llvm-6502/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeVectorTypes.cpp

821 lines
30 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===------- LegalizeVectorTypes.cpp - Legalization of vector types -------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file performs vector type splitting and scalarization for LegalizeTypes.
// Scalarization is the act of changing a computation in an illegal one-element
// vector type to be a computation in its scalar element type. For example,
// implementing <1 x f32> arithmetic in a scalar f32 register. This is needed
// as a base case when scalarizing vector arithmetic like <4 x f32>, which
// eventually decomposes to scalars if the target doesn't support v4f32 or v2f32
// types.
// Splitting is the act of changing a computation in an invalid vector type to
// be a computation in multiple vectors of a smaller type. For example,
// implementing <128 x f32> operations in terms of two <64 x f32> operations.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "LegalizeTypes.h"
using namespace llvm;
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Result Vector Scalarization: <1 x ty> -> ty.
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
void DAGTypeLegalizer::ScalarizeVectorResult(SDNode *N, unsigned ResNo) {
DEBUG(cerr << "Scalarize node result " << ResNo << ": "; N->dump(&DAG);
cerr << "\n");
SDValue R = SDValue();
switch (N->getOpcode()) {
default:
#ifndef NDEBUG
cerr << "ScalarizeVectorResult #" << ResNo << ": ";
N->dump(&DAG); cerr << "\n";
#endif
assert(0 && "Do not know how to scalarize the result of this operator!");
abort();
case ISD::BIT_CONVERT: R = ScalarizeVecRes_BIT_CONVERT(N); break;
case ISD::BUILD_VECTOR: R = N->getOperand(0); break;
case ISD::FPOWI: R = ScalarizeVecRes_FPOWI(N); break;
case ISD::INSERT_VECTOR_ELT: R = ScalarizeVecRes_INSERT_VECTOR_ELT(N); break;
case ISD::LOAD: R = ScalarizeVecRes_LOAD(cast<LoadSDNode>(N));break;
case ISD::SELECT: R = ScalarizeVecRes_SELECT(N); break;
case ISD::UNDEF: R = ScalarizeVecRes_UNDEF(N); break;
case ISD::VECTOR_SHUFFLE: R = ScalarizeVecRes_VECTOR_SHUFFLE(N); break;
case ISD::VSETCC: R = ScalarizeVecRes_VSETCC(N); break;
case ISD::CTLZ:
case ISD::CTPOP:
case ISD::CTTZ:
case ISD::FABS:
case ISD::FCOS:
case ISD::FNEG:
case ISD::FP_TO_SINT:
case ISD::FP_TO_UINT:
case ISD::FSIN:
case ISD::FSQRT:
case ISD::FTRUNC:
case ISD::FFLOOR:
case ISD::FCEIL:
case ISD::FRINT:
case ISD::FNEARBYINT:
case ISD::SINT_TO_FP:
case ISD::UINT_TO_FP: R = ScalarizeVecRes_UnaryOp(N); break;
case ISD::ADD:
case ISD::AND:
case ISD::FADD:
case ISD::FDIV:
case ISD::FMUL:
case ISD::FPOW:
case ISD::FREM:
case ISD::FSUB:
case ISD::MUL:
case ISD::OR:
case ISD::SDIV:
case ISD::SREM:
case ISD::SUB:
case ISD::UDIV:
case ISD::UREM:
case ISD::XOR: R = ScalarizeVecRes_BinOp(N); break;
}
// If R is null, the sub-method took care of registering the result.
if (R.getNode())
SetScalarizedVector(SDValue(N, ResNo), R);
}
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::ScalarizeVecRes_BinOp(SDNode *N) {
SDValue LHS = GetScalarizedVector(N->getOperand(0));
SDValue RHS = GetScalarizedVector(N->getOperand(1));
return DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), LHS.getValueType(), LHS, RHS);
}
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::ScalarizeVecRes_BIT_CONVERT(SDNode *N) {
MVT NewVT = N->getValueType(0).getVectorElementType();
return DAG.getNode(ISD::BIT_CONVERT, NewVT, N->getOperand(0));
}
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::ScalarizeVecRes_FPOWI(SDNode *N) {
SDValue Op = GetScalarizedVector(N->getOperand(0));
return DAG.getNode(ISD::FPOWI, Op.getValueType(), Op, N->getOperand(1));
}
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::ScalarizeVecRes_INSERT_VECTOR_ELT(SDNode *N) {
// The value to insert may have a wider type than the vector element type,
// so be sure to truncate it to the element type if necessary.
SDValue Op = N->getOperand(1);
MVT EltVT = N->getValueType(0).getVectorElementType();
if (Op.getValueType() != EltVT)
// FIXME: Can this happen for floating point types?
Op = DAG.getNode(ISD::TRUNCATE, EltVT, Op);
return Op;
}
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::ScalarizeVecRes_LOAD(LoadSDNode *N) {
assert(N->isUnindexed() && "Indexed vector load?");
SDValue Result = DAG.getLoad(ISD::UNINDEXED, N->getExtensionType(),
N->getValueType(0).getVectorElementType(),
N->getChain(), N->getBasePtr(),
DAG.getNode(ISD::UNDEF,
N->getBasePtr().getValueType()),
N->getSrcValue(), N->getSrcValueOffset(),
N->getMemoryVT().getVectorElementType(),
N->isVolatile(), N->getAlignment());
// Legalized the chain result - switch anything that used the old chain to
// use the new one.
ReplaceValueWith(SDValue(N, 1), Result.getValue(1));
return Result;
}
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::ScalarizeVecRes_UnaryOp(SDNode *N) {
// Get the dest type - it doesn't always match the input type, e.g. int_to_fp.
MVT DestVT = TLI.getTypeToTransformTo(N->getValueType(0));
SDValue Op = GetScalarizedVector(N->getOperand(0));
return DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), DestVT, Op);
}
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::ScalarizeVecRes_UNDEF(SDNode *N) {
return DAG.getNode(ISD::UNDEF, N->getValueType(0).getVectorElementType());
}
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::ScalarizeVecRes_SELECT(SDNode *N) {
SDValue LHS = GetScalarizedVector(N->getOperand(1));
return DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, LHS.getValueType(), N->getOperand(0), LHS,
GetScalarizedVector(N->getOperand(2)));
}
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::ScalarizeVecRes_VECTOR_SHUFFLE(SDNode *N) {
// Figure out if the scalar is the LHS or RHS and return it.
