full paths for its first argument.
This allows us to remove the annoying sed lines in the test cases, and write
direct references to file names in stub_addr calls (rather than <filename>
placeholders).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214211 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This will let users in other libraries know which error occurred. In particular,
it will be possible to check if the parsing failed or if the file is not
bitcode.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214209 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Per feedback on r214111, we are going to use null to represent unspecified
parameter. If the type array is {null}, it means a function that returns void;
If the type array is {null, null}, it means a variadic function that returns
void. In summary if we have more than one element in the type array and the last
element is null, it is a variadic function.
rdar://17628609
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214189 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The test being performed is just an approximation anyway, so it really
shouldn't crash when things don't go entirely as expected.
Should fix PR20474.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214177 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We need to make sure we use the softened version of all appropriate operands in
the libcall, or things go horribly wrong. This may entail actually executing a
1-stage softening.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214175 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fix the sort of expected order in the reader to correctly return `false`
when comparing a `Use` against itself.
This was caught by test/Bitcode/binaryIntInstructions.3.2.ll, so I'm
adding a `RUN` line using `llvm-uselistorder` for every test in
`test/Bitcode` that passes.
A few tests still fail, so I'll investigate those next.
This is part of PR5680.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214157 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The enum types array by design contains pointers to MDNodes rather than DIRefs.
Unique them when handling the enum types in DwarfDebug.
rdar://17628609
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214139 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Since we're storing lots of these, save two-pointers per vector with a
custom type rather than using the relatively heavy `SmallVector`.
Part of PR5680.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214135 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
DITypeArray is an array of DITypeRef, at its creation, we will create
DITypeRef (i.e use the identifier if the type node has an identifier).
This is the last patch to unique the type array of a subroutine type.
rdar://17628609
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214132 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Predict and serialize use-list order in bitcode. This makes the option
`-preserve-bc-use-list-order` work *most* of the time, but this is still
experimental.
- Builds a full value-table up front in the writer, sets up a list of
use-list orders to write out, and discards the table. This is a
simpler first step than determining the order from the various
overlapping IDs of values on-the-fly.
- The shuffles stored in the use-list order list have an unnecessarily
large memory footprint.
- `blockaddress` expressions cause functions to be materialized
out-of-order. For now I've ignored this problem, so use-list orders
will be wrong for constants used by functions that have block
addresses taken. There are a couple of ways to fix this, but I
don't have a concrete plan yet.
- When materializing functions lazily, the use-lists for constants
will not be correct. This use case is out of scope: what should the
use-list order be, if it's incomplete?
This is part of PR5680.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214125 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Typedef DIArray to DITypedArray<DIDescriptor>. Also typedef DITypeArray as
DITypedArray<DITypeRef>.
This is the third of a series of patches to handle type uniqueing of the
type array for a subroutine type.
This commit should have no functionality change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214115 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the second of a series of patches to handle type uniqueing of the
type array for a subroutine type.
For vector and array types, getElements returns the array of subranges, so it
is a better name than getTypeArray. Even for class, struct and enum types,
getElements returns the members, which can be subprograms.
setArrays can set up to two arrays, the second is the templates.
This commit should have no functionality change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214112 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the first of a series of patches to handle type uniqueing of the
type array for a subroutine type.
This commit makes sure unspecified_parameter is a DIType to enable converting
the type array for a subroutine type to an array of DITypes.
This commit should have no functionality change. With this commit, we may
change unspecified type to be a DITrivialType instead of a DIType.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214111 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
inspection in the proccess, and shuffle the logging in the DAG combiner
around a bit.
With this it is much easier to follow what the legalizer is doing. It
should even accurately present most of the strange legalization
operations where a single node is replaced by multiple nodes, etc. There
is still some information lost (we log SDNodes not SDValues so we don't
log which result is used for which thing), but I think this is much
closer to a usable system. Notably, this will make it *much* more
apparant when legalization is actually happening inside the combiner, or
when there is a cycle caused by interactions of the legalizer and the
combiner.
The "bug" I fixed here I'm not sure is remotely possible to trigger. We
were only adding one of the nodes in a replacement to the updated set
rather than all of the nodes in the replacement. Realistically, the
worst result of this are nodes not getting back onto the worklist in the
DAG combiner. I doubt it is possible to trigger this today, and
I certainly don't have any ideas about how, but this at least brings the
code into alignment with the principled operation of the routine.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214105 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The default guess uses i32. This needs an address space argument
to really do the right thing in all cases.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214104 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
While LLVM now supports both ELFv1 and ELFv2 ABIs, their use is currently
hard-coded via the target triple: powerpc64-linux is always ELFv1, while
powerpc64le-linux is always ELFv2.
These are of course the most common scenarios, but in principle it is
possible to support the ELFv2 ABI on big-endian or the ELFv1 ABI on
little-endian systems (and GCC does support that), and there are some
special use cases for that (e.g. certain Linux kernel versions could
only be built using ELFv1 on LE).
This patch implements the LLVM side of supporting this. As precedent
on other platforms suggests, ABI options are passed to the back-end as
features. Thus, this patch implements two features "elfv1" and "elfv2"
that select the desired ABI if present. (If not, the LLVM uses the
same default rules as now.)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214072 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The subtarget information is the ultimate source of truth for the feature set
that is enabled at this point. We would previously not propagate the feature
information to the subtarget. While this worked for the most part (features
would be enabled/disabled as requested), if another operation that changed the
feature bits was encountered (such as a mode switch via a .arm or .thumb
directive), we would end up resetting the behaviour of the architectural
extensions.
