets of roots based off the same induction variable.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228821 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If the landingpad of the invoke is using a personality function that
catches asynch exceptions, then it can catch a trap.
Also add some landingpads to invalid LLVM IR test cases that lack them.
Over-the-shoulder reviewed by David Majnemer.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228782 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Unless we meet an insertvalue on a path from some value to a return, that value
will be live if *any* of the return's components are live, so all of those
components must be added to the MaybeLiveUses.
Previously we were deleting arguments if sub-value 0 turned out to be dead.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228731 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit isn't using the correct context, and is transfoming calls
that are operands to loads rather than calls that are operands to an
icmp feeding into an assume. I've replied on the original review thread
with a very reduced test case and some thoughts on how to rework this.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228677 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These tests the two optimizations for backedge insertion currently implemented and the split backedge flag which is currently off by default.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228617 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is just adding really simple tests which should have been part of the original submission. When doing so, I discovered that I'd mistakenly removed required pieces when preparing the patch for upstream submission. I fixed two such bugs in this submission.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228610 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Some parts of DeadArgElim were only considering the individual fields
of StructTypes separately, but others (where insertvalue &
extractvalue instructions occur) also looked into ArrayTypes.
This one is an actual bug; the mismatch can lead to an argument being
considered used by a return sub-value that isn't being tracked (and
hence is dead by default). It then gets incorrectly eliminated.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228559 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously, a non-extractvalue use of an aggregate return value meant
the entire return was considered live (the algorithm gave up
entirely). This was correct, but conservative. It's better to actually
look at that Use, making the analysis results apply to all sub-values
under consideration.
E.g.
%val = call { i32, i32 } @whatever()
[...]
ret { i32, i32 } %val
The return is using the entire aggregate (sub-values 0 and 1). We can
still simplify @whatever if we can prove that this return is itself
unused.
Also unifies the logic slightly between aggregate and non-aggregate
cases..
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228558 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The alias.scope metadata represents sets of things an instruction might
alias with. When generically combining the metadata from two
instructions the result must be the union of the original sets, because
the new instruction might alias with anything any of the original
instructions aliased with.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7490
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228525 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Turns out there is a simpler way of checking that all bytes in a word are equal
than binary decomposition.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228503 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Normalize
select(C0, select(C1, a, b), b) -> select((C0 & C1), a, b)
select(C0, a, select(C1, a, b)) -> select((C0 | C1), a, b)
This normal form may enable further combines on the And/Or and shortens
paths for the values. Many targets prefer the other but can go back
easily in CodeGen.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7399
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228409 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: When evaluating floating point instructions in the inliner, ask the TTI whether it is an expensive operation. By default, it's not an expensive operation. This keeps the default behavior the same as before. The ARM TTI has been updated to return back TCC_Expensive for targets which don't have hardware floating point.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo
Reviewed By: echristo
Subscribers: t.p.northover, aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6936
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228263 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We were previously doing a post-order traversal and operating on the
list in reverse, however this would occasionaly cause backedges for
loops to be visited before some of the other blocks in the loop.
We know use a reverse post-order traversal, which avoids this issue.
The reverse post-order traversal is not completely ideal, so we need
to manually fixup the list to ensure that inner loop backedges are
visited before outer loop backedges.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228186 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts patches 223862, 224198, 224203, and 224754, which were all
related to the vector load/store combining and were reverted/reaplied
a few times due to the same alignment problems we're seeing now.
Further tests, mainly self-hosting Clang, will be needed to reapply this
patch in the future.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228129 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Straight-line strength reduction (SLSR) is implemented in GCC but not yet in
LLVM. It has proven to effectively simplify statements derived from an unrolled
loop, and can potentially benefit many other cases too. For example,
LLVM unrolls
#pragma unroll
foo (int i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
sum += foo((b + i) * s);
}
into
sum += foo(b * s);
sum += foo((b + 1) * s);
sum += foo((b + 2) * s);
However, no optimizations yet reduce the internal redundancy of the three
expressions:
b * s
(b + 1) * s
(b + 2) * s
With SLSR, LLVM can optimize these three expressions into:
t1 = b * s
t2 = t1 + s
t3 = t2 + s
This commit is only an initial step towards implementing a series of such
optimizations. I will implement more (see TODO in the file commentary) in the
near future. This optimization is enabled for the NVPTX backend for now.
However, I am more than happy to push it to the standard optimization pipeline
after more thorough performance tests.
Test Plan: test/StraightLineStrengthReduce/slsr.ll
Reviewers: eliben, HaoLiu, meheff, hfinkel, jholewinski, atrick
Reviewed By: jholewinski, atrick
Subscribers: karthikthecool, jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7310
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228016 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The commit r225977 uncovered this bug. The problem was that the vectorizer tried to
read the second operand of an already deleted instruction.
The bug didn't show up before r225977 because the freed memory still contained a non-null pointer.
With r225977 deletion of instructions is delayed and the read operand pointer is always null.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227800 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This should be sufficient to replace the initial (minor) function pass
pipeline in Clang with the new pass manager. I'll probably add an (off
by default) flag to do that just to ensure we can get extra testing.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227726 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I've added RUN lines both to the basic test for EarlyCSE and the
target-specific test, as this serves as a nice test that the TTI layer
in the new pass manager is in fact working well.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227725 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Patch by: Igor Laevsky <igor@azulsystems.com>
"Currently SplitBlockPredecessors generates incorrect code in case if basic block we are going to split has a landingpad. Also seems like it is fairly common case among it's users to conditionally call either SplitBlockPredecessors or SplitLandingPadPredecessors. Because of this I think it is reasonable to add this condition directly into SplitBlockPredecessors."
