llvm-6502/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp

3327 lines
122 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===- CodeGenPrepare.cpp - Prepare a function for code generation --------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This pass munges the code in the input function to better prepare it for
// SelectionDAG-based code generation. This works around limitations in it's
// basic-block-at-a-time approach. It should eventually be removed.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/CodeGen/Passes.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.h"
#include "llvm/IR/CallSite.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Constants.h"
#include "llvm/IR/DataLayout.h"
#include "llvm/IR/DerivedTypes.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
#include "llvm/IR/GetElementPtrTypeIterator.h"
#include "llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h"
#include "llvm/IR/InlineAsm.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h"
#include "llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h"
#include "llvm/IR/PatternMatch.h"
#include "llvm/IR/ValueHandle.h"
#include "llvm/IR/ValueMap.h"
#include "llvm/Pass.h"
#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetLibraryInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h"
Add the ability to use GEPs for address sinking in CGP The current memory-instruction optimization logic in CGP, which sinks parts of the address computation that can be adsorbed by the addressing mode, does this by explicitly converting the relevant part of the address computation into IR-level integer operations (making use of ptrtoint and inttoptr). For most targets this is currently not a problem, but for targets wishing to make use of IR-level aliasing analysis during CodeGen, the use of ptrtoint/inttoptr is a problem for two reasons: 1. BasicAA becomes less powerful in the face of the ptrtoint/inttoptr 2. In cases where type-punning was used, and BasicAA was used to override TBAA, BasicAA may no longer do so. (this had forced us to disable all use of TBAA in CodeGen; something which we can now enable again) This (use of GEPs instead of ptrtoint/inttoptr) is not currently enabled by default (except for those targets that use AA during CodeGen), and so aside from some PowerPC subtargets and SystemZ, there should be no change in behavior. We may be able to switch completely away from the ptrtoint/inttoptr sinking on all targets, but further testing is required. I've doubled-up on a number of existing tests that are sensitive to the address sinking behavior (including some store-merging tests that are sensitive to the order of the resulting ADD operations at the SDAG level). git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206092 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-04-12 00:59:48 +00:00
#include "llvm/Target/TargetSubtargetInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BuildLibCalls.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BypassSlowDivision.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h"
using namespace llvm;
using namespace llvm::PatternMatch;
#define DEBUG_TYPE "codegenprepare"
STATISTIC(NumBlocksElim, "Number of blocks eliminated");
STATISTIC(NumPHIsElim, "Number of trivial PHIs eliminated");
STATISTIC(NumGEPsElim, "Number of GEPs converted to casts");
STATISTIC(NumCmpUses, "Number of uses of Cmp expressions replaced with uses of "
"sunken Cmps");
STATISTIC(NumCastUses, "Number of uses of Cast expressions replaced with uses "
"of sunken Casts");
STATISTIC(NumMemoryInsts, "Number of memory instructions whose address "
"computations were sunk");
STATISTIC(NumExtsMoved, "Number of [s|z]ext instructions combined with loads");
STATISTIC(NumExtUses, "Number of uses of [s|z]ext instructions optimized");
STATISTIC(NumRetsDup, "Number of return instructions duplicated");
STATISTIC(NumDbgValueMoved, "Number of debug value instructions moved");
CodeGenPrepare: Add a transform to turn selects into branches in some cases. This came up when a change in block placement formed a cmov and slowed down a hot loop by 50%: ucomisd (%rdi), %xmm0 cmovbel %edx, %esi cmov is a really bad choice in this context because it doesn't get branch prediction. If we emit it as a branch, an out-of-order CPU can do a better job (if the branch is predicted right) and avoid waiting for the slow load+compare instruction to finish. Of course it won't help if the branch is unpredictable, but those are really rare in practice. This patch uses a dumb conservative heuristic, it turns all cmovs that have one use and a direct memory operand into branches. cmovs usually save some code size, so we disable the transform in -Os mode. In-Order architectures are unlikely to benefit as well, those are included in the "predictableSelectIsExpensive" flag. It would be better to reuse branch probability info here, but BPI doesn't support select instructions currently. It would make sense to use the same heuristics as the if-converter pass, which does the opposite direction of this transform. Test suite shows a small improvement here and there on corei7-level machines, but the actual results depend a lot on the used microarchitecture. The transformation is currently disabled by default and available by passing the -enable-cgp-select2branch flag to the code generator. Thanks to Chandler for the initial test case to him and Evan Cheng for providing me with comments and test-suite numbers that were more stable than mine :) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@156234 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-05-05 12:49:22 +00:00
STATISTIC(NumSelectsExpanded, "Number of selects turned into branches");
STATISTIC(NumAndCmpsMoved, "Number of and/cmp's pushed into branches");
static cl::opt<bool> DisableBranchOpts(
"disable-cgp-branch-opts", cl::Hidden, cl::init(false),
cl::desc("Disable branch optimizations in CodeGenPrepare"));
static cl::opt<bool> DisableSelectToBranch(
"disable-cgp-select2branch", cl::Hidden, cl::init(false),
cl::desc("Disable select to branch conversion."));
CodeGenPrepare: Add a transform to turn selects into branches in some cases. This came up when a change in block placement formed a cmov and slowed down a hot loop by 50%: ucomisd (%rdi), %xmm0 cmovbel %edx, %esi cmov is a really bad choice in this context because it doesn't get branch prediction. If we emit it as a branch, an out-of-order CPU can do a better job (if the branch is predicted right) and avoid waiting for the slow load+compare instruction to finish. Of course it won't help if the branch is unpredictable, but those are really rare in practice. This patch uses a dumb conservative heuristic, it turns all cmovs that have one use and a direct memory operand into branches. cmovs usually save some code size, so we disable the transform in -Os mode. In-Order architectures are unlikely to benefit as well, those are included in the "predictableSelectIsExpensive" flag. It would be better to reuse branch probability info here, but BPI doesn't support select instructions currently. It would make sense to use the same heuristics as the if-converter pass, which does the opposite direction of this transform. Test suite shows a small improvement here and there on corei7-level machines, but the actual results depend a lot on the used microarchitecture. The transformation is currently disabled by default and available by passing the -enable-cgp-select2branch flag to the code generator. Thanks to Chandler for the initial test case to him and Evan Cheng for providing me with comments and test-suite numbers that were more stable than mine :) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@156234 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-05-05 12:49:22 +00:00
Add the ability to use GEPs for address sinking in CGP The current memory-instruction optimization logic in CGP, which sinks parts of the address computation that can be adsorbed by the addressing mode, does this by explicitly converting the relevant part of the address computation into IR-level integer operations (making use of ptrtoint and inttoptr). For most targets this is currently not a problem, but for targets wishing to make use of IR-level aliasing analysis during CodeGen, the use of ptrtoint/inttoptr is a problem for two reasons: 1. BasicAA becomes less powerful in the face of the ptrtoint/inttoptr 2. In cases where type-punning was used, and BasicAA was used to override TBAA, BasicAA may no longer do so. (this had forced us to disable all use of TBAA in CodeGen; something which we can now enable again) This (use of GEPs instead of ptrtoint/inttoptr) is not currently enabled by default (except for those targets that use AA during CodeGen), and so aside from some PowerPC subtargets and SystemZ, there should be no change in behavior. We may be able to switch completely away from the ptrtoint/inttoptr sinking on all targets, but further testing is required. I've doubled-up on a number of existing tests that are sensitive to the address sinking behavior (including some store-merging tests that are sensitive to the order of the resulting ADD operations at the SDAG level). git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206092 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-04-12 00:59:48 +00:00
static cl::opt<bool> AddrSinkUsingGEPs(
"addr-sink-using-gep", cl::Hidden, cl::init(false),
cl::desc("Address sinking in CGP using GEPs."));
static cl::opt<bool> EnableAndCmpSinking(
"enable-andcmp-sinking", cl::Hidden, cl::init(true),
cl::desc("Enable sinkinig and/cmp into branches."));
namespace {
typedef SmallPtrSet<Instruction *, 16> SetOfInstrs;
typedef DenseMap<Instruction *, Type *> InstrToOrigTy;
class CodeGenPrepare : public FunctionPass {
/// TLI - Keep a pointer of a TargetLowering to consult for determining
/// transformation profitability.
const TargetMachine *TM;
const TargetLowering *TLI;
const TargetLibraryInfo *TLInfo;
DominatorTree *DT;
/// CurInstIterator - As we scan instructions optimizing them, this is the
/// next instruction to optimize. Xforms that can invalidate this should
/// update it.
BasicBlock::iterator CurInstIterator;
/// Keeps track of non-local addresses that have been sunk into a block.
/// This allows us to avoid inserting duplicate code for blocks with
/// multiple load/stores of the same address.
ValueMap<Value*, Value*> SunkAddrs;
/// Keeps track of all truncates inserted for the current function.
SetOfInstrs InsertedTruncsSet;
/// Keeps track of the type of the related instruction before their
/// promotion for the current function.
InstrToOrigTy PromotedInsts;
/// ModifiedDT - If CFG is modified in anyway, dominator tree may need to
/// be updated.
bool ModifiedDT;
CodeGenPrepare: Add a transform to turn selects into branches in some cases. This came up when a change in block placement formed a cmov and slowed down a hot loop by 50%: ucomisd (%rdi), %xmm0 cmovbel %edx, %esi cmov is a really bad choice in this context because it doesn't get branch prediction. If we emit it as a branch, an out-of-order CPU can do a better job (if the branch is predicted right) and avoid waiting for the slow load+compare instruction to finish. Of course it won't help if the branch is unpredictable, but those are really rare in practice. This patch uses a dumb conservative heuristic, it turns all cmovs that have one use and a direct memory operand into branches. cmovs usually save some code size, so we disable the transform in -Os mode. In-Order architectures are unlikely to benefit as well, those are included in the "predictableSelectIsExpensive" flag. It would be better to reuse branch probability info here, but BPI doesn't support select instructions currently. It would make sense to use the same heuristics as the if-converter pass, which does the opposite direction of this transform. Test suite shows a small improvement here and there on corei7-level machines, but the actual results depend a lot on the used microarchitecture. The transformation is currently disabled by default and available by passing the -enable-cgp-select2branch flag to the code generator. Thanks to Chandler for the initial test case to him and Evan Cheng for providing me with comments and test-suite numbers that were more stable than mine :) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@156234 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-05-05 12:49:22 +00:00
/// OptSize - True if optimizing for size.
bool OptSize;
public:
static char ID; // Pass identification, replacement for typeid
explicit CodeGenPrepare(const TargetMachine *TM = nullptr)
: FunctionPass(ID), TM(TM), TLI(nullptr) {
initializeCodeGenPreparePass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
}
bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override;
const char *getPassName() const override { return "CodeGen Prepare"; }
void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override {
AU.addPreserved<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
AU.addRequired<TargetLibraryInfo>();
}
private:
bool EliminateFallThrough(Function &F);
bool EliminateMostlyEmptyBlocks(Function &F);
bool CanMergeBlocks(const BasicBlock *BB, const BasicBlock *DestBB) const;
void EliminateMostlyEmptyBlock(BasicBlock *BB);
bool OptimizeBlock(BasicBlock &BB);
bool OptimizeInst(Instruction *I);
bool OptimizeMemoryInst(Instruction *I, Value *Addr, Type *AccessTy);
bool OptimizeInlineAsmInst(CallInst *CS);
bool OptimizeCallInst(CallInst *CI);
bool MoveExtToFormExtLoad(Instruction *I);
bool OptimizeExtUses(Instruction *I);
CodeGenPrepare: Add a transform to turn selects into branches in some cases. This came up when a change in block placement formed a cmov and slowed down a hot loop by 50%: ucomisd (%rdi), %xmm0 cmovbel %edx, %esi cmov is a really bad choice in this context because it doesn't get branch prediction. If we emit it as a branch, an out-of-order CPU can do a better job (if the branch is predicted right) and avoid waiting for the slow load+compare instruction to finish. Of course it won't help if the branch is unpredictable, but those are really rare in practice. This patch uses a dumb conservative heuristic, it turns all cmovs that have one use and a direct memory operand into branches. cmovs usually save some code size, so we disable the transform in -Os mode. In-Order architectures are unlikely to benefit as well, those are included in the "predictableSelectIsExpensive" flag. It would be better to reuse branch probability info here, but BPI doesn't support select instructions currently. It would make sense to use the same heuristics as the if-converter pass, which does the opposite direction of this transform. Test suite shows a small improvement here and there on corei7-level machines, but the actual results depend a lot on the used microarchitecture. The transformation is currently disabled by default and available by passing the -enable-cgp-select2branch flag to the code generator. Thanks to Chandler for the initial test case to him and Evan Cheng for providing me with comments and test-suite numbers that were more stable than mine :) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@156234 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-05-05 12:49:22 +00:00
bool OptimizeSelectInst(SelectInst *SI);
bool OptimizeShuffleVectorInst(ShuffleVectorInst *SI);
bool DupRetToEnableTailCallOpts(BasicBlock *BB);
bool PlaceDbgValues(Function &F);
bool sinkAndCmp(Function &F);
};
}
char CodeGenPrepare::ID = 0;
INITIALIZE_TM_PASS(CodeGenPrepare, "codegenprepare",
"Optimize for code generation", false, false)
FunctionPass *llvm::createCodeGenPreparePass(const TargetMachine *TM) {
return new CodeGenPrepare(TM);
}
bool CodeGenPrepare::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
if (skipOptnoneFunction(F))
return false;
bool EverMadeChange = false;
// Clear per function information.
InsertedTruncsSet.clear();
PromotedInsts.clear();
ModifiedDT = false;
if (TM) TLI = TM->getTargetLowering();
TLInfo = &getAnalysis<TargetLibraryInfo>();
DominatorTreeWrapperPass *DTWP =
getAnalysisIfAvailable<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
DT = DTWP ? &DTWP->getDomTree() : nullptr;
OptSize = F.getAttributes().hasAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex,
Attribute::OptimizeForSize);
/// This optimization identifies DIV instructions that can be
/// profitably bypassed and carried out with a shorter, faster divide.
if (!OptSize && TLI && TLI->isSlowDivBypassed()) {
const DenseMap<unsigned int, unsigned int> &BypassWidths =
TLI->getBypassSlowDivWidths();
for (Function::iterator I = F.begin(); I != F.end(); I++)
EverMadeChange |= bypassSlowDivision(F, I, BypassWidths);
}
// Eliminate blocks that contain only PHI nodes and an
// unconditional branch.
EverMadeChange |= EliminateMostlyEmptyBlocks(F);
// llvm.dbg.value is far away from the value then iSel may not be able
// handle it properly. iSel will drop llvm.dbg.value if it can not
// find a node corresponding to the value.
EverMadeChange |= PlaceDbgValues(F);
// If there is a mask, compare against zero, and branch that can be combined
// into a single target instruction, push the mask and compare into branch
// users. Do this before OptimizeBlock -> OptimizeInst ->
// OptimizeCmpExpression, which perturbs the pattern being searched for.
if (!DisableBranchOpts)
EverMadeChange |= sinkAndCmp(F);
bool MadeChange = true;
while (MadeChange) {
MadeChange = false;
for (Function::iterator I = F.begin(); I != F.end(); ) {
BasicBlock *BB = I++;
MadeChange |= OptimizeBlock(*BB);
}
EverMadeChange |= MadeChange;
}
SunkAddrs.clear();
if (!DisableBranchOpts) {
MadeChange = false;
SmallPtrSet<BasicBlock*, 8> WorkList;
for (Function::iterator BB = F.begin(), E = F.end(); BB != E; ++BB) {
SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 2> Successors(succ_begin(BB), succ_end(BB));
MadeChange |= ConstantFoldTerminator(BB, true);
if (!MadeChange) continue;
for (SmallVectorImpl<BasicBlock*>::iterator
II = Successors.begin(), IE = Successors.end(); II != IE; ++II)
if (pred_begin(*II) == pred_end(*II))
WorkList.insert(*II);
}
// Delete the dead blocks and any of their dead successors.
MadeChange |= !WorkList.empty();
while (!WorkList.empty()) {
BasicBlock *BB = *WorkList.begin();
WorkList.erase(BB);
SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 2> Successors(succ_begin(BB), succ_end(BB));
DeleteDeadBlock(BB);
for (SmallVectorImpl<BasicBlock*>::iterator
II = Successors.begin(), IE = Successors.end(); II != IE; ++II)
if (pred_begin(*II) == pred_end(*II))
WorkList.insert(*II);
}
// Merge pairs of basic blocks with unconditional branches, connected by
// a single edge.
if (EverMadeChange || MadeChange)
MadeChange |= EliminateFallThrough(F);
if (MadeChange)
ModifiedDT = true;
EverMadeChange |= MadeChange;
}
if (ModifiedDT && DT)
DT->recalculate(F);
return EverMadeChange;
}
/// EliminateFallThrough - Merge basic blocks which are connected
/// by a single edge, where one of the basic blocks has a single successor
/// pointing to the other basic block, which has a single predecessor.
bool CodeGenPrepare::EliminateFallThrough(Function &F) {
bool Changed = false;
// Scan all of the blocks in the function, except for the entry block.
for (Function::iterator I = std::next(F.begin()), E = F.end(); I != E;) {
BasicBlock *BB = I++;
// If the destination block has a single pred, then this is a trivial
// edge, just collapse it.
BasicBlock *SinglePred = BB->getSinglePredecessor();
// Don't merge if BB's address is taken.
if (!SinglePred || SinglePred == BB || BB->hasAddressTaken()) continue;
BranchInst *Term = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(SinglePred->getTerminator());
if (Term && !Term->isConditional()) {
Changed = true;
DEBUG(dbgs() << "To merge:\n"<< *SinglePred << "\n\n\n");
// Remember if SinglePred was the entry block of the function.