SDValue EltNum = N->getOperand(2).getOperand(0);
unsigned Op = cast<ConstantSDNode>(EltNum)->getZExtValue() != 0;
return GetScalarizedVector(N->getOperand(Op));
}
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::ScalarizeVecRes_VSETCC(SDNode *N) {
MVT NewVT = N->getValueType(0).getVectorElementType();
SDValue LHS = GetScalarizedVector(N->getOperand(0));
SDValue RHS = GetScalarizedVector(N->getOperand(1));
LHS = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHS), LHS, RHS,
N->getOperand(2));
return
DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, NewVT, LHS,
DAG.getConstant(APInt::getAllOnesValue(NewVT.getSizeInBits()),
NewVT),
DAG.getConstant(0ULL, NewVT));
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Operand Vector Scalarization <1 x ty> -> ty.
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
bool DAGTypeLegalizer::ScalarizeVectorOperand(SDNode *N, unsigned OpNo) {
DEBUG(cerr << "Scalarize node operand " << OpNo << ": "; N->dump(&DAG);
cerr << "\n");
SDValue Res = SDValue();
if (Res.getNode() == 0) {
switch (N->getOpcode()) {
default:
#ifndef NDEBUG
cerr << "ScalarizeVectorOperand Op #" << OpNo << ": ";
N->dump(&DAG); cerr << "\n";
#endif
assert(0 && "Do not know how to scalarize this operator's operand!");
abort();
case ISD::BIT_CONVERT:
Res = ScalarizeVecOp_BIT_CONVERT(N); break;
case ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT:
Res = ScalarizeVecOp_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT(N); break;
case ISD::STORE:
Res = ScalarizeVecOp_STORE(cast<StoreSDNode>(N), OpNo); break;
}
}
// If the result is null, the sub-method took care of registering results etc.
if (!Res.getNode()) return false;
// If the result is N, the sub-method updated N in place. Check to see if any
// operands are new, and if so, mark them.
if (Res.getNode() == N) {
// Mark N as new and remark N and its operands. This allows us to correctly
// revisit N if it needs another step of promotion and allows us to visit
// any new operands to N.
ReanalyzeNode(N);
return true;
}
assert(Res.getValueType() == N->getValueType(0) && N->getNumValues() == 1 &&
"Invalid operand expansion");
ReplaceValueWith(SDValue(N, 0), Res);
return false;
}
/// ScalarizeVecOp_BIT_CONVERT - If the value to convert is a vector that needs
/// to be scalarized, it must be <1 x ty>. Convert the element instead.
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::ScalarizeVecOp_BIT_CONVERT(SDNode *N) {
SDValue Elt = GetScalarizedVector(N->getOperand(0));
return DAG.getNode(ISD::BIT_CONVERT, N->getValueType(0), Elt);
}
/// ScalarizeVecOp_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT - If the input is a vector that needs to
/// be scalarized, it must be <1 x ty>, so just return the element, ignoring the
/// index.
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::ScalarizeVecOp_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT(SDNode *N) {
return GetScalarizedVector(N->getOperand(0));
}
/// ScalarizeVecOp_STORE - If the value to store is a vector that needs to be
/// scalarized, it must be <1 x ty>. Just store the element.
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::ScalarizeVecOp_STORE(StoreSDNode *N, unsigned OpNo){
assert(N->isUnindexed() && "Indexed store of one-element vector?");
assert(OpNo == 1 && "Do not know how to scalarize this operand!");
if (N->isTruncatingStore())
return DAG.getTruncStore(N->getChain(),
GetScalarizedVector(N->getOperand(1)),
N->getBasePtr(),
N->getSrcValue(), N->getSrcValueOffset(),
N->getMemoryVT().getVectorElementType(),
N->isVolatile(), N->getAlignment());
return DAG.getStore(N->getChain(), GetScalarizedVector(N->getOperand(1)),
N->getBasePtr(), N->getSrcValue(), N->getSrcValueOffset(),
N->isVolatile(), N->getAlignment());
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Result Vector Splitting
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
/// SplitVectorResult - This method is called when the specified result of the
/// specified node is found to need vector splitting. At this point, the node
/// may also have invalid operands or may have other results that need
/// legalization, we just know that (at least) one result needs vector
/// splitting.
void DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVectorResult(SDNode *N, unsigned ResNo) {
DEBUG(cerr << "Split node result: "; N->dump(&DAG); cerr << "\n");
SDValue Lo, Hi;
switch (N->getOpcode()) {
default:
#ifndef NDEBUG
cerr << "SplitVectorResult #" << ResNo << ": ";
N->dump(&DAG); cerr << "\n";
#endif
assert(0 && "Do not know how to split the result of this operator!");
abort();
case ISD::MERGE_VALUES: SplitRes_MERGE_VALUES(N, Lo, Hi); break;
case ISD::SELECT: SplitRes_SELECT(N, Lo, Hi); break;
case ISD::SELECT_CC: SplitRes_SELECT_CC(N, Lo, Hi); break;
case ISD::UNDEF: SplitRes_UNDEF(N, Lo, Hi); break;
case ISD::BIT_CONVERT: SplitVecRes_BIT_CONVERT(N, Lo, Hi); break;
case ISD::BUILD_VECTOR: SplitVecRes_BUILD_VECTOR(N, Lo, Hi); break;
case ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS: SplitVecRes_CONCAT_VECTORS(N, Lo, Hi); break;
case ISD::FPOWI: SplitVecRes_FPOWI(N, Lo, Hi); break;
case ISD::INSERT_VECTOR_ELT: SplitVecRes_INSERT_VECTOR_ELT(N, Lo, Hi); break;
case ISD::LOAD: SplitVecRes_LOAD(cast<LoadSDNode>(N), Lo, Hi);break;
case ISD::VECTOR_SHUFFLE: SplitVecRes_VECTOR_SHUFFLE(N, Lo, Hi); break;
case ISD::VSETCC: SplitVecRes_VSETCC(N, Lo, Hi); break;
case ISD::CTTZ:
case ISD::CTLZ:
case ISD::CTPOP:
case ISD::FNEG:
case ISD::FABS:
case ISD::FSQRT:
case ISD::FSIN:
case ISD::FCOS:
case ISD::FTRUNC:
case ISD::FFLOOR:
case ISD::FCEIL:
case ISD::FRINT:
case ISD::FNEARBYINT:
case ISD::FP_TO_SINT:
case ISD::FP_TO_UINT:
case ISD::SINT_TO_FP:
case ISD::UINT_TO_FP: SplitVecRes_UnaryOp(N, Lo, Hi); break;
case ISD::ADD:
case ISD::SUB:
case ISD::MUL:
case ISD::FADD:
case ISD::FSUB:
case ISD::FMUL:
case ISD::SDIV:
case ISD::UDIV:
case ISD::FDIV:
case ISD::FPOW:
case ISD::AND:
case ISD::OR:
case ISD::XOR:
case ISD::UREM:
case ISD::SREM:
case ISD::FREM: SplitVecRes_BinOp(N, Lo, Hi); break;
}
// If Lo/Hi is null, the sub-method took care of registering results etc.
