numbering, in which it considers (for example) "%a = add i32 %x, %y" and
"%b = add i32 %x, %y" to be equal because the operands are equal and the
result of the instructions only depends on the values of the operands.
This has almost no effect (it removes 4 instructions from gcc-as-one-file),
and perhaps slows down compilation: I measured a 0.4% slowdown on the large
gcc-as-one-file testcase, but it wasn't statistically significant.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122654 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the original instruction, half the cases were missed (making it not
wrong but suboptimal). Also correct a typo (A <-> B) in the second
chunk.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122414 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
not assume this (for example in case more transforms get added below
it). Suggested by Frits van Bommel.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122332 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
quite often, but don't make much difference in practice presumably because
instcombine also knows them and more.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122328 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a couple of existing transforms. This fires surprisingly often, for
example when compiling gcc "(X+(-1))+1->X" fires quite a lot as well
as various "and" simplifications (usually with a phi node operand).
Most of the time this doesn't make a real difference since the same
thing would have been done elsewhere anyway, eg: by instcombine, but
there are a few places where this results in simplifications that we
were not doing before.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122326 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