// If so, we will need to move BB back to the entry position.
bool isEntry = SinglePred == &SinglePred->getParent()->getEntryBlock();
MergeBasicBlockIntoOnlyPred(BB, this);
if (isEntry && BB != &BB->getParent()->getEntryBlock())
BB->moveBefore(&BB->getParent()->getEntryBlock());
// We have erased a block. Update the iterator.
I = BB;
}
}
return Changed;
}
/// EliminateMostlyEmptyBlocks - eliminate blocks that contain only PHI nodes,
/// debug info directives, and an unconditional branch. Passes before isel
/// (e.g. LSR/loopsimplify) often split edges in ways that are non-optimal for
/// isel. Start by eliminating these blocks so we can split them the way we
/// want them.
bool CodeGenPrepare::EliminateMostlyEmptyBlocks(Function &F) {
bool MadeChange = false;
// Note that this intentionally skips the entry block.
for (Function::iterator I = std::next(F.begin()), E = F.end(); I != E;) {
BasicBlock *BB = I++;
// If this block doesn't end with an uncond branch, ignore it.
BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(BB->getTerminator());
if (!BI || !BI->isUnconditional())
continue;
// If the instruction before the branch (skipping debug info) isn't a phi
// node, then other stuff is happening here.
BasicBlock::iterator BBI = BI;
if (BBI != BB->begin()) {
--BBI;
while (isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(BBI)) {
if (BBI == BB->begin())
break;
--BBI;
}
if (!isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(BBI) && !isa<PHINode>(BBI))
continue;
}
// Do not break infinite loops.
BasicBlock *DestBB = BI->getSuccessor(0);
if (DestBB == BB)
continue;
if (!CanMergeBlocks(BB, DestBB))
continue;
EliminateMostlyEmptyBlock(BB);
MadeChange = true;
}
return MadeChange;
}
/// CanMergeBlocks - Return true if we can merge BB into DestBB if there is a
/// single uncond branch between them, and BB contains no other non-phi
/// instructions.
bool CodeGenPrepare::CanMergeBlocks(const BasicBlock *BB,
const BasicBlock *DestBB) const {
// We only want to eliminate blocks whose phi nodes are used by phi nodes in
// the successor. If there are more complex condition (e.g. preheaders),
// don't mess around with them.
BasicBlock::const_iterator BBI = BB->begin();
while (const PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(BBI++)) {
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
for (const User *U : PN->users()) {
const Instruction *UI = cast<Instruction>(U);
if (UI->getParent() != DestBB || !isa<PHINode>(UI))
return false;
// If User is inside DestBB block and it is a PHINode then check
// incoming value. If incoming value is not from BB then this is
// a complex condition (e.g. preheaders) we want to avoid here.
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
if (UI->getParent() == DestBB) {
if (const PHINode *UPN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(UI))
for (unsigned I = 0, E = UPN->getNumIncomingValues(); I != E; ++I) {
Instruction *Insn = dyn_cast<Instruction>(UPN->getIncomingValue(I));
if (Insn && Insn->getParent() == BB &&
Insn->getParent() != UPN->getIncomingBlock(I))
return false;
}
}
}
}
// If BB and DestBB contain any common predecessors, then the phi nodes in BB
// and DestBB may have conflicting incoming values for the block. If so, we
// can't merge the block.
const PHINode *DestBBPN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(DestBB->begin());
if (!DestBBPN) return true; // no conflict.
// Collect the preds of BB.
SmallPtrSet<const BasicBlock*, 16> BBPreds;
if (const PHINode *BBPN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(BB->begin())) {
// It is faster to get preds from a PHI than with pred_iterator.
for (unsigned i = 0, e = BBPN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i)
BBPreds.insert(BBPN->getIncomingBlock(i));
} else {
BBPreds.insert(pred_begin(BB), pred_end(BB));
}
// Walk the preds of DestBB.
for (unsigned i = 0, e = DestBBPN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i) {
BasicBlock *Pred = DestBBPN->getIncomingBlock(i);
if (BBPreds.count(Pred)) { // Common predecessor?
BBI = DestBB->begin();
while (const PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(BBI++)) {
const Value *V1 = PN->getIncomingValueForBlock(Pred);
const Value *V2 = PN->getIncomingValueForBlock(BB);
// If V2 is a phi node in BB, look up what the mapped value will be.
if (const PHINode *V2PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(V2))
if (V2PN->getParent() == BB)
V2 = V2PN->getIncomingValueForBlock(Pred);
// If there is a conflict, bail out.
if (V1 != V2) return false;
}
}
}
return true;
}
/// EliminateMostlyEmptyBlock - Eliminate a basic block that have only phi's and
/// an unconditional branch in it.
void CodeGenPrepare::EliminateMostlyEmptyBlock(BasicBlock *BB) {
BranchInst *BI = cast<BranchInst>(BB->getTerminator());
BasicBlock *DestBB = BI->getSuccessor(0);
DEBUG(dbgs() << "MERGING MOSTLY EMPTY BLOCKS - BEFORE:\n" << *BB << *DestBB);
// If the destination block has a single pred, then this is a trivial edge,
// just collapse it.
if (BasicBlock *SinglePred = DestBB->getSinglePredecessor()) {
if (SinglePred != DestBB) {
// Remember if SinglePred was the entry block of the function. If so, we
// will need to move BB back to the entry position.
bool isEntry = SinglePred == &SinglePred->getParent()->getEntryBlock();
MergeBasicBlockIntoOnlyPred(DestBB, this);
if (isEntry && BB != &BB->getParent()->getEntryBlock())
BB->moveBefore(&BB->getParent()->getEntryBlock());
DEBUG(dbgs() << "AFTER:\n" << *DestBB << "\n\n\n");
return;
}
}
// Otherwise, we have multiple predecessors of BB. Update the PHIs in DestBB
// to handle the new incoming edges it is about to have.
PHINode *PN;
for (BasicBlock::iterator BBI = DestBB->begin();
(PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(BBI)); ++BBI) {
// Remove the incoming value for BB, and remember it.
Value *InVal = PN->removeIncomingValue(BB, false);
// Two options: either the InVal is a phi node defined in BB or it is some
// value that dominates BB.
PHINode *InValPhi = dyn_cast<PHINode>(InVal);
if (InValPhi && InValPhi->getParent() == BB) {
// Add all of the input values of the input PHI as inputs of this phi.
for (unsigned i = 0, e = InValPhi->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i)
PN->addIncoming(InValPhi->getIncomingValue(i),
InValPhi->getIncomingBlock(i));
} else {
// Otherwise, add one instance of the dominating value for each edge that
// we will be adding.
if (PHINode *BBPN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(BB->begin())) {
for (unsigned i = 0, e = BBPN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i)
PN->addIncoming(InVal, BBPN->getIncomingBlock(i));
} else {
for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(BB), E = pred_end(BB); PI != E; ++PI)
PN->addIncoming(InVal, *PI);
}
}
}
// The PHIs are now updated, change everything that refers to BB to use
// DestBB and remove BB.
BB->replaceAllUsesWith(DestBB);
if (DT && !ModifiedDT) {
BasicBlock *BBIDom = DT->getNode(BB)->getIDom()->getBlock();
BasicBlock *DestBBIDom = DT->getNode(DestBB)->getIDom()->getBlock();
BasicBlock *NewIDom = DT->findNearestCommonDominator(BBIDom, DestBBIDom);
DT->changeImmediateDominator(DestBB, NewIDom);
DT->eraseNode(BB);
}
BB->eraseFromParent();
++NumBlocksElim;
DEBUG(dbgs() << "AFTER:\n" << *DestBB << "\n\n\n");
}
/// SinkCast - Sink the specified cast instruction into its user blocks
static bool SinkCast(CastInst *CI) {
BasicBlock *DefBB = CI->getParent();
/// InsertedCasts - Only insert a cast in each block once.
DenseMap<BasicBlock*, CastInst*> InsertedCasts;
bool MadeChange = false;
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
for (Value::user_iterator UI = CI->user_begin(), E = CI->user_end();
UI != E; ) {
Use &TheUse = UI.getUse();
Instruction *User = cast<Instruction>(*UI);
// Figure out which BB this cast is used in. For PHI's this is the
// appropriate predecessor block.
BasicBlock *UserBB = User->getParent();
if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(User)) {
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
UserBB = PN->getIncomingBlock(TheUse);
}
// Preincrement use iterator so we don't invalidate it.
++UI;
// If this user is in the same block as the cast, don't change the cast.
if (UserBB == DefBB) continue;
// If we have already inserted a cast into this block, use it.
CastInst *&InsertedCast = InsertedCasts[UserBB];
if (!InsertedCast) {
BasicBlock::iterator InsertPt = UserBB->getFirstInsertionPt();
InsertedCast =
CastInst::Create(CI->getOpcode(), CI->getOperand(0), CI->getType(), "",
InsertPt);
MadeChange = true;
}
// Replace a use of the cast with a use of the new cast.
TheUse = InsertedCast;
++NumCastUses;
}
// If we removed all uses, nuke the cast.
if (CI->use_empty()) {
CI->eraseFromParent();
MadeChange = true;
}
return MadeChange;
}
/// OptimizeNoopCopyExpression - If the specified cast instruction is a noop
/// copy (e.g. it's casting from one pointer type to another, i32->i8 on PPC),
/// sink it into user blocks to reduce the number of virtual
/// registers that must be created and coalesced.
///
/// Return true if any changes are made.
///
static bool OptimizeNoopCopyExpression(CastInst *CI, const TargetLowering &TLI){
// If this is a noop copy,
EVT SrcVT = TLI.getValueType(CI->getOperand(0)->getType());
EVT DstVT = TLI.getValueType(CI->getType());
// This is an fp<->int conversion?
if (SrcVT.isInteger() != DstVT.isInteger())
return false;
// If this is an extension, it will be a zero or sign extension, which
// isn't a noop.
if (SrcVT.bitsLT(DstVT)) return false;
// If these values will be promoted, find out what they will be promoted
// to. This helps us consider truncates on PPC as noop copies when they
// are.
if (TLI.getTypeAction(CI->getContext(), SrcVT) ==
TargetLowering::TypePromoteInteger)
SrcVT = TLI.getTypeToTransformTo(CI->getContext(), SrcVT);
if (TLI.getTypeAction(CI->getContext(), DstVT) ==
TargetLowering::TypePromoteInteger)
DstVT = TLI.getTypeToTransformTo(CI->getContext(), DstVT);
// If, after promotion, these are the same types, this is a noop copy.
if (SrcVT != DstVT)
return false;
return SinkCast(CI);
}
/// OptimizeCmpExpression - sink the given CmpInst into user blocks to reduce
/// the number of virtual registers that must be created and coalesced. This is
/// a clear win except on targets with multiple condition code registers
/// (PowerPC), where it might lose; some adjustment may be wanted there.
///
/// Return true if any changes are made.
static bool OptimizeCmpExpression(CmpInst *CI) {
BasicBlock *DefBB = CI->getParent();
/// InsertedCmp - Only insert a cmp in each block once.
DenseMap<BasicBlock*, CmpInst*> InsertedCmps;
bool MadeChange = false;
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
for (Value::user_iterator UI = CI->user_begin(), E = CI->user_end();
UI != E; ) {
Use &TheUse = UI.getUse();
Instruction *User = cast<Instruction>(*UI);
// Preincrement use iterator so we don't invalidate it.
++UI;
// Don't bother for PHI nodes.
if (isa<PHINode>(User))
continue;
// Figure out which BB this cmp is used in.
BasicBlock *UserBB = User->getParent();
// If this user is in the same block as the cmp, don't change the cmp.
if (UserBB == DefBB) continue;
// If we have already inserted a cmp into this block, use it.
CmpInst *&InsertedCmp = InsertedCmps[UserBB];
if (!InsertedCmp) {
BasicBlock::iterator InsertPt = UserBB->getFirstInsertionPt();
InsertedCmp =
CmpInst::Create(CI->getOpcode(),
CI->getPredicate(), CI->getOperand(0),
CI->getOperand(1), "", InsertPt);
MadeChange = true;
}
// Replace a use of the cmp with a use of the new cmp.
TheUse = InsertedCmp;
++NumCmpUses;
}
// If we removed all uses, nuke the cmp.
if (CI->use_empty())
CI->eraseFromParent();
return MadeChange;
}
/// isExtractBitsCandidateUse - Check if the candidates could
/// be combined with shift instruction, which includes:
/// 1. Truncate instruction
/// 2. And instruction and the imm is a mask of the low bits:
/// imm & (imm+1) == 0
static bool isExtractBitsCandidateUse(Instruction *User) {
if (!isa<TruncInst>(User)) {
if (User->getOpcode() != Instruction::And ||
!isa<ConstantInt>(User->getOperand(1)))
return false;
const APInt &Cimm = cast<ConstantInt>(User->getOperand(1))->getValue();
if ((Cimm & (Cimm + 1)).getBoolValue())
return false;
}
return true;
}
/// SinkShiftAndTruncate - sink both shift and truncate instruction
/// to the use of truncate's BB.
static bool
SinkShiftAndTruncate(BinaryOperator *ShiftI, Instruction *User, ConstantInt *CI,
DenseMap<BasicBlock *, BinaryOperator *> &InsertedShifts,
const TargetLowering &TLI) {
BasicBlock *UserBB = User->getParent();
DenseMap<BasicBlock *, CastInst *> InsertedTruncs;
TruncInst *TruncI = dyn_cast<TruncInst>(User);
bool MadeChange = false;
for (Value::user_iterator TruncUI = TruncI->user_begin(),
TruncE = TruncI->user_end();
TruncUI != TruncE;) {
Use &TruncTheUse = TruncUI.getUse();
Instruction *TruncUser = cast<Instruction>(*TruncUI);
// Preincrement use iterator so we don't invalidate it.
++TruncUI;
int ISDOpcode = TLI.InstructionOpcodeToISD(TruncUser->getOpcode());
if (!ISDOpcode)
continue;
// If the use is actually a legal node, there will not be an implicit
// truncate.
if (TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISDOpcode,
EVT::getEVT(TruncUser->getType())))
continue;
// Don't bother for PHI nodes.
if (isa<PHINode>(TruncUser))
continue;
BasicBlock *TruncUserBB = TruncUser->getParent();
if (UserBB == TruncUserBB)
continue;
BinaryOperator *&InsertedShift = InsertedShifts[TruncUserBB];
CastInst *&InsertedTrunc = InsertedTruncs[TruncUserBB];
if (!InsertedShift && !InsertedTrunc) {
BasicBlock::iterator InsertPt = TruncUserBB->getFirstInsertionPt();
// Sink the shift
if (ShiftI->getOpcode() == Instruction::AShr)
InsertedShift =
BinaryOperator::CreateAShr(ShiftI->getOperand(0), CI, "", InsertPt);
else
InsertedShift =
BinaryOperator::CreateLShr(ShiftI->getOperand(0), CI, "", InsertPt);
// Sink the trunc
BasicBlock::iterator TruncInsertPt = TruncUserBB->getFirstInsertionPt();
TruncInsertPt++;
InsertedTrunc = CastInst::Create(TruncI->getOpcode(), InsertedShift,
TruncI->getType(), "", TruncInsertPt);
MadeChange = true;
TruncTheUse = InsertedTrunc;
}
}
return MadeChange;
}
/// OptimizeExtractBits - sink the shift *right* instruction into user blocks if
/// the uses could potentially be combined with this shift instruction and
/// generate BitExtract instruction. It will only be applied if the architecture
/// supports BitExtract instruction. Here is an example:
/// BB1:
/// %x.extract.shift = lshr i64 %arg1, 32
/// BB2:
/// %x.extract.trunc = trunc i64 %x.extract.shift to i16
/// ==>
///
/// BB2:
/// %x.extract.shift.1 = lshr i64 %arg1, 32
/// %x.extract.trunc = trunc i64 %x.extract.shift.1 to i16
///
/// CodeGen will recoginze the pattern in BB2 and generate BitExtract
/// instruction.
/// Return true if any changes are made.
static bool OptimizeExtractBits(BinaryOperator *ShiftI, ConstantInt *CI,
const TargetLowering &TLI) {
BasicBlock *DefBB = ShiftI->getParent();
/// Only insert instructions in each block once.
DenseMap<BasicBlock *, BinaryOperator *> InsertedShifts;
bool shiftIsLegal = TLI.isTypeLegal(TLI.getValueType(ShiftI->getType()));
bool MadeChange = false;
for (Value::user_iterator UI = ShiftI->user_begin(), E = ShiftI->user_end();
UI != E;) {
Use &TheUse = UI.getUse();
Instruction *User = cast<Instruction>(*UI);
// Preincrement use iterator so we don't invalidate it.
++UI;
// Don't bother for PHI nodes.
if (isa<PHINode>(User))
continue;
if (!isExtractBitsCandidateUse(User))
continue;
BasicBlock *UserBB = User->getParent();
if (UserBB == DefBB) {
// If the shift and truncate instruction are in the same BB. The use of
// the truncate(TruncUse) may still introduce another truncate if not
// legal. In this case, we would like to sink both shift and truncate
// instruction to the BB of TruncUse.
// for example:
// BB1:
// i64 shift.result = lshr i64 opnd, imm
// trunc.result = trunc shift.result to i16
//
// BB2:
// ----> We will have an implicit truncate here if the architecture does
// not have i16 compare.
// cmp i16 trunc.result, opnd2
//
if (isa<TruncInst>(User) && shiftIsLegal
// If the type of the truncate is legal, no trucate will be
// introduced in other basic blocks.
&& (!TLI.isTypeLegal(TLI.getValueType(User->getType()))))
MadeChange =
SinkShiftAndTruncate(ShiftI, User, CI, InsertedShifts, TLI);
continue;
}
// If we have already inserted a shift into this block, use it.