if (Lo.getNode())
SetSplitVector(SDValue(N, ResNo), Lo, Hi);
}
void DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecRes_BinOp(SDNode *N, SDValue &Lo,
SDValue &Hi) {
SDValue LHSLo, LHSHi;
GetSplitVector(N->getOperand(0), LHSLo, LHSHi);
SDValue RHSLo, RHSHi;
GetSplitVector(N->getOperand(1), RHSLo, RHSHi);
Lo = DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), LHSLo.getValueType(), LHSLo, RHSLo);
Hi = DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), LHSHi.getValueType(), LHSHi, RHSHi);
}
void DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecRes_BIT_CONVERT(SDNode *N, SDValue &Lo,
SDValue &Hi) {
// We know the result is a vector. The input may be either a vector or a
// scalar value.
MVT LoVT, HiVT;
GetSplitDestVTs(N->getValueType(0), LoVT, HiVT);
SDValue InOp = N->getOperand(0);
MVT InVT = InOp.getValueType();
// Handle some special cases efficiently.
switch (getTypeAction(InVT)) {
default:
assert(false && "Unknown type action!");
case Legal:
case PromoteInteger:
case SoftenFloat:
case ScalarizeVector:
break;
case ExpandInteger:
case ExpandFloat:
// A scalar to vector conversion, where the scalar needs expansion.
// If the vector is being split in two then we can just convert the
// expanded pieces.
if (LoVT == HiVT) {
GetExpandedOp(InOp, Lo, Hi);
if (TLI.isBigEndian())
std::swap(Lo, Hi);
Lo = DAG.getNode(ISD::BIT_CONVERT, LoVT, Lo);
Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::BIT_CONVERT, HiVT, Hi);
return;
}
break;
case SplitVector:
// If the input is a vector that needs to be split, convert each split
// piece of the input now.
GetSplitVector(InOp, Lo, Hi);
Lo = DAG.getNode(ISD::BIT_CONVERT, LoVT, Lo);
Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::BIT_CONVERT, HiVT, Hi);
return;
}
// In the general case, convert the input to an integer and split it by hand.
MVT LoIntVT = MVT::getIntegerVT(LoVT.getSizeInBits());
MVT HiIntVT = MVT::getIntegerVT(HiVT.getSizeInBits());
if (TLI.isBigEndian())
std::swap(LoIntVT, HiIntVT);
SplitInteger(BitConvertToInteger(InOp), LoIntVT, HiIntVT, Lo, Hi);
if (TLI.isBigEndian())
std::swap(Lo, Hi);
Lo = DAG.getNode(ISD::BIT_CONVERT, LoVT, Lo);
Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::BIT_CONVERT, HiVT, Hi);
}
void DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecRes_BUILD_VECTOR(SDNode *N, SDValue &Lo,
SDValue &Hi) {
MVT LoVT, HiVT;
GetSplitDestVTs(N->getValueType(0), LoVT, HiVT);
unsigned LoNumElts = LoVT.getVectorNumElements();
SmallVector<SDValue, 8> LoOps(N->op_begin(), N->op_begin()+LoNumElts);
Lo = DAG.getNode(ISD::BUILD_VECTOR, LoVT, &LoOps[0], LoOps.size());
SmallVector<SDValue, 8> HiOps(N->op_begin()+LoNumElts, N->op_end());
Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::BUILD_VECTOR, HiVT, &HiOps[0], HiOps.size());
}
void DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecRes_CONCAT_VECTORS(SDNode *N, SDValue &Lo,
SDValue &Hi) {
assert(!(N->getNumOperands() & 1) && "Unsupported CONCAT_VECTORS");
unsigned NumSubvectors = N->getNumOperands() / 2;
if (NumSubvectors == 1) {
Lo = N->getOperand(0);
Hi = N->getOperand(1);
return;
}
MVT LoVT, HiVT;
GetSplitDestVTs(N->getValueType(0), LoVT, HiVT);
SmallVector<SDValue, 8> LoOps(N->op_begin(), N->op_begin()+NumSubvectors);
Lo = DAG.getNode(ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS, LoVT, &LoOps[0], LoOps.size());
SmallVector<SDValue, 8> HiOps(N->op_begin()+NumSubvectors, N->op_end());
Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS, HiVT, &HiOps[0], HiOps.size());
}
void DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecRes_FPOWI(SDNode *N, SDValue &Lo,
SDValue &Hi) {
GetSplitVector(N->getOperand(0), Lo, Hi);
Lo = DAG.getNode(ISD::FPOWI, Lo.getValueType(), Lo, N->getOperand(1));
Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::FPOWI, Hi.getValueType(), Hi, N->getOperand(1));
}
void DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecRes_INSERT_VECTOR_ELT(SDNode *N, SDValue &Lo,
SDValue &Hi) {
SDValue Vec = N->getOperand(0);
SDValue Elt = N->getOperand(1);
SDValue Idx = N->getOperand(2);
GetSplitVector(Vec, Lo, Hi);
if (ConstantSDNode *CIdx = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Idx)) {
unsigned IdxVal = CIdx->getZExtValue();
unsigned LoNumElts = Lo.getValueType().getVectorNumElements();
if (IdxVal < LoNumElts)
Lo = DAG.getNode(ISD::INSERT_VECTOR_ELT, Lo.getValueType(), Lo, Elt, Idx);
else
Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::INSERT_VECTOR_ELT, Hi.getValueType(), Hi, Elt,
DAG.getIntPtrConstant(IdxVal - LoNumElts));
return;
}
// Spill the vector to the stack.
