information to simplify [sz]ext({a,+,b}) to {zext(a),+,[zs]ext(b)},
as appropriate.
These functions and the trip count code each call into the other, so
this requires careful handling to avoid infinite recursion. During
the initial trip count computation, conservative SCEVs are used,
which are subsequently discarded once the trip count is actually
known.
Among other benefits, this change lets LSR automatically eliminate
some unnecessary zext-inreg and sext-inreg operation where the
operand is an induction variable.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@70241 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
type to truncate to should be the number of bits of the value that are
preserved, not the number that are clobbered with sign-extension.
This fixes regressions in ldecod.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@69704 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
as they appear in LLVM IR. This isn't particularly interesting
on its own; this is just setting up some infrastructure.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@69655 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
size from the integer, requiring zero extension or truncation. Don't
create ZExtInsts with pointer types. This fixes a regression in
consumer-jpeg.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@69307 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
have pointer types, though in contrast to C pointer types, SCEV
addition is never implicitly scaled. This not only eliminates the
need for special code like IndVars' EliminatePointerRecurrence
and LSR's own GEP expansion code, it also does a better job because
it lets the normal optimizations handle pointer expressions just
like integer expressions.
Also, since LLVM IR GEPs can't directly index into multi-dimensional
VLAs, moving the GEP analysis out of client code and into the SCEV
framework makes it easier for clients to handle multi-dimensional
VLAs the same way as other arrays.
Some existing regression tests show improved optimization.
test/CodeGen/ARM/2007-03-13-InstrSched.ll in particular improved to
the point where if-conversion started kicking in; I turned it off
for this test to preserve the intent of the test.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@69258 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to more accurately describe what it does. Expand its doxygen comment
to describe what the backedge-taken count is and how it differs
from the actual iteration count of the loop. Adjust names and
comments in associated code accordingly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@65382 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
trip count value when the original loop iteration condition is
signed and the canonical induction variable won't undergo signed
overflow. This isn't required for correctness; it just preserves
more information about original loop iteration values.
Add a getTruncateOrSignExtend method to ScalarEvolution,
following getTruncateOrZeroExtend.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@64918 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
modified in a way that may effect the trip count calculation. Change
IndVars to use this method when it rewrites pointer or floating-point
induction variables instead of using a doInitialization method to
sneak these changes in before ScalarEvolution has a chance to see
the loop. This eliminates the need for LoopPass to depend on
ScalarEvolution.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@64810 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
loop induction on LP64 targets. When the induction variable is
used in addressing, IndVars now is usually able to inserst a
64-bit induction variable and eliminates the sign-extending cast.
This is also useful for code using C "short" types for
induction variables on targets with 32-bit addressing.
Inserting a wider induction variable is easy; the tricky part is
determining when trunc(sext(i)) expressions are no-ops. This
requires range analysis of the loop trip count. A common case is
when the original loop iteration starts at 0 and exits when the
induction variable is signed-less-than a fixed value; this case
is now handled.
This replaces IndVarSimplify's OptimizeCanonicalIVType. It was
doing the same optimization, but it was limited to loops with
constant trip counts, because it was running after the loop
rewrite, and the information about the original induction
variable is lost by that point.
Rename ScalarEvolution's executesAtLeastOnce to
isLoopGuardedByCond, generalize it to be able to test for
ICMP_NE conditions, and move it to be a public function so that
IndVars can use it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@64407 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Use it to safely handle less-than-or-equals-to exit conditions in loops. These
also occur when the loop exit branch is exit on true because SCEV inverses the
icmp predicate.
Use it again to handle non-zero strides, but only with an unsigned comparison
in the exit condition.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@59528 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If this patch causes a performance regression for anyone, please let me know,
and it can be fixed in a different way with much more effort.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@59384 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
returned by BinomialCoefficient and don't try to operate with them. This
replaces the previous fix for PR2857.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@57431 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- Recognize expressions like "x > -1 ? x : 0" as min/max and turn them
into expressions like "x < 0 ? 0 : x", which is easily recognizable
as a min/max operation.
- Refrain from folding expression like "y/2 < 1" to "y < 2" when the
comparison is being used as part of a min or max idiom, like
"y/2 < 1 ? 1 : y/2". In that case, the division has another use, so
folding doesn't eliminate it, and obfuscates the min/max, making it
harder to recognize as a min/max operation.
These benefit ScalarEvolution, CodeGen, and anything else that wants to
recognize integer min and max.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@56246 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
its callers to emit a space character before calling it when a
space is needed.
This fixes several spurious whitespace issues in
ScalarEvolution's debug dumps. See the test changes for
examples.
This also fixes odd space-after-tab indentation in the output
for switch statements, and changes calls from being printed like
this:
call void @foo( i32 %x )
to this:
call void @foo(i32 %x)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@56196 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
continue past the first conditional branch when looking for a
relevant test. This helps it avoid using MAX expressions in
loop trip counts in more cases.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@54697 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
version uses a new algorithm for evaluating the binomial coefficients
which is significantly more efficient for AddRecs of more than 2 terms
(see the comments in the code for details on how the algorithm works).
It also fixes some bugs: it removes the arbitrary length restriction for
AddRecs, it fixes the silent generation of incorrect code for AddRecs
which require a wide calculation width, and it fixes an issue where we
were incorrectly truncating the iteration count too far when evaluating
an AddRec expression narrower than the induction variable.
There are still a few related issues I know of: I think there's
still an issue with the SCEVExpander expansion of AddRec in terms of
the width of the induction variable used. The hack to avoid generating
too-wide integers shouldn't be necessary; instead, the callers should be
considering the cost of the expansion before expanding it (in addition
to not expanding too-wide integers, we might not want to expand
expressions that are really expensive, especially when optimizing for
size; calculating an length-17 32-bit AddRec currently generates about 250
instructions of straight-line code on X86). Also, for long 32-bit
AddRecs on X86, CodeGen really sucks at scheduling the code. I'm planning on
filing follow-up PRs for these issues.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@54332 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