BinaryOperator *&InsertedShift = InsertedShifts[UserBB];
if (!InsertedShift) {
BasicBlock::iterator InsertPt = UserBB->getFirstInsertionPt();
if (ShiftI->getOpcode() == Instruction::AShr)
InsertedShift =
BinaryOperator::CreateAShr(ShiftI->getOperand(0), CI, "", InsertPt);
else
InsertedShift =
BinaryOperator::CreateLShr(ShiftI->getOperand(0), CI, "", InsertPt);
MadeChange = true;
}
// Replace a use of the shift with a use of the new shift.
TheUse = InsertedShift;
}
// If we removed all uses, nuke the shift.
if (ShiftI->use_empty())
ShiftI->eraseFromParent();
return MadeChange;
}
namespace {
class CodeGenPrepareFortifiedLibCalls : public SimplifyFortifiedLibCalls {
protected:
void replaceCall(Value *With) override {
CI->replaceAllUsesWith(With);
CI->eraseFromParent();
}
bool isFoldable(unsigned SizeCIOp, unsigned, bool) const override {
if (ConstantInt *SizeCI =
dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(CI->getArgOperand(SizeCIOp)))
return SizeCI->isAllOnesValue();
return false;
}
};
} // end anonymous namespace
bool CodeGenPrepare::OptimizeCallInst(CallInst *CI) {
BasicBlock *BB = CI->getParent();
// Lower inline assembly if we can.
// If we found an inline asm expession, and if the target knows how to
// lower it to normal LLVM code, do so now.
if (TLI && isa<InlineAsm>(CI->getCalledValue())) {
if (TLI->ExpandInlineAsm(CI)) {
// Avoid invalidating the iterator.
CurInstIterator = BB->begin();
// Avoid processing instructions out of order, which could cause
// reuse before a value is defined.
SunkAddrs.clear();
return true;
}
// Sink address computing for memory operands into the block.
if (OptimizeInlineAsmInst(CI))
return true;
}
// Lower all uses of llvm.objectsize.*
IntrinsicInst *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(CI);
if (II && II->getIntrinsicID() == Intrinsic::objectsize) {
bool Min = (cast<ConstantInt>(II->getArgOperand(1))->getZExtValue() == 1);
Type *ReturnTy = CI->getType();
Constant *RetVal = ConstantInt::get(ReturnTy, Min ? 0 : -1ULL);
// Substituting this can cause recursive simplifications, which can
// invalidate our iterator. Use a WeakVH to hold onto it in case this
// happens.
WeakVH IterHandle(CurInstIterator);
replaceAndRecursivelySimplify(CI, RetVal,
TLI ? TLI->getDataLayout() : nullptr,
TLInfo, ModifiedDT ? nullptr : DT);
// If the iterator instruction was recursively deleted, start over at the
// start of the block.
if (IterHandle != CurInstIterator) {
CurInstIterator = BB->begin();
SunkAddrs.clear();
}
return true;
}
if (II && TLI) {
SmallVector<Value*, 2> PtrOps;
Type *AccessTy;
if (TLI->GetAddrModeArguments(II, PtrOps, AccessTy))
while (!PtrOps.empty())
if (OptimizeMemoryInst(II, PtrOps.pop_back_val(), AccessTy))
return true;
}
// From here on out we're working with named functions.
if (!CI->getCalledFunction()) return false;
// We'll need DataLayout from here on out.
const DataLayout *TD = TLI ? TLI->getDataLayout() : nullptr;
if (!TD) return false;
// Lower all default uses of _chk calls. This is very similar
// to what InstCombineCalls does, but here we are only lowering calls
// that have the default "don't know" as the objectsize. Anything else
// should be left alone.
CodeGenPrepareFortifiedLibCalls Simplifier;
return Simplifier.fold(CI, TD, TLInfo);
}
/// DupRetToEnableTailCallOpts - Look for opportunities to duplicate return
/// instructions to the predecessor to enable tail call optimizations. The
/// case it is currently looking for is:
/// @code
/// bb0:
/// %tmp0 = tail call i32 @f0()
/// br label %return
/// bb1:
/// %tmp1 = tail call i32 @f1()
/// br label %return
/// bb2:
/// %tmp2 = tail call i32 @f2()
/// br label %return
/// return:
/// %retval = phi i32 [ %tmp0, %bb0 ], [ %tmp1, %bb1 ], [ %tmp2, %bb2 ]
/// ret i32 %retval
/// @endcode
///
/// =>
///
/// @code
/// bb0:
/// %tmp0 = tail call i32 @f0()
/// ret i32 %tmp0
/// bb1:
/// %tmp1 = tail call i32 @f1()
/// ret i32 %tmp1
/// bb2:
/// %tmp2 = tail call i32 @f2()
/// ret i32 %tmp2
/// @endcode
bool CodeGenPrepare::DupRetToEnableTailCallOpts(BasicBlock *BB) {
if (!TLI)
return false;
ReturnInst *RI = dyn_cast<ReturnInst>(BB->getTerminator());
if (!RI)
return false;
PHINode *PN = nullptr;
BitCastInst *BCI = nullptr;
Value *V = RI->getReturnValue();
if (V) {
BCI = dyn_cast<BitCastInst>(V);
if (BCI)
V = BCI->getOperand(0);
PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(V);
if (!PN)
return false;
}
if (PN && PN->getParent() != BB)
return false;
// It's not safe to eliminate the sign / zero extension of the return value.
// See llvm::isInTailCallPosition().
const Function *F = BB->getParent();
AttributeSet CallerAttrs = F->getAttributes();
if (CallerAttrs.hasAttribute(AttributeSet::ReturnIndex, Attribute::ZExt) ||
CallerAttrs.hasAttribute(AttributeSet::ReturnIndex, Attribute::SExt))
return false;
// Make sure there are no instructions between the PHI and return, or that the
// return is the first instruction in the block.
if (PN) {
BasicBlock::iterator BI = BB->begin();
do { ++BI; } while (isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(BI));
if (&*BI == BCI)
// Also skip over the bitcast.
++BI;
if (&*BI != RI)
return false;
} else {
BasicBlock::iterator BI = BB->begin();
while (isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(BI)) ++BI;
if (&*BI != RI)
return false;
}
/// Only dup the ReturnInst if the CallInst is likely to be emitted as a tail
/// call.
SmallVector<CallInst*, 4> TailCalls;
if (PN) {
for (unsigned I = 0, E = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); I != E; ++I) {
CallInst *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(PN->getIncomingValue(I));
// Make sure the phi value is indeed produced by the tail call.
if (CI && CI->hasOneUse() && CI->getParent() == PN->getIncomingBlock(I) &&
TLI->mayBeEmittedAsTailCall(CI))
TailCalls.push_back(CI);
}
} else {
SmallPtrSet<BasicBlock*, 4> VisitedBBs;
for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(BB), PE = pred_end(BB); PI != PE; ++PI) {
if (!VisitedBBs.insert(*PI))
continue;
BasicBlock::InstListType &InstList = (*PI)->getInstList();
BasicBlock::InstListType::reverse_iterator RI = InstList.rbegin();
BasicBlock::InstListType::reverse_iterator RE = InstList.rend();
do { ++RI; } while (RI != RE && isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(&*RI));
if (RI == RE)
continue;
CallInst *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(&*RI);
if (CI && CI->use_empty() && TLI->mayBeEmittedAsTailCall(CI))
TailCalls.push_back(CI);
}
}
bool Changed = false;
for (unsigned i = 0, e = TailCalls.size(); i != e; ++i) {
CallInst *CI = TailCalls[i];
CallSite CS(CI);
// Conservatively require the attributes of the call to match those of the
// return. Ignore noalias because it doesn't affect the call sequence.
AttributeSet CalleeAttrs = CS.getAttributes();
if (AttrBuilder(CalleeAttrs, AttributeSet::ReturnIndex).
removeAttribute(Attribute::NoAlias) !=
AttrBuilder(CalleeAttrs, AttributeSet::ReturnIndex).
removeAttribute(Attribute::NoAlias))
continue;
// Make sure the call instruction is followed by an unconditional branch to
// the return block.
BasicBlock *CallBB = CI->getParent();
BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(CallBB->getTerminator());
if (!BI || !BI->isUnconditional() || BI->getSuccessor(0) != BB)
continue;
// Duplicate the return into CallBB.
(void)FoldReturnIntoUncondBranch(RI, BB, CallBB);
ModifiedDT = Changed = true;
++NumRetsDup;
}
// If we eliminated all predecessors of the block, delete the block now.
if (Changed && !BB->hasAddressTaken() && pred_begin(BB) == pred_end(BB))
BB->eraseFromParent();
return Changed;
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Memory Optimization
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
namespace {
/// ExtAddrMode - This is an extended version of TargetLowering::AddrMode
/// which holds actual Value*'s for register values.
struct ExtAddrMode : public TargetLowering::AddrMode {
Value *BaseReg;
Value *ScaledReg;
ExtAddrMode() : BaseReg(nullptr), ScaledReg(nullptr) {}
void print(raw_ostream &OS) const;
void dump() const;
bool operator==(const ExtAddrMode& O) const {
return (BaseReg == O.BaseReg) && (ScaledReg == O.ScaledReg) &&
(BaseGV == O.BaseGV) && (BaseOffs == O.BaseOffs) &&
(HasBaseReg == O.HasBaseReg) && (Scale == O.Scale);
}
};
#ifndef NDEBUG
static inline raw_ostream &operator<<(raw_ostream &OS, const ExtAddrMode &AM) {
AM.print(OS);
return OS;
}
#endif
void ExtAddrMode::print(raw_ostream &OS) const {
bool NeedPlus = false;
OS << "[";
if (BaseGV) {
OS << (NeedPlus ? " + " : "")
<< "GV:";
BaseGV->printAsOperand(OS, /*PrintType=*/false);
NeedPlus = true;
}
if (BaseOffs) {
OS << (NeedPlus ? " + " : "")
<< BaseOffs;
NeedPlus = true;
}
if (BaseReg) {
OS << (NeedPlus ? " + " : "")
<< "Base:";
BaseReg->printAsOperand(OS, /*PrintType=*/false);
NeedPlus = true;
}
if (Scale) {
OS << (NeedPlus ? " + " : "")
<< Scale << "*";
ScaledReg->printAsOperand(OS, /*PrintType=*/false);
}
OS << ']';
}
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
void ExtAddrMode::dump() const {
print(dbgs());
dbgs() << '\n';
}
#endif
/// \brief This class provides transaction based operation on the IR.
/// Every change made through this class is recorded in the internal state and
/// can be undone (rollback) until commit is called.
class TypePromotionTransaction {
/// \brief This represents the common interface of the individual transaction.
/// Each class implements the logic for doing one specific modification on
/// the IR via the TypePromotionTransaction.
class TypePromotionAction {
protected:
/// The Instruction modified.
Instruction *Inst;
public:
/// \brief Constructor of the action.
/// The constructor performs the related action on the IR.
TypePromotionAction(Instruction *Inst) : Inst(Inst) {}
virtual ~TypePromotionAction() {}
/// \brief Undo the modification done by this action.
/// When this method is called, the IR must be in the same state as it was
/// before this action was applied.
/// \pre Undoing the action works if and only if the IR is in the exact same
/// state as it was directly after this action was applied.
virtual void undo() = 0;
/// \brief Advocate every change made by this action.
/// When the results on the IR of the action are to be kept, it is important
/// to call this function, otherwise hidden information may be kept forever.
virtual void commit() {
// Nothing to be done, this action is not doing anything.
}
};
/// \brief Utility to remember the position of an instruction.
class InsertionHandler {
/// Position of an instruction.
/// Either an instruction:
/// - Is the first in a basic block: BB is used.
/// - Has a previous instructon: PrevInst is used.
union {
Instruction *PrevInst;
BasicBlock *BB;
} Point;
/// Remember whether or not the instruction had a previous instruction.
bool HasPrevInstruction;
public:
/// \brief Record the position of \p Inst.
InsertionHandler(Instruction *Inst) {
BasicBlock::iterator It = Inst;
HasPrevInstruction = (It != (Inst->getParent()->begin()));
if (HasPrevInstruction)
Point.PrevInst = --It;
else
Point.BB = Inst->getParent();
}
/// \brief Insert \p Inst at the recorded position.
void insert(Instruction *Inst) {
if (HasPrevInstruction) {
if (Inst->getParent())
Inst->removeFromParent();
Inst->insertAfter(Point.PrevInst);
} else {
Instruction *Position = Point.BB->getFirstInsertionPt();
if (Inst->getParent())
Inst->moveBefore(Position);
else
Inst->insertBefore(Position);
}
}
};
/// \brief Move an instruction before another.
class InstructionMoveBefore : public TypePromotionAction {
/// Original position of the instruction.
InsertionHandler Position;
public:
/// \brief Move \p Inst before \p Before.
InstructionMoveBefore(Instruction *Inst, Instruction *Before)
: TypePromotionAction(Inst), Position(Inst) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Do: move: " << *Inst << "\nbefore: " << *Before << "\n");
Inst->moveBefore(Before);
}
/// \brief Move the instruction back to its original position.
void undo() override {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Undo: moveBefore: " << *Inst << "\n");
Position.insert(Inst);
}
};
/// \brief Set the operand of an instruction with a new value.
class OperandSetter : public TypePromotionAction {
/// Original operand of the instruction.
Value *Origin;
/// Index of the modified instruction.
unsigned Idx;
public:
/// \brief Set \p Idx operand of \p Inst with \p NewVal.
OperandSetter(Instruction *Inst, unsigned Idx, Value *NewVal)
: TypePromotionAction(Inst), Idx(Idx) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Do: setOperand: " << Idx << "\n"
<< "for:" << *Inst << "\n"
<< "with:" << *NewVal << "\n");
Origin = Inst->getOperand(Idx);
Inst->setOperand(Idx, NewVal);
}
/// \brief Restore the original value of the instruction.
void undo() override {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Undo: setOperand:" << Idx << "\n"
<< "for: " << *Inst << "\n"
<< "with: " << *Origin << "\n");
Inst->setOperand(Idx, Origin);
}
};
/// \brief Hide the operands of an instruction.
/// Do as if this instruction was not using any of its operands.
class OperandsHider : public TypePromotionAction {
/// The list of original operands.
SmallVector<Value *, 4> OriginalValues;
public:
/// \brief Remove \p Inst from the uses of the operands of \p Inst.
OperandsHider(Instruction *Inst) : TypePromotionAction(Inst) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Do: OperandsHider: " << *Inst << "\n");
unsigned NumOpnds = Inst->getNumOperands();
OriginalValues.reserve(NumOpnds);
for (unsigned It = 0; It < NumOpnds; ++It) {
// Save the current operand.
Value *Val = Inst->getOperand(It);
OriginalValues.push_back(Val);
// Set a dummy one.
// We could use OperandSetter here, but that would implied an overhead
// that we are not willing to pay.
Inst->setOperand(It, UndefValue::get(Val->getType()));
}
}
/// \brief Restore the original list of uses.
void undo() override {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Undo: OperandsHider: " << *Inst << "\n");
for (unsigned It = 0, EndIt = OriginalValues.size(); It != EndIt; ++It)
Inst->setOperand(It, OriginalValues[It]);
}
};
/// \brief Build a truncate instruction.
class TruncBuilder : public TypePromotionAction {
public:
/// \brief Build a truncate instruction of \p Opnd producing a \p Ty
/// result.
/// trunc Opnd to Ty.
TruncBuilder(Instruction *Opnd, Type *Ty) : TypePromotionAction(Opnd) {
IRBuilder<> Builder(Opnd);
Inst = cast<Instruction>(Builder.CreateTrunc(Opnd, Ty, "promoted"));
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Do: TruncBuilder: " << *Inst << "\n");
}
/// \brief Get the built instruction.
Instruction *getBuiltInstruction() { return Inst; }
/// \brief Remove the built instruction.
void undo() override {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Undo: TruncBuilder: " << *Inst << "\n");
Inst->eraseFromParent();
}
};
/// \brief Build a sign extension instruction.
class SExtBuilder : public TypePromotionAction {
public:
/// \brief Build a sign extension instruction of \p Opnd producing a \p Ty
/// result.
/// sext Opnd to Ty.
SExtBuilder(Instruction *InsertPt, Value *Opnd, Type *Ty)
: TypePromotionAction(Inst) {
IRBuilder<> Builder(InsertPt);
Inst = cast<Instruction>(Builder.CreateSExt(Opnd, Ty, "promoted"));
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Do: SExtBuilder: " << *Inst << "\n");
}
/// \brief Get the built instruction.
Instruction *getBuiltInstruction() { return Inst; }
/// \brief Remove the built instruction.
void undo() override {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Undo: SExtBuilder: " << *Inst << "\n");
Inst->eraseFromParent();
}
};
/// \brief Mutate an instruction to another type.
class TypeMutator : public TypePromotionAction {
/// Record the original type.
Type *OrigTy;
public:
/// \brief Mutate the type of \p Inst into \p NewTy.
TypeMutator(Instruction *Inst, Type *NewTy)
: TypePromotionAction(Inst), OrigTy(Inst->getType()) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Do: MutateType: " << *Inst << " with " << *NewTy
<< "\n");
Inst->mutateType(NewTy);
}
/// \brief Mutate the instruction back to its original type.
void undo() override {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Undo: MutateType: " << *Inst << " with " << *OrigTy
<< "\n");
Inst->mutateType(OrigTy);
}
};
/// \brief Replace the uses of an instruction by another instruction.
class UsesReplacer : public TypePromotionAction {
/// Helper structure to keep track of the replaced uses.
struct InstructionAndIdx {
/// The instruction using the instruction.
Instruction *Inst;
/// The index where this instruction is used for Inst.
unsigned Idx;
InstructionAndIdx(Instruction *Inst, unsigned Idx)
: Inst(Inst), Idx(Idx) {}
};
/// Keep track of the original uses (pair Instruction, Index).
SmallVector<InstructionAndIdx, 4> OriginalUses;
typedef SmallVectorImpl<InstructionAndIdx>::iterator use_iterator;
public:
/// \brief Replace all the use of \p Inst by \p New.
