really does need to be a vector type, because
TargetLowering::getOperationAction for SIGN_EXTEND_INREG uses that type,
and it needs to be able to distinguish between vectors and scalars.
Also, fix some more issues with legalization of vector casts.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@93043 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
result int by 8 for the first byte. While normally harmless,
if the result is smaller than a byte, this shift is invalid.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@93018 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
that feeds into a zext, similar to the patch I did yesterday for sext.
There is a lot of room for extension beyond this patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92962 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When folding a and(any_ext(load)) both the any_ext and the
load have to have only a single use.
This removes the anyext-uses.ll testcase which started failing
because it is unreduced and unclear what it is testing.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92950 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to an element of a vector in a static ctor) which occurs with an
unrelated patch I'm testing. Annoyingly, EvaluateStoreInto basically
does exactly the same stuff as InsertElement constant folding, but it
now handles vectors, and you can't insertelement into a vector. It
would be 'really nice' if GEP into a vector were not legal.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92889 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(OP (trunc x), (trunc y)) -> (trunc (OP x, y))
Unfortunately this simple change causes dag combine to infinite looping. The problem is the shrink demanded ops optimization tend to canonicalize expressions in the opposite manner. That is badness. This patch disable those optimizations in dag combine but instead it is done as a late pass in sdisel.
This also exposes some deficiencies in dag combine and x86 setcc / brcond lowering. Teach them to look pass ISD::TRUNCATE in various places.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92849 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
phi nodes when deciding which pointers point to local memory.
I actually checked long ago how useful this is, and it isn't
very: it hardly ever fires in the testsuite, but since Chris
wants it here it is!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92836 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
memcpy, memset and other intrinsics that only access their arguments
to be readnone if the intrinsic's arguments all point to local memory.
This improves the testcase in the README to readonly, but it could in
theory be made readnone, however this would involve more sophisticated
analysis that looks through the memcpy.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92829 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously, instcombine would only promote an expression tree to
the larger type if doing so eliminated two casts. This is because
a need to manually do the sign extend after the promoted expression
tree with two shifts. Now, we keep track of whether the result of
the computation is going to be properly sign extended already. If
so, we can unconditionally promote the expression, which allows us
to zap more sext's.
This implements rdar://6598839 (aka gcc pr38751)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92815 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The only difference is that EvaluateInDifferentType checks to ensure
they are profitable before doing them :)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92788 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
when doing this transform if the GEP is not inbounds. No testcase because
it is very difficult to trigger this: instcombine already canonicalizes
GEP indices to pointer size, so it relies specific permutations of the
instcombine worklist.
Thanks to Duncan for pointing this possible problem out.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92495 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
on the example in PR4216. This doesn't trigger in the testsuite,
so I'd really appreciate someone scrutinizing the logic for
correctness.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92458 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