Handling this properly requires a slightly more complicated handling. We need
to check if the feature is now being toggled. If so, only then do we toggle the
features. In return, we no longer have to calculate the feature bits ourselves.
The test changes are mostly to the diagnosis, which is now more uniform (a nice
side effect!). Add an additional test to ensure that we handle this case
properly.
Thanks to Nico Weber for alerting me to this issue!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214057 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Convert a loop to use range based iteration. Rename structure members to help
naming, and make structure definition anonymous. NFC.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214056 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Rename to allowsMisalignedMemoryAccess.
On R600, 8 and 16 byte accesses are mostly OK with 4-byte alignment,
and don't need to be split into multiple accesses. Vector loads with
an alignment of the element type are not uncommon in OpenCL code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214055 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
'J' represents a negative number suitable for an add/sub alias
instruction, but while preparing it to become an int64_t we were
mangling the sign extension. So "i32 -1" became 0xffffffffLL, for
example.
Should fix one half of PR20456.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214052 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
instructions in the legalized DAG, and leverage it to combine long
sequences of instructions to PSHUFB.
Eventually, the other x86-instruction-specific shuffle combines will
probably all be driven out of this routine. But the real motivation is
to detect after we have fully legalized and optimized a shuffle to the
minimal number of x86 instructions whether it is profitable to replace
the chain with a fully generic PSHUFB instruction even though doing so
requires either a load from a constant pool or tying up a register with
the mask.
While the Intel manuals claim it should be used when it replaces 5 or
more instructions (!!!!) my experience is that it is actually very fast
on modern chips, and so I've gon with a much more aggressive model of
replacing any sequence of 3 or more instructions.
I've also taught it to do some basic canonicalization to special-purpose
instructions which have smaller encodings than their generic
counterparts.
There are still quite a few FIXMEs here, and I've not yet implemented
support for lowering blends with PSHUFB (where its power really shines
due to being able to zero out lanes), but this starts implementing real
PSHUFB support even when using the new, fancy shuffle lowering. =]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214042 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
over each node in the worklist prior to combining.
This allows the combiner to produce new nodes which need to go back
through legalization. This is particularly useful when generating
operands to target specific nodes in a post-legalize DAG combine where
the operands are significantly easier to express as pre-legalized
operations. My immediate use case will be PSHUFB formation where we need
to build a constant shuffle mask with a build_vector node.
This also refactors the relevant functionality in the legalizer to
support this, and updates relevant tests. I've spoken to the R600 folks
and these changes look like improvements to them. The avx512 change
needs to be investigated, I suspect there is a disagreement between the
legalizer and the DAG combiner there, but it seems a minor issue so
leaving it to be re-evaluated after this patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4564
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214020 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The tale starts with r212808 which attempted to fix inversion of the low
and high bits when lowering MUL_LOHI. Sadly, that commit did not include
any positive test cases, and just removed some operations from a test
case where the actual logic being changed isn't fully visible from the
test.
What this commit did was two things. First, it reversed the low and high
results in the formation of the MERGE_VALUES node for the multiple
results. This is entirely correct.
Second it changed the shuffles for extracting the low and high
components from the i64 results of the multiplies to extract them
assuming a big-endian-style encoding of the multiply results. This
second change is wrong. There is no big-endian encoding in x86, the
results of the multiplies are normal v2i64s: when cast to v4i32, the low
i32s are at offsets 0 and 2, and the high i32s are at offsets 1 and 3.
However, the first change wasn't enough to actually fix the bug, which
is (I assume) why the second change was also made. There was another bug
in the MERGE_VALUES formation: we weren't using a VTList, and so were
getting a single result node! When grabbing the *second* result from the
node, we got... well.. colud be anything. I think this *appeared* to
invert things, but had to be causing other problems as well.
Fortunately, I fixed the MERGE_VALUES issue in r213931, so we should
have been fine, right? NOOOPE! Because the core bug was never addressed,
the test in vector-idiv failed when I fixed the MERGE_VALUES node.
Because there are essentially no docs for this node, I had to guess at
how to fix it and tried swapping the operands, restoring the order of
the original code before r212808. While this "fixed" the test case (in
that we produced the write instructions) we were still extracting the
wrong elements of the i64s, and thus PR20355 was still broken.
This commit essentially reverts the big-endian-style extraction part of
r212808 and goes back to the original masks which were correct. Now that
the MERGE_VALUES node formation is also correct, everything works. I've
also included a more detailed test from PR20355 to make sure this stays
fixed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214011 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The clever way to implement signed multiplication with unsigned *is
already implemented* and tested and working correctly. The bug is
somewhere else. Re-investigating.
This will teach me to not scroll far enough to read the code that did
what I thought needed to be done.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214009 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
signed multiplication is requested. While there is not a difference in
the *low* half of the result, the *high* half (used specifically to
implement the signed division by these constants) certainly is used. The
test case I've nuked was actively asserting wrong code.
There is a delightful solution to doing signed multiplication even when
we don't have it that Richard Smith has crafted, but I'll add the
machinery back and implement that in a follow-up patch. This at least
restores correctness.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214007 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