UsesReplacer(Instruction *Inst, Value *New) : TypePromotionAction(Inst) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Do: UsersReplacer: " << *Inst << " with " << *New
<< "\n");
// Record the original uses.
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
for (Use &U : Inst->uses()) {
Instruction *UserI = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());
OriginalUses.push_back(InstructionAndIdx(UserI, U.getOperandNo()));
}
// Now, we can replace the uses.
Inst->replaceAllUsesWith(New);
}
/// \brief Reassign the original uses of Inst to Inst.
void undo() override {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Undo: UsersReplacer: " << *Inst << "\n");
for (use_iterator UseIt = OriginalUses.begin(),
EndIt = OriginalUses.end();
UseIt != EndIt; ++UseIt) {
UseIt->Inst->setOperand(UseIt->Idx, Inst);
}
}
};
/// \brief Remove an instruction from the IR.
class InstructionRemover : public TypePromotionAction {
/// Original position of the instruction.
InsertionHandler Inserter;
/// Helper structure to hide all the link to the instruction. In other
/// words, this helps to do as if the instruction was removed.
OperandsHider Hider;
/// Keep track of the uses replaced, if any.
UsesReplacer *Replacer;
public:
/// \brief Remove all reference of \p Inst and optinally replace all its
/// uses with New.
/// \pre If !Inst->use_empty(), then New != nullptr
InstructionRemover(Instruction *Inst, Value *New = nullptr)
: TypePromotionAction(Inst), Inserter(Inst), Hider(Inst),
Replacer(nullptr) {
if (New)
Replacer = new UsesReplacer(Inst, New);
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Do: InstructionRemover: " << *Inst << "\n");
Inst->removeFromParent();
}
~InstructionRemover() { delete Replacer; }
/// \brief Really remove the instruction.
void commit() override { delete Inst; }
/// \brief Resurrect the instruction and reassign it to the proper uses if
/// new value was provided when build this action.
void undo() override {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Undo: InstructionRemover: " << *Inst << "\n");
Inserter.insert(Inst);
if (Replacer)
Replacer->undo();
Hider.undo();
}
};
public:
/// Restoration point.
/// The restoration point is a pointer to an action instead of an iterator
/// because the iterator may be invalidated but not the pointer.
typedef const TypePromotionAction *ConstRestorationPt;
/// Advocate every changes made in that transaction.
void commit();
/// Undo all the changes made after the given point.
void rollback(ConstRestorationPt Point);
/// Get the current restoration point.
ConstRestorationPt getRestorationPoint() const;
/// \name API for IR modification with state keeping to support rollback.
/// @{
/// Same as Instruction::setOperand.
void setOperand(Instruction *Inst, unsigned Idx, Value *NewVal);
/// Same as Instruction::eraseFromParent.
void eraseInstruction(Instruction *Inst, Value *NewVal = nullptr);
/// Same as Value::replaceAllUsesWith.
void replaceAllUsesWith(Instruction *Inst, Value *New);
/// Same as Value::mutateType.
void mutateType(Instruction *Inst, Type *NewTy);
/// Same as IRBuilder::createTrunc.
Instruction *createTrunc(Instruction *Opnd, Type *Ty);
/// Same as IRBuilder::createSExt.
Instruction *createSExt(Instruction *Inst, Value *Opnd, Type *Ty);
/// Same as Instruction::moveBefore.
void moveBefore(Instruction *Inst, Instruction *Before);
/// @}
private:
/// The ordered list of actions made so far.
SmallVector<std::unique_ptr<TypePromotionAction>, 16> Actions;
typedef SmallVectorImpl<std::unique_ptr<TypePromotionAction>>::iterator CommitPt;
};
void TypePromotionTransaction::setOperand(Instruction *Inst, unsigned Idx,
Value *NewVal) {
Actions.push_back(
make_unique<TypePromotionTransaction::OperandSetter>(Inst, Idx, NewVal));
}
void TypePromotionTransaction::eraseInstruction(Instruction *Inst,
Value *NewVal) {
Actions.push_back(
make_unique<TypePromotionTransaction::InstructionRemover>(Inst, NewVal));
}
void TypePromotionTransaction::replaceAllUsesWith(Instruction *Inst,
Value *New) {
Actions.push_back(make_unique<TypePromotionTransaction::UsesReplacer>(Inst, New));
}
void TypePromotionTransaction::mutateType(Instruction *Inst, Type *NewTy) {
Actions.push_back(make_unique<TypePromotionTransaction::TypeMutator>(Inst, NewTy));
}
Instruction *TypePromotionTransaction::createTrunc(Instruction *Opnd,
Type *Ty) {
std::unique_ptr<TruncBuilder> Ptr(new TruncBuilder(Opnd, Ty));
Instruction *I = Ptr->getBuiltInstruction();
Actions.push_back(std::move(Ptr));
return I;
}
Instruction *TypePromotionTransaction::createSExt(Instruction *Inst,
Value *Opnd, Type *Ty) {
std::unique_ptr<SExtBuilder> Ptr(new SExtBuilder(Inst, Opnd, Ty));
Instruction *I = Ptr->getBuiltInstruction();
Actions.push_back(std::move(Ptr));
return I;
}
void TypePromotionTransaction::moveBefore(Instruction *Inst,
Instruction *Before) {
Actions.push_back(
make_unique<TypePromotionTransaction::InstructionMoveBefore>(Inst, Before));
}
TypePromotionTransaction::ConstRestorationPt
TypePromotionTransaction::getRestorationPoint() const {
return !Actions.empty() ? Actions.back().get() : nullptr;
}
void TypePromotionTransaction::commit() {
for (CommitPt It = Actions.begin(), EndIt = Actions.end(); It != EndIt;
++It)
(*It)->commit();
Actions.clear();
}
void TypePromotionTransaction::rollback(
TypePromotionTransaction::ConstRestorationPt Point) {
while (!Actions.empty() && Point != Actions.back().get()) {
std::unique_ptr<TypePromotionAction> Curr = Actions.pop_back_val();
Curr->undo();
}
}
/// \brief A helper class for matching addressing modes.
///
/// This encapsulates the logic for matching the target-legal addressing modes.
class AddressingModeMatcher {
SmallVectorImpl<Instruction*> &AddrModeInsts;
const TargetLowering &TLI;
/// AccessTy/MemoryInst - This is the type for the access (e.g. double) and
/// the memory instruction that we're computing this address for.
Type *AccessTy;
Instruction *MemoryInst;
/// AddrMode - This is the addressing mode that we're building up. This is
/// part of the return value of this addressing mode matching stuff.
ExtAddrMode &AddrMode;
/// The truncate instruction inserted by other CodeGenPrepare optimizations.
const SetOfInstrs &InsertedTruncs;
/// A map from the instructions to their type before promotion.
InstrToOrigTy &PromotedInsts;
/// The ongoing transaction where every action should be registered.
TypePromotionTransaction &TPT;
/// IgnoreProfitability - This is set to true when we should not do
/// profitability checks. When true, IsProfitableToFoldIntoAddressingMode
/// always returns true.
bool IgnoreProfitability;
AddressingModeMatcher(SmallVectorImpl<Instruction*> &AMI,
const TargetLowering &T, Type *AT,
Instruction *MI, ExtAddrMode &AM,
const SetOfInstrs &InsertedTruncs,
InstrToOrigTy &PromotedInsts,
TypePromotionTransaction &TPT)
: AddrModeInsts(AMI), TLI(T), AccessTy(AT), MemoryInst(MI), AddrMode(AM),
InsertedTruncs(InsertedTruncs), PromotedInsts(PromotedInsts), TPT(TPT) {
IgnoreProfitability = false;
}
public:
/// Match - Find the maximal addressing mode that a load/store of V can fold,
/// give an access type of AccessTy. This returns a list of involved
/// instructions in AddrModeInsts.
/// \p InsertedTruncs The truncate instruction inserted by other
/// CodeGenPrepare
/// optimizations.
/// \p PromotedInsts maps the instructions to their type before promotion.
/// \p The ongoing transaction where every action should be registered.
static ExtAddrMode Match(Value *V, Type *AccessTy,
Instruction *MemoryInst,
SmallVectorImpl<Instruction*> &AddrModeInsts,
const TargetLowering &TLI,
const SetOfInstrs &InsertedTruncs,
InstrToOrigTy &PromotedInsts,
TypePromotionTransaction &TPT) {
ExtAddrMode Result;
bool Success = AddressingModeMatcher(AddrModeInsts, TLI, AccessTy,
MemoryInst, Result, InsertedTruncs,
PromotedInsts, TPT).MatchAddr(V, 0);
(void)Success; assert(Success && "Couldn't select *anything*?");
return Result;
}
private:
bool MatchScaledValue(Value *ScaleReg, int64_t Scale, unsigned Depth);
bool MatchAddr(Value *V, unsigned Depth);
bool MatchOperationAddr(User *Operation, unsigned Opcode, unsigned Depth,
bool *MovedAway = nullptr);
bool IsProfitableToFoldIntoAddressingMode(Instruction *I,
ExtAddrMode &AMBefore,
ExtAddrMode &AMAfter);
bool ValueAlreadyLiveAtInst(Value *Val, Value *KnownLive1, Value *KnownLive2);
bool IsPromotionProfitable(unsigned MatchedSize, unsigned SizeWithPromotion,
Value *PromotedOperand) const;
};
/// MatchScaledValue - Try adding ScaleReg*Scale to the current addressing mode.
/// Return true and update AddrMode if this addr mode is legal for the target,
/// false if not.
bool AddressingModeMatcher::MatchScaledValue(Value *ScaleReg, int64_t Scale,
unsigned Depth) {
// If Scale is 1, then this is the same as adding ScaleReg to the addressing
// mode. Just process that directly.
if (Scale == 1)
return MatchAddr(ScaleReg, Depth);
// If the scale is 0, it takes nothing to add this.
if (Scale == 0)
return true;
// If we already have a scale of this value, we can add to it, otherwise, we
// need an available scale field.
if (AddrMode.Scale != 0 && AddrMode.ScaledReg != ScaleReg)
return false;
ExtAddrMode TestAddrMode = AddrMode;
// Add scale to turn X*4+X*3 -> X*7. This could also do things like
// [A+B + A*7] -> [B+A*8].
TestAddrMode.Scale += Scale;
TestAddrMode.ScaledReg = ScaleReg;
// If the new address isn't legal, bail out.
if (!TLI.isLegalAddressingMode(TestAddrMode, AccessTy))
return false;
// It was legal, so commit it.
AddrMode = TestAddrMode;
// Okay, we decided that we can add ScaleReg+Scale to AddrMode. Check now
// to see if ScaleReg is actually X+C. If so, we can turn this into adding
// X*Scale + C*Scale to addr mode.
ConstantInt *CI = nullptr; Value *AddLHS = nullptr;
if (isa<Instruction>(ScaleReg) && // not a constant expr.
match(ScaleReg, m_Add(m_Value(AddLHS), m_ConstantInt(CI)))) {
TestAddrMode.ScaledReg = AddLHS;
TestAddrMode.BaseOffs += CI->getSExtValue()*TestAddrMode.Scale;
// If this addressing mode is legal, commit it and remember that we folded
// this instruction.
if (TLI.isLegalAddressingMode(TestAddrMode, AccessTy)) {
AddrModeInsts.push_back(cast<Instruction>(ScaleReg));
AddrMode = TestAddrMode;
return true;
}
}
// Otherwise, not (x+c)*scale, just return what we have.
return true;
}
/// MightBeFoldableInst - This is a little filter, which returns true if an
/// addressing computation involving I might be folded into a load/store
/// accessing it. This doesn't need to be perfect, but needs to accept at least
/// the set of instructions that MatchOperationAddr can.
static bool MightBeFoldableInst(Instruction *I) {
switch (I->getOpcode()) {
case Instruction::BitCast:
case Instruction::AddrSpaceCast:
// Don't touch identity bitcasts.
if (I->getType() == I->getOperand(0)->getType())
return false;
return I->getType()->isPointerTy() || I->getType()->isIntegerTy();
case Instruction::PtrToInt:
// PtrToInt is always a noop, as we know that the int type is pointer sized.
return true;
case Instruction::IntToPtr:
// We know the input is intptr_t, so this is foldable.
return true;
case Instruction::Add:
return true;
case Instruction::Mul:
case Instruction::Shl:
// Can only handle X*C and X << C.
return isa<ConstantInt>(I->getOperand(1));
case Instruction::GetElementPtr:
return true;
default:
return false;
}
}
/// \brief Hepler class to perform type promotion.
class TypePromotionHelper {
/// \brief Utility function to check whether or not a sign extension of
/// \p Inst with \p ConsideredSExtType can be moved through \p Inst by either
/// using the operands of \p Inst or promoting \p Inst.
/// In other words, check if:
/// sext (Ty Inst opnd1 opnd2 ... opndN) to ConsideredSExtType.
/// #1 Promotion applies:
/// ConsideredSExtType Inst (sext opnd1 to ConsideredSExtType, ...).
/// #2 Operand reuses:
/// sext opnd1 to ConsideredSExtType.
/// \p PromotedInsts maps the instructions to their type before promotion.
static bool canGetThrough(const Instruction *Inst, Type *ConsideredSExtType,
const InstrToOrigTy &PromotedInsts);
/// \brief Utility function to determine if \p OpIdx should be promoted when
/// promoting \p Inst.
static bool shouldSExtOperand(const Instruction *Inst, int OpIdx) {
if (isa<SelectInst>(Inst) && OpIdx == 0)
return false;
return true;
}
/// \brief Utility function to promote the operand of \p SExt when this
/// operand is a promotable trunc or sext.
/// \p PromotedInsts maps the instructions to their type before promotion.
/// \p CreatedInsts[out] contains how many non-free instructions have been
/// created to promote the operand of SExt.
/// Should never be called directly.
/// \return The promoted value which is used instead of SExt.
static Value *promoteOperandForTruncAndSExt(Instruction *SExt,
TypePromotionTransaction &TPT,
InstrToOrigTy &PromotedInsts,
unsigned &CreatedInsts);
/// \brief Utility function to promote the operand of \p SExt when this
/// operand is promotable and is not a supported trunc or sext.
/// \p PromotedInsts maps the instructions to their type before promotion.
/// \p CreatedInsts[out] contains how many non-free instructions have been
/// created to promote the operand of SExt.
/// Should never be called directly.
/// \return The promoted value which is used instead of SExt.
static Value *promoteOperandForOther(Instruction *SExt,
TypePromotionTransaction &TPT,
InstrToOrigTy &PromotedInsts,
unsigned &CreatedInsts);
public:
/// Type for the utility function that promotes the operand of SExt.
typedef Value *(*Action)(Instruction *SExt, TypePromotionTransaction &TPT,
InstrToOrigTy &PromotedInsts,
unsigned &CreatedInsts);
/// \brief Given a sign extend instruction \p SExt, return the approriate
/// action to promote the operand of \p SExt instead of using SExt.
/// \return NULL if no promotable action is possible with the current
/// sign extension.
/// \p InsertedTruncs keeps track of all the truncate instructions inserted by
/// the others CodeGenPrepare optimizations. This information is important
/// because we do not want to promote these instructions as CodeGenPrepare
/// will reinsert them later. Thus creating an infinite loop: create/remove.
/// \p PromotedInsts maps the instructions to their type before promotion.
static Action getAction(Instruction *SExt, const SetOfInstrs &InsertedTruncs,
const TargetLowering &TLI,
const InstrToOrigTy &PromotedInsts);
};
bool TypePromotionHelper::canGetThrough(const Instruction *Inst,
Type *ConsideredSExtType,
const InstrToOrigTy &PromotedInsts) {
// We can always get through sext.
if (isa<SExtInst>(Inst))
return true;
// We can get through binary operator, if it is legal. In other words, the
// binary operator must have a nuw or nsw flag.
const BinaryOperator *BinOp = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(Inst);
if (BinOp && isa<OverflowingBinaryOperator>(BinOp) &&
(BinOp->hasNoUnsignedWrap() || BinOp->hasNoSignedWrap()))
return true;
// Check if we can do the following simplification.
// sext(trunc(sext)) --> sext
if (!isa<TruncInst>(Inst))
return false;
Value *OpndVal = Inst->getOperand(0);
// Check if we can use this operand in the sext.
// If the type is larger than the result type of the sign extension,
// we cannot.
if (OpndVal->getType()->getIntegerBitWidth() >
ConsideredSExtType->getIntegerBitWidth())
return false;
// If the operand of the truncate is not an instruction, we will not have
// any information on the dropped bits.
// (Actually we could for constant but it is not worth the extra logic).
Instruction *Opnd = dyn_cast<Instruction>(OpndVal);
if (!Opnd)
return false;
// Check if the source of the type is narrow enough.
// I.e., check that trunc just drops sign extended bits.
// #1 get the type of the operand.
const Type *OpndType;
InstrToOrigTy::const_iterator It = PromotedInsts.find(Opnd);
if (It != PromotedInsts.end())
OpndType = It->second;
else if (isa<SExtInst>(Opnd))
OpndType = cast<Instruction>(Opnd)->getOperand(0)->getType();
else
return false;
// #2 check that the truncate just drop sign extended bits.
if (Inst->getType()->getIntegerBitWidth() >= OpndType->getIntegerBitWidth())
return true;
return false;
}
TypePromotionHelper::Action TypePromotionHelper::getAction(
Instruction *SExt, const SetOfInstrs &InsertedTruncs,
const TargetLowering &TLI, const InstrToOrigTy &PromotedInsts) {
Instruction *SExtOpnd = dyn_cast<Instruction>(SExt->getOperand(0));
Type *SExtTy = SExt->getType();
// If the operand of the sign extension is not an instruction, we cannot
// get through.
// If it, check we can get through.
if (!SExtOpnd || !canGetThrough(SExtOpnd, SExtTy, PromotedInsts))
return nullptr;
// Do not promote if the operand has been added by codegenprepare.