MVT VecVT = Vec.getValueType();
MVT EltVT = VecVT.getVectorElementType();
SDValue StackPtr = DAG.CreateStackTemporary(VecVT);
SDValue Store = DAG.getStore(DAG.getEntryNode(), Vec, StackPtr, NULL, 0);
// Store the new element. This may be larger than the vector element type,
// so use a truncating store.
SDValue EltPtr = GetVectorElementPointer(StackPtr, EltVT, Idx);
Store = DAG.getTruncStore(Store, Elt, EltPtr, NULL, 0, EltVT);
// Reload the vector from the stack.
SDValue Load = DAG.getLoad(VecVT, Store, StackPtr, NULL, 0);
// Split it.
SplitVecRes_LOAD(cast<LoadSDNode>(Load.getNode()), Lo, Hi);
}
void DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecRes_LOAD(LoadSDNode *LD, SDValue &Lo,
SDValue &Hi) {
assert(ISD::isUNINDEXEDLoad(LD) && "Indexed load during type legalization!");
MVT LoVT, HiVT;
GetSplitDestVTs(LD->getValueType(0), LoVT, HiVT);
ISD::LoadExtType ExtType = LD->getExtensionType();
SDValue Ch = LD->getChain();
SDValue Ptr = LD->getBasePtr();
SDValue Offset = DAG.getNode(ISD::UNDEF, Ptr.getValueType());
const Value *SV = LD->getSrcValue();
int SVOffset = LD->getSrcValueOffset();
MVT MemoryVT = LD->getMemoryVT();
unsigned Alignment = LD->getAlignment();
bool isVolatile = LD->isVolatile();
MVT LoMemVT, HiMemVT;
GetSplitDestVTs(MemoryVT, LoMemVT, HiMemVT);
Lo = DAG.getLoad(ISD::UNINDEXED, ExtType, LoVT, Ch, Ptr, Offset,
SV, SVOffset, LoMemVT, isVolatile, Alignment);
unsigned IncrementSize = LoMemVT.getSizeInBits()/8;
Ptr = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, Ptr.getValueType(), Ptr,
DAG.getIntPtrConstant(IncrementSize));
SVOffset += IncrementSize;
Alignment = MinAlign(Alignment, IncrementSize);
Hi = DAG.getLoad(ISD::UNINDEXED, ExtType, HiVT, Ch, Ptr, Offset,
SV, SVOffset, HiMemVT, isVolatile, Alignment);
// Build a factor node to remember that this load is independent of the
// other one.
Ch = DAG.getNode(ISD::TokenFactor, MVT::Other, Lo.getValue(1),
Hi.getValue(1));
// Legalized the chain result - switch anything that used the old chain to
// use the new one.
ReplaceValueWith(SDValue(LD, 1), Ch);
}
void DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecRes_UnaryOp(SDNode *N, SDValue &Lo,
SDValue &Hi) {
// Get the dest types - they may not match the input types, e.g. int_to_fp.
MVT LoVT, HiVT;
GetSplitDestVTs(N->getValueType(0), LoVT, HiVT);
// Split the input.
MVT InVT = N->getOperand(0).getValueType();
switch (getTypeAction(InVT)) {
default: assert(0 && "Unexpected type action!");
case Legal: {
assert(LoVT == HiVT && "Legal non-power-of-two vector type?");
MVT InNVT = MVT::getVectorVT(InVT.getVectorElementType(),
LoVT.getVectorNumElements());
Lo = DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, InNVT, N->getOperand(0),
DAG.getIntPtrConstant(0));
Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, InNVT, N->getOperand(0),
DAG.getIntPtrConstant(InNVT.getVectorNumElements()));
break;
}
case SplitVector:
GetSplitVector(N->getOperand(0), Lo, Hi);
break;
}
Lo = DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), LoVT, Lo);
Hi = DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), HiVT, Hi);
}
void DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecRes_VECTOR_SHUFFLE(SDNode *N, SDValue &Lo,
SDValue &Hi) {
// Build the low part.
SDValue Mask = N->getOperand(2);
SmallVector<SDValue, 16> Ops;
MVT LoVT, HiVT;
GetSplitDestVTs(N->getValueType(0), LoVT, HiVT);
MVT EltVT = LoVT.getVectorElementType();
unsigned LoNumElts = LoVT.getVectorNumElements();
unsigned NumElements = Mask.getNumOperands();
// Insert all of the elements from the input that are needed. We use
// buildvector of extractelement here because the input vectors will have
// to be legalized, so this makes the code simpler.
for (unsigned i = 0; i != LoNumElts; ++i) {
unsigned Idx = cast<ConstantSDNode>(Mask.getOperand(i))->getZExtValue();
SDValue InVec = N->getOperand(0);
if (Idx >= NumElements) {
InVec = N->getOperand(1);
Idx -= NumElements;
}
Ops.push_back(DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT, EltVT, InVec,
DAG.getIntPtrConstant(Idx)));
}
Lo = DAG.getNode(ISD::BUILD_VECTOR, LoVT, &Ops[0], Ops.size());
Ops.clear();
for (unsigned i = LoNumElts; i != NumElements; ++i) {
unsigned Idx = cast<ConstantSDNode>(Mask.getOperand(i))->getZExtValue();
SDValue InVec = N->getOperand(0);
if (Idx >= NumElements) {
InVec = N->getOperand(1);
Idx -= NumElements;
}
Ops.push_back(DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT, EltVT, InVec,
DAG.getIntPtrConstant(Idx)));
}
Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::BUILD_VECTOR, HiVT, &Ops[0], Ops.size());
}
void DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecRes_VSETCC(SDNode *N, SDValue &Lo,
SDValue &Hi) {
MVT LoVT, HiVT;
GetSplitDestVTs(N->getValueType(0), LoVT, HiVT);
SDValue LL, LH, RL, RH;
GetSplitVector(N->getOperand(0), LL, LH);
GetSplitVector(N->getOperand(1), RL, RH);
Lo = DAG.getNode(ISD::VSETCC, LoVT, LL, RL, N->getOperand(2));
Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::VSETCC, HiVT, LH, RH, N->getOperand(2));
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Operand Vector Splitting
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
/// SplitVectorOperand - This method is called when the specified operand of the
/// specified node is found to need vector splitting. At this point, all of the
/// result types of the node are known to be legal, but other operands of the
/// node may need legalization as well as the specified one.
