We can have a FrameSetup in one basic block and the matching FrameDestroy
in a different basic block when we have struct byval. In that case, SPAdj
is not zero at beginning of the basic block.
Modify PEI to correctly set SPAdj at beginning of each basic block using
DFS traversal. We used to assume SPAdj is 0 at beginning of each basic block.
PEI had an assert SPAdjCount || SPAdj == 0.
If we have a Destroy <n> followed by a Setup <m>, PEI will assert failure.
We can add an extra condition to make sure the pairs are matched:
The pairs start with a FrameSetup.
But since we are doing a much better job in the verifier, this patch removes
the check in PEI.
PR16393
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
replaceFrameIndices(MF) will iterate over the BBs and call
replaceFrameIndices(BB). No functionality change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186141 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
SystemZ wants normal register scavenging slots, as close to the stack or
frame pointer as possible. The only reason it was using custom code was
because PrologEpilogInserter assumed an x86-like layout, where the frame
pointer is at the opposite end of the frame from the stack pointer.
This meant that when frame pointer elimination was disabled,
the slots ended up being as close as possible to the incoming
stack pointer, which is the opposite of what we want on SystemZ.
This patch adds a new knob to say which layout is used and converts
SystemZ to use target-independent scavenging slots. It's one of the pieces
needed to support frame-to-frame MVCs, where two slots might be required.
The ABI requires us to allocate 160 bytes for calls, so one approach
would be to use that area as temporary spill space instead. It would need
some surgery to make sure that the slot isn't live across a call though.
I stuck to the "isFPCloseToIncomingSP - ..." style comment on the
"do what the surrounding code does" principle. The FP case is already
covered by several Systemz/frame-* tests, which fail without the
PrologueEpilogueInserter change, so no new ones are needed.
No behavioural change intended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185696 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Rather than using the full power of target-specific addressing modes in
DBG_VALUEs with Frame Indicies, simply use Frame Index + Offset. This
reduces the complexity of debug info handling down to two
representations of values (reg+offset and frame index+offset) rather
than three or four.
Ideally we could ensure that frame indicies had been eliminated by the
time we reached an assembly or dwarf generation, but I haven't spent the
time to figure out where the FIs are leaking through into that & whether
there's a good place to convert them. Some FI+offset=>reg+offset
conversion is done (see PrologEpilogInserter, for example) which is
necessary for some SelectionDAG assumptions about registers, I believe,
but it might be possible to make this a more thorough conversion &
ensure there are no remaining FIs no matter how instruction selection
is performed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@184066 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
in functions which call __builtin_unwind_init()
__builtin_unwind_init() is an undocumented gcc intrinsic which has this effect,
and is used in libgcc_eh.
Goes part of the way toward fixing PR8541.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@183984 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
instantiation issue with non-standard type.
Add a backend option to warn on a given stack size limit.
Option: -mllvm -warn-stack-size=<limit>
Output (if limit is exceeded):
warning: Stack size limit exceeded (<actual size>) in <functionName>.
The longer term plan is to hook that to a clang warning.
PR:4072
<rdar://problem/13987214>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@183595 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Option: -mllvm -warn-stack-size=<limit>
Output (if limit is exceeded):
warning: Stack size limit exceeded (<actual size>) in <functionName>.
The longer term plan is to hook that to a clang warning.
PR:4072
<rdar://problem/13987214>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@183552 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This fixes PEI as previously described, but correctly handles the case where
the instruction defining the virtual register to be scavenged is the first in
the block. Arnold provided me with a bugpoint-reduced test case, but even that
seems too large to use as a regression test. If I'm successful in cleaning it
up then I'll commit that as well.
Original commit message:
This change fixes a bug that I introduced in r178058. After a register is
scavenged using one of the available spills slots the instruction defining the
virtual register needs to be moved to after the spill code. The scavenger has
already processed the defining instruction so that registers killed by that
instruction are available for definition in that same instruction. Unfortunately,
after this, the scavenger needs to iterate through the spill code and then
visit, again, the instruction that defines the now-scavenged register. In order
to avoid confusion, the register scavenger needs the ability to 'back up'
through the spill code so that it can again process the instructions in the
appropriate order. Prior to this fix, once the scavenger reached the
just-moved instruction, it would assert if it killed any registers because,
having already processed the instruction, it believed they were undefined.
Unfortunately, I don't yet have a small test case. Thanks to Pranav Bhandarkar
for diagnosing the problem and testing this fix.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178919 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Reverting because this breaks one of the LTO builders. Original commit message:
This change fixes a bug that I introduced in r178058. After a register is
scavenged using one of the available spills slots the instruction defining the
virtual register needs to be moved to after the spill code. The scavenger has
already processed the defining instruction so that registers killed by that
instruction are available for definition in that same instruction. Unfortunately,
after this, the scavenger needs to iterate through the spill code and then
visit, again, the instruction that defines the now-scavenged register. In order
to avoid confusion, the register scavenger needs the ability to 'back up'
through the spill code so that it can again process the instructions in the
appropriate order. Prior to this fix, once the scavenger reached the
just-moved instruction, it would assert if it killed any registers because,
having already processed the instruction, it believed they were undefined.