// Otherwise, it means we are undoing an optimization that is likely to be
// redone, thus causing potential infinite loop.
if (isa<TruncInst>(SExtOpnd) && InsertedTruncs.count(SExtOpnd))
return nullptr;
// SExt or Trunc instructions.
// Return the related handler.
if (isa<SExtInst>(SExtOpnd) || isa<TruncInst>(SExtOpnd))
return promoteOperandForTruncAndSExt;
// Regular instruction.
// Abort early if we will have to insert non-free instructions.
if (!SExtOpnd->hasOneUse() &&
!TLI.isTruncateFree(SExtTy, SExtOpnd->getType()))
return nullptr;
return promoteOperandForOther;
}
Value *TypePromotionHelper::promoteOperandForTruncAndSExt(
llvm::Instruction *SExt, TypePromotionTransaction &TPT,
InstrToOrigTy &PromotedInsts, unsigned &CreatedInsts) {
// By construction, the operand of SExt is an instruction. Otherwise we cannot
// get through it and this method should not be called.
Instruction *SExtOpnd = cast<Instruction>(SExt->getOperand(0));
// Replace sext(trunc(opnd)) or sext(sext(opnd))
// => sext(opnd).
TPT.setOperand(SExt, 0, SExtOpnd->getOperand(0));
CreatedInsts = 0;
// Remove dead code.
if (SExtOpnd->use_empty())
TPT.eraseInstruction(SExtOpnd);
// Check if the sext is still needed.
if (SExt->getType() != SExt->getOperand(0)->getType())
return SExt;
// At this point we have: sext ty opnd to ty.
// Reassign the uses of SExt to the opnd and remove SExt.
Value *NextVal = SExt->getOperand(0);
TPT.eraseInstruction(SExt, NextVal);
return NextVal;
}
Value *
TypePromotionHelper::promoteOperandForOther(Instruction *SExt,
TypePromotionTransaction &TPT,
InstrToOrigTy &PromotedInsts,
unsigned &CreatedInsts) {
// By construction, the operand of SExt is an instruction. Otherwise we cannot
// get through it and this method should not be called.
Instruction *SExtOpnd = cast<Instruction>(SExt->getOperand(0));
CreatedInsts = 0;
if (!SExtOpnd->hasOneUse()) {
// SExtOpnd will be promoted.
// All its uses, but SExt, will need to use a truncated value of the
// promoted version.
// Create the truncate now.
Instruction *Trunc = TPT.createTrunc(SExt, SExtOpnd->getType());
Trunc->removeFromParent();
// Insert it just after the definition.
Trunc->insertAfter(SExtOpnd);
TPT.replaceAllUsesWith(SExtOpnd, Trunc);
// Restore the operand of SExt (which has been replace by the previous call
// to replaceAllUsesWith) to avoid creating a cycle trunc <-> sext.
TPT.setOperand(SExt, 0, SExtOpnd);
}
// Get through the Instruction:
// 1. Update its type.
// 2. Replace the uses of SExt by Inst.
// 3. Sign extend each operand that needs to be sign extended.
// Remember the original type of the instruction before promotion.
// This is useful to know that the high bits are sign extended bits.
PromotedInsts.insert(
std::pair<Instruction *, Type *>(SExtOpnd, SExtOpnd->getType()));
// Step #1.
TPT.mutateType(SExtOpnd, SExt->getType());
// Step #2.
TPT.replaceAllUsesWith(SExt, SExtOpnd);
// Step #3.
Instruction *SExtForOpnd = SExt;
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Propagate SExt to operands\n");
for (int OpIdx = 0, EndOpIdx = SExtOpnd->getNumOperands(); OpIdx != EndOpIdx;
++OpIdx) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Operand:\n" << *(SExtOpnd->getOperand(OpIdx)) << '\n');
if (SExtOpnd->getOperand(OpIdx)->getType() == SExt->getType() ||
!shouldSExtOperand(SExtOpnd, OpIdx)) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "No need to propagate\n");
continue;
}
// Check if we can statically sign extend the operand.
Value *Opnd = SExtOpnd->getOperand(OpIdx);
if (const ConstantInt *Cst = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Opnd)) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Statically sign extend\n");
TPT.setOperand(
SExtOpnd, OpIdx,
ConstantInt::getSigned(SExt->getType(), Cst->getSExtValue()));
continue;
}
// UndefValue are typed, so we have to statically sign extend them.
if (isa<UndefValue>(Opnd)) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Statically sign extend\n");
TPT.setOperand(SExtOpnd, OpIdx, UndefValue::get(SExt->getType()));
continue;
}
// Otherwise we have to explicity sign extend the operand.
// Check if SExt was reused to sign extend an operand.
if (!SExtForOpnd) {
// If yes, create a new one.
DEBUG(dbgs() << "More operands to sext\n");
SExtForOpnd = TPT.createSExt(SExt, Opnd, SExt->getType());
++CreatedInsts;
}
TPT.setOperand(SExtForOpnd, 0, Opnd);
// Move the sign extension before the insertion point.
TPT.moveBefore(SExtForOpnd, SExtOpnd);
TPT.setOperand(SExtOpnd, OpIdx, SExtForOpnd);
// If more sext are required, new instructions will have to be created.
SExtForOpnd = nullptr;
}
if (SExtForOpnd == SExt) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Sign extension is useless now\n");
TPT.eraseInstruction(SExt);
}
return SExtOpnd;
}
/// IsPromotionProfitable - Check whether or not promoting an instruction
/// to a wider type was profitable.
/// \p MatchedSize gives the number of instructions that have been matched
/// in the addressing mode after the promotion was applied.
/// \p SizeWithPromotion gives the number of created instructions for
/// the promotion plus the number of instructions that have been
/// matched in the addressing mode before the promotion.
/// \p PromotedOperand is the value that has been promoted.
/// \return True if the promotion is profitable, false otherwise.
bool
AddressingModeMatcher::IsPromotionProfitable(unsigned MatchedSize,
unsigned SizeWithPromotion,
Value *PromotedOperand) const {
// We folded less instructions than what we created to promote the operand.
// This is not profitable.
if (MatchedSize < SizeWithPromotion)
return false;
if (MatchedSize > SizeWithPromotion)
return true;
// The promotion is neutral but it may help folding the sign extension in
// loads for instance.
// Check that we did not create an illegal instruction.
Instruction *PromotedInst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(PromotedOperand);
if (!PromotedInst)
return false;
int ISDOpcode = TLI.InstructionOpcodeToISD(PromotedInst->getOpcode());
// If the ISDOpcode is undefined, it was undefined before the promotion.
if (!ISDOpcode)
return true;
// Otherwise, check if the promoted instruction is legal or not.
return TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISDOpcode,
EVT::getEVT(PromotedInst->getType()));
}
/// MatchOperationAddr - Given an instruction or constant expr, see if we can
/// fold the operation into the addressing mode. If so, update the addressing
/// mode and return true, otherwise return false without modifying AddrMode.
/// If \p MovedAway is not NULL, it contains the information of whether or
/// not AddrInst has to be folded into the addressing mode on success.
/// If \p MovedAway == true, \p AddrInst will not be part of the addressing
/// because it has been moved away.
/// Thus AddrInst must not be added in the matched instructions.
/// This state can happen when AddrInst is a sext, since it may be moved away.
/// Therefore, AddrInst may not be valid when MovedAway is true and it must
/// not be referenced anymore.
bool AddressingModeMatcher::MatchOperationAddr(User *AddrInst, unsigned Opcode,
unsigned Depth,
bool *MovedAway) {
// Avoid exponential behavior on extremely deep expression trees.
if (Depth >= 5) return false;
// By default, all matched instructions stay in place.
if (MovedAway)
*MovedAway = false;
switch (Opcode) {
case Instruction::PtrToInt:
// PtrToInt is always a noop, as we know that the int type is pointer sized.
return MatchAddr(AddrInst->getOperand(0), Depth);
case Instruction::IntToPtr:
// This inttoptr is a no-op if the integer type is pointer sized.
if (TLI.getValueType(AddrInst->getOperand(0)->getType()) ==
TLI.getPointerTy(AddrInst->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace()))
return MatchAddr(AddrInst->getOperand(0), Depth);
return false;
case Instruction::BitCast:
case Instruction::AddrSpaceCast:
// BitCast is always a noop, and we can handle it as long as it is
// int->int or pointer->pointer (we don't want int<->fp or something).
if ((AddrInst->getOperand(0)->getType()->isPointerTy() ||
AddrInst->getOperand(0)->getType()->isIntegerTy()) &&
// Don't touch identity bitcasts. These were probably put here by LSR,
// and we don't want to mess around with them. Assume it knows what it
// is doing.
AddrInst->getOperand(0)->getType() != AddrInst->getType())
return MatchAddr(AddrInst->getOperand(0), Depth);
return false;
case Instruction::Add: {
// Check to see if we can merge in the RHS then the LHS. If so, we win.
ExtAddrMode BackupAddrMode = AddrMode;
unsigned OldSize = AddrModeInsts.size();
// Start a transaction at this point.
// The LHS may match but not the RHS.
// Therefore, we need a higher level restoration point to undo partially
// matched operation.
TypePromotionTransaction::ConstRestorationPt LastKnownGood =
TPT.getRestorationPoint();
if (MatchAddr(AddrInst->getOperand(1), Depth+1) &&
MatchAddr(AddrInst->getOperand(0), Depth+1))
return true;
// Restore the old addr mode info.
AddrMode = BackupAddrMode;
AddrModeInsts.resize(OldSize);
TPT.rollback(LastKnownGood);
// Otherwise this was over-aggressive. Try merging in the LHS then the RHS.
if (MatchAddr(AddrInst->getOperand(0), Depth+1) &&
MatchAddr(AddrInst->getOperand(1), Depth+1))
return true;
// Otherwise we definitely can't merge the ADD in.
AddrMode = BackupAddrMode;
AddrModeInsts.resize(OldSize);
TPT.rollback(LastKnownGood);
break;
}
//case Instruction::Or:
// TODO: We can handle "Or Val, Imm" iff this OR is equivalent to an ADD.
//break;
case Instruction::Mul:
case Instruction::Shl: {
// Can only handle X*C and X << C.
ConstantInt *RHS = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(AddrInst->getOperand(1));
if (!RHS)
return false;
int64_t Scale = RHS->getSExtValue();
if (Opcode == Instruction::Shl)
Scale = 1LL << Scale;
return MatchScaledValue(AddrInst->getOperand(0), Scale, Depth);
}
case Instruction::GetElementPtr: {
// Scan the GEP. We check it if it contains constant offsets and at most
// one variable offset.
int VariableOperand = -1;
unsigned VariableScale = 0;
int64_t ConstantOffset = 0;
const DataLayout *TD = TLI.getDataLayout();
gep_type_iterator GTI = gep_type_begin(AddrInst);
for (unsigned i = 1, e = AddrInst->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i, ++GTI) {
if (StructType *STy = dyn_cast<StructType>(*GTI)) {
const StructLayout *SL = TD->getStructLayout(STy);
unsigned Idx =
cast<ConstantInt>(AddrInst->getOperand(i))->getZExtValue();
ConstantOffset += SL->getElementOffset(Idx);
} else {
uint64_t TypeSize = TD->getTypeAllocSize(GTI.getIndexedType());
if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(AddrInst->getOperand(i))) {
ConstantOffset += CI->getSExtValue()*TypeSize;
} else if (TypeSize) { // Scales of zero don't do anything.
// We only allow one variable index at the moment.
if (VariableOperand != -1)
return false;
// Remember the variable index.
VariableOperand = i;
VariableScale = TypeSize;
}
}
}
// A common case is for the GEP to only do a constant offset. In this case,
// just add it to the disp field and check validity.
if (VariableOperand == -1) {
AddrMode.BaseOffs += ConstantOffset;
if (ConstantOffset == 0 || TLI.isLegalAddressingMode(AddrMode, AccessTy)){
// Check to see if we can fold the base pointer in too.
if (MatchAddr(AddrInst->getOperand(0), Depth+1))
return true;
}
AddrMode.BaseOffs -= ConstantOffset;
return false;
}
// Save the valid addressing mode in case we can't match.
ExtAddrMode BackupAddrMode = AddrMode;
unsigned OldSize = AddrModeInsts.size();
// See if the scale and offset amount is valid for this target.
AddrMode.BaseOffs += ConstantOffset;
// Match the base operand of the GEP.
if (!MatchAddr(AddrInst->getOperand(0), Depth+1)) {
// If it couldn't be matched, just stuff the value in a register.
if (AddrMode.HasBaseReg) {
AddrMode = BackupAddrMode;
AddrModeInsts.resize(OldSize);
return false;
}
AddrMode.HasBaseReg = true;
AddrMode.BaseReg = AddrInst->getOperand(0);
}
// Match the remaining variable portion of the GEP.
if (!MatchScaledValue(AddrInst->getOperand(VariableOperand), VariableScale,
Depth)) {
// If it couldn't be matched, try stuffing the base into a register
// instead of matching it, and retrying the match of the scale.
AddrMode = BackupAddrMode;
AddrModeInsts.resize(OldSize);
if (AddrMode.HasBaseReg)
return false;
AddrMode.HasBaseReg = true;
AddrMode.BaseReg = AddrInst->getOperand(0);
AddrMode.BaseOffs += ConstantOffset;
if (!MatchScaledValue(AddrInst->getOperand(VariableOperand),
VariableScale, Depth)) {
// If even that didn't work, bail.
AddrMode = BackupAddrMode;
AddrModeInsts.resize(OldSize);
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
case Instruction::SExt: {
Instruction *SExt = dyn_cast<Instruction>(AddrInst);
if (!SExt)
return false;
// Try to move this sext out of the way of the addressing mode.
// Ask for a method for doing so.
TypePromotionHelper::Action TPH = TypePromotionHelper::getAction(
SExt, InsertedTruncs, TLI, PromotedInsts);
if (!TPH)
return false;
TypePromotionTransaction::ConstRestorationPt LastKnownGood =
TPT.getRestorationPoint();
unsigned CreatedInsts = 0;
Value *PromotedOperand = TPH(SExt, TPT, PromotedInsts, CreatedInsts);
// SExt has been moved away.
// Thus either it will be rematched later in the recursive calls or it is
// gone. Anyway, we must not fold it into the addressing mode at this point.
// E.g.,
// op = add opnd, 1
// idx = sext op
// addr = gep base, idx
// is now:
// promotedOpnd = sext opnd <- no match here
// op = promoted_add promotedOpnd, 1 <- match (later in recursive calls)
// addr = gep base, op <- match
if (MovedAway)
*MovedAway = true;
assert(PromotedOperand &&
"TypePromotionHelper should have filtered out those cases");
ExtAddrMode BackupAddrMode = AddrMode;
unsigned OldSize = AddrModeInsts.size();
if (!MatchAddr(PromotedOperand, Depth) ||
!IsPromotionProfitable(AddrModeInsts.size(), OldSize + CreatedInsts,
PromotedOperand)) {
AddrMode = BackupAddrMode;
AddrModeInsts.resize(OldSize);
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Sign extension does not pay off: rollback\n");
TPT.rollback(LastKnownGood);
return false;
}
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
/// MatchAddr - If we can, try to add the value of 'Addr' into the current
/// addressing mode. If Addr can't be added to AddrMode this returns false and
/// leaves AddrMode unmodified. This assumes that Addr is either a pointer type
/// or intptr_t for the target.
///
bool AddressingModeMatcher::MatchAddr(Value *Addr, unsigned Depth) {
// Start a transaction at this point that we will rollback if the matching
// fails.
TypePromotionTransaction::ConstRestorationPt LastKnownGood =
TPT.getRestorationPoint();
if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Addr)) {
// Fold in immediates if legal for the target.
AddrMode.BaseOffs += CI->getSExtValue();
if (TLI.isLegalAddressingMode(AddrMode, AccessTy))
return true;
AddrMode.BaseOffs -= CI->getSExtValue();
} else if (GlobalValue *GV = dyn_cast<GlobalValue>(Addr)) {
// If this is a global variable, try to fold it into the addressing mode.
if (!AddrMode.BaseGV) {
AddrMode.BaseGV = GV;
if (TLI.isLegalAddressingMode(AddrMode, AccessTy))
return true;
AddrMode.BaseGV = nullptr;
}
} else if (Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Addr)) {
ExtAddrMode BackupAddrMode = AddrMode;
unsigned OldSize = AddrModeInsts.size();
// Check to see if it is possible to fold this operation.
bool MovedAway = false;
if (MatchOperationAddr(I, I->getOpcode(), Depth, &MovedAway)) {
// This instruction may have been move away. If so, there is nothing
// to check here.
if (MovedAway)
return true;
// Okay, it's possible to fold this. Check to see if it is actually
// *profitable* to do so. We use a simple cost model to avoid increasing
// register pressure too much.
if (I->hasOneUse() ||
IsProfitableToFoldIntoAddressingMode(I, BackupAddrMode, AddrMode)) {
AddrModeInsts.push_back(I);
return true;
}
// It isn't profitable to do this, roll back.
//cerr << "NOT FOLDING: " << *I;
AddrMode = BackupAddrMode;
AddrModeInsts.resize(OldSize);
TPT.rollback(LastKnownGood);
}
} else if (ConstantExpr *CE = dyn_cast<ConstantExpr>(Addr)) {
if (MatchOperationAddr(CE, CE->getOpcode(), Depth))
return true;
TPT.rollback(LastKnownGood);
} else if (isa<ConstantPointerNull>(Addr)) {
// Null pointer gets folded without affecting the addressing mode.
return true;
}
// Worse case, the target should support [reg] addressing modes. :)
if (!AddrMode.HasBaseReg) {
AddrMode.HasBaseReg = true;
AddrMode.BaseReg = Addr;
// Still check for legality in case the target supports [imm] but not [i+r].
if (TLI.isLegalAddressingMode(AddrMode, AccessTy))
return true;
AddrMode.HasBaseReg = false;
AddrMode.BaseReg = nullptr;
}
// If the base register is already taken, see if we can do [r+r].
if (AddrMode.Scale == 0) {
AddrMode.Scale = 1;
AddrMode.ScaledReg = Addr;
if (TLI.isLegalAddressingMode(AddrMode, AccessTy))
return true;
AddrMode.Scale = 0;
AddrMode.ScaledReg = nullptr;
}
// Couldn't match.