bool DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVectorOperand(SDNode *N, unsigned OpNo) {
DEBUG(cerr << "Split node operand: "; N->dump(&DAG); cerr << "\n");
SDValue Res = SDValue();
if (Res.getNode() == 0) {
switch (N->getOpcode()) {
default:
#ifndef NDEBUG
cerr << "SplitVectorOperand Op #" << OpNo << ": ";
N->dump(&DAG); cerr << "\n";
#endif
assert(0 && "Do not know how to split this operator's operand!");
abort();
LegalizeTypes support for EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT. The approach taken is different to that in LegalizeDAG when it is a question of expanding or promoting the result type: for example, if extracting an i64 from a <2 x i64>, when i64 needs expanding, it bitcasts the vector to <4 x i32>, extracts the appropriate two i32's, and uses those for the Lo and Hi parts. Likewise, when extracting an i16 from a <4 x i16>, and i16 needs promoting, it bitcasts the vector to <2 x i32>, extracts the appropriate i32, twiddles the bits if necessary, and uses that as the promoted value. This puts more pressure on bitcast legalization, and I've added the appropriate cases. They needed to be added anyway since users can generate such bitcasts too if they want to. Also, when considering various cases (Legal, Promote, Expand, Scalarize, Split) it is a pain that expand can correspond to Expand, Scalarize or Split, so I've changed the LegalizeTypes enum so it lists those different cases - now Expand only means splitting a scalar in two. The code produced is the same as by LegalizeDAG for all relevant testcases, except for 2007-10-31-extractelement-i64.ll, where the code seems to have improved (see below; can an expert please tell me if it is better or not). Before < vs after >. < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 16(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 20(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 24(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 28(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2008-02-27 13:34:40 +00:00
case ISD::BIT_CONVERT: Res = SplitVecOp_BIT_CONVERT(N); break;
case ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR: Res = SplitVecOp_EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR(N); break;
case ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT:Res = SplitVecOp_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT(N); break;
case ISD::STORE: Res = SplitVecOp_STORE(cast<StoreSDNode>(N),
OpNo); break;
case ISD::VECTOR_SHUFFLE: Res = SplitVecOp_VECTOR_SHUFFLE(N, OpNo);break;
}
}
// If the result is null, the sub-method took care of registering results etc.
if (!Res.getNode()) return false;
// If the result is N, the sub-method updated N in place. Check to see if any
// operands are new, and if so, mark them.
if (Res.getNode() == N) {
// Mark N as new and remark N and its operands. This allows us to correctly
// revisit N if it needs another step of promotion and allows us to visit
// any new operands to N.
ReanalyzeNode(N);
return true;
}
assert(Res.getValueType() == N->getValueType(0) && N->getNumValues() == 1 &&
"Invalid operand expansion");
ReplaceValueWith(SDValue(N, 0), Res);
return false;
}
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecOp_BIT_CONVERT(SDNode *N) {
LegalizeTypes support for EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT. The approach taken is different to that in LegalizeDAG when it is a question of expanding or promoting the result type: for example, if extracting an i64 from a <2 x i64>, when i64 needs expanding, it bitcasts the vector to <4 x i32>, extracts the appropriate two i32's, and uses those for the Lo and Hi parts. Likewise, when extracting an i16 from a <4 x i16>, and i16 needs promoting, it bitcasts the vector to <2 x i32>, extracts the appropriate i32, twiddles the bits if necessary, and uses that as the promoted value. This puts more pressure on bitcast legalization, and I've added the appropriate cases. They needed to be added anyway since users can generate such bitcasts too if they want to. Also, when considering various cases (Legal, Promote, Expand, Scalarize, Split) it is a pain that expand can correspond to Expand, Scalarize or Split, so I've changed the LegalizeTypes enum so it lists those different cases - now Expand only means splitting a scalar in two. The code produced is the same as by LegalizeDAG for all relevant testcases, except for 2007-10-31-extractelement-i64.ll, where the code seems to have improved (see below; can an expert please tell me if it is better or not). Before < vs after >. < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 16(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 20(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 24(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 28(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2008-02-27 13:34:40 +00:00
// For example, i64 = BIT_CONVERT v4i16 on alpha. Typically the vector will
// end up being split all the way down to individual components. Convert the
// split pieces into integers and reassemble.