Unfortunately, I don't yet have a small test case. Thanks to Pranav Bhandarkar
for diagnosing the problem and testing this fix.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178916 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change fixes a bug that I introduced in r178058. After a register is
scavenged using one of the available spills slots the instruction defining the
virtual register needs to be moved to after the spill code. The scavenger has
already processed the defining instruction so that registers killed by that
instruction are available for definition in that same instruction. Unfortunately,
after this, the scavenger needs to iterate through the spill code and then
visit, again, the instruction that defines the now-scavenged register. In order
to avoid confusion, the register scavenger needs the ability to 'back up'
through the spill code so that it can again process the instructions in the
appropriate order. Prior to this fix, once the scavenger reached the
just-moved instruction, it would assert if it killed any registers because,
having already processed the instruction, it believed they were undefined.
Unfortunately, I don't yet have a small test case. Thanks to Pranav Bhandarkar
for diagnosing the problem and testing this fix.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178845 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The previous algorithm could not deal properly with scavenging multiple virtual
registers because it kept only one live virtual -> physical mapping (and
iterated through operands in order). Now we don't maintain a current mapping,
but rather use replaceRegWith to completely remove the virtual register as
soon as the mapping is established.
In order to allow the register scavenger to return a physical register killed
by an instruction for definition by that same instruction, we now call
RS->forward(I) prior to eliminating virtual registers defined in I. This
requires a minor update to forward to ignore virtual registers.
These new features will be tested in forthcoming commits.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178058 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch lets the register scavenger make use of multiple spill slots in
order to guarantee that it will be able to provide multiple registers
simultaneously.
To support this, the RS's API has changed slightly: setScavengingFrameIndex /
getScavengingFrameIndex have been replaced by addScavengingFrameIndex /
isScavengingFrameIndex / getScavengingFrameIndices.
In forthcoming commits, the PowerPC backend will use this capability in order
to implement the spilling of condition registers, and some special-purpose
registers, without relying on r0 being reserved. In some cases, spilling these
registers requires two GPRs: one for addressing and one to hold the value being
transferred.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177774 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add the current PEI register scavenger as a parameter to the
processFunctionBeforeFrameFinalized callback.
This change is necessary in order to allow the PowerPC target code to
set the register scavenger frame index after the save-area offset
adjustments performed by processFunctionBeforeFrameFinalized. Only
after these adjustments have been made is it possible to estimate
the size of the stack frame.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177108 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to TargetFrameLowering, where it belongs. Incidentally, this allows us
to delete some duplicated (and slightly different!) code in TRI.
There are potentially other layering problems that can be cleaned up
as a result, or in a similar manner.
The refactoring was OK'd by Anton Korobeynikov on llvmdev.
Note: this touches the target interfaces, so out-of-tree targets may
be affected.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@175788 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171366 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
directly.
This is in preparation for removing the use of the 'Attribute' class as a
collection of attributes. That will shift to the AttributeSet class instead.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171253 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169131 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
All callers of these functions really want the isPhysRegOrOverlapUsed()
functionality which also checks aliases. For historical reasons, targets
without register aliases were calling isPhysRegUsed() instead.
Change isPhysRegUsed() to also check aliases, and switch all
isPhysRegOrOverlapUsed() callers to isPhysRegUsed().
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166117 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We use the enums to query whether an Attributes object has that attribute. The
opaque layer is responsible for knowing where that specific attribute is stored.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165488 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The hasFnAttr method has been replaced by querying the Attributes explicitly. No
intended functionality change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164725 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Passes after RegAlloc should be able to rely on MRI->getNumVirtRegs() == 0.
This makes sharing code for pre/postRA passes more robust.
Now, to check if a pass is running before the RA pipeline begins, use MRI->isSSA().
To check if a pass is running after the RA pipeline ends, use !MRI->getNumVirtRegs().
PEI resets virtual regs when it's done scavenging.
PTX will either have to provide its own PEI pass or assign physregs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@151032 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Moving toward a uniform style of pass definition to allow easier target configuration.
Globally declare Pass ID.
Globally declare pass initializer.
Use INITIALIZE_PASS consistently.
Add a call to the initializer from CodeGen.cpp.
Remove redundant "createPass" functions and "getPassName" methods.
While cleaning up declarations, cleaned up comments (sorry for large diff).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@150100 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
generator to it. For non-bundle instructions, these behave exactly the same
as the MC layer API.
For properties like mayLoad / mayStore, look into the bundle and if any of the
bundled instructions has the property it would return true.
For properties like isPredicable, only return true if *all* of the bundled
instructions have the property.
For properties like canFoldAsLoad, isCompare, conservatively return false for
bundles.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@146026 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
change, now you need a TargetOptions object to create a TargetMachine. Clang
patch to follow.
One small functionality change in PTX. PTX had commented out the machine
verifier parts in their copy of printAndVerify. That now calls the version in
LLVMTargetMachine. Users of PTX who need verification disabled should rely on
not passing the command-line flag to enable it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@145714 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
X86. Modify the pass added in the previous patch to call this new
code.
This new prologues generated will call a libgcc routine (__morestack)
to allocate more stack space from the heap when required
Patch by Sanjoy Das.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@138812 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Instead encode llvm IR level property "HasSideEffects" in an operand (shared
with IsAlignStack). Added MachineInstrs::hasUnmodeledSideEffects() to check
the operand when the instruction is an INLINEASM.
This allows memory instructions to be moved around INLINEASM instructions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123044 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