TPT.rollback(LastKnownGood);
return false;
}
/// IsOperandAMemoryOperand - Check to see if all uses of OpVal by the specified
/// inline asm call are due to memory operands. If so, return true, otherwise
/// return false.
static bool IsOperandAMemoryOperand(CallInst *CI, InlineAsm *IA, Value *OpVal,
const TargetLowering &TLI) {
TargetLowering::AsmOperandInfoVector TargetConstraints = TLI.ParseConstraints(ImmutableCallSite(CI));
for (unsigned i = 0, e = TargetConstraints.size(); i != e; ++i) {
TargetLowering::AsmOperandInfo &OpInfo = TargetConstraints[i];
// Compute the constraint code and ConstraintType to use.
TLI.ComputeConstraintToUse(OpInfo, SDValue());
// If this asm operand is our Value*, and if it isn't an indirect memory
// operand, we can't fold it!
if (OpInfo.CallOperandVal == OpVal &&
(OpInfo.ConstraintType != TargetLowering::C_Memory ||
!OpInfo.isIndirect))
return false;
}
return true;
}
/// FindAllMemoryUses - Recursively walk all the uses of I until we find a
/// memory use. If we find an obviously non-foldable instruction, return true.
/// Add the ultimately found memory instructions to MemoryUses.
static bool FindAllMemoryUses(Instruction *I,
SmallVectorImpl<std::pair<Instruction*,unsigned> > &MemoryUses,
SmallPtrSet<Instruction*, 16> &ConsideredInsts,
const TargetLowering &TLI) {
// If we already considered this instruction, we're done.
if (!ConsideredInsts.insert(I))
return false;
// If this is an obviously unfoldable instruction, bail out.
if (!MightBeFoldableInst(I))
return true;
// Loop over all the uses, recursively processing them.
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
for (Use &U : I->uses()) {
Instruction *UserI = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
if (LoadInst *LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(UserI)) {
MemoryUses.push_back(std::make_pair(LI, U.getOperandNo()));
continue;
}
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(UserI)) {
unsigned opNo = U.getOperandNo();
if (opNo == 0) return true; // Storing addr, not into addr.
MemoryUses.push_back(std::make_pair(SI, opNo));
continue;
}
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
if (CallInst *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(UserI)) {
InlineAsm *IA = dyn_cast<InlineAsm>(CI->getCalledValue());
if (!IA) return true;
// If this is a memory operand, we're cool, otherwise bail out.
if (!IsOperandAMemoryOperand(CI, IA, I, TLI))
return true;
continue;
}
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
if (FindAllMemoryUses(UserI, MemoryUses, ConsideredInsts, TLI))
return true;
}
return false;
}
/// ValueAlreadyLiveAtInst - Retrn true if Val is already known to be live at
/// the use site that we're folding it into. If so, there is no cost to
/// include it in the addressing mode. KnownLive1 and KnownLive2 are two values
/// that we know are live at the instruction already.
bool AddressingModeMatcher::ValueAlreadyLiveAtInst(Value *Val,Value *KnownLive1,
Value *KnownLive2) {
// If Val is either of the known-live values, we know it is live!
if (Val == nullptr || Val == KnownLive1 || Val == KnownLive2)
return true;
// All values other than instructions and arguments (e.g. constants) are live.
if (!isa<Instruction>(Val) && !isa<Argument>(Val)) return true;
// If Val is a constant sized alloca in the entry block, it is live, this is
// true because it is just a reference to the stack/frame pointer, which is
// live for the whole function.
if (AllocaInst *AI = dyn_cast<AllocaInst>(Val))
if (AI->isStaticAlloca())
return true;
// Check to see if this value is already used in the memory instruction's
// block. If so, it's already live into the block at the very least, so we
// can reasonably fold it.
return Val->isUsedInBasicBlock(MemoryInst->getParent());
}
/// IsProfitableToFoldIntoAddressingMode - It is possible for the addressing
/// mode of the machine to fold the specified instruction into a load or store
/// that ultimately uses it. However, the specified instruction has multiple
/// uses. Given this, it may actually increase register pressure to fold it
/// into the load. For example, consider this code:
///
/// X = ...
/// Y = X+1
/// use(Y) -> nonload/store
/// Z = Y+1
/// load Z
///
/// In this case, Y has multiple uses, and can be folded into the load of Z
/// (yielding load [X+2]). However, doing this will cause both "X" and "X+1" to
/// be live at the use(Y) line. If we don't fold Y into load Z, we use one
/// fewer register. Since Y can't be folded into "use(Y)" we don't increase the
/// number of computations either.
///
/// Note that this (like most of CodeGenPrepare) is just a rough heuristic. If
/// X was live across 'load Z' for other reasons, we actually *would* want to
/// fold the addressing mode in the Z case. This would make Y die earlier.
bool AddressingModeMatcher::
IsProfitableToFoldIntoAddressingMode(Instruction *I, ExtAddrMode &AMBefore,
ExtAddrMode &AMAfter) {
if (IgnoreProfitability) return true;
// AMBefore is the addressing mode before this instruction was folded into it,
// and AMAfter is the addressing mode after the instruction was folded. Get
// the set of registers referenced by AMAfter and subtract out those
// referenced by AMBefore: this is the set of values which folding in this
// address extends the lifetime of.
//
// Note that there are only two potential values being referenced here,
// BaseReg and ScaleReg (global addresses are always available, as are any
// folded immediates).
Value *BaseReg = AMAfter.BaseReg, *ScaledReg = AMAfter.ScaledReg;
// If the BaseReg or ScaledReg was referenced by the previous addrmode, their
// lifetime wasn't extended by adding this instruction.
if (ValueAlreadyLiveAtInst(BaseReg, AMBefore.BaseReg, AMBefore.ScaledReg))
BaseReg = nullptr;
if (ValueAlreadyLiveAtInst(ScaledReg, AMBefore.BaseReg, AMBefore.ScaledReg))
ScaledReg = nullptr;
// If folding this instruction (and it's subexprs) didn't extend any live
// ranges, we're ok with it.
if (!BaseReg && !ScaledReg)
return true;
// If all uses of this instruction are ultimately load/store/inlineasm's,
// check to see if their addressing modes will include this instruction. If
// so, we can fold it into all uses, so it doesn't matter if it has multiple
// uses.
SmallVector<std::pair<Instruction*,unsigned>, 16> MemoryUses;
SmallPtrSet<Instruction*, 16> ConsideredInsts;
if (FindAllMemoryUses(I, MemoryUses, ConsideredInsts, TLI))
return false; // Has a non-memory, non-foldable use!
// Now that we know that all uses of this instruction are part of a chain of
// computation involving only operations that could theoretically be folded
// into a memory use, loop over each of these uses and see if they could
// *actually* fold the instruction.
SmallVector<Instruction*, 32> MatchedAddrModeInsts;
for (unsigned i = 0, e = MemoryUses.size(); i != e; ++i) {
Instruction *User = MemoryUses[i].first;
unsigned OpNo = MemoryUses[i].second;
// Get the access type of this use. If the use isn't a pointer, we don't
// know what it accesses.
Value *Address = User->getOperand(OpNo);
if (!Address->getType()->isPointerTy())
return false;
Type *AddressAccessTy = Address->getType()->getPointerElementType();
// Do a match against the root of this address, ignoring profitability. This
// will tell us if the addressing mode for the memory operation will
// *actually* cover the shared instruction.
ExtAddrMode Result;
TypePromotionTransaction::ConstRestorationPt LastKnownGood =
TPT.getRestorationPoint();
AddressingModeMatcher Matcher(MatchedAddrModeInsts, TLI, AddressAccessTy,
MemoryInst, Result, InsertedTruncs,
PromotedInsts, TPT);
Matcher.IgnoreProfitability = true;
bool Success = Matcher.MatchAddr(Address, 0);
(void)Success; assert(Success && "Couldn't select *anything*?");
// The match was to check the profitability, the changes made are not
// part of the original matcher. Therefore, they should be dropped
// otherwise the original matcher will not present the right state.
TPT.rollback(LastKnownGood);
// If the match didn't cover I, then it won't be shared by it.
if (std::find(MatchedAddrModeInsts.begin(), MatchedAddrModeInsts.end(),
I) == MatchedAddrModeInsts.end())
return false;
MatchedAddrModeInsts.clear();
}
return true;
}
} // end anonymous namespace
/// IsNonLocalValue - Return true if the specified values are defined in a
/// different basic block than BB.
static bool IsNonLocalValue(Value *V, BasicBlock *BB) {
if (Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V))
return I->getParent() != BB;
return false;
}
/// OptimizeMemoryInst - Load and Store Instructions often have
/// addressing modes that can do significant amounts of computation. As such,
/// instruction selection will try to get the load or store to do as much
/// computation as possible for the program. The problem is that isel can only
/// see within a single block. As such, we sink as much legal addressing mode
/// stuff into the block as possible.
///
/// This method is used to optimize both load/store and inline asms with memory
/// operands.
bool CodeGenPrepare::OptimizeMemoryInst(Instruction *MemoryInst, Value *Addr,
Type *AccessTy) {
Value *Repl = Addr;
// Try to collapse single-value PHI nodes. This is necessary to undo
// unprofitable PRE transformations.
SmallVector<Value*, 8> worklist;
SmallPtrSet<Value*, 16> Visited;
worklist.push_back(Addr);
// Use a worklist to iteratively look through PHI nodes, and ensure that
// the addressing mode obtained from the non-PHI roots of the graph
// are equivalent.
Value *Consensus = nullptr;
unsigned NumUsesConsensus = 0;
bool IsNumUsesConsensusValid = false;
SmallVector<Instruction*, 16> AddrModeInsts;
ExtAddrMode AddrMode;
TypePromotionTransaction TPT;
TypePromotionTransaction::ConstRestorationPt LastKnownGood =
TPT.getRestorationPoint();
while (!worklist.empty()) {
Value *V = worklist.back();
worklist.pop_back();
// Break use-def graph loops.
if (!Visited.insert(V)) {
Consensus = nullptr;
break;
}
// For a PHI node, push all of its incoming values.
if (PHINode *P = dyn_cast<PHINode>(V)) {
for (unsigned i = 0, e = P->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i)
worklist.push_back(P->getIncomingValue(i));
continue;
}
// For non-PHIs, determine the addressing mode being computed.
SmallVector<Instruction*, 16> NewAddrModeInsts;
ExtAddrMode NewAddrMode = AddressingModeMatcher::Match(
V, AccessTy, MemoryInst, NewAddrModeInsts, *TLI, InsertedTruncsSet,
PromotedInsts, TPT);
// This check is broken into two cases with very similar code to avoid using
// getNumUses() as much as possible. Some values have a lot of uses, so
// calling getNumUses() unconditionally caused a significant compile-time
// regression.
if (!Consensus) {
Consensus = V;
AddrMode = NewAddrMode;
AddrModeInsts = NewAddrModeInsts;
continue;
} else if (NewAddrMode == AddrMode) {
if (!IsNumUsesConsensusValid) {
NumUsesConsensus = Consensus->getNumUses();
IsNumUsesConsensusValid = true;
}
// Ensure that the obtained addressing mode is equivalent to that obtained
// for all other roots of the PHI traversal. Also, when choosing one
// such root as representative, select the one with the most uses in order
// to keep the cost modeling heuristics in AddressingModeMatcher
// applicable.
unsigned NumUses = V->getNumUses();
if (NumUses > NumUsesConsensus) {
Consensus = V;
NumUsesConsensus = NumUses;
AddrModeInsts = NewAddrModeInsts;
}
continue;
}
Consensus = nullptr;
break;
}
// If the addressing mode couldn't be determined, or if multiple different
// ones were determined, bail out now.
if (!Consensus) {
TPT.rollback(LastKnownGood);
return false;
}
TPT.commit();
// Check to see if any of the instructions supersumed by this addr mode are
// non-local to I's BB.
bool AnyNonLocal = false;
for (unsigned i = 0, e = AddrModeInsts.size(); i != e; ++i) {
if (IsNonLocalValue(AddrModeInsts[i], MemoryInst->getParent())) {
AnyNonLocal = true;
break;
}
}
// If all the instructions matched are already in this BB, don't do anything.
if (!AnyNonLocal) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "CGP: Found local addrmode: " << AddrMode << "\n");
return false;
}
// Insert this computation right after this user. Since our caller is
// scanning from the top of the BB to the bottom, reuse of the expr are
// guaranteed to happen later.
IRBuilder<> Builder(MemoryInst);
// Now that we determined the addressing expression we want to use and know
// that we have to sink it into this block. Check to see if we have already
// done this for some other load/store instr in this block. If so, reuse the
// computation.
Value *&SunkAddr = SunkAddrs[Addr];
if (SunkAddr) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "CGP: Reusing nonlocal addrmode: " << AddrMode << " for "
<< *MemoryInst << "\n");
if (SunkAddr->getType() != Addr->getType())
SunkAddr = Builder.CreateBitCast(SunkAddr, Addr->getType());
Add the ability to use GEPs for address sinking in CGP The current memory-instruction optimization logic in CGP, which sinks parts of the address computation that can be adsorbed by the addressing mode, does this by explicitly converting the relevant part of the address computation into IR-level integer operations (making use of ptrtoint and inttoptr). For most targets this is currently not a problem, but for targets wishing to make use of IR-level aliasing analysis during CodeGen, the use of ptrtoint/inttoptr is a problem for two reasons: 1. BasicAA becomes less powerful in the face of the ptrtoint/inttoptr 2. In cases where type-punning was used, and BasicAA was used to override TBAA, BasicAA may no longer do so. (this had forced us to disable all use of TBAA in CodeGen; something which we can now enable again) This (use of GEPs instead of ptrtoint/inttoptr) is not currently enabled by default (except for those targets that use AA during CodeGen), and so aside from some PowerPC subtargets and SystemZ, there should be no change in behavior. We may be able to switch completely away from the ptrtoint/inttoptr sinking on all targets, but further testing is required. I've doubled-up on a number of existing tests that are sensitive to the address sinking behavior (including some store-merging tests that are sensitive to the order of the resulting ADD operations at the SDAG level). git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206092 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-04-12 00:59:48 +00:00
} else if (AddrSinkUsingGEPs || (!AddrSinkUsingGEPs.getNumOccurrences() &&
TM && TM->getSubtarget<TargetSubtargetInfo>().useAA())) {
// By default, we use the GEP-based method when AA is used later. This
// prevents new inttoptr/ptrtoint pairs from degrading AA capabilities.
DEBUG(dbgs() << "CGP: SINKING nonlocal addrmode: " << AddrMode << " for "
<< *MemoryInst << "\n");
Add the ability to use GEPs for address sinking in CGP The current memory-instruction optimization logic in CGP, which sinks parts of the address computation that can be adsorbed by the addressing mode, does this by explicitly converting the relevant part of the address computation into IR-level integer operations (making use of ptrtoint and inttoptr). For most targets this is currently not a problem, but for targets wishing to make use of IR-level aliasing analysis during CodeGen, the use of ptrtoint/inttoptr is a problem for two reasons: 1. BasicAA becomes less powerful in the face of the ptrtoint/inttoptr 2. In cases where type-punning was used, and BasicAA was used to override TBAA, BasicAA may no longer do so. (this had forced us to disable all use of TBAA in CodeGen; something which we can now enable again) This (use of GEPs instead of ptrtoint/inttoptr) is not currently enabled by default (except for those targets that use AA during CodeGen), and so aside from some PowerPC subtargets and SystemZ, there should be no change in behavior. We may be able to switch completely away from the ptrtoint/inttoptr sinking on all targets, but further testing is required. I've doubled-up on a number of existing tests that are sensitive to the address sinking behavior (including some store-merging tests that are sensitive to the order of the resulting ADD operations at the SDAG level). git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206092 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-04-12 00:59:48 +00:00
Type *IntPtrTy = TLI->getDataLayout()->getIntPtrType(Addr->getType());
Value *ResultPtr = nullptr, *ResultIndex = nullptr;
Add the ability to use GEPs for address sinking in CGP The current memory-instruction optimization logic in CGP, which sinks parts of the address computation that can be adsorbed by the addressing mode, does this by explicitly converting the relevant part of the address computation into IR-level integer operations (making use of ptrtoint and inttoptr). For most targets this is currently not a problem, but for targets wishing to make use of IR-level aliasing analysis during CodeGen, the use of ptrtoint/inttoptr is a problem for two reasons: 1. BasicAA becomes less powerful in the face of the ptrtoint/inttoptr 2. In cases where type-punning was used, and BasicAA was used to override TBAA, BasicAA may no longer do so. (this had forced us to disable all use of TBAA in CodeGen; something which we can now enable again) This (use of GEPs instead of ptrtoint/inttoptr) is not currently enabled by default (except for those targets that use AA during CodeGen), and so aside from some PowerPC subtargets and SystemZ, there should be no change in behavior. We may be able to switch completely away from the ptrtoint/inttoptr sinking on all targets, but further testing is required. I've doubled-up on a number of existing tests that are sensitive to the address sinking behavior (including some store-merging tests that are sensitive to the order of the resulting ADD operations at the SDAG level). git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206092 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-04-12 00:59:48 +00:00
// First, find the pointer.
