into adjacent loops. Also, ensure that the insert position is
dominated by the loop latch of any loop in the post-inc set which
has a latch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@100906 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
explicitly split into stride-and-offset pairs. Also, add the
ability to track multiple post-increment loops on the same expression.
This refines the concept of "normalizing" SCEV expressions used for
to post-increment uses, and introduces a dedicated utility routine for
normalizing and denormalizing expressions.
This fixes the expansion of expressions which are post-increment users
of more than one loop at a time. More broadly, this takes LSR another
step closer to being able to reason about more than one loop at a time.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@100699 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
bug fixes, and with improved heuristics for analyzing foreign-loop
addrecs.
This change also flattens IVUsers, eliminating the stride-oriented
groupings, which makes it easier to work with.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@95975 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This new version is much more aggressive about doing "full" reduction in
cases where it reduces register pressure, and also more aggressive about
rewriting induction variables to count down (or up) to zero when doing so
reduces register pressure.
It currently uses fairly simplistic algorithms for finding reuse
opportunities, but it introduces a new framework allows it to combine
multiple strategies at once to form hybrid solutions, instead of doing
all full-reduction or all base+index.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@94061 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
input filename so that opt doesn't print the input filename in the
output so that grep lines in the tests don't unintentionally match
strings in the input filename.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@81537 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- I'd appreciate it if someone else eyeballs my changes to make sure I captured
the intent of the test.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@81083 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
expression in IVUsers, because in the case of a use of a non-linear
addrec outside of a loop, this causes the addrec to be evaluated as
a linear addrec.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@73774 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
rewrite the comparison if there is any implicit extension or truncation
on the induction variable. I'm planning for IVUsers to eventually take
over some of the work of this code, and for it to be generalized.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@72496 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
of the comparison is defined inside the loop. This fixes a
use-before-def problem, because the transformation puts a use
of the RHS outside the loop.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@72149 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
instructions. It attempts to create high-level multi-operand GEPs,
though in cases where this isn't possible it falls back to casting
the pointer to i8* and emitting a GEP with that. Using GEP instructions
instead of ptrtoint+arithmetic+inttoptr helps pointer analyses that
don't use ScalarEvolution, such as BasicAliasAnalysis.
Also, make the AddrModeMatcher more aggressive in handling GEPs.
Previously it assumed that operand 0 of a GEP would require a register
in almost all cases. It now does extra checking and can do more
matching if operand 0 of the GEP is foldable. This fixes a problem
that was exposed by SCEVExpander using GEPs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@72093 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and generalize it so that it can be used by IndVarSimplify. Implement the
base IndVarSimplify transformation code using IVUsers. This removes
TestOrigIVForWrap and associated code, as ScalarEvolution now has enough
builtin overflow detection and folding logic to handle all the same cases,
and more. Run "opt -iv-users -analyze -disable-output" on your favorite
loop for an example of what IVUsers does.
This lets IndVarSimplify eliminate IV casts and compute trip counts in
more cases. Also, this happens to finally fix the remaining testcases
in PR1301.
Now that IndVarSimplify is being more aggressive, it occasionally runs
into the problem where ScalarEvolutionExpander's code for avoiding
duplicate expansions makes it difficult to ensure that all expanded
instructions dominate all the instructions that will use them. As a
temporary measure, IndVarSimplify now uses a FixUsesBeforeDefs function
to fix up instructions inserted by SCEVExpander. Fortunately, this code
is contained, and can be easily removed once a more comprehensive
solution is available.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@71535 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
of returning a list of pointers to Values that are deleted. This was
unsafe, because the pointers in the list are, by nature of what
RecursivelyDeleteDeadInstructions does, always dangling. Replace this
with a simple callback mechanism. This may eventually be removed if
all clients can reasonably be expected to use CallbackVH.
Use this to factor out the dead-phi-cycle-elimination code from LSR
utility function, and generalize it to use the
RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions utility function.
This makes LSR more aggressive about eliminating dead PHI cycles;
adjust tests to either be less trivial or to simply expect fewer
instructions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@70636 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
information to simplify [sz]ext({a,+,b}) to {zext(a),+,[zs]ext(b)},
as appropriate.
These functions and the trip count code each call into the other, so
this requires careful handling to avoid infinite recursion. During
the initial trip count computation, conservative SCEVs are used,
which are subsequently discarded once the trip count is actually
known.
Among other benefits, this change lets LSR automatically eliminate
some unnecessary zext-inreg and sext-inreg operation where the
operand is an induction variable.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@70241 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
reduction of address calculations down to basic pointer arithmetic.
This is currently off by default, as it needs a few other features
before it becomes generally useful. And even when enabled, full
strength reduction is only performed when it doesn't increase
register pressure, and when several other conditions are true.
This also factors out a bunch of exisiting LSR code out of
StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers into separate functions, and tidies
up IV insertion. This actually decreases register pressure even
in non-superhero mode. The change in iv-users-in-other-loops.ll
is an example of this; there are two more adds because there are
two fewer leas, and there is less spilling.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@65108 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
my earlier patch to this file.
The issue there was that all uses of an IV inside a loop
are actually references to Base[IV*2], and there was one
use outside that was the same but LSR didn't see the base
or the scaling because it didn't recurse into uses outside
the loop; thus, it used base+IV*scale mode inside the loop
instead of pulling base out of the loop. This was extra bad
because register pressure later forced both base and IV into
memory. Doing that recursion, at least enough
to figure out addressing modes, is a good idea in general;
the change in AddUsersIfInteresting does this. However,
there were side effects....
It is also possible for recursing outside the loop to
introduce another IV where there was only 1 before (if
the refs inside are not scaled and the ref outside is).
I don't think this is a common case, but it's in the testsuite.
It is right to be very aggressive about getting rid of
such introduced IVs (CheckForIVReuse and the handling of
nonzero RewriteFactor in StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers).
In the testcase in question the new IV produced this way
has both a nonconstant stride and a nonzero base, neither
of which was handled before. And when inserting
new code that feeds into a PHI, it's right to put such
code at the original location rather than in the PHI's
immediate predecessor(s) when the original location is outside
the loop (a case that couldn't happen before)
(RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase); better to avoid making
multiple copies of it in this case.
Also, the mechanism for keeping SCEV's corresponding to GEP's
no longer works, as the GEP might change after its SCEV
is remembered, invalidating the SCEV, and we might get a bad
SCEV value when looking up the GEP again for a later loop.
This also couldn't happen before, as we weren't recursing
into GEP's outside the loop.
Also, when we build an expression that involves a (possibly
non-affine) IV from a different loop as well as an IV from
the one we're interested in (containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop),
don't recurse into that. We can't do much with it and will
get in trouble if we try to create new non-affine IVs or something.
More testcases are coming.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@62212 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
