approach taken is different to that in LegalizeDAG
when it is a question of expanding or promoting the
result type: for example, if extracting an i64 from
a <2 x i64>, when i64 needs expanding, it bitcasts
the vector to <4 x i32>, extracts the appropriate
two i32's, and uses those for the Lo and Hi parts.
Likewise, when extracting an i16 from a <4 x i16>,
and i16 needs promoting, it bitcasts the vector to
<2 x i32>, extracts the appropriate i32, twiddles
the bits if necessary, and uses that as the promoted
value. This puts more pressure on bitcast legalization,
and I've added the appropriate cases. They needed to
be added anyway since users can generate such bitcasts
too if they want to. Also, when considering various
cases (Legal, Promote, Expand, Scalarize, Split) it is
a pain that expand can correspond to Expand, Scalarize
or Split, so I've changed the LegalizeTypes enum so it
lists those different cases - now Expand only means
splitting a scalar in two.
The code produced is the same as by LegalizeDAG for
all relevant testcases, except for
2007-10-31-extractelement-i64.ll, where the code seems
to have improved (see below; can an expert please tell
me if it is better or not).
Before < vs after >.
< subl $92, %esp
< movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp)
< movaps %xmm0, (%esp)
< movl 4(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 28(%esp)
< movl (%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 24(%esp)
< movq 24(%esp), %mm0
< movq %mm0, 56(%esp)
---
> subl $44, %esp
> movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp)
> pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1
> movd %xmm1, 4(%esp)
> movd %xmm0, (%esp)
> movq (%esp), %mm0
> movq %mm0, 8(%esp)
< subl $92, %esp
< movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp)
< movaps %xmm0, (%esp)
< movl 12(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 28(%esp)
< movl 8(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 24(%esp)
< movq 24(%esp), %mm0
< movq %mm0, 56(%esp)
---
> subl $44, %esp
> movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp)
> pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1
> movd %xmm1, 4(%esp)
> movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0
> movd %xmm0, (%esp)
> movq (%esp), %mm0
> movq %mm0, 8(%esp)
< subl $92, %esp
< movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp)
---
> subl $44, %esp
< movl 16(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 48(%esp)
< movl 20(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 52(%esp)
< movaps %xmm0, (%esp)
< movl 4(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 60(%esp)
< movl (%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 56(%esp)
---
> pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1
> movd %xmm1, 4(%esp)
> movd %xmm0, (%esp)
> movd %xmm1, 12(%esp)
> movd %xmm0, 8(%esp)
< subl $92, %esp
< movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp)
---
> subl $44, %esp
< movl 24(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 48(%esp)
< movl 28(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 52(%esp)
< movaps %xmm0, (%esp)
< movl 12(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 60(%esp)
< movl 8(%esp), %eax
< movl %eax, 56(%esp)
---
> pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1
> movd %xmm1, 4(%esp)
> movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0
> movd %xmm0, (%esp)
> movd %xmm1, 12(%esp)
> movd %xmm0, 8(%esp)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
CodeGen/PowerPC/illegal-element-type.ll): suppose
a node X is processed, and processing maps it to
a node Y. Then X continues to exist in the DAG,
but with no users. While processing some other
node, a new node may be created that happens to
be equal to X, and thus X will be reused rather
than a truly new node. This can cause X to
"magically reappear", and since it is in the
Processed state in will not be reprocessed, so
at the end of type legalization the illegal node
X can still be present. The solution is to replace
X with Y whenever X gets resurrected like this.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47601 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
out of illegal elements (BUILD_VECTOR). Uses and beefs
up BUILD_PAIR, though it didn't really have to. Like
most of LegalizeTypes, does not support soft-float.
This cures all "make check" vector building failures.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47537 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
CTTZ and CTPOP. The expansion code differs from
that in LegalizeDAG in that it chooses to take the
CTLZ/CTTZ count from the Hi/Lo part depending on
whether the Hi/Lo value is zero, not on whether
CTLZ/CTTZ of Hi/Lo returned 32 (or whatever the
width of the type is) for it. I made this change
because the optimizers may well know that Hi/Lo
is zero and exploit it. The promotion code for
CTTZ also differs from that in LegalizeDAG: it
uses an "or" to get the right result when the
original value is zero, rather than using a compare
and select. This also means the value doesn't
need to be zero extended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47075 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and StoreSDNode into their common base class LSBaseSDNode. Member
functions getLoadedVT and getStoredVT are replaced with the common
getMemoryVT to simplify code that will handle both loads and stores.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@46538 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
type that matters but the operand type. This fixes
2008-01-08-IllegalCMP.ll which crashed with the new
legalize infrastructure because SETCC with result
type i8 and operand type i64 was being custom expanded
by the X86 backend. With this fix, the gcc build gets
as far as the first libcall.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@46525 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and switch various codegen pieces and the X86 backend over
to using it.
* Add some comments to SelectionDAGNodes.h
* Introduce a second argument to FP_ROUND, which indicates
whether the FP_ROUND changes the value of its input. If
not it is safe to xform things like fp_extend(fp_round(x)) -> x.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@46125 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8