if (AddrMode.BaseReg && AddrMode.BaseReg->getType()->isPointerTy()) {
ResultPtr = AddrMode.BaseReg;
AddrMode.BaseReg = nullptr;
Add the ability to use GEPs for address sinking in CGP The current memory-instruction optimization logic in CGP, which sinks parts of the address computation that can be adsorbed by the addressing mode, does this by explicitly converting the relevant part of the address computation into IR-level integer operations (making use of ptrtoint and inttoptr). For most targets this is currently not a problem, but for targets wishing to make use of IR-level aliasing analysis during CodeGen, the use of ptrtoint/inttoptr is a problem for two reasons: 1. BasicAA becomes less powerful in the face of the ptrtoint/inttoptr 2. In cases where type-punning was used, and BasicAA was used to override TBAA, BasicAA may no longer do so. (this had forced us to disable all use of TBAA in CodeGen; something which we can now enable again) This (use of GEPs instead of ptrtoint/inttoptr) is not currently enabled by default (except for those targets that use AA during CodeGen), and so aside from some PowerPC subtargets and SystemZ, there should be no change in behavior. We may be able to switch completely away from the ptrtoint/inttoptr sinking on all targets, but further testing is required. I've doubled-up on a number of existing tests that are sensitive to the address sinking behavior (including some store-merging tests that are sensitive to the order of the resulting ADD operations at the SDAG level). git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206092 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-04-12 00:59:48 +00:00
}
if (AddrMode.Scale && AddrMode.ScaledReg->getType()->isPointerTy()) {
// We can't add more than one pointer together, nor can we scale a
// pointer (both of which seem meaningless).
if (ResultPtr || AddrMode.Scale != 1)
return false;
ResultPtr = AddrMode.ScaledReg;
AddrMode.Scale = 0;
}
if (AddrMode.BaseGV) {
if (ResultPtr)
return false;
ResultPtr = AddrMode.BaseGV;
}
// If the real base value actually came from an inttoptr, then the matcher
// will look through it and provide only the integer value. In that case,
// use it here.
if (!ResultPtr && AddrMode.BaseReg) {
ResultPtr =
Builder.CreateIntToPtr(AddrMode.BaseReg, Addr->getType(), "sunkaddr");
AddrMode.BaseReg = nullptr;
Add the ability to use GEPs for address sinking in CGP The current memory-instruction optimization logic in CGP, which sinks parts of the address computation that can be adsorbed by the addressing mode, does this by explicitly converting the relevant part of the address computation into IR-level integer operations (making use of ptrtoint and inttoptr). For most targets this is currently not a problem, but for targets wishing to make use of IR-level aliasing analysis during CodeGen, the use of ptrtoint/inttoptr is a problem for two reasons: 1. BasicAA becomes less powerful in the face of the ptrtoint/inttoptr 2. In cases where type-punning was used, and BasicAA was used to override TBAA, BasicAA may no longer do so. (this had forced us to disable all use of TBAA in CodeGen; something which we can now enable again) This (use of GEPs instead of ptrtoint/inttoptr) is not currently enabled by default (except for those targets that use AA during CodeGen), and so aside from some PowerPC subtargets and SystemZ, there should be no change in behavior. We may be able to switch completely away from the ptrtoint/inttoptr sinking on all targets, but further testing is required. I've doubled-up on a number of existing tests that are sensitive to the address sinking behavior (including some store-merging tests that are sensitive to the order of the resulting ADD operations at the SDAG level). git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206092 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-04-12 00:59:48 +00:00
} else if (!ResultPtr && AddrMode.Scale == 1) {
ResultPtr =
Builder.CreateIntToPtr(AddrMode.ScaledReg, Addr->getType(), "sunkaddr");
AddrMode.Scale = 0;
}
if (!ResultPtr &&
!AddrMode.BaseReg && !AddrMode.Scale && !AddrMode.BaseOffs) {
SunkAddr = Constant::getNullValue(Addr->getType());
} else if (!ResultPtr) {
return false;
} else {
Type *I8PtrTy =
Builder.getInt8PtrTy(Addr->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace());
// Start with the base register. Do this first so that subsequent address
// matching finds it last, which will prevent it from trying to match it
// as the scaled value in case it happens to be a mul. That would be
// problematic if we've sunk a different mul for the scale, because then
// we'd end up sinking both muls.
if (AddrMode.BaseReg) {
Value *V = AddrMode.BaseReg;
if (V->getType() != IntPtrTy)
V = Builder.CreateIntCast(V, IntPtrTy, /*isSigned=*/true, "sunkaddr");
ResultIndex = V;
}
// Add the scale value.
if (AddrMode.Scale) {
Value *V = AddrMode.ScaledReg;
if (V->getType() == IntPtrTy) {
// done.
} else if (cast<IntegerType>(IntPtrTy)->getBitWidth() <
cast<IntegerType>(V->getType())->getBitWidth()) {
V = Builder.CreateTrunc(V, IntPtrTy, "sunkaddr");
} else {
// It is only safe to sign extend the BaseReg if we know that the math
// required to create it did not overflow before we extend it. Since
// the original IR value was tossed in favor of a constant back when
// the AddrMode was created we need to bail out gracefully if widths
// do not match instead of extending it.
Instruction *I = dyn_cast_or_null<Instruction>(ResultIndex);
if (I && (ResultIndex != AddrMode.BaseReg))
I->eraseFromParent();
return false;
}
if (AddrMode.Scale != 1)
V = Builder.CreateMul(V, ConstantInt::get(IntPtrTy, AddrMode.Scale),
"sunkaddr");
if (ResultIndex)
ResultIndex = Builder.CreateAdd(ResultIndex, V, "sunkaddr");
else
ResultIndex = V;
}
// Add in the Base Offset if present.
if (AddrMode.BaseOffs) {
Value *V = ConstantInt::get(IntPtrTy, AddrMode.BaseOffs);
if (ResultIndex) {
// We need to add this separately from the scale above to help with
// SDAG consecutive load/store merging.
if (ResultPtr->getType() != I8PtrTy)
ResultPtr = Builder.CreateBitCast(ResultPtr, I8PtrTy);
ResultPtr = Builder.CreateGEP(ResultPtr, ResultIndex, "sunkaddr");
}
ResultIndex = V;
}
if (!ResultIndex) {
SunkAddr = ResultPtr;
} else {
if (ResultPtr->getType() != I8PtrTy)
ResultPtr = Builder.CreateBitCast(ResultPtr, I8PtrTy);
SunkAddr = Builder.CreateGEP(ResultPtr, ResultIndex, "sunkaddr");
}
if (SunkAddr->getType() != Addr->getType())
SunkAddr = Builder.CreateBitCast(SunkAddr, Addr->getType());
}
} else {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "CGP: SINKING nonlocal addrmode: " << AddrMode << " for "
<< *MemoryInst << "\n");
Type *IntPtrTy = TLI->getDataLayout()->getIntPtrType(Addr->getType());
Value *Result = nullptr;
// Start with the base register. Do this first so that subsequent address
// matching finds it last, which will prevent it from trying to match it
// as the scaled value in case it happens to be a mul. That would be
// problematic if we've sunk a different mul for the scale, because then
// we'd end up sinking both muls.
if (AddrMode.BaseReg) {
Value *V = AddrMode.BaseReg;
if (V->getType()->isPointerTy())
V = Builder.CreatePtrToInt(V, IntPtrTy, "sunkaddr");
if (V->getType() != IntPtrTy)
V = Builder.CreateIntCast(V, IntPtrTy, /*isSigned=*/true, "sunkaddr");
Result = V;
}
// Add the scale value.
if (AddrMode.Scale) {
Value *V = AddrMode.ScaledReg;
if (V->getType() == IntPtrTy) {
// done.
} else if (V->getType()->isPointerTy()) {
V = Builder.CreatePtrToInt(V, IntPtrTy, "sunkaddr");
} else if (cast<IntegerType>(IntPtrTy)->getBitWidth() <
cast<IntegerType>(V->getType())->getBitWidth()) {
V = Builder.CreateTrunc(V, IntPtrTy, "sunkaddr");
} else {
// It is only safe to sign extend the BaseReg if we know that the math
// required to create it did not overflow before we extend it. Since
// the original IR value was tossed in favor of a constant back when
// the AddrMode was created we need to bail out gracefully if widths
// do not match instead of extending it.
Instruction *I = dyn_cast_or_null<Instruction>(Result);
if (I && (Result != AddrMode.BaseReg))
I->eraseFromParent();
return false;
}
if (AddrMode.Scale != 1)
V = Builder.CreateMul(V, ConstantInt::get(IntPtrTy, AddrMode.Scale),
"sunkaddr");
if (Result)
Result = Builder.CreateAdd(Result, V, "sunkaddr");
else
Result = V;
}
// Add in the BaseGV if present.
if (AddrMode.BaseGV) {
Value *V = Builder.CreatePtrToInt(AddrMode.BaseGV, IntPtrTy, "sunkaddr");
if (Result)
Result = Builder.CreateAdd(Result, V, "sunkaddr");
else
Result = V;
}
// Add in the Base Offset if present.
if (AddrMode.BaseOffs) {
Value *V = ConstantInt::get(IntPtrTy, AddrMode.BaseOffs);
if (Result)
Result = Builder.CreateAdd(Result, V, "sunkaddr");
else
Result = V;
}
if (!Result)
SunkAddr = Constant::getNullValue(Addr->getType());
else
SunkAddr = Builder.CreateIntToPtr(Result, Addr->getType(), "sunkaddr");
}
MemoryInst->replaceUsesOfWith(Repl, SunkAddr);
// If we have no uses, recursively delete the value and all dead instructions
// using it.
if (Repl->use_empty()) {
// This can cause recursive deletion, which can invalidate our iterator.
// Use a WeakVH to hold onto it in case this happens.
WeakVH IterHandle(CurInstIterator);
BasicBlock *BB = CurInstIterator->getParent();
RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(Repl, TLInfo);
if (IterHandle != CurInstIterator) {
// If the iterator instruction was recursively deleted, start over at the
// start of the block.
CurInstIterator = BB->begin();
SunkAddrs.clear();
}
}
++NumMemoryInsts;
return true;
}
/// OptimizeInlineAsmInst - If there are any memory operands, use
/// OptimizeMemoryInst to sink their address computing into the block when
/// possible / profitable.
bool CodeGenPrepare::OptimizeInlineAsmInst(CallInst *CS) {
bool MadeChange = false;
TargetLowering::AsmOperandInfoVector
TargetConstraints = TLI->ParseConstraints(CS);
unsigned ArgNo = 0;
for (unsigned i = 0, e = TargetConstraints.size(); i != e; ++i) {
TargetLowering::AsmOperandInfo &OpInfo = TargetConstraints[i];
// Compute the constraint code and ConstraintType to use.
TLI->ComputeConstraintToUse(OpInfo, SDValue());
if (OpInfo.ConstraintType == TargetLowering::C_Memory &&
OpInfo.isIndirect) {
Value *OpVal = CS->getArgOperand(ArgNo++);
MadeChange |= OptimizeMemoryInst(CS, OpVal, OpVal->getType());
} else if (OpInfo.Type == InlineAsm::isInput)
ArgNo++;
}
return MadeChange;
}
/// MoveExtToFormExtLoad - Move a zext or sext fed by a load into the same
/// basic block as the load, unless conditions are unfavorable. This allows
/// SelectionDAG to fold the extend into the load.
///
bool CodeGenPrepare::MoveExtToFormExtLoad(Instruction *I) {
// Look for a load being extended.
LoadInst *LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(I->getOperand(0));
if (!LI) return false;
// If they're already in the same block, there's nothing to do.
if (LI->getParent() == I->getParent())
return false;
// If the load has other users and the truncate is not free, this probably
// isn't worthwhile.
if (!LI->hasOneUse() &&
TLI && (TLI->isTypeLegal(TLI->getValueType(LI->getType())) ||
!TLI->isTypeLegal(TLI->getValueType(I->getType()))) &&
!TLI->isTruncateFree(I->getType(), LI->getType()))
return false;
// Check whether the target supports casts folded into loads.
unsigned LType;
if (isa<ZExtInst>(I))
LType = ISD::ZEXTLOAD;
else {
assert(isa<SExtInst>(I) && "Unexpected ext type!");
LType = ISD::SEXTLOAD;
}
if (TLI && !TLI->isLoadExtLegal(LType, TLI->getValueType(LI->getType())))
return false;
// Move the extend into the same block as the load, so that SelectionDAG
// can fold it.
I->removeFromParent();
I->insertAfter(LI);
++NumExtsMoved;
return true;
}
bool CodeGenPrepare::OptimizeExtUses(Instruction *I) {
BasicBlock *DefBB = I->getParent();
// If the result of a {s|z}ext and its source are both live out, rewrite all
// other uses of the source with result of extension.
Value *Src = I->getOperand(0);
if (Src->hasOneUse())
return false;
// Only do this xform if truncating is free.
if (TLI && !TLI->isTruncateFree(I->getType(), Src->getType()))
return false;
// Only safe to perform the optimization if the source is also defined in
// this block.
if (!isa<Instruction>(Src) || DefBB != cast<Instruction>(Src)->getParent())
return false;
bool DefIsLiveOut = false;
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
for (User *U : I->users()) {
Instruction *UI = cast<Instruction>(U);
// Figure out which BB this ext is used in.
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
BasicBlock *UserBB = UI->getParent();
if (UserBB == DefBB) continue;
DefIsLiveOut = true;
break;
}
if (!DefIsLiveOut)
return false;
// Make sure none of the uses are PHI nodes.
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
for (User *U : Src->users()) {
Instruction *UI = cast<Instruction>(U);
BasicBlock *UserBB = UI->getParent();
if (UserBB == DefBB) continue;
// Be conservative. We don't want this xform to end up introducing
// reloads just before load / store instructions.
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
if (isa<PHINode>(UI) || isa<LoadInst>(UI) || isa<StoreInst>(UI))
return false;
}
// InsertedTruncs - Only insert one trunc in each block once.
DenseMap<BasicBlock*, Instruction*> InsertedTruncs;
bool MadeChange = false;
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
for (Use &U : Src->uses()) {
Instruction *User = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());
// Figure out which BB this ext is used in.
BasicBlock *UserBB = User->getParent();
if (UserBB == DefBB) continue;
// Both src and def are live in this block. Rewrite the use.
Instruction *&InsertedTrunc = InsertedTruncs[UserBB];
if (!InsertedTrunc) {
BasicBlock::iterator InsertPt = UserBB->getFirstInsertionPt();
InsertedTrunc = new TruncInst(I, Src->getType(), "", InsertPt);
InsertedTruncsSet.insert(InsertedTrunc);
}
// Replace a use of the {s|z}ext source with a use of the result.
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
U = InsertedTrunc;
++NumExtUses;
MadeChange = true;
}
return MadeChange;
}
CodeGenPrepare: Add a transform to turn selects into branches in some cases. This came up when a change in block placement formed a cmov and slowed down a hot loop by 50%: ucomisd (%rdi), %xmm0 cmovbel %edx, %esi cmov is a really bad choice in this context because it doesn't get branch prediction. If we emit it as a branch, an out-of-order CPU can do a better job (if the branch is predicted right) and avoid waiting for the slow load+compare instruction to finish. Of course it won't help if the branch is unpredictable, but those are really rare in practice. This patch uses a dumb conservative heuristic, it turns all cmovs that have one use and a direct memory operand into branches. cmovs usually save some code size, so we disable the transform in -Os mode. In-Order architectures are unlikely to benefit as well, those are included in the "predictableSelectIsExpensive" flag. It would be better to reuse branch probability info here, but BPI doesn't support select instructions currently. It would make sense to use the same heuristics as the if-converter pass, which does the opposite direction of this transform. Test suite shows a small improvement here and there on corei7-level machines, but the actual results depend a lot on the used microarchitecture. The transformation is currently disabled by default and available by passing the -enable-cgp-select2branch flag to the code generator. Thanks to Chandler for the initial test case to him and Evan Cheng for providing me with comments and test-suite numbers that were more stable than mine :) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@156234 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-05-05 12:49:22 +00:00
/// isFormingBranchFromSelectProfitable - Returns true if a SelectInst should be
/// turned into an explicit branch.
static bool isFormingBranchFromSelectProfitable(SelectInst *SI) {
// FIXME: This should use the same heuristics as IfConversion to determine
// whether a select is better represented as a branch. This requires that
// branch probability metadata is preserved for the select, which is not the
// case currently.
CmpInst *Cmp = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(SI->getCondition());
// If the branch is predicted right, an out of order CPU can avoid blocking on
// the compare. Emit cmovs on compares with a memory operand as branches to
// avoid stalls on the load from memory. If the compare has more than one use
// there's probably another cmov or setcc around so it's not worth emitting a
// branch.
if (!Cmp)
return false;
Value *CmpOp0 = Cmp->getOperand(0);
Value *CmpOp1 = Cmp->getOperand(1);
// We check that the memory operand has one use to avoid uses of the loaded
// value directly after the compare, making branches unprofitable.
return Cmp->hasOneUse() &&
((isa<LoadInst>(CmpOp0) && CmpOp0->hasOneUse()) ||
(isa<LoadInst>(CmpOp1) && CmpOp1->hasOneUse()));
}
/// If we have a SelectInst that will likely profit from branch prediction,
/// turn it into a branch.