SDValue Lo, Hi;
GetSplitVector(N->getOperand(0), Lo, Hi);
Lo = BitConvertToInteger(Lo);
Hi = BitConvertToInteger(Hi);
LegalizeTypes support for EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT. The approach taken is different to that in LegalizeDAG when it is a question of expanding or promoting the result type: for example, if extracting an i64 from a <2 x i64>, when i64 needs expanding, it bitcasts the vector to <4 x i32>, extracts the appropriate two i32's, and uses those for the Lo and Hi parts. Likewise, when extracting an i16 from a <4 x i16>, and i16 needs promoting, it bitcasts the vector to <2 x i32>, extracts the appropriate i32, twiddles the bits if necessary, and uses that as the promoted value. This puts more pressure on bitcast legalization, and I've added the appropriate cases. They needed to be added anyway since users can generate such bitcasts too if they want to. Also, when considering various cases (Legal, Promote, Expand, Scalarize, Split) it is a pain that expand can correspond to Expand, Scalarize or Split, so I've changed the LegalizeTypes enum so it lists those different cases - now Expand only means splitting a scalar in two. The code produced is the same as by LegalizeDAG for all relevant testcases, except for 2007-10-31-extractelement-i64.ll, where the code seems to have improved (see below; can an expert please tell me if it is better or not). Before < vs after >. < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 16(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 20(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 24(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 28(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2008-02-27 13:34:40 +00:00
if (TLI.isBigEndian())
std::swap(Lo, Hi);
return DAG.getNode(ISD::BIT_CONVERT, N->getValueType(0),
JoinIntegers(Lo, Hi));
LegalizeTypes support for EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT. The approach taken is different to that in LegalizeDAG when it is a question of expanding or promoting the result type: for example, if extracting an i64 from a <2 x i64>, when i64 needs expanding, it bitcasts the vector to <4 x i32>, extracts the appropriate two i32's, and uses those for the Lo and Hi parts. Likewise, when extracting an i16 from a <4 x i16>, and i16 needs promoting, it bitcasts the vector to <2 x i32>, extracts the appropriate i32, twiddles the bits if necessary, and uses that as the promoted value. This puts more pressure on bitcast legalization, and I've added the appropriate cases. They needed to be added anyway since users can generate such bitcasts too if they want to. Also, when considering various cases (Legal, Promote, Expand, Scalarize, Split) it is a pain that expand can correspond to Expand, Scalarize or Split, so I've changed the LegalizeTypes enum so it lists those different cases - now Expand only means splitting a scalar in two. The code produced is the same as by LegalizeDAG for all relevant testcases, except for 2007-10-31-extractelement-i64.ll, where the code seems to have improved (see below; can an expert please tell me if it is better or not). Before < vs after >. < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 16(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 20(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 24(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 28(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2008-02-27 13:34:40 +00:00
}
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecOp_EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR(SDNode *N) {
// We know that the extracted result type is legal. For now, assume the index
// is a constant.
MVT SubVT = N->getValueType(0);
SDValue Idx = N->getOperand(1);
SDValue Lo, Hi;
GetSplitVector(N->getOperand(0), Lo, Hi);
uint64_t LoElts = Lo.getValueType().getVectorNumElements();
uint64_t IdxVal = cast<ConstantSDNode>(Idx)->getZExtValue();
if (IdxVal < LoElts) {
assert(IdxVal + SubVT.getVectorNumElements() <= LoElts &&
"Extracted subvector crosses vector split!");
return DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, SubVT, Lo, Idx);
} else {
return DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, SubVT, Hi,
DAG.getConstant(IdxVal - LoElts, Idx.getValueType()));
}
}
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecOp_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT(SDNode *N) {
SDValue Vec = N->getOperand(0);
SDValue Idx = N->getOperand(1);
MVT VecVT = Vec.getValueType();
LegalizeTypes support for EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT. The approach taken is different to that in LegalizeDAG when it is a question of expanding or promoting the result type: for example, if extracting an i64 from a <2 x i64>, when i64 needs expanding, it bitcasts the vector to <4 x i32>, extracts the appropriate two i32's, and uses those for the Lo and Hi parts. Likewise, when extracting an i16 from a <4 x i16>, and i16 needs promoting, it bitcasts the vector to <2 x i32>, extracts the appropriate i32, twiddles the bits if necessary, and uses that as the promoted value. This puts more pressure on bitcast legalization, and I've added the appropriate cases. They needed to be added anyway since users can generate such bitcasts too if they want to. Also, when considering various cases (Legal, Promote, Expand, Scalarize, Split) it is a pain that expand can correspond to Expand, Scalarize or Split, so I've changed the LegalizeTypes enum so it lists those different cases - now Expand only means splitting a scalar in two. The code produced is the same as by LegalizeDAG for all relevant testcases, except for 2007-10-31-extractelement-i64.ll, where the code seems to have improved (see below; can an expert please tell me if it is better or not). Before < vs after >. < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 16(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 20(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 24(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 28(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2008-02-27 13:34:40 +00:00
if (isa<ConstantSDNode>(Idx)) {
uint64_t IdxVal = cast<ConstantSDNode>(Idx)->getZExtValue();
assert(IdxVal < VecVT.getVectorNumElements() && "Invalid vector index!");
LegalizeTypes support for EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT. The approach taken is different to that in LegalizeDAG when it is a question of expanding or promoting the result type: for example, if extracting an i64 from a <2 x i64>, when i64 needs expanding, it bitcasts the vector to <4 x i32>, extracts the appropriate two i32's, and uses those for the Lo and Hi parts. Likewise, when extracting an i16 from a <4 x i16>, and i16 needs promoting, it bitcasts the vector to <2 x i32>, extracts the appropriate i32, twiddles the bits if necessary, and uses that as the promoted value. This puts more pressure on bitcast legalization, and I've added the appropriate cases. They needed to be added anyway since users can generate such bitcasts too if they want to. Also, when considering various cases (Legal, Promote, Expand, Scalarize, Split) it is a pain that expand can correspond to Expand, Scalarize or Split, so I've changed the LegalizeTypes enum so it lists those different cases - now Expand only means splitting a scalar in two. The code produced is the same as by LegalizeDAG for all relevant testcases, except for 2007-10-31-extractelement-i64.ll, where the code seems to have improved (see below; can an expert please tell me if it is better or not). Before < vs after >. < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 16(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 20(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 24(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 28(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2008-02-27 13:34:40 +00:00
SDValue Lo, Hi;
GetSplitVector(Vec, Lo, Hi);
