Chris Lattner ec2bc64505 Improve comments a bit
Use an explicit LiveRange class to represent ranges instead of an std::pair.
This is a minor cleanup, but is really intended to make a future patch simpler
and less invasive.

Alkis, could you please take a look at LiveInterval::liveAt?  I suspect that
you can add an operator<(unsigned) to LiveRange, allowing us to speed up the
upper_bound call by quite a bit (this would also apply to other callers of
upper/lower_bound).  I would do it myself, but I still don't understand that
crazy liveAt function, despite the comment. :)

Basically I would like to see this:
    LiveRange dummy(index, index+1);
    Ranges::const_iterator r = std::upper_bound(ranges.begin(),
                                                ranges.end(),
                                                dummy);

Turn into:
    Ranges::const_iterator r = std::upper_bound(ranges.begin(),
                                                ranges.end(),
                                                index);


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@15130 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2004-07-23 08:24:23 +00:00
2004-07-23 08:24:23 +00:00
2004-07-23 08:24:23 +00:00
2004-07-22 07:59:20 +00:00
2004-07-23 01:30:49 +00:00
2004-07-23 06:50:18 +00:00
2004-07-21 03:50:25 +00:00
2004-06-01 20:37:41 +00:00

This file is a placeholder; see docs/index.html for documentation.
Description
LLVM backend for 6502
Readme 277 MiB
Languages
C++ 48.7%
LLVM 38.5%
Assembly 10.2%
C 0.9%
Python 0.4%
Other 1.2%