the original instruction, half the cases were missed (making it not
wrong but suboptimal). Also correct a typo (A <-> B) in the second
chunk.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122414 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
if both A op B and A op C simplify. This fires fairly often but doesn't
make that much difference. On gcc-as-one-file it removes two "and"s and
turns one branch into a select.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122399 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I still think that LVI should be handling this, but that capability is some ways off in the future,
and this matters for some significant benchmarks.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122378 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
not assume this (for example in case more transforms get added below
it). Suggested by Frits van Bommel.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122332 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
quite often, but don't make much difference in practice presumably because
instcombine also knows them and more.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122328 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a couple of existing transforms. This fires surprisingly often, for
example when compiling gcc "(X+(-1))+1->X" fires quite a lot as well
as various "and" simplifications (usually with a phi node operand).
Most of the time this doesn't make a real difference since the same
thing would have been done elsewhere anyway, eg: by instcombine, but
there are a few places where this results in simplifications that we
were not doing before.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122326 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(they had just been forgotten before). Adding Xor causes "main" in the
existing testcase 2010-11-01-lshr-mask.ll to be hugely more simplified.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122245 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
argument. The generated alloca has to have at least the alignment of the
byval, if not, the client may be making assumptions that the new alloca won't
satisfy.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122234 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This resolves a README entry and technically resolves PR4916,
but we still get poor code for the testcase in that PR because
GVN isn't CSE'ing uadd with add, filed as PR8817.
Previously we got:
_test7: ## @test7
addq %rsi, %rdi
cmpq %rdi, %rsi
movl $42, %eax
cmovaq %rsi, %rax
ret
Now we get:
_test7: ## @test7
addq %rsi, %rdi
movl $42, %eax
cmovbq %rsi, %rax
ret
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122182 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
sadd formed is half the size of the original type. We can
now compile this into a sadd.i8:
unsigned char X(char a, char b) {
int res = a+b;
if ((unsigned )(res+128) > 255U)
abort();
return res;
}
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122178 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
checking to see if the high bits of the original add result were dead.
Inserting a smaller add and zexting back to that size is not good enough.
This is likely to be the fix for 8816.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122177 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
which have trapping constant exprs in them due to PHI nodes.
Eliminating them can cause the constant expr to be evalutated
on new paths if the input edges are critical.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122164 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
on the DragonEgg self-host bot. Unfortunately, the testcase is pretty messy and doesn't reduce well due to
interactions with other parts of InstCombine.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122072 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a null endptr argument, because they may write to errno.
This fixes a seflhost miscompile observed on Linux targets when TBAA
was enabled.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122014 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dragonegg self-host buildbot. Original commit message:
Add an InstCombine transform to recognize instances of manual overflow-safe addition
(performing the addition in a wider type and explicitly checking for overflow), and
fold them down to intrinsics. This currently only supports signed-addition, but could
be generalized if someone works out the magic constant formulas for other operations.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121965 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(performing the addition in a wider type and explicitly checking for overflow), and
fold them down to intrinsics. This currently only supports signed-addition, but could
be generalized if someone works out the magic constant formulas for other operations.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8558713>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121905 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When it sees a promising select it now tries to figure out whether the condition of the select is known in any of the predecessors and if so it maps the operands appropriately.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121859 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
which is simpler than finding a place to insert in BB.
- Don't perform the 'if condition hoisting' xform on certain
i1 PHIs, as it interferes with switch formation.
This re-fixes "example 7", without breaking the world hopefully.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121764 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
first, it can kick in on blocks whose conditions have been
folded to a constant, even though one of the edges will be
trivially folded.
second, it doesn't clean up the "if diamond" that it just
eliminated away. This is a problem because other simplifycfg
xforms kick in depending on the order of block visitation,
causing pointless work.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121762 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
when simplifying, allowing them to be eagerly turned into switches. This
is the last step required to get "Example 7" from this blog post:
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320
On X86, we now generate this machine code, which (to my eye) seems better
than the ICC generated code:
_crud: ## @crud
## BB#0: ## %entry
cmpb $33, %dil
jb LBB0_4
## BB#1: ## %switch.early.test
addb $-34, %dil
cmpb $58, %dil
ja LBB0_3
## BB#2: ## %switch.early.test
movzbl %dil, %eax
movabsq $288230376537592865, %rcx ## imm = 0x400000017001421
btq %rax, %rcx
jb LBB0_4
LBB0_3: ## %lor.rhs
xorl %eax, %eax
ret
LBB0_4: ## %lor.end
movl $1, %eax
ret
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121690 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8