mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2025-02-08 06:32:24 +00:00
52ab0bc417
preparation for de-coupling the AA implementations. In order to do this, they had to become fake-scoped using the traditional LLVM pattern of a leading initialism. These can't be actual scoped enumerations because they're bitfields and thus inherently we use them as integers. I've also renamed the behavior enums that are specific to reasoning about the mod/ref behavior of functions when called. This makes it more clear that they have a very narrow domain of applicability. I think there is a significantly cleaner API for all of this, but I don't want to try to do really substantive changes for now, I just want to refactor the things away from analysis groups so I'm preserving the exact original design and just cleaning up the names, style, and lifting out of the class. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10564 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@242963 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Analysis Opportunities:
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:
{1,+,3,+,2}<loop>
Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as
(-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))
In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,
ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:
((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))
This could be folded to
(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//