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7157
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227390 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Reduce integer multiplication by a constant of the form k*2^c, where k is in {3,5,9} into a lea + shl. Previously it was only done for imulq on 64-bit platforms, but it makes sense for imull and 32-bit as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7196
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227308 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch folds fcmp in some cases of interest in Julia. The patch adds a function CannotBeOrderedLessThanZero that returns true if a value is provably not less than zero. I.e. the function returns true if the value is provably -0, +0, positive, or a NaN. The patch extends InstructionSimplify.cpp to fold instances of fcmp where:
- the predicate is olt or uge
- the first operand is provably not less than zero
- the second operand is zero
The motivation for handling these cases optimizing away domain checks for sqrt in Julia for common idioms such as sqrt(x*x+y*y)..
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6972
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227298 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was introduced in a faulty refactoring (r225640, mea culpa):
the tests weren't testing the return values, so, for both
__strcpy_chk and __stpcpy_chk, we would return the end of the
buffer (matching stpcpy) instead of the beginning (for strcpy).
The root cause was the prefix "__" being ignored when comparing,
which made us always pick LibFunc::stpcpy_chk.
Pass the LibFunc::Func directly to avoid this kind of error.
Also, make the testcases as explicit as possible to prevent this.
The now-useful testcases expose another, entangled, stpcpy problem,
with the further simplification. This was introduced in a
refactoring (r225640) to match the original behavior.
However, this leads to problems when successive simplifications
generate several similar instructions, none of which are removed
by the custom replaceAllUsesWith.
For instance, InstCombine (the main user) doesn't erase the
instruction in its custom RAUW. When trying to simplify say
__stpcpy_chk:
- first, an stpcpy is created (fortified simplifier),
- second, a memcpy is created (normal simplifier), but the
stpcpy call isn't removed.
- third, InstCombine later revisits the instructions,
and simplifies the first stpcpy to a memcpy. We now have
two memcpys.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227250 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Splitting a loop to make range checks redundant is profitable only if
the range check "never" fails. Make this fact a part of recognizing a
range check -- a branch is a range check only if it is expected to
pass (via branch_weights metadata).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7192
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227249 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch teaches the Instruction Combiner how to fold a cttz/ctlz followed by
a icmp plus select into a single cttz/ctlz with flag 'is_zero_undef' cleared.
Added test InstCombine/select-cmp-cttz-ctlz.ll.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227197 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
LoopRotate wanted to avoid live range interference by looking at the
uses of a Value in the loop latch and seeing if any lied outside of the
loop. We would wrongly perform this operation on Constants.
This fixes PR22337.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227171 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These tests check that the combination of 227110 (cross block query inst) and 227112 (volatile load semantics) work together properly to allow PRE in cases where a loop contains a volatile access.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227146 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
An unreachable default destination can be exploited by other optimizations and
allows for more efficient lowering. Both the SDag switch lowering and
LowerSwitch can exploit unreachable defaults.
Also make TurnSwitchRangeICmp handle switches with unreachable default.
This is kind of separate change, but it cannot be tested without the change
above, and I don't want to land the change above without this since that would
regress other tests.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6471
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227125 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
According to my reading of the LangRef, volatiles are only ordered with respect to other volatiles. It is entirely legal and profitable to forward unrelated loads over the volatile load. This patch implements this for GVN by refining the transition rules MemoryDependenceAnalysis uses when encountering a volatile.
The added test cases show where the extra flexibility is profitable for local dependence optimizations. I have a related change (227110) which will extend this to non-local dependence (i.e. PRE), but that's essentially orthogonal to the semantic change in this patch. I have tested the two together and can confirm that PRE works over a volatile load with both changes. I will be submitting a PRE w/volatiles test case seperately in the near future.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6901
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227112 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change is mostly motivated by exposing information about the original query instruction to the actual scanning work in getPointerDependencyFrom when used by GVN PRE. In a follow up change, I will use this to be more precise with regards to the semantics of volatile instructions encountered in the scan of a basic block.
Worth noting, is that this change (despite appearing quite simple) is not semantically preserving. By providing more information to the helper routine, we allow some optimizations to kick in that weren't previously able to (when called from this code path.) In particular, we see that treatment of !invariant.load becomes more precise. In theory, we might see a difference with an ordered/atomic instruction as well, but I'm having a hard time actually finding a test case which shows that.
Test wise, I've included new tests for !invariant.load which illustrate this difference. I've also included some updated TBAA tests which highlight that this change isn't needed for that optimization to kick in - it's handled inside alias analysis itself.
Eventually, it would be nice to factor the !invariant.load handling inside alias analysis as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6895
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227110 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This just lifts the logic into a static helper function, sinks the
legacy pass to be a trivial wrapper of that helper fuction, and adds
a trivial wrapper for the new PM as well. Not much to see here.
I switched a test case to run in both modes, but we have to strip the
dead prototypes separately as that pass isn't in the new pass manager
(yet).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@226999 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is exciting as this is a much more involved port. This is
a complex, existing transformation pass. All of the core logic is shared
between both old and new pass managers. Only the access to the analyses
is separate because the actual techniques are separate. This also uses
a bunch of different and interesting analyses and is the first time
where we need to use an analysis across an IR layer.
This also paves the way to expose instcombine utility functions. I've
got a static function that implements the core pass logic over
a function which might be mildly interesting, but more interesting is
likely exposing a routine which just uses instructions *already in* the
worklist and combines until empty.
I've switched one of my favorite instcombine tests to run with both as
well to make sure this keeps working.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@226987 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
