Hal Finkel recently added code to allow unaligned memory references
for PowerPC. Two tests were temporarily modified with
-disable-ppc-unaligned to keep them from failing. This patch adjusts
the expected code generation for the unaligned references.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177328 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This handles the case where we have an inbounds GEP with alloca as the pointer.
This fixes the regression in PR12750 and rdar://13286434.
Note that we can also fix this by handling some GEP cases in isKnownNonNull.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177321 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Apparently my final cleanup to use a relevant suffix for these tests before
committing r176831 caused them to stop running since lit wasn't configured to
run tests with that suffix in those directories (why don't we just have a
global suffix list?). So, add the suffix to the relevant directories & fix the
test that has bitrotted over the last week due to my debug info schema changes.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177315 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit fixes an assert that would occur on loops with large constant counts
(like looping for ((uint32_t) -1) iterations on PPC64). The existing code did
not handle counts that it computed to be negative (asserting instead), but
these can be created with valid inputs.
This bug was discovered by bugpoint while I was attempting to isolate a
completely different problem.
Also, in writing test cases for the negative-count problem, I discovered that
the ori/lsi handling was broken (there was a typo which caused the logic that
was supposed to detect these pairs and extract the iteration count to always
fail). This has now also been corrected (and is covered by one of the new test
cases).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177295 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Because the initial-value constants had not been added to the list
of instructions considered for DCE the resulting code had redundant
constant-materialization instructions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177294 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
*NOTE* I verified that the original bug behind
dont-infinite-loop-during-block-escape-analysis.ll occurs when using opt on
retain-block-escape-analysis.ll.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177240 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the first step to making all DIScopes have a common metadata prefix (so
that things (using directives, for example) that can appear in any scope can be
added to that common prefix). DIFile is itself a DIScope so the common prefix
of all DIScopes cannot be a DIFile - instead it's the raw filename/directory
name pair.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177239 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This test makes sure that the ObjCARC escape analysis looks at the uses of
instructions which copy the block pointer value by checking all four cases where
that can occur.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177232 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change cleans up two issues with Altivec register spilling:
1. The spilling code was inefficient (using two instructions, and add and a
load, when just one would do)
2. The code assumed that r0 would always be available (true for now, but this
will change)
The new code handles VR spilling just like GPR spills but forced into r+r mode.
As a result, when any VR spills are present, we must now always allocate the
register-scavenger spill slot.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177231 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I was too pessimistic in r177105. Vector selects that fit into a legal register
type lower just fine. I was mislead by the code fragment that I was using. The
stores/loads that I saw in those cases came from lowering the conditional off
an address.
Changing the code fragment to:
%T0_3 = type <8 x i18>
%T1_3 = type <8 x i1>
define void @func_blend3(%T0_3* %loadaddr, %T0_3* %loadaddr2,
%T1_3* %blend, %T0_3* %storeaddr) {
%v0 = load %T0_3* %loadaddr
%v1 = load %T0_3* %loadaddr2
==> FROM:
;%c = load %T1_3* %blend
==> TO:
%c = icmp slt %T0_3 %v0, %v1
==> USE:
%r = select %T1_3 %c, %T0_3 %v0, %T0_3 %v1
store %T0_3 %r, %T0_3* %storeaddr
ret void
}
revealed this mistake.
radar://13403975
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177170 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Unaligned access is supported on PPC for non-vector types, and is generally
more efficient than manually expanding the loads and stores.
A few of the existing test cases were using expanded unaligned loads and stores
to test other features (like load/store with update), and for these test cases,
unaligned access remains disabled.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177160 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In preparation for the addition of other SIMD ISA extensions (such as QPX) we
need to make sure that all Altivec patterns are properly predicated on having
Altivec support.
No functionality change intended (one test case needed to be updated b/c it
assumed that Altivec intrinsics would be supported without enabling Altivec
support).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177152 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a very late complement to r130637 which fixed this on x86_64. Fixes
pr15448.
