Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169131 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Each SM and PTX version is modeled as a subtarget feature/CPU. Additionally,
PTX 3.1 is added as the default PTX version to be out-of-the-box compatible
with CUDA 5.0.
Available CPUs for this target:
sm_10 - Select the sm_10 processor.
sm_11 - Select the sm_11 processor.
sm_12 - Select the sm_12 processor.
sm_13 - Select the sm_13 processor.
sm_20 - Select the sm_20 processor.
sm_21 - Select the sm_21 processor.
sm_30 - Select the sm_30 processor.
sm_35 - Select the sm_35 processor.
Available features for this target:
ptx30 - Use PTX version 3.0.
ptx31 - Use PTX version 3.1.
sm_10 - Target SM 1.0.
sm_11 - Target SM 1.1.
sm_12 - Target SM 1.2.
sm_13 - Target SM 1.3.
sm_20 - Target SM 2.0.
sm_21 - Target SM 2.1.
sm_30 - Target SM 3.0.
sm_35 - Target SM 3.5.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@167699 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
r165941: Resubmit the changes to llvm core to update the functions to
support different pointer sizes on a per address space basis.
Despite this commit log, this change primarily changed stuff outside of
VMCore, and those changes do not carry any tests for correctness (or
even plausibility), and we have consistently found questionable or flat
out incorrect cases in these changes. Most of them are probably correct,
but we need to devise a system that makes it more clear when we have
handled the address space concerns correctly, and ideally each pass that
gets updated would receive an accompanying test case that exercises that
pass specificaly w.r.t. alternate address spaces.
However, from this commit, I have retained the new C API entry points.
Those were an orthogonal change that probably should have been split
apart, but they seem entirely good.
In several places the changes were very obvious cleanups with no actual
multiple address space code added; these I have not reverted when
I spotted them.
In a few other places there were merge conflicts due to a cleaner
solution being implemented later, often not using address spaces at all.
In those cases, I've preserved the new code which isn't address space
dependent.
This is part of my ongoing effort to clean out the partial address space
code which carries high risk and low test coverage, and not likely to be
finished before the 3.2 release looms closer. Duncan and I would both
like to see the above issues addressed before we return to these
changes.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@167222 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
getIntPtrType support for multiple address spaces via a pointer type,
and also introduced a crasher bug in the constant folder reported in
PR14233.
These commits also contained several problems that should really be
addressed before they are re-committed. I have avoided reverting various
cleanups to the DataLayout APIs that are reasonable to have moving
forward in order to reduce the amount of churn, and minimize the number
of commits that were reverted. I've also manually updated merge
conflicts and manually arranged for the getIntPtrType function to stay
in DataLayout and to be defined in a plausible way after this revert.
Thanks to Duncan for working through this exact strategy with me, and
Nick Lewycky for tracking down the really annoying crasher this
triggered. (Test case to follow in its own commit.)
After discussing with Duncan extensively, and based on a note from
Micah, I'm going to continue to back out some more of the more
problematic patches in this series in order to ensure we go into the
LLVM 3.2 branch with a reasonable story here. I'll send a note to
llvmdev explaining what's going on and why.
Summary of reverted revisions:
r166634: Fix a compiler warning with an unused variable.
r166607: Add some cleanup to the DataLayout changes requested by
Chandler.
r166596: Revert "Back out r166591, not sure why this made it through
since I cancelled the command. Bleh, sorry about this!
r166591: Delete a directory that wasn't supposed to be checked in yet.
r166578: Add in support for getIntPtrType to get the pointer type based
on the address space.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@167221 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We use the enums to query whether an Attributes object has that attribute. The
opaque layer is responsible for knowing where that specific attribute is stored.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165488 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
include/llvm/Analysis/DebugInfo.h to include/llvm/DebugInfo.h.
The reasoning is because the DebugInfo module is simply an interface to the
debug info MDNodes and has nothing to do with analysis.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@159312 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
up to r158925 were handled as processor specific. Making them
generic and putting tests for these modifiers in the CodeGen/Generic
directory caused a number of targets to fail.
This commit addresses that problem by having the targets call
the generic routine for generic modifiers that they don't currently
have explicit code for.
For now only generic print operands 'c' and 'n' are supported.vi
Affected files:
test/CodeGen/Generic/asm-large-immediate.ll
lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCAsmPrinter.cpp
lib/Target/NVPTX/NVPTXAsmPrinter.cpp
lib/Target/ARM/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp
lib/Target/XCore/XCoreAsmPrinter.cpp
lib/Target/X86/X86AsmPrinter.cpp
lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonAsmPrinter.cpp
lib/Target/CellSPU/SPUAsmPrinter.cpp
lib/Target/Sparc/SparcAsmPrinter.cpp
lib/Target/MBlaze/MBlazeAsmPrinter.cpp
lib/Target/Mips/MipsAsmPrinter.cpp
MSP430 isn't represented because it did not even run with
the long existing 'c' modifier and it was not apparent what
needs to be done to get it inline asm ready.
Contributer: Jack Carter
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@159203 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The new target machines are:
nvptx (old ptx32) => 32-bit PTX
nvptx64 (old ptx64) => 64-bit PTX
The sources are based on the internal NVIDIA NVPTX back-end, and
contain more functionality than the current PTX back-end currently
provides.
NV_CONTRIB
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@156196 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
