llvm-6502/unittests/VMCore/DominatorTreeTest.cpp
Rafael Espindola 092c5ccf5b Handle unreachable code in the dominates functions. This changes users when
needed for correctness, but still doesn't clean up code that now unnecessary
checks for reachability.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@153755 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-03-30 16:46:21 +00:00

196 lines
6.3 KiB
C++

#include "llvm/Instructions.h"
#include "llvm/LLVMContext.h"
#include "llvm/Module.h"
#include "llvm/PassManager.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
#include "llvm/Assembly/Parser.h"
#include "llvm/Support/SourceMgr.h"
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
using namespace llvm;
namespace llvm {
void initializeDPassPass(PassRegistry&);
namespace {
struct DPass : public FunctionPass {
static char ID;
virtual bool runOnFunction(Function &F) {
DominatorTree *DT = &getAnalysis<DominatorTree>();
Function::iterator FI = F.begin();
BasicBlock *BB0 = FI++;
BasicBlock::iterator BBI = BB0->begin();
Instruction *Y1 = BBI++;
Instruction *Y2 = BBI++;
Instruction *Y3 = BBI++;
BasicBlock *BB1 = FI++;
BBI = BB1->begin();
Instruction *Y4 = BBI++;
BasicBlock *BB2 = FI++;
BBI = BB2->begin();
Instruction *Y5 = BBI++;
BasicBlock *BB3 = FI++;
BBI = BB3->begin();
Instruction *Y6 = BBI++;
Instruction *Y7 = BBI++;
BasicBlock *BB4 = FI++;
BBI = BB4->begin();
Instruction *Y8 = BBI++;
Instruction *Y9 = BBI++;
// Reachability
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB0));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB1));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB2));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB3));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB4));
// BB dominance
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB0, BB0));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB0, BB1));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB0, BB2));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB0, BB3));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB0, BB4));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB1, BB0));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB1, BB1));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB1, BB2));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB1, BB3));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB1, BB4));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB2, BB0));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB2, BB1));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB2, BB2));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB2, BB3));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB2, BB4));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB3, BB0));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB3, BB1));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB3, BB2));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB3, BB3));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB3, BB4));
// BB proper dominance
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB0, BB0));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->properlyDominates(BB0, BB1));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->properlyDominates(BB0, BB2));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->properlyDominates(BB0, BB3));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB1, BB0));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB1, BB1));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB1, BB2));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->properlyDominates(BB1, BB3));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB2, BB0));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB2, BB1));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB2, BB2));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->properlyDominates(BB2, BB3));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB3, BB0));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB3, BB1));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB3, BB2));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB3, BB3));
// Instruction dominance in the same reachable BB
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y1, Y1));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y1, Y2));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y2, Y1));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y2, Y2));
// Instruction dominance in the same unreachable BB
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y6, Y6));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y6, Y7));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y7, Y6));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y7, Y7));
// Invoke
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y3, Y4));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y3, Y5));
// Phi
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y2, Y9));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y3, Y9));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y8, Y9));
// Anything dominates unreachable
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y1, Y6));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y3, Y6));
// Unreachable doesn't dominate reachable
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y6, Y1));
// Instruction, BB dominance
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y1, BB0));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y1, BB1));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y1, BB2));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y1, BB3));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y1, BB4));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y3, BB0));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y3, BB1));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y3, BB2));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y3, BB3));
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y3, BB4));
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y6, BB3));
return false;
}
virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>();
}
DPass() : FunctionPass(ID) {
initializeDPassPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
}
};
char DPass::ID = 0;
Module* makeLLVMModule(DPass *P) {
const char *ModuleStrig =
"declare i32 @g()\n" \
"define void @f(i32 %x) {\n" \
"bb0:\n" \
" %y1 = add i32 %x, 1\n" \
" %y2 = add i32 %x, 1\n" \
" %y3 = invoke i32 @g() to label %bb1 unwind label %bb2\n" \
"bb1:\n" \
" %y4 = add i32 %x, 1\n" \
" br label %bb4\n" \
"bb2:\n" \
" %y5 = landingpad i32 personality i32 ()* @g\n" \
" cleanup\n" \
" br label %bb4\n" \
"bb3:\n" \
" %y6 = add i32 %x, 1\n" \
" %y7 = add i32 %x, 1\n" \
" ret void\n" \
"bb4:\n" \
" %y8 = phi i32 [0, %bb2], [%y4, %bb1]\n"
" %y9 = phi i32 [0, %bb2], [%y4, %bb1]\n"
" ret void\n" \
"}\n";
LLVMContext &C = getGlobalContext();
SMDiagnostic Err;
return ParseAssemblyString(ModuleStrig, NULL, Err, C);
}
TEST(DominatorTree, Unreachable) {
DPass *P = new DPass();
Module *M = makeLLVMModule(P);
PassManager Passes;
Passes.add(P);
Passes.run(*M);
}
}
}
INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(DPass, "dpass", "dpass", false, false)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTree)
INITIALIZE_PASS_END(DPass, "dpass", "dpass", false, false)