them, just skip over any DFS-numbered nodes when finding the next root
of a DFS. This allows the entry set to just be a vector as we populate
it from a uniqued source. It also removes the possibility for a linear
scan of the entry set to actually do the removal which can make things
go quadratic if we get unlucky.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207312 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the DFS stack for leaves in the call graph. As mentioned in my previous
commit, this is particularly interesting for graphs which have high fan
out but low connectivity resulting in many leaves. For such graphs, this
can remove a large % of the DFS stack traffic even though it doesn't
make the stack much smaller.
It's a bit easier to formulate this for the full algorithm because that
one stops completely for each SCC. For example, I was able to directly
eliminate the "Recurse" boolean used to continue an outer loop from the
inner loop.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207311 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
makes working through the worklist much cleaner, and makes it possible
to avoid the 'bool-to-continue-the-outer-loop' hack. Not a huge
difference, but I think this is approaching as polished as I can make
it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207310 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
more than 1 instruction. The caller need to be aware of this
and adjust instruction iterators accordingly.
rdar://16679376
Repaired r207302.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207309 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
processed in the DFS out of the stack completely. Keep it exclusively in
a variable. Re-shuffle some code structure to make this easier. This can
have a very dramatic effect in some cases because call graphs tend to
look like a high fan-out spanning tree. As a consequence, there are
a large number of leaf nodes in the graph, and this technique causes
leaf nodes to never even go into the stack. While this only reduces the
max depth by 1, it may cause the total number of round trips through the
stack to drop by a lot.
Now, most of this isn't really relevant for the incremental version. =]
But I wanted to prototype it first here as this variant is in ways more
complex. As long as I can get the code factored well here, I'll next
make the primary walk look the same. There are several refactorings this
exposes I think.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207306 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
graph in any way because we don't track edges in the SCC graph, just
nodes. This also lets us add a nice assert about the invariant that
we're working on at least a certain number of nodes within the SCC.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207305 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The included test case would return the incorrect results, because the expansion
of an shift with a constant shift amount of 0 would generate undefined behavior.
This is because ExpandShiftByConstant assumes that all shifts by constants with
a value of 0 have already been optimized away. This doesn't happen for opaque
constants and usually this isn't a problem, because opaque constants won't take
this code path - they are not supposed to. In the case that the opaque constant
has to be expanded by the legalizer, the legalizer would drop the opaque flag.
In this case we hit the limitations of ExpandShiftByConstant and create incorrect
code.
This commit fixes the legalizer by not dropping the opaque flag when expanding
opaque constants and adding an assertion to ExpandShiftByConstant to catch this
not supported case in the future.
This fixes <rdar://problem/16718472>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207304 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
more than 1 instruction. The caller need to be aware of this
and adjust instruction iterators accordingly.
rdar://16679376
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207302 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Scaling factors are not free on X86 because every "complex" addressing mode
breaks the related instruction into 2 allocations instead of 1.
<rdar://problem/16730541>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207301 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a helper function. Also factor the other two places where we did the
same thing into the helper function. =] Much cleaner this way. NFC.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207300 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
right intrinsics.
A packed logical shift right with a shift count bigger than or equal to the
element size always produces a zero vector. In all other cases, it can be
safely replaced by a 'lshr' instruction.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207299 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
If we're doing a v4f32/v4i32 shuffle on x86 with SSE4.1, we can lower
certain shufflevectors to an insertps instruction:
When most of the shufflevector result's elements come from one vector (and
keep their index), and one element comes from another vector or a memory
operand.
Added tests for insertps optimizations on shufflevector.
Added support and tests for v4i32 vector optimization.
Reviewers: nadav
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3475
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207291 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously, irreducible backedges were ignored. With this commit,
irreducible SCCs are discovered on the fly, and modelled as loops with
multiple headers.
This approximation specifies the headers of irreducible sub-SCCs as its
entry blocks and all nodes that are targets of a backedge within it
(excluding backedges within true sub-loops). Block frequency
calculations act as if we insert a new block that intercepts all the
edges to the headers. All backedges and entries to the irreducible SCC
point to this imaginary block. This imaginary block has an edge (with
even probability) to each header block.
The result is now reasonable enough that I've added a number of
testcases for irreducible control flow. I've outlined in
`BlockFrequencyInfoImpl.h` ways to improve the approximation.
