Add a helper function getDebugInfoVersionFromModule to return the debug info
version number for a module.
"Verifier/module-flags-1.ll" checks for verification errors.
It will seg fault when calling getDebugInfoVersionFromModule because of the
incorrect format for module flags in the testing case. We make
getModuleFlagsMetadata more robust by checking for error conditions.
PR17982
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196158 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Header/cpp file rename to follow immediately - just splitting out the
commits for ease of review/reading to demonstrate that the renaming
changes are entirely mechanical.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196139 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
MO_JumpTableIndex and MO_ExternalSymbol don't show up on inline asm.
Keeping parts of the old asm printer just to print inline asm to a string that
we then parse back looks like a hack.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196111 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
eliminateFrameIndex() has been reworked to handle both small & large frames
with either a FP or SP.
An additional Slot is required for Scavenging spills when not using FP for large frames.
Reworked the handling of Register Scavenging.
Whether we are using an FP or not, whether it is a large frame or not,
and whether we are using a large code model or not are now independent.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196091 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These are used by MachO only at the moment, and (much like the existing
MOVW/MOVT set) work around the fact that the labels used in the actual
instructions often contain PC-dependent components, which means that repeatedly
materialising the same global can't be CSEed.
With small modifications, it could be adapted to how ELF finds the address of
_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_, which would give similar benefits in PIC mode there.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196090 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When using large code model:
Global objects larger than 'CodeModelLargeSize' bytes are placed in sections named with a trailing ".large"
The folded global address of such objects are lowered into the const pool.
During inspection it was noted that LowerConstantPool() was using a default offset of zero.
A fix was made, but due to only offsets of zero being generated, testing only verifies the change is not detrimental.
Correct the flags emitted for explicitly specified sections.
We assume the size of the object queried by getSectionForConstant() is never greater than CodeModelLargeSize.
To handle greater than CodeModelLargeSize, changes to AsmPrinter would be required.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196087 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Large frame offsets are loaded from the ConstantPool.
Where possible, offsets are encoded using the smaller MKMSK instruction.
Large frame offsets can only be used when there is a frame-pointer.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196085 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously, we clobbered callee-saved registers when folding an "add
sp, #N" into a "pop {rD, ...}" instruction. This change checks whether
a register we're going to add to the "pop" could actually be live
outside the function before doing so and should fix the issue.
This should fix PR18081.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196046 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- Actually abort when an error occurred.
- Check that the frontend lookup worked when parsing length/size/type operators.
Tested by a clang test. PR18096.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196044 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This adds a scheduling model for the POWER7 (P7) core, and enables the
machine-instruction scheduler when targeting the P7. Scheduling for the P7,
like earlier ooo PPC cores, requires considering both dispatch group hazards,
and functional unit resources and latencies. These are both modeled in a
combined itinerary. Dispatch group formation is still handled by the post-RA
scheduler (which still needs to be updated for the P7, but nevertheless does a
pretty good job).
One interesting aspect of this change is that I've also enabled to use of AA
duing CodeGen for the P7 (just as it is for the embedded cores). The benchmark
results seem to support this decision (see below), and while this is normally
useful for in-order cores, and not for ooo cores like the P7, I think that the
dispatch slot hazards are enough like in-order resources to make the AA useful.
Test suite significant performance differences (where negative is a speedup,
and positive is a regression) vs. the current situation:
MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/drop3/drop3
with AA: N/A
without AA: -28.7614% +/- 19.8356%
(significantly against AA)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural
with AA: -17.7406% +/- 11.2712%
without AA: N/A
(significantly in favor of AA)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2
with AA: -11.2079% +/- 1.80543%
without AA: -11.3263% +/- 2.79651%
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt
with AA: -41.8649% +/- 17.0053%
without AA: -34.5256% +/- 23.7072%
MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign
with AA: 25.3016% +/- 17.8614%
without AA: 38.6629% +/- 14.9391%
(significantly in favor of AA)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/sim/sim
with AA: N/A
without AA: 13.4844% +/- 7.18195%
(significantly in favor of AA)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/Large/fasta
with AA: 15.0664% +/- 6.70216%
without AA: 12.7747% +/- 8.43043%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/puzzle
with AA: 82.2713% +/- 26.3567%
without AA: 75.7525% +/- 41.1842%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-2
with AA: -37.1621% +/- 20.7964%
without AA: -35.2342% +/- 20.2999%
(significantly in favor of AA)
These are 99.5% confidence intervals from 5 runs per configuration. Regarding
the choice to turn on AA during CodeGen, of these results, four seem
significantly in favor of using AA, and one seems significantly against. I'm
not making this decision based on these numbers alone, but these results
seem consistent with results I have from other tests, and so I think that, on
balance, using AA is a win.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195981 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In preparation for adding scheduling definitions for the POWER7, split some PPC
itinerary classes so that the P7's latencies and hazards can be better
described. For the most part, this means differentiating indexed from non-index
pre-increment loads and stores. Also, differentiate single from
double-precision sqrt.
No functionality change intended (except for a more-specific latency for
single-precision sqrt on the A2).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195980 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This prevents the compiler from emitting invalid ld.[bhwd]'s and st.[bhwd]'s
when the stack frame is between 512 and 32,768 bytes in size.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195973 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
in constant islands for Mips16. We introdcuce JalB16 as a synomnym
for Jal16. It makes it easier to read and is also necessary because
Jal16 is a call instruction but JalB16 is being used as a branch.
Various parts of LLVM will not work properly even in this late stage of
the backend if we use what was declared as a call instruction to function
as a branch. For one, basic block labels may not get emitted in some
situations.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195968 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Some of the older PPC processor definitions don't have associated
SchedMachineModels; correct this for the PPC440.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195949 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The operand latencies for loads and stores in the PPC440 itinerary were wrong
(the store operands are all inputs, and the "with update" (pre-increment)
instructions need a latency for the additional output).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195948 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The operand latencies for the PPC440 should be specified relative to dispatch,
not relative to the initial fetch-and-decode stages. Because most instructions
(ignoring bypass) wait in dispatch until their operands are ready, this is
modeled as reading input operands "at dispatch" (0 cycles after issue), and so
every input and output operand has 4 cycles subtracted from it.
This could alter scheduling slightly, but I don't expect a large effect.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195947 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Modeling the fetch and decode units in the PPC440 itinerary does not add
anything to the hazard detection capability (and so modeling them just wastes
compile time).
No functionality change intended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195946 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