LegalizeTypes support for EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT. The approach taken is different to that in LegalizeDAG when it is a question of expanding or promoting the result type: for example, if extracting an i64 from a <2 x i64>, when i64 needs expanding, it bitcasts the vector to <4 x i32>, extracts the appropriate two i32's, and uses those for the Lo and Hi parts. Likewise, when extracting an i16 from a <4 x i16>, and i16 needs promoting, it bitcasts the vector to <2 x i32>, extracts the appropriate i32, twiddles the bits if necessary, and uses that as the promoted value. This puts more pressure on bitcast legalization, and I've added the appropriate cases. They needed to be added anyway since users can generate such bitcasts too if they want to. Also, when considering various cases (Legal, Promote, Expand, Scalarize, Split) it is a pain that expand can correspond to Expand, Scalarize or Split, so I've changed the LegalizeTypes enum so it lists those different cases - now Expand only means splitting a scalar in two. The code produced is the same as by LegalizeDAG for all relevant testcases, except for 2007-10-31-extractelement-i64.ll, where the code seems to have improved (see below; can an expert please tell me if it is better or not). Before < vs after >. < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 16(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 20(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 24(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 28(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2008-02-27 13:34:40 +00:00
uint64_t LoElts = Lo.getValueType().getVectorNumElements();
LegalizeTypes support for EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT. The approach taken is different to that in LegalizeDAG when it is a question of expanding or promoting the result type: for example, if extracting an i64 from a <2 x i64>, when i64 needs expanding, it bitcasts the vector to <4 x i32>, extracts the appropriate two i32's, and uses those for the Lo and Hi parts. Likewise, when extracting an i16 from a <4 x i16>, and i16 needs promoting, it bitcasts the vector to <2 x i32>, extracts the appropriate i32, twiddles the bits if necessary, and uses that as the promoted value. This puts more pressure on bitcast legalization, and I've added the appropriate cases. They needed to be added anyway since users can generate such bitcasts too if they want to. Also, when considering various cases (Legal, Promote, Expand, Scalarize, Split) it is a pain that expand can correspond to Expand, Scalarize or Split, so I've changed the LegalizeTypes enum so it lists those different cases - now Expand only means splitting a scalar in two. The code produced is the same as by LegalizeDAG for all relevant testcases, except for 2007-10-31-extractelement-i64.ll, where the code seems to have improved (see below; can an expert please tell me if it is better or not). Before < vs after >. < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 16(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 20(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 24(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 28(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2008-02-27 13:34:40 +00:00
if (IdxVal < LoElts)
return DAG.UpdateNodeOperands(SDValue(N, 0), Lo, Idx);
LegalizeTypes support for EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT. The approach taken is different to that in LegalizeDAG when it is a question of expanding or promoting the result type: for example, if extracting an i64 from a <2 x i64>, when i64 needs expanding, it bitcasts the vector to <4 x i32>, extracts the appropriate two i32's, and uses those for the Lo and Hi parts. Likewise, when extracting an i16 from a <4 x i16>, and i16 needs promoting, it bitcasts the vector to <2 x i32>, extracts the appropriate i32, twiddles the bits if necessary, and uses that as the promoted value. This puts more pressure on bitcast legalization, and I've added the appropriate cases. They needed to be added anyway since users can generate such bitcasts too if they want to. Also, when considering various cases (Legal, Promote, Expand, Scalarize, Split) it is a pain that expand can correspond to Expand, Scalarize or Split, so I've changed the LegalizeTypes enum so it lists those different cases - now Expand only means splitting a scalar in two. The code produced is the same as by LegalizeDAG for all relevant testcases, except for 2007-10-31-extractelement-i64.ll, where the code seems to have improved (see below; can an expert please tell me if it is better or not). Before < vs after >. < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 16(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 20(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 24(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 28(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2008-02-27 13:34:40 +00:00
else
return DAG.UpdateNodeOperands(SDValue(N, 0), Hi,
LegalizeTypes support for EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT. The approach taken is different to that in LegalizeDAG when it is a question of expanding or promoting the result type: for example, if extracting an i64 from a <2 x i64>, when i64 needs expanding, it bitcasts the vector to <4 x i32>, extracts the appropriate two i32's, and uses those for the Lo and Hi parts. Likewise, when extracting an i16 from a <4 x i16>, and i16 needs promoting, it bitcasts the vector to <2 x i32>, extracts the appropriate i32, twiddles the bits if necessary, and uses that as the promoted value. This puts more pressure on bitcast legalization, and I've added the appropriate cases. They needed to be added anyway since users can generate such bitcasts too if they want to. Also, when considering various cases (Legal, Promote, Expand, Scalarize, Split) it is a pain that expand can correspond to Expand, Scalarize or Split, so I've changed the LegalizeTypes enum so it lists those different cases - now Expand only means splitting a scalar in two. The code produced is the same as by LegalizeDAG for all relevant testcases, except for 2007-10-31-extractelement-i64.ll, where the code seems to have improved (see below; can an expert please tell me if it is better or not). Before < vs after >. < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 16(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 20(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 24(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 28(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2008-02-27 13:34:40 +00:00
DAG.getConstant(IdxVal - LoElts,
Idx.getValueType()));
}
// Store the vector to the stack.
MVT EltVT = VecVT.getVectorElementType();
SDValue StackPtr = DAG.CreateStackTemporary(VecVT);
SDValue Store = DAG.getStore(DAG.getEntryNode(), Vec, StackPtr, NULL, 0);
LegalizeTypes support for EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT. The approach taken is different to that in LegalizeDAG when it is a question of expanding or promoting the result type: for example, if extracting an i64 from a <2 x i64>, when i64 needs expanding, it bitcasts the vector to <4 x i32>, extracts the appropriate two i32's, and uses those for the Lo and Hi parts. Likewise, when extracting an i16 from a <4 x i16>, and i16 needs promoting, it bitcasts the vector to <2 x i32>, extracts the appropriate i32, twiddles the bits if necessary, and uses that as the promoted value. This puts more pressure on bitcast legalization, and I've added the appropriate cases. They needed to be added anyway since users can generate such bitcasts too if they want to. Also, when considering various cases (Legal, Promote, Expand, Scalarize, Split) it is a pain that expand can correspond to Expand, Scalarize or Split, so I've changed the LegalizeTypes enum so it lists those different cases - now Expand only means splitting a scalar in two. The code produced is the same as by LegalizeDAG for all relevant testcases, except for 2007-10-31-extractelement-i64.ll, where the code seems to have improved (see below; can an expert please tell me if it is better or not). Before < vs after >. < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 16(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 20(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 24(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 28(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2008-02-27 13:34:40 +00:00
// Load back the required element.
