Chris Lattner ec2bc64505 Improve comments a bit ... Use an explicit LiveRange class to represent ranges instead of an std::pair. This is a minor cleanup, but is really intended to make a future patch simpler and less invasive. Alkis, could you please take a look at LiveInterval::liveAt? I suspect that you can add an operator<(unsigned) to LiveRange, allowing us to speed up the upper_bound call by quite a bit (this would also apply to other callers of upper/lower_bound). I would do it myself, but I still don't understand that crazy liveAt function, despite the comment. :) Basically I would like to see this: LiveRange dummy(index, index+1); Ranges::const_iterator r = std::upper_bound(ranges.begin(), ranges.end(), dummy); Turn into: Ranges::const_iterator r = std::upper_bound(ranges.begin(), ranges.end(), index); git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@15130 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8		2004-07-23 08:24:23 +00:00
..
Config	Regenerated with autoconf/autoheader 2.57	2004-07-21 03:33:58 +00:00
llvm	Improve comments a bit	2004-07-23 08:24:23 +00:00
Support	Include <iostream> here, because most people using DEBUG() want to use std::cerr too.	2004-07-21 20:50:22 +00:00