CodeGenPrepare: Add a transform to turn selects into branches in some cases. This came up when a change in block placement formed a cmov and slowed down a hot loop by 50%: ucomisd (%rdi), %xmm0 cmovbel %edx, %esi cmov is a really bad choice in this context because it doesn't get branch prediction. If we emit it as a branch, an out-of-order CPU can do a better job (if the branch is predicted right) and avoid waiting for the slow load+compare instruction to finish. Of course it won't help if the branch is unpredictable, but those are really rare in practice. This patch uses a dumb conservative heuristic, it turns all cmovs that have one use and a direct memory operand into branches. cmovs usually save some code size, so we disable the transform in -Os mode. In-Order architectures are unlikely to benefit as well, those are included in the "predictableSelectIsExpensive" flag. It would be better to reuse branch probability info here, but BPI doesn't support select instructions currently. It would make sense to use the same heuristics as the if-converter pass, which does the opposite direction of this transform. Test suite shows a small improvement here and there on corei7-level machines, but the actual results depend a lot on the used microarchitecture. The transformation is currently disabled by default and available by passing the -enable-cgp-select2branch flag to the code generator. Thanks to Chandler for the initial test case to him and Evan Cheng for providing me with comments and test-suite numbers that were more stable than mine :) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@156234 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-05-05 12:49:22 +00:00
bool CodeGenPrepare::OptimizeSelectInst(SelectInst *SI) {
bool VectorCond = !SI->getCondition()->getType()->isIntegerTy(1);
CodeGenPrepare: Add a transform to turn selects into branches in some cases. This came up when a change in block placement formed a cmov and slowed down a hot loop by 50%: ucomisd (%rdi), %xmm0 cmovbel %edx, %esi cmov is a really bad choice in this context because it doesn't get branch prediction. If we emit it as a branch, an out-of-order CPU can do a better job (if the branch is predicted right) and avoid waiting for the slow load+compare instruction to finish. Of course it won't help if the branch is unpredictable, but those are really rare in practice. This patch uses a dumb conservative heuristic, it turns all cmovs that have one use and a direct memory operand into branches. cmovs usually save some code size, so we disable the transform in -Os mode. In-Order architectures are unlikely to benefit as well, those are included in the "predictableSelectIsExpensive" flag. It would be better to reuse branch probability info here, but BPI doesn't support select instructions currently. It would make sense to use the same heuristics as the if-converter pass, which does the opposite direction of this transform. Test suite shows a small improvement here and there on corei7-level machines, but the actual results depend a lot on the used microarchitecture. The transformation is currently disabled by default and available by passing the -enable-cgp-select2branch flag to the code generator. Thanks to Chandler for the initial test case to him and Evan Cheng for providing me with comments and test-suite numbers that were more stable than mine :) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@156234 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-05-05 12:49:22 +00:00
// Can we convert the 'select' to CF ?
if (DisableSelectToBranch || OptSize || !TLI || VectorCond)
CodeGenPrepare: Add a transform to turn selects into branches in some cases. This came up when a change in block placement formed a cmov and slowed down a hot loop by 50%: ucomisd (%rdi), %xmm0 cmovbel %edx, %esi cmov is a really bad choice in this context because it doesn't get branch prediction. If we emit it as a branch, an out-of-order CPU can do a better job (if the branch is predicted right) and avoid waiting for the slow load+compare instruction to finish. Of course it won't help if the branch is unpredictable, but those are really rare in practice. This patch uses a dumb conservative heuristic, it turns all cmovs that have one use and a direct memory operand into branches. cmovs usually save some code size, so we disable the transform in -Os mode. In-Order architectures are unlikely to benefit as well, those are included in the "predictableSelectIsExpensive" flag. It would be better to reuse branch probability info here, but BPI doesn't support select instructions currently. It would make sense to use the same heuristics as the if-converter pass, which does the opposite direction of this transform. Test suite shows a small improvement here and there on corei7-level machines, but the actual results depend a lot on the used microarchitecture. The transformation is currently disabled by default and available by passing the -enable-cgp-select2branch flag to the code generator. Thanks to Chandler for the initial test case to him and Evan Cheng for providing me with comments and test-suite numbers that were more stable than mine :) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@156234 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-05-05 12:49:22 +00:00
return false;
TargetLowering::SelectSupportKind SelectKind;
if (VectorCond)
SelectKind = TargetLowering::VectorMaskSelect;
else if (SI->getType()->isVectorTy())
SelectKind = TargetLowering::ScalarCondVectorVal;
else
SelectKind = TargetLowering::ScalarValSelect;
// Do we have efficient codegen support for this kind of 'selects' ?
if (TLI->isSelectSupported(SelectKind)) {
// We have efficient codegen support for the select instruction.
// Check if it is profitable to keep this 'select'.
if (!TLI->isPredictableSelectExpensive() ||
!isFormingBranchFromSelectProfitable(SI))
return false;
}
CodeGenPrepare: Add a transform to turn selects into branches in some cases. This came up when a change in block placement formed a cmov and slowed down a hot loop by 50%: ucomisd (%rdi), %xmm0 cmovbel %edx, %esi cmov is a really bad choice in this context because it doesn't get branch prediction. If we emit it as a branch, an out-of-order CPU can do a better job (if the branch is predicted right) and avoid waiting for the slow load+compare instruction to finish. Of course it won't help if the branch is unpredictable, but those are really rare in practice. This patch uses a dumb conservative heuristic, it turns all cmovs that have one use and a direct memory operand into branches. cmovs usually save some code size, so we disable the transform in -Os mode. In-Order architectures are unlikely to benefit as well, those are included in the "predictableSelectIsExpensive" flag. It would be better to reuse branch probability info here, but BPI doesn't support select instructions currently. It would make sense to use the same heuristics as the if-converter pass, which does the opposite direction of this transform. Test suite shows a small improvement here and there on corei7-level machines, but the actual results depend a lot on the used microarchitecture. The transformation is currently disabled by default and available by passing the -enable-cgp-select2branch flag to the code generator. Thanks to Chandler for the initial test case to him and Evan Cheng for providing me with comments and test-suite numbers that were more stable than mine :) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@156234 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-05-05 12:49:22 +00:00
ModifiedDT = true;
// First, we split the block containing the select into 2 blocks.
BasicBlock *StartBlock = SI->getParent();
BasicBlock::iterator SplitPt = ++(BasicBlock::iterator(SI));
BasicBlock *NextBlock = StartBlock->splitBasicBlock(SplitPt, "select.end");
// Create a new block serving as the landing pad for the branch.
BasicBlock *SmallBlock = BasicBlock::Create(SI->getContext(), "select.mid",
NextBlock->getParent(), NextBlock);
// Move the unconditional branch from the block with the select in it into our
// landing pad block.
StartBlock->getTerminator()->eraseFromParent();
BranchInst::Create(NextBlock, SmallBlock);
// Insert the real conditional branch based on the original condition.
BranchInst::Create(NextBlock, SmallBlock, SI->getCondition(), SI);
// The select itself is replaced with a PHI Node.
PHINode *PN = PHINode::Create(SI->getType(), 2, "", NextBlock->begin());
PN->takeName(SI);
PN->addIncoming(SI->getTrueValue(), StartBlock);
PN->addIncoming(SI->getFalseValue(), SmallBlock);
SI->replaceAllUsesWith(PN);
SI->eraseFromParent();
// Instruct OptimizeBlock to skip to the next block.
CurInstIterator = StartBlock->end();
++NumSelectsExpanded;
return true;
}
static bool isBroadcastShuffle(ShuffleVectorInst *SVI) {
SmallVector<int, 16> Mask(SVI->getShuffleMask());
int SplatElem = -1;
for (unsigned i = 0; i < Mask.size(); ++i) {
if (SplatElem != -1 && Mask[i] != -1 && Mask[i] != SplatElem)
return false;
SplatElem = Mask[i];
}
return true;
}
/// Some targets have expensive vector shifts if the lanes aren't all the same
/// (e.g. x86 only introduced "vpsllvd" and friends with AVX2). In these cases
/// it's often worth sinking a shufflevector splat down to its use so that
/// codegen can spot all lanes are identical.
bool CodeGenPrepare::OptimizeShuffleVectorInst(ShuffleVectorInst *SVI) {
BasicBlock *DefBB = SVI->getParent();
// Only do this xform if variable vector shifts are particularly expensive.
if (!TLI || !TLI->isVectorShiftByScalarCheap(SVI->getType()))
return false;
// We only expect better codegen by sinking a shuffle if we can recognise a
// constant splat.
if (!isBroadcastShuffle(SVI))
return false;
// InsertedShuffles - Only insert a shuffle in each block once.
DenseMap<BasicBlock*, Instruction*> InsertedShuffles;
bool MadeChange = false;
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
for (User *U : SVI->users()) {
Instruction *UI = cast<Instruction>(U);
// Figure out which BB this ext is used in.
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
BasicBlock *UserBB = UI->getParent();
if (UserBB == DefBB) continue;
// For now only apply this when the splat is used by a shift instruction.
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
if (!UI->isShift()) continue;
// Everything checks out, sink the shuffle if the user's block doesn't
// already have a copy.
Instruction *&InsertedShuffle = InsertedShuffles[UserBB];
if (!InsertedShuffle) {
BasicBlock::iterator InsertPt = UserBB->getFirstInsertionPt();
InsertedShuffle = new ShuffleVectorInst(SVI->getOperand(0),
SVI->getOperand(1),
SVI->getOperand(2), "", InsertPt);
}
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
UI->replaceUsesOfWith(SVI, InsertedShuffle);
MadeChange = true;
}
// If we removed all uses, nuke the shuffle.
if (SVI->use_empty()) {
SVI->eraseFromParent();
MadeChange = true;
}
return MadeChange;
}
bool CodeGenPrepare::OptimizeInst(Instruction *I) {
if (PHINode *P = dyn_cast<PHINode>(I)) {
// It is possible for very late stage optimizations (such as SimplifyCFG)
// to introduce PHI nodes too late to be cleaned up. If we detect such a
// trivial PHI, go ahead and zap it here.
if (Value *V = SimplifyInstruction(P, TLI ? TLI->getDataLayout() : nullptr,
TLInfo, DT)) {
P->replaceAllUsesWith(V);
P->eraseFromParent();
++NumPHIsElim;
return true;
}
return false;
}
if (CastInst *CI = dyn_cast<CastInst>(I)) {
// If the source of the cast is a constant, then this should have
// already been constant folded. The only reason NOT to constant fold
// it is if something (e.g. LSR) was careful to place the constant
// evaluation in a block other than then one that uses it (e.g. to hoist
// the address of globals out of a loop). If this is the case, we don't
// want to forward-subst the cast.
if (isa<Constant>(CI->getOperand(0)))
return false;
if (TLI && OptimizeNoopCopyExpression(CI, *TLI))
return true;
if (isa<ZExtInst>(I) || isa<SExtInst>(I)) {
/// Sink a zext or sext into its user blocks if the target type doesn't
/// fit in one register
if (TLI && TLI->getTypeAction(CI->getContext(),
TLI->getValueType(CI->getType())) ==
TargetLowering::TypeExpandInteger) {
return SinkCast(CI);
} else {
bool MadeChange = MoveExtToFormExtLoad(I);
return MadeChange | OptimizeExtUses(I);
}
}
return false;
}
if (CmpInst *CI = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(I))
if (!TLI || !TLI->hasMultipleConditionRegisters())
return OptimizeCmpExpression(CI);
if (LoadInst *LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(I)) {
if (TLI)
return OptimizeMemoryInst(I, I->getOperand(0), LI->getType());
return false;
}
if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(I)) {
if (TLI)
return OptimizeMemoryInst(I, SI->getOperand(1),
SI->getOperand(0)->getType());
return false;
}
BinaryOperator *BinOp = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(I);
if (BinOp && (BinOp->getOpcode() == Instruction::AShr ||
BinOp->getOpcode() == Instruction::LShr)) {
ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(BinOp->getOperand(1));
if (TLI && CI && TLI->hasExtractBitsInsn())
return OptimizeExtractBits(BinOp, CI, *TLI);
return false;
}
if (GetElementPtrInst *GEPI = dyn_cast<GetElementPtrInst>(I)) {
if (GEPI->hasAllZeroIndices()) {
/// The GEP operand must be a pointer, so must its result -> BitCast
Instruction *NC = new BitCastInst(GEPI->getOperand(0), GEPI->getType(),
GEPI->getName(), GEPI);
GEPI->replaceAllUsesWith(NC);
GEPI->eraseFromParent();
++NumGEPsElim;
OptimizeInst(NC);
return true;
}
return false;
}
if (CallInst *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(I))
return OptimizeCallInst(CI);
CodeGenPrepare: Add a transform to turn selects into branches in some cases. This came up when a change in block placement formed a cmov and slowed down a hot loop by 50%: ucomisd (%rdi), %xmm0 cmovbel %edx, %esi cmov is a really bad choice in this context because it doesn't get branch prediction. If we emit it as a branch, an out-of-order CPU can do a better job (if the branch is predicted right) and avoid waiting for the slow load+compare instruction to finish. Of course it won't help if the branch is unpredictable, but those are really rare in practice. This patch uses a dumb conservative heuristic, it turns all cmovs that have one use and a direct memory operand into branches. cmovs usually save some code size, so we disable the transform in -Os mode. In-Order architectures are unlikely to benefit as well, those are included in the "predictableSelectIsExpensive" flag. It would be better to reuse branch probability info here, but BPI doesn't support select instructions currently. It would make sense to use the same heuristics as the if-converter pass, which does the opposite direction of this transform. Test suite shows a small improvement here and there on corei7-level machines, but the actual results depend a lot on the used microarchitecture. The transformation is currently disabled by default and available by passing the -enable-cgp-select2branch flag to the code generator. Thanks to Chandler for the initial test case to him and Evan Cheng for providing me with comments and test-suite numbers that were more stable than mine :) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@156234 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-05-05 12:49:22 +00:00
if (SelectInst *SI = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(I))
return OptimizeSelectInst(SI);
if (ShuffleVectorInst *SVI = dyn_cast<ShuffleVectorInst>(I))
return OptimizeShuffleVectorInst(SVI);
return false;
}
// In this pass we look for GEP and cast instructions that are used
// across basic blocks and rewrite them to improve basic-block-at-a-time
// selection.
bool CodeGenPrepare::OptimizeBlock(BasicBlock &BB) {
SunkAddrs.clear();
bool MadeChange = false;
CurInstIterator = BB.begin();
while (CurInstIterator != BB.end())
MadeChange |= OptimizeInst(CurInstIterator++);
MadeChange |= DupRetToEnableTailCallOpts(&BB);
return MadeChange;
}
// llvm.dbg.value is far away from the value then iSel may not be able
// handle it properly. iSel will drop llvm.dbg.value if it can not
// find a node corresponding to the value.
bool CodeGenPrepare::PlaceDbgValues(Function &F) {
bool MadeChange = false;
for (Function::iterator I = F.begin(), E = F.end(); I != E; ++I) {
Instruction *PrevNonDbgInst = nullptr;
for (BasicBlock::iterator BI = I->begin(), BE = I->end(); BI != BE;) {
Instruction *Insn = BI; ++BI;
DbgValueInst *DVI = dyn_cast<DbgValueInst>(Insn);
// Leave dbg.values that refer to an alloca alone. These
// instrinsics describe the address of a variable (= the alloca)
// being taken. They should not be moved next to the alloca
// (and to the beginning of the scope), but rather stay close to
// where said address is used.
if (!DVI || (DVI->getValue() && isa<AllocaInst>(DVI->getValue()))) {
PrevNonDbgInst = Insn;
continue;
}
Instruction *VI = dyn_cast_or_null<Instruction>(DVI->getValue());
if (VI && VI != PrevNonDbgInst && !VI->isTerminator()) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Moving Debug Value before :\n" << *DVI << ' ' << *VI);
DVI->removeFromParent();
if (isa<PHINode>(VI))
DVI->insertBefore(VI->getParent()->getFirstInsertionPt());
else
DVI->insertAfter(VI);
MadeChange = true;
++NumDbgValueMoved;
}
}
}
return MadeChange;
}
// If there is a sequence that branches based on comparing a single bit
// against zero that can be combined into a single instruction, and the
// target supports folding these into a single instruction, sink the
// mask and compare into the branch uses. Do this before OptimizeBlock ->
// OptimizeInst -> OptimizeCmpExpression, which perturbs the pattern being
// searched for.
bool CodeGenPrepare::sinkAndCmp(Function &F) {
if (!EnableAndCmpSinking)
return false;
if (!TLI || !TLI->isMaskAndBranchFoldingLegal())
return false;
bool MadeChange = false;
for (Function::iterator I = F.begin(), E = F.end(); I != E; ) {
BasicBlock *BB = I++;
// Does this BB end with the following?
// %andVal = and %val, #single-bit-set
// %icmpVal = icmp %andResult, 0
// br i1 %cmpVal label %dest1, label %dest2"
BranchInst *Brcc = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(BB->getTerminator());
if (!Brcc || !Brcc->isConditional())
continue;
ICmpInst *Cmp = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(Brcc->getOperand(0));
if (!Cmp || Cmp->getParent() != BB)
continue;
ConstantInt *Zero = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Cmp->getOperand(1));
if (!Zero || !Zero->isZero())
continue;
Instruction *And = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Cmp->getOperand(0));
if (!And || And->getOpcode() != Instruction::And || And->getParent() != BB)
continue;
ConstantInt* Mask = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(And->getOperand(1));
if (!Mask || !Mask->getUniqueInteger().isPowerOf2())
continue;
DEBUG(dbgs() << "found and; icmp ?,0; brcc\n"); DEBUG(BB->dump());
// Push the "and; icmp" for any users that are conditional branches.
// Since there can only be one branch use per BB, we don't need to keep
// track of which BBs we insert into.
for (Value::use_iterator UI = Cmp->use_begin(), E = Cmp->use_end();
UI != E; ) {
Use &TheUse = *UI;
// Find brcc use.
BranchInst *BrccUser = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(*UI);
++UI;
if (!BrccUser || !BrccUser->isConditional())
continue;
BasicBlock *UserBB = BrccUser->getParent();
if (UserBB == BB) continue;
DEBUG(dbgs() << "found Brcc use\n");
// Sink the "and; icmp" to use.
MadeChange = true;
BinaryOperator *NewAnd =
BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(And->getOperand(0), And->getOperand(1), "",
BrccUser);
CmpInst *NewCmp =
CmpInst::Create(Cmp->getOpcode(), Cmp->getPredicate(), NewAnd, Zero,
"", BrccUser);
TheUse = NewCmp;
++NumAndCmpsMoved;
DEBUG(BrccUser->getParent()->dump());
}
}
return MadeChange;
}