Since it looks like that every elf architecture uses this encoding when using
cfi, make it the default for elf. Just exclude mips64el. It has a lovely
.ll -> .o test (ef_frame.ll) that tests that nothing changes in the binary
content of the .eh_frame produced by llc. Oblige it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177141 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For spills into a large stack frame, the FI-elimination code uses the register
scavenger to obtain a free GPR for use with an r+r-addressed load or store.
When there are no available GPRs, the scavenger gets one by using its spill
slot. Previously, we were not always allocating that spill slot and the RS
would assert when the spill slot was needed.
I don't currently have a small test that triggered the assert, but I've
created a small regression test that verifies that the spill slot is now
added when the stack frame is sufficiently large.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177140 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We used to add a spill slot for the register scavenger whenever the function
has a frame pointer. This is unnecessarily conservative: We may need the spill
slot for dynamic stack allocations, and functions with dynamic stack
allocations always have a FP, but we might also have a FP for other reasons
(such as the user explicitly disabling frame-pointer elimination), and we don't
necessarily need a spill slot for those functions.
The structsinregs test needed adjustment because it disables FP elimination.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177106 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
By terrible I mean we store/load from the stack.
This matters on PAQp8 in _Z5trainPsS_ii (which is inlined into Mixer::update)
where we decide to vectorize a loop with a VF of 8 resulting in a 25%
degradation on a cortex-a8.
LV: Found an estimated cost of 2 for VF 8 For instruction: icmp slt i32
LV: Found an estimated cost of 2 for VF 8 For instruction: select i1, i32, i32
The bug that tracks the CodeGen part is PR14868.
radar://13403975
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177105 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We generate a select with a vectorized condition argument when the condition is
NOT loop invariant. Not the other way around.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177098 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Rules include:
1)1 x*y +/- x*z => x*(y +/- z)
(the order of operands dosen't matter)
2) y/x +/- z/x => (y +/- z)/x
The transformation is disabled if the new add/sub expr "y +/- z" is a
denormal/naz/inifinity.
rdar://12911472
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177088 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The fundamental problem is that SROA didn't allow for overly wide loads
where the bits past the end of the alloca were masked away and the load
was sufficiently aligned to ensure there is no risk of page fault, or
other trapping behavior. With such widened loads, SROA would delete the
load entirely rather than clamping it to the size of the alloca in order
to allow mem2reg to fire. This was exposed by a test case that neatly
arranged for GVN to run first, widening certain loads, followed by an
inline step, and then SROA which miscompiles the code. However, I see no
reason why this hasn't been plaguing us in other contexts. It seems
deeply broken.
Diagnosing all of the above took all of 10 minutes of debugging. The
really annoying aspect is that fixing this completely breaks the pass.
;] There was an implicit reliance on the fact that no loads or stores
extended past the alloca once we decided to rewrite them in the final
stage of SROA. This was used to encode information about whether the
loads and stores had been split across multiple partitions of the
original alloca. That required threading explicit tracking of whether
a *use* of a partition is split across multiple partitions.
Once that was done, another problem arose: we allowed splitting of
integer loads and stores iff they were loads and stores to the entire
alloca. This is a really arbitrary limitation, and splitting at least
some integer loads and stores is crucial to maximize promotion
opportunities. My first attempt was to start removing the restriction
entirely, but currently that does Very Bad Things by causing *many*
common alloca patterns to be fully decomposed into i8 operations and
lots of or-ing together to produce larger integers on demand. The code
bloat is terrifying. That is still the right end-goal, but substantial
work must be done to either merge partitions or ensure that small i8
values are eagerly merged in some other pass. Sadly, figuring all this
out took essentially all the time and effort here.
So the end result is that we allow splitting only when the load or store
at least covers the alloca. That ensures widened loads and stores don't
hurt SROA, and that we don't rampantly decompose operations more than we
have previously.
All of this was already fairly well tested, and so I've just updated the
tests to cover the wide load behavior. I can add a test that crafts the
pass ordering magic which caused the original PR, but that seems really
brittle and to provide little benefit. The fundamental problem is that
widened loads should Just Work.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177055 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
constructs default arguments. It can now take default arguments from
cl::opt'ions. Add a new -default-gcov-version=... option, and actually test it!
Sink the reverse-order of the version into GCOVProfiling, hiding it from our
users.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177002 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
