instruction lower optimization" in the pre-RA scheduler.
The optimization, rather the hack, was done before MI use-list was available.
Now we should be able to implement it in a better way, perhaps in the
two-address pass until a MI scheduler is available.
Now that the scheduler has to backtrack to handle call sequences. Adding
artificial scheduling constraints is just not safe. Furthermore, the hack
is not taking all the other scheduling decisions into consideration so it's just
as likely to pessimize code. So I view disabling this optimization goodness
regardless of PR11314.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@144267 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- I'd appreciate it if someone else eyeballs my changes to make sure I captured
the intent of the test.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@81083 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This fixes a very subtle bug. vr defined by an implicit_def is allowed overlap with any register since it doesn't actually modify anything. However, if it's used as a two-address use, its live range can be extended and it can be spilled. The spiller must take care not to emit a reload for the vn number that's defined by the implicit_def. This is both a correctness and performance issue.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@69743 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