StackPtr = GetVectorElementPointer(StackPtr, EltVT, Idx);
LegalizeTypes support for EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT. The approach taken is different to that in LegalizeDAG when it is a question of expanding or promoting the result type: for example, if extracting an i64 from a <2 x i64>, when i64 needs expanding, it bitcasts the vector to <4 x i32>, extracts the appropriate two i32's, and uses those for the Lo and Hi parts. Likewise, when extracting an i16 from a <4 x i16>, and i16 needs promoting, it bitcasts the vector to <2 x i32>, extracts the appropriate i32, twiddles the bits if necessary, and uses that as the promoted value. This puts more pressure on bitcast legalization, and I've added the appropriate cases. They needed to be added anyway since users can generate such bitcasts too if they want to. Also, when considering various cases (Legal, Promote, Expand, Scalarize, Split) it is a pain that expand can correspond to Expand, Scalarize or Split, so I've changed the LegalizeTypes enum so it lists those different cases - now Expand only means splitting a scalar in two. The code produced is the same as by LegalizeDAG for all relevant testcases, except for 2007-10-31-extractelement-i64.ll, where the code seems to have improved (see below; can an expert please tell me if it is better or not). Before < vs after >. < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 28(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 24(%esp) < movq 24(%esp), %mm0 < movq %mm0, 56(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp > movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movq (%esp), %mm0 > movq %mm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 16(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 20(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 4(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl (%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) < subl $92, %esp < movaps %xmm0, 64(%esp) --- > subl $44, %esp < movl 24(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 48(%esp) < movl 28(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 52(%esp) < movaps %xmm0, (%esp) < movl 12(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 60(%esp) < movl 8(%esp), %eax < movl %eax, 56(%esp) --- > pshufd $3, %xmm0, %xmm1 > movd %xmm1, 4(%esp) > movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 > movd %xmm0, (%esp) > movd %xmm1, 12(%esp) > movd %xmm0, 8(%esp) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2008-02-27 13:34:40 +00:00
return DAG.getLoad(EltVT, Store, StackPtr, NULL, 0);
}
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecOp_STORE(StoreSDNode *N, unsigned OpNo) {
assert(N->isUnindexed() && "Indexed store of vector?");
assert(OpNo == 1 && "Can only split the stored value");
bool isTruncating = N->isTruncatingStore();
SDValue Ch = N->getChain();
SDValue Ptr = N->getBasePtr();
int SVOffset = N->getSrcValueOffset();
MVT MemoryVT = N->getMemoryVT();
unsigned Alignment = N->getAlignment();
bool isVol = N->isVolatile();
SDValue Lo, Hi;
GetSplitVector(N->getOperand(1), Lo, Hi);
MVT LoMemVT, HiMemVT;
GetSplitDestVTs(MemoryVT, LoMemVT, HiMemVT);
unsigned IncrementSize = LoMemVT.getSizeInBits()/8;
if (isTruncating)
Lo = DAG.getTruncStore(Ch, Lo, Ptr, N->getSrcValue(), SVOffset,
LoMemVT, isVol, Alignment);
else
Lo = DAG.getStore(Ch, Lo, Ptr, N->getSrcValue(), SVOffset,
isVol, Alignment);
// Increment the pointer to the other half.
Ptr = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, Ptr.getValueType(), Ptr,
DAG.getIntPtrConstant(IncrementSize));
if (isTruncating)
Hi = DAG.getTruncStore(Ch, Hi, Ptr,
N->getSrcValue(), SVOffset+IncrementSize,
HiMemVT,
isVol, MinAlign(Alignment, IncrementSize));
else
Hi = DAG.getStore(Ch, Hi, Ptr, N->getSrcValue(), SVOffset+IncrementSize,
isVol, MinAlign(Alignment, IncrementSize));
return DAG.getNode(ISD::TokenFactor, MVT::Other, Lo, Hi);
}
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecOp_VECTOR_SHUFFLE(SDNode *N, unsigned OpNo){
assert(OpNo == 2 && "Shuffle source type differs from result type?");
SDValue Mask = N->getOperand(2);
unsigned MaskLength = Mask.getValueType().getVectorNumElements();
unsigned LargestMaskEntryPlusOne = 2 * MaskLength;
unsigned MinimumBitWidth = Log2_32_Ceil(LargestMaskEntryPlusOne);
// Look for a legal vector type to place the mask values in.
// Note that there may not be *any* legal vector-of-integer
// type for which the element type is legal!
for (MVT::SimpleValueType EltVT = MVT::FIRST_INTEGER_VALUETYPE;
EltVT <= MVT::LAST_INTEGER_VALUETYPE;
// Integer values types are consecutively numbered. Exploit this.
EltVT = MVT::SimpleValueType(EltVT + 1)) {
// Is the element type big enough to hold the values?
if (MVT(EltVT).getSizeInBits() < MinimumBitWidth)
// Nope.
continue;
// Is the vector type legal?
MVT VecVT = MVT::getVectorVT(EltVT, MaskLength);
if (!isTypeLegal(VecVT))
// Nope.
continue;
// If the element type is not legal, find a larger legal type to use for
// the BUILD_VECTOR operands. This is an ugly hack, but seems to work!
// FIXME: The real solution is to change VECTOR_SHUFFLE into a variadic
// node where the shuffle mask is a list of integer operands, #2 .. #2+n.
for (MVT::SimpleValueType OpVT = EltVT; OpVT <= MVT::LAST_INTEGER_VALUETYPE;
// Integer values types are consecutively numbered. Exploit this.
OpVT = MVT::SimpleValueType(OpVT + 1)) {
if (!isTypeLegal(OpVT))
continue;
// Success! Rebuild the vector using the legal types.
SmallVector<SDValue, 16> Ops(MaskLength);
for (unsigned i = 0; i < MaskLength; ++i) {
uint64_t Idx =
cast<ConstantSDNode>(Mask.getOperand(i))->getZExtValue();
Ops[i] = DAG.getConstant(Idx, OpVT);
}
return DAG.UpdateNodeOperands(SDValue(N,0),
N->getOperand(0), N->getOperand(1),
DAG.getNode(ISD::BUILD_VECTOR,
VecVT, &Ops[0], Ops.size()));
}
// Continuing is pointless - failure is certain.
break;
}
assert(false && "Failed to find an appropriate mask type!");
return SDValue(N, 0);
}