<rdar://problem/14292693>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207286 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This also avoids the need for subtly side-effecting calls to manifest
strings in the string table at the point where items are added to the
accelerator tables.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207281 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This adds support for an -mattr option to the gold plugin and to llvm-lto. This
allows the caller to specify details of the subtarget architecture, like +aes,
or +ssse3 on x86. Note that this requires a change to the include/llvm-c/lto.h
interface: it adds a function lto_codegen_set_attr and it increments the
version of the interface.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207279 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Pulls out some more code from some of the rather monolithic DWARF
classes. Unlike the address table, the string table won't move up into
DwarfDebug - each DWARF file has its own string table (but there can be
only one address table).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207277 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Consider this use from the new testcase:
LSR Use: Kind=ICmpZero, Offsets={0}, widest fixup type: i32
reg({1000,+,-1}<nw><%for.body>)
-3003 + reg({3,+,3}<nw><%for.body>)
-1001 + reg({1,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%for.body>)
-1000 + reg({0,+,1}<nw><%for.body>)
-3000 + reg({0,+,3}<nuw><%for.body>)
reg({-1000,+,1}<nw><%for.body>)
reg({-3000,+,3}<nsw><%for.body>)
This is the last use we consider for a solution in SolveRecurse, so CurRegs is
a large set. (CurRegs is the set of registers that are needed by the
previously visited uses in the in-progress solution.)
ReqRegs is {
{3,+,3}<nw><%for.body>,
{1,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%for.body>
}
This is the intersection of the regs used by any of the formulas for the
current use and CurRegs.
Now, the code requires a formula to contain *all* these regs (the comment is
simply wrong), otherwise the formula is immediately disqualified. Obviously,
no formula for this use contains two regs so they will all get disqualified.
The fix modifies the check to allow the formula in this case. The idea is
that neither of these formulae is introducing any new registers which is the
point of this early pruning as far as I understand.
In terms of set arithmetic, we now allow formulas whose used regs are a subset
of the required regs not just the other way around.
There are few more loops in the test-suite that are now successfully LSRed. I
have benchmarked those and found very minimal change.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13965777>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207271 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Actually use the `reference` typedef, and remove the private
redefinition of `pointer` since it has no users.
Using `reference` exposes a problem with r207257, which specified the
wrong `value_type` to `iterator_facade_base` (fixed that too).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207270 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
buildbot - do not insert debug intrinsics before phi nodes.
Debug info for optimized code: Support variables that are on the stack and
described by DBG_VALUEs during their lifetime.
Previously, when a variable was at a FrameIndex for any part of its
lifetime, this would shadow all other DBG_VALUEs and only a single
fbreg location would be emitted, which in fact is only valid for a small
range and not the entire lexical scope of the variable. The included
dbg-value-const-byref testcase demonstrates this.
This patch fixes this by
Local
- emitting dbg.value intrinsics for allocas that are passed by reference
- dropping all dbg.declares (they are now fully lowered to dbg.values)
SelectionDAG
- renamed constructors for SDDbgValue for better readability.
- fix UserValue::match() to handle indirect values correctly
- not inserting an MMI table entries for dbg.values that describe allocas.
- lowering dbg.values that describe allocas into *indirect* DBG_VALUEs.
CodeGenPrepare
- leaving dbg.values for an alloca were they are (see comment)
Other
- regenerated/updated instcombine.ll testcase and included source
rdar://problem/16679879
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3374
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207269 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Patch by Kostya Serebryany.
unique_ptr would be nice, but it's a bit too much work for an area I'm
not familiar with, nor invested in, unfortunately.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207265 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This should reduce the chance of memory leaks like those fixed in
r207240.
There's still some unclear ownership of DIEs happening in DwarfDebug.
Pushing unique_ptr and references through more APIs should help expose
the cases where ownership is a bit fuzzy.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207263 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Makes some more cases (the unit tests, specifically), lexically
compatible with a change to unique_ptr.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207261 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Since this doesn't return ownership (the DIE has been added to the
specified parent already) nor return null, just return by reference.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207259 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Move a lot of the loop-related logic that was sprinkled around the code
into `LoopData`.
<rdar://problem/14292693>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207258 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Use the fancy new `iterator_facade_base` to add
`scc_iterator::operator->()`. Remove other definitions where
`iterator_facade_base` does the right thing.
<rdar://problem/14292693>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207257 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This'll make changing to unique_ptr ownership of DIEs easier since the
usages will now have '*' on them making them textually compatible
between unique_ptr and raw pointer.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207253 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It's fishy to be changing the `std::vector<>` owned by the iterator, and
no one actual does it, so I'm going to remove the ability in a
subsequent commit. First, update the users.
<rdar://problem/14292693>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207252 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These are long functions that really shouldn't be inlined. Otherwise,
no functionality change.
<rdar://problem/14292693>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207249 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Functions declared in line in a class are inlined by default. There's
no reason for the `inline` keyword.
<rdar://problem/14292693>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